Does the 1.2.0 stable release contain sim-buffering?
have you checked the NEWS file for that release?!
I've been trying out the latest cvs snapshot but got the following error
when I request the status from kannel via the http interface:-
[0] DEBUG: Kannel bearerbox version `cvs-20020819
Hi Oded,
I'll try tonight your patch,
by the way you say:
this patch, allow you to work
around the problem by not caring whether messages land in memory or not.
I noticed that you don't care for +CMTI: messages,
only for +CMGR.
By the way when I got an sms which lands into sm
memory I have:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:11 PM
To: Oded Arbel; Andrea Viscovich; Kannel-devel E-mail
Subject: Rif: RE: [PATCH] Resubmit: sim buffering support for AT2.
Hi Oded,
I'll try tonight your patch,
by the way you say:
this patch, allow you
Yes, it will work.
the main reason is that (a) checking the
memory directly (+CPMS?) we can read
messages that were stored before Kannel was activated.
Checking also for +CMTI: and reading the single message
Well, I haven't your patch here so I cannot look at it.
BTW I can't understand
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Oded Arbel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kannel-devel E-mail
Subject: RE: RE: [PATCH] Resubmit: sim buffering support for AT2.
Yes, it will work.
the main reason
Hi list.
Here's another resubmit ( I think the last one for today ;-) this time
of SIM buffering for AT2. ported to latest CVS, droped all the #ifdefs
and using configuration file instead. cleaned some stuff, and generally
I think that it looks much better now.
To use, set sim-buffering = true
Hi Oded,
looking at it, it seems something has still to be fixed.
Even with your patch there is no AT+CNMI: check when receiving sms.
With wavecom happens to receive some sms which goes into sim memory even if
we haven't sim-buffering. They may be class 2 messages (reading manual about
AT+CNMI
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 03:06, Matthew Flax wrote:
The main problem with Matthew's solution is the short life span of SIM
memory: using Flash technology, SIM memory cards are limited to 10,000
writes to each bit of memory. when usage exceeds this bound, the card
will become useless and
