Hi list,
Do we
implement WAP-183-ProvCont-20010724-a specification in Kannel
WML compiler?
Because when
I try to find syntax mapping in ota_prov_attr.h for
example "PXADDR", I can not found it.
WAP-183-ProvCont-20010724-a
is use by latest Siemens and Pocket PC 2003 for their OTA
I tried to fetch the 170K application into Nokia7650 ower Kannel's SAR (CVS version),
but get the following error:
...
2003-07-23 14:06:07 [6] DEBUG: WTP: resp_machine 13, state RESULT_RESP_WAIT, event
RcvAck.
2003-07-23 14:06:07 [6] DEBUG: WTP: continue_sar_result(): lsegm=251, nsegm=332,
El lun, 21-07-2003 a las 15:26, nicoweb escribió:
Hi!
I am not very sure which your problem is, but i think your problems is
based on that the mobile phone receives de indication of a MMS ready to
download, and when you try to download it doesnt get any thing. Here we
have a similar problem with
Yury Mikhienko schrieb:
I tried to fetch the 170K application into Nokia7650 ower Kannel's SAR (CVS version),
but get the following error:
...
2003-07-23 14:06:07 [6] DEBUG: WTP: resp_machine 13, state RESULT_RESP_WAIT, event
RcvAck.
2003-07-23 14:06:07 [6] DEBUG: WTP:
Hi List,
it seems that wap push crashes bearerbox, if there is no store file.
(If there
is one, then everything is ok.)
Everybody of course want a store file ? Not necessary, not even when
running production systems: higher level may do reliable storage, so
Kannel
should not do it.
Aarno
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:55:15 +0400
Yury Mikhienko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to fetch the 170K application into Nokia7650 ower Kannel's SAR (CVS version),
but get the following error:
...
2003-07-23 14:06:07 [6] DEBUG: WTP: resp_machine 13, state RESULT_RESP_WAIT, event
RcvAck.
No, at least not directly. the ota_prov_attr.h contains the tokens as
defined by the Ericsson/Nokia OTA config protocol, *not* the official
WAP specs.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Hi,
sorry that where changes from me in bb_store :(
I am looking on resolving it, or want you resolve it Stipe?
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 12:44, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Jared Odulio wrote:
Hi,
I am having a Segmentation fault at bearerbox while running fakesmsc
here's the log for
Alexander Malysh wrote:
sorry that where changes from me in bb_store :(
I am looking on resolving it, or want you resolve it Stipe?
nop, your job! ;)
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470
Hi,
segfault is fixed and commited! Here are some notes from me about
store-file...
Store must be always initialized, even if no store file defined,
because store create message id's and timestamp for all sms's
handled in bearerbox! If no store file defined in config then no
files will be
-1 from to make store-file mandatory. What if Kannel is used as gw/ppg
for mmsc ? Then mmsc would do reliable storage, and Kannel, to avoid
duplication, should not do it.
Another case are tests: when a new user is just testing Kannel, he would
not need a store file.
Aarno
On Wednesday, July 23,
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 14:35, Aarno Syvänen wrote:
-1 from to make store-file mandatory. What if Kannel is used as gw/ppg
for mmsc ? Then mmsc would do reliable storage, and Kannel, to avoid
duplication, should not do it.
I believe, in this case bearerbox will always get response from mmsc
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 14:54, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
segfault is fixed and commited! Here are some notes from me about
store-file...
ok, thanks.
Store must be always initialized, even if no store file defined,
because store create message id's and timestamp for
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 15:22, Nisan Bloch wrote:
At 02:23 PM 7/23/03 +0200, you wrote:
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 14:21, Nisan Bloch wrote:
At 02:13 PM 7/23/03 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
I believe store file must be mandatory parameter, because
otherwise all queued messages in
yep, and this PANIC is reported as bug #4 in bugs.kannel.org and if
noone fixes it I will myself.
(No, I won't be able to implement ESAR myself, don't even think about
that Stipe :P)
hmmm, it was the first thing that got into my mind ;)
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, at least not directly. the ota_prov_attr.h contains the tokens as
defined by the Ericsson/Nokia OTA config protocol, *not* the official
WAP specs.
Please open a bug on bugs.kannel.org for a wishlist feature. That way
someone can not forget that it's a
Bruno Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aarno Syvänen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
does new code that checks does phone accept some content type work with
wildcards ?
(Some phones send just Accept: */*, which is quite stupid, of course.)
There seems to be
some problems with mms
I should have asked for comments before, but I'm really work-free now
and I'd like to implement stuff as fast as I can, even if there's
momentary cvs versions with major bugs.
If you can, please test cvs versions as hardly as you can and report
everything you find to this list so I can see if I
18 matches
Mail list logo
