RE: SAR panic

2003-01-23 Thread Igor Ivoilov
Title: RE: SAR panic Dear Slava, While ESAR is not implemented I think a graceful way to hanlde it is to reduce client sdu size sent to wsp to SAR_SEGM_SIZE*255. Also I can change SAR_SEGM_SIZE to be let's say 1300. it will change the maximum file size to 331K from 146K. But it may cause

Re: SAR panic

2003-01-23 Thread Stipe Tolj
Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: Hi, Igor. I think, first of all, panic must be eliminated. yep, agreed. Panics do stop wapbox service. Hence a download of a too large file kills wapbox, which is not the way we want it in an operational environment. If something can't be done, then other clients

RE: SAR

2002-12-09 Thread Damir Salantic
Title: RE: SAR Hi to all I need an opinion of anyone familiar with WTP and SAR handling. Here is the excerption from WTP specs. (WAP-224-WTP-20010710-a.pdf) : " The missing packets are re-transmitted with the original Packet Sequence Numbers. When the sender has re-transmitted the requ

Re: SAR

2002-12-09 Thread denzel
Title: RE: SAR Hi Damir, According to the SAR specification, it says the Acknowledgement is sent when the GTR is ON. When the TTR is ON, it doesn't send an Ack, instead the Result_Response is sent. But if there're missing packets, a Nack is sent even if it's a TTR packet. I'm not sure

RE: SAR

2002-12-06 Thread Damir Salantic
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 6. prosinac 2002 21:26 To: Igor Ivoilov; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: kannel-mailing-list Subject: Re: SAR Hi Damir/Igor, As you have seen, my implementation is done based on State Machine

RE: SAR

2002-12-06 Thread Damir Salantic
Title: RE: SAR Hi Igor. We are experimenting witha wap stack. That's probably the reason ofunexpected behaviour. Anyway, wap gateway should accept up to 256 packets in a group (or more with ESAR). Damir S -Original Message-From: Igor Ivoilov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: SAR

2002-12-06 Thread denzel
Title: RE: SAR Hi Damir, I checked your log dump. As I can see, the SAR part has successfully worked. Igor is right, your device has sent more than 6 packets in one group and from that 6had failed, and the NACK was sent sucessfully with the missing PDU Numbers. The problem has occured

RE: SAR

2002-12-06 Thread Damir Salantic
Title: RE: SAR Hi Denzel Here is the wapbox.log (I already sent it to Igor). I hope it helps. bye Damir -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 7. prosinac 2002 1:32To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'kannel-mailing-list'Cc: 'Igor Ivoilov'Subject

RE: SAR

2002-12-06 Thread Damir Salantic
Title: RE: SAR Hi to all. Here is what Ifound: My kannel really received malformed PDU (PDU type == unknown). I can see that from my ethereal log. I don't know how it happened. Probably my wap client is not working properly. Anyway, it seems that kannel is not ready to handle

RE: SAR

2002-12-05 Thread Igor Ivoilov
Title: RE: SAR Hi Damir, You're right, this thing is not implemented, but the implementation is coming soon Igor -Original Message- From: Damir Salantic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SAR Hi to all

Re: SAR

2002-12-05 Thread denzel
Title: RE: SAR Hi Damir/Igor, As you have seen, my implementation is done based on State Machine in WTP Response Layer. Also to my knowledge, I implemented all the functionalities in SAR (Segmentation/Re-Assembly/NACK/ACK). One thing I like to ask from Igor is is there any efficiency

Re: SAR patch and segfaults

2002-11-14 Thread Matias Lahti
Hi - the SAR patch applied to CVS works nice with smaller files, but with bigger files it segfaults. how big was the object and what kind of object?! You should also supply us with more information regarding the phone, even while this may not be that crussial. 8k mms message (with nothing

RE: SAR patch and segfaults

2002-11-14 Thread Igor Ivoilov
Title: RE: SAR patch and segfaults Hello Matias, Could you send what caused the seg fault using my wap proxy at 217.27.32.21 ? Crash happened at the 1st or the 4th packet, so it does not depend on file size. I have tested upload/download up to 100K, and did now see anything strange. Before

Re: SAR patch and segfaults

2002-11-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
8k mms message (with nothing more than a picture and the SMIL of course) with a nokia 7650 to kannel. hmmm, we used to send and receive MMS via the 7650 up to 130 kb successfully. Strange things happen here... So you used Kannel as WAP gateway to talk to an MMS Server right?! Does it break in

RE: SAR

2002-11-13 Thread Igor Ivoilov
Title: RE: SAR Hi Denzel, Nack reaction was not implemented in early version of sar.patch. But version that's come to cvs has this feature. Did you experience nack problems with this version? Igor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

Re: SAR Patch for Kannel

2002-11-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
You once promissed :) to send your updated SAR patch to the Kannel mailing list. I tried to find this email on the list but couldn't find it. Could you send your latest version to the list? Possible with your findings like quality, missing features, working phones. Alternatively I can offer

Re: SAR Patch for Kannel

2002-11-06 Thread Dave White
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Dave, You once promissed :) to send your updated SAR patch to the Kannel mailing list. I tried to find this email on the list but couldn't find it. Could you send your latest version to the list? Possible with your findings like quality, missing features,

Re: SAR question

2002-11-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Can I get information about SAR for kannel WAPgw. There is exists at least 1 SAR implementation (can be found on the list as patch). I think Kannel must support SAR. So why this patch don't applied to CVS. How it can be quicken? If there is another SAR implementation (I heard about it, but

RE: SAR Patch for Kannel

2002-11-06 Thread Igor Ivoilov
Title: RE: SAR Patch for Kannel Hi list, I have updated the patch to be applicable to current version of gw Also reaction on nack is now implemented. (ESAR - not yet) Attached patch is the next version of SAR-cumulative I never saw problems described by Dave, and our mms server is working

RE: SAR

2002-10-10 Thread dw11610
A patch has already been posted. I had to modify it slightly to apply it to a CVS checkout. It will work for midlet dl with a nokia 7650. However, SAR doesn't work yet for TR-invoke type messages, so MMS is no go. I'll post my modified patch when I get home. Dave -- original message --

RE: SAR Functionality.

2002-10-05 Thread Igor Ivoilov
Title: RE: SAR Functionality. Hello All I want to have a clarification, 1 What is SAR functionality? Segmentation and reassembly (WAP-224 from http://www.wapforum.org/what/technical.htm) 2 The kannel gateway we have downloaded does it support SAR functionality. No 3 we are supposed

RE: SAR

2002-09-04 Thread Anupama R
Hello Maria, Denzel and Mike. Is the development for SAR going on? I need to make a statement to the higher management telling them how much is already supported and going to be supported with Kannel ;)) Best Regards Anu -Original Message- From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Re: SAR needed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2002-08-16 Thread Stipe Tolj
SAR is described in the WTP specs. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de

Re: SAR and GPRS

2002-08-16 Thread Stipe Tolj
does this mean Kannel now supports SAR.. no, this only means that flaged SAR invoke requests are answered by non-SARed packets to enable at least normal traffic to newer phones. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG