andard DLR mechanism...
Mat.
Andreas Fink wrote:
On Dienstag, August 19, 2003, at 05:01 Uhr, Mat wrote:
Hi list,
I was wondering why kannel does not have a callback mechanism so
that when an MT
fails and an NACK is returned after the UCP 52, we can directly
update our DB.
r
given as
an urlencoded parameter to sendsms.
Did I miss something? Are there any people who implemented such feature?
Does that feature interrest someone ? If we provide a patch, will it be
integrated ?
Thank you in advance!
Mat.
Answers follows...
Oded Arbel wrote:
On Sunday 20 July 2003 18:47, Mat wrote:
We are connected directly to an operator which is using an SMSC running
under OpenVMS.
What protocol do you use to connect
EMI4.0
Apparently, the information of what they are running is a bit secret
SMSC ?
But what is really strange to me is most of time it works fine, and only
a few messages
are affected. How do you think I should investigate ?
Many thanks!
Oded Arbel wrote:
On Sunday 20 July 2003 16:12, Mat wrote:
Ok! So if I understand well, I've to spank my operator because he
Oded Arbel wrote:
Mat wrote:
The goal is to monitor the SMSC connection with the GSM modem.
For this, I send a specific keyword with the modem, and I wait for
the answer.
In order to make the tests more reliable, I use a dlrmask=31 when I
send the MO,
so our monitoring don't shout
at I can't
figure it out... For me the bug can come from :
- Kannel at2 driver / dlr handling
- The GSM modem
- The operator SMSC
Thank for your precious time and knowledge...
Mat.
