Hi,
sorry, i've already looked at nokia smart messaging faqs, tried to
understand it, and once the logo was sent to my phone using a gsm modem, i
can't open it, i'm using nokia 7605
however i have success with a ringing tone: (was able to open,plave and
save) that came from this newsgroup;
udh=%0
Hi,
sms box now supports url as well as text and exec methods for
generating responses to sms. However the use of parameters for the exec
cases is somewhat flawed: smsbox performs url encoding on the command
parameters, which is probably undesirable for most applications. A
quick but dirty so
Hello list,
this is a call for participation on a virtual IRC meeting this Fri at
2:30pm in IRC room #kannel at the freenode server.
We'd (which means Aarno and me) would like to discuss with our other
WAP related developers the generic roadmap towards WAP 2.0 compliante
and identify essential mi
Hi list,
this is slight off-topic, so please don't flame me ;)
Wapme is looking for 1-2 Kannel developers who are able to join Alex
and me on the future work and architecture design of Kannel.
Wapme's policy is to have an open, clean and stable Kannel maintained
in the official open-source way a
The problem is that it is unclear whether Kannel can remain Apache/BSD-free
when it references the newer MySQL libraries. Avoiding the GPL question at
all is the safest way. If the GPL avoiding solution is technical superior
to the previous one (e.g. wider choice of DBMS), then this is even better.
Alexander Malysh schrieb:
>
> or even better, use postresql.
that's an "additional" option IMO.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.21
you are highly welcome to implement odbc things for kannel ;)
but I can't undestand what is the problem with Kannel license (Apache/BSD
like) and mysqlclient (GPL)?
see here:
http://www.mysql.com/products/licensing.html
Quote:
For those developing open source applications, the Open Source Lice
Thinking longer about this, I start to like the ODBC solution.
There is really no need to hardcode the DBMS into the code.
This is a bad tradition on Unix-like environments that other
environments (Java/JDBC, Windows/ODBC) have left behind for
years.
Unix ODBC is available from http://www.unixod
or even better, use postresql.
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 14:46, Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
> Does "neutral injection platform" mean something like ODBC?
>
> Another option would be a clean room implementation of the MySQL
> libraries. After all, the protocol is well known, so how hard can
> it be to
Does "neutral injection platform" mean something like ODBC?
Another option would be a clean room implementation of the MySQL
libraries. After all, the protocol is well known, so how hard can
it be to wrap this into a library?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
hi,
This is becoming quite a headache, i did some reading on this today and
their (mysql's) bottom line is if you are a company or a goverment
that's not developing open source software you should get a commercial
licence.
in one of the threads i read they suggested that fork is what we shoul
Jörg Pommnitz schrieb:
>
> Can one circumvent the viral nature of the GPL by using the
> dlopen functions?
interesting question. Like using a neutral injection platform. ;)
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münst
Can one circumvent the viral nature of the GPL by using the
dlopen functions?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Keogh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2004 11:13
An: Kannel Development List (E-mail) (Kannel Development List (E-mail))
Betreff: MySQL 4.0 license cha
Jari Juslin wrote:
>
> Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > all this stuff can be found at ww.gnu.org ;)
> >
> > from [2]: using the ordinary GPL for a library makes it available only for
> > free programs (see [1] for definition 'free programm').
>
> I think you are quoting that out of the context now; w
Alexander Malysh wrote:
all this stuff can be found at ww.gnu.org ;)
from [2]: using the ordinary GPL for a library makes it available only for
free programs (see [1] for definition 'free programm').
I think you are quoting that out of the context now; what the quotation
means is that it is _pos
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 11:58, Paul Keogh wrote:
> > it's not true... Kannel is a open source project, so GPL just
> > say: when
> > linking against GPL library then source code for this
> > application _must_ be
> > available and this is the case with Kannel. It's not allowed
> > to link clos
Paul Keogh wrote:
But available under what license ? My understanding is that if you
link or include GPL code into a code base, then that code base itself
must be made available under GPL.
I recall from the early days of Kannel that using GPL licensed
components
was'nt possible, whereas LGPL was OK
>
> it's not true... Kannel is a open source project, so GPL just
> say: when
> linking against GPL library then source code for this
> application _must_ be
> available and this is the case with Kannel. It's not allowed
> to link closed
> source applications against GPLed libraries.
But av
Hi Paul,
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 11:16, Paul Keogh wrote:
> Sorry, thats 4.1
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keogh
> > Sent: 21 January 2004 10:13
> > To: Kannel Development List (E-mail) (Kannel Development List
> >
Sorry, thats 4.1
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keogh
> Sent: 21 January 2004 10:13
> To: Kannel Development List (E-mail) (Kannel Development List
> (E-mail))
> Subject: MySQL 4.0 license change
>
>
>
> The license for the
The license for the MySQL 4.0 client API has changed from LGPL to GPL.
See
http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/01/16/03OPstrategic_1.html?developme
nt
for full details.
I guess this affects Kannel - my understanding is that linking GPL
libraries
under the current Kannel license is not possible
21 matches
Mail list logo
