On 08/06/04, Navjot Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[OT] any good reasons to leave MYSQL?
Triggers, Transactions, Stored Procedures + many many more.
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell-lange.net
the new sqlbox
and instead of having a standard sql statement, use a postgres stored
procedure with some custom triggers in the database. As you probably
know, query plans for stored procedures are cached, so they are very
very fast.
Rory
On 08/06/04, Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
Thanks for the notes Guillaume.
On 08/06/04, Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Rory Campbell-Lange rory 'at' campbell-lange.net writes:
It works ok, but we have only a few hundreds/thousands of messages a
day. For each DLR call a new database connection is created, which
I'd love to help. I really, really would. postgres is very powerful (I
do a lot of work in pl/pgsql) and has a BSD-style license. However I've
only got to page 10 in Kernigan Ritchie!
So I'm just another happy Kannel user!
Kind regards,
Rory
On 22/01/04, Stipe Tolj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
not
receive money directoy for the services it provides, but we wouldn't be
doing protoype work for Orange unless we had it.
Kind regards,
Rory
On 15/12/03, Stipe Tolj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
we expect that we have a huge ammount of people reading the list
because they use Kannel actively as SMS
to another bind. I get round this by giving the binds the same
SMSC-ID.
correct!
This is currently the only practible solution. Name all SMPP smsc
links with the *same* smsc-id and you will get it done.
This issue is on the TODO for implementing smsc-groups.
Stipe
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
with the user's db
interface. I suppose this is no more complex than the existing work you
have to do with cgi or whatever to support multiple kannel users over
the internet.
Cheers!
Rory
On 28/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Right now I'm using kannel towards Telenor (Norwegian
Hi Benjamim
Haven't tried with post. Should I?
My sending url is constructed as a GET string, and CGI.pm doesn't like a
mixture of POST and GET.
On 06/10/03, Benjamin Lee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
See comments inserted below...
On Sunday, 2003-10-05 at 10:34:21 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange
and then push onto it.
perldoc HTTP::Headers:
$h-push_header($field, $value)
Add a new field value for the specified header field. Previous
values for the same field are retained.
Are you saing the X-Kannel headers work?!
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell
can probably write it yourself using the time it
takes to google on it.
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell-lange.net
these items in the get url, which seems somewhat
less elegant.
Is this a known bug?
Thanks,
Rory
--- perl code snippet ---
my $dlr_url = uri_escape('http://localhost/cgi-bin/dlr.pl?row=$msgiddlr=%d');
$h-header('X-Kannel-DLR-Mask' = 7);
$h-push_header('X-Kannel-DLR-URL' = $dlr_url);
$h-push_header('X
I am using a recent CVS version of Kannel.
I note that in the 1.3.1 userguide that there is a question mark about
whether one can set the validity in the SMSC group for SMPP.
Does it work?
Thanks,
Rory
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell-lange.net
against (properly indexed) unique ids will be far
quicker than the existing system.
Kind regards
Rory
On 19/09/03, Stipe Tolj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Andreas. My point is that the LIMIT clauses are not optional for
Postgres. You simply can't have them.
ok, so this is a bug at least
On 19/09/03, Stipe Tolj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
Another note is that some people may wish to keep a record of their
dlrs and not have them deleted by default. I patched dlr.c to call
update on delete rather than delete, which meant that the dlr status
[orangeshort] handle_pdu, got DLR
DEBUG: DLR[internal]: Looking for DLR smsc=orangeshort, ts=104831036, dst=87262,
type=1
DEBUG: DLR[internal]: created DLR message for URL
http://localhost/sms/dlr.php?type=%d
I very much appreciate everyone's help.
Rory
On 16/09/03, Alexander Malysh ([EMAIL
question(!)
If I'm using internal dlrs and I need to restart, will the DLRs still be
correctly pointed to my dlr-url? I am expecting to do give the dlr-url a
database row id number.
Thanks again,
Rory
On 16/09/03, Alexander Malysh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
you will never get buffered dlr
Thanks. Hoping that these would be recovered from the store file in the
recent releases.
Thanks for all the help.
Rory
On 16/09/03, Bill Brigden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Quote from the Kannel userguide:
Delivery reports are supported by default internaly, which means all DLRs
are stored
octstr_get_cstr(fields-field_ts),
octstr_get_cstr(ts), sdb_get_limit_str());
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell-lange.net
I'd be grateful to know if someone has written up the precise steps
needed to make an MMS Notification. (I am at present using Kannel's SMPP
services.)
Thanks
Rory
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell-lange.net
(in C, C++, Python, etc.) for decoding (and
meaby even encoding) MMS messages ?
Have a look at
http://www.hellkvist.org/software/index.php3
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell-lange.net
On 04/09/03, Stipe Tolj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I'd be grateful to know if someone has written up the precise steps
needed to make an MMS Notification. (I am at present using Kannel's SMPP
services.)
you should poll the mailing list archives. There has been
examples
would be warmly received! I promise to summarise my findings to the
list.
Kind regards,
Rory
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell-lange.net
their maximum is below 15
msgs/sec.
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell-lange.net
well over the past few months. Except for
one niggling issue, which I think is also a problem for some other
people using SMPP to deliver messages - messages getting stuck in
the store file and not being delivered until Kannel gets restarted.
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell
.
group = smsc
smsc-id = oshort
allowed-smsc-id = oshort
smsc = smpp
host = xxx.xx.xx.xx
port = 8000
receive-port = 8000
smsc-username = xxx
smsc-password = pass
system-type = SMPP
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
source-addr-ton = 3
source-addr-npi = 1
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED
: data: 67 65 74 20 69 74 2e 20 get it.
10:28:37 [8] DEBUG: data: 52 6f 72 79 2eRory.
10:28:37 [8] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends.
10:28:37 [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
10:28:37 [8] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NUL terminated string has no NUL.
10:28:37 [8] DEBUG: SMPP[duckalorange]: Got PDU
the number of messages sent in a second or automatically
retrying requeued messages when sending clients try to send too many
messages in a few moments?
Thanks for your time,
Rory
On 08/06/03, Stipe Tolj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
Is this a response?
2003-06-06 07:30
that havne't got a
response? As I mentioned, the messages ended up being sent after I restarted bearerbox.
Thanks for all your help.
Rory
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:34:02AM +0200, Andreas Fink wrote:
I dont see any reply from the SMSC in this log?
On Samstag, Juni 7, 2003, at 10:50 Uhr, Rory
*.
I'd be most grateful to know the reasons for this problem, if it can be
identified, and ways of troubleshooting. So I need to put in a loop on
the perl message sending program (its for a medical trial for diabetic
kids).
Many thanks,
Rory
*a*
2003-06-07 07:30:08 [15] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms
Brilliant Alexander. Thanks very much. Apologies for not reading this
entry in the User Guide properly.
Kind regards
Rory
On 28/03/03, Alexander Malysh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
it's simple , because bearerbox make load balancing :)
just add allowed-smsc-id
I have two send-sms user accounts, each sending to a different SMSC (the
same remote SMSC with different ton settings for each).
Help gratefull received!
Rory
Kannel version 1.3.1
smsbox shows the corrent send-sms account registered:
INFO: smsbox: Got HTTP request /cgi-bin/sendsms from
What I should have said was:
The incorrect smsc group is being used by the sendsms-user.
So, seas should send to orangeshort, in fact it sends to smsc group
orangelong, and is rejected as the ton values are incorrect.
Please help!
Rory
On 28/03/03, Rory Campbell-Lange ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
00 00 00 00 00 00 03
2003-03-27 21:34:59 [7] DEBUG: data: 00 00 00 07
2003-03-27 21:34:59 [7] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends.
2003-03-27 21:34:59 [7] ERROR: SMPP[orangeshort]: I/O error or other error.
Re-connecting.
Thanks for any help.
Rory
,
but have had to configure two smsc groups because the one requires a
source_addr_ton of 3 (short code) while the other needs a long code setting
(source_addr_ton of 1).
Thanks very much for your help.
rory
34 matches
Mail list logo
