thanks Andreas!
Is that GSM AT PDU decoder in the cvs?! :)) If not, it should :)
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL
On Freitag, November 8, 2002, at 02:13 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote:
From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fre Nov 8, 2002 2:13:12 Uhr Europe/Zurich
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: smsc_at2.c PDU coding
Hi list,
I have some problems with an Siemens M20. So I came across the
On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 11:26, David Holland wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:21:08PM +0100, Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
something must gone wrong...
snapshot-timestamp says Apr 09, snapshot doesn't have my patch
and I've commited it on Apr 10
OK. There was a missing /row in userguide.xml. I
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 05:14:44PM +0100, Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote:
Shouldn't the scripts detect the error and send us an email to
devel-reports ? ;)
Yes :-(
Dave
--
David Holland =*= Systems Manager =*= tel: +44 01223 478900
http://www.3glab.com/ =*= 3G Lab,
I don't know what is +CMMS (IIRC it isn't mentioned on the wavecom
manual), what its suposed to do or why Bruno put it in, but latest CVS
has a configuration for that (in modems.conf) that is disabled by
default for most modem types (only enabled for nokia phone in the sample
modems.conf).
--
+CMMS is More messages to send and is used by the Siemens, however not
by most other devices.
Have a look at
http://gatling.ikk.sztaki.hu/~kissg/gsm/at+c.html
and reports from Siemens vs. Falcon there too.
Alex
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
I don't know what is +CMMS (IIRC it
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 12:57, Alex Judd wrote:
+CMMS is More messages to send and is used by the Siemens, however not
by most other devices.
Uhm. I've set it disabled by default because altough it works with nokia
6210, it ain't working with Siemens M20...
Thanks Alex and Oded.
but latest CVS
has a configuration for that (in modems.conf) that is disabled by
default for most modem types
I just dowloaded latest tar.gz (snapshot). There is exactly the same code:
void at2_send_messages(PrivAT2data *privdata)
{
Msg *msg;
do
{
- Original Message -
From: Andrea Viscovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alex Judd [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2
Thanks Alex and Oded.
but latest CVS
has a configuration
Subject: Snapshots aren't being built (Was: Re: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2)
Hi Bruno,
can you tell me why this happens?
Still I tought snapshot were built at 4.00 every morning.
Is there any reason as someone stopeed it?
Cheers
Andrea
+CMTI: SM, AFAIR, means that the message landed in SM memory (SIM card
- '3' probably means you'll find it in memory location 3, the first two
obviously already filled). we should do two things - (a) teach kannel to
look for +CMT: and not any +CMT like it does now, and (b) apply the
SIM
we should do two things - (a) teach kannel to
look for +CMT: and not any +CMT and (b) apply the
SIM buffering patch
Why does it do so with alphanumeric sender ? I guess it's modem
dependant and nothing Kannel can do about.
Hi there,
I totally agree with you, we have to change to +CMT:,
well it doesn't - I can prove it :-)
at2_write_line_cstr always return 0 no matter what happens.
what do you say about this patch ?
You're right by saying at2_write_line_cstr always returns 0. I
consider that a cosmetic bug. However that has absolutely no
influence as the return code is
the at2_wait_modem_command call which would have
failed anyway.
Oded Arbel
m-Wise ltd.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 6:43 PM
To: Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: smsc_at2 module doesnot detect failed writes to modem.
well
14 matches
Mail list logo
