Peter Christensen wrote:
Under all circumstances, the patch is better than the one I was forced
to make myself in a hurry when I encountered the problem. I ended up not
using the real_escape version because I didn't have time to dig into how
the DB pool was working, and I didn't use the
Hi,
Enver Altin gave a patch for datagram mode to help a fellow kannel user.
Will this be included in CVS or altered and then entered?
Rgds
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:21:40 +0300
From: Enver ALTIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DATAGRAM MODE
To: users@kannel.org
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Message-ID:
Enver ALTIN wrote:
Hey,
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 12:05 +0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
Count me in! (Now it's 2 Alejandro's ;) ) I've had to change the darn
ESM_CLASS to DEFAULT about a thousand times :)
I think general consensus is to prevent adding SMSC-specific parameters
to the sendsms
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:28:30PM +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
I'm -1 on commiting the patch in the form Enver send it in. We need to add
a meta field layer in order to pass smsc specific values to the smsc
module layer.
I had the same problem while still working for my previous employer
(i.e
