Hello,
I'am wondering if anyone has done benchmarking of Kannel with SMSC
simulator for SMPP protocol. The setup which i am using is :
1) MySQL 5 community server.
2) SMPP v3.4 simulator for MO and MT.
3) Suse Linux v 11.
4) Kannel 1.5.0
The performance which I am getting is 60 Transactio
Hi,
Are there any stats available about how Kannel (stable or dev) performs
under any sort of load.
Stats such as:
messages per minute
I know this might be somewhere in the documentation, but I could not find it.
Thanks
Jason
> Are there any stats available about how Kannel (stable or dev)
> performs
> under any sort of load.
>
> Stats such as:
> messages per minute
>
> I know this might be somewhere in the documentation, but I could not
> find it.
it depends mainly on how you log within Kannel, ie. log-level
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 10:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any stats available about how Kannel (stable or dev)
> performs
> under any sort of load.
>
> Stats such as:
> messages per minute
>
> I know this might be somewhere in the documentation, but I could not
> find it.
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Performance benchmarking
> On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 10:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are there any stats available about how Kannel (stable or dev)
> > performs
What was your server load at 25/second?
We are also a research on the capacity loading of kannel on different
platform.
Thanks,
Andy
Andrew McMillan wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 10:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are there any stats available about how Kannel (stable or dev)
> >
rform signficantly well as you'll be throttled by the SMSC or SIM modem
> you use to send and receive the messages!
>
> Alex
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew McMillan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PR
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 16:02, Andy Elacion, Jr. wrote:
> What was your server load at 25/second?
>
> We are also a research on the capacity loading of kannel on different
> platform.
One of the other guys did the tests, so I'm not completely sure. I
believe that the load was negligible - perhaps
On Sonntag, März 23, 2003, at 05:20 Uhr, Andrew McMillan wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 16:02, Andy Elacion, Jr. wrote:
What was your server load at 25/second?
We are also a research on the capacity loading of kannel on different
platform.
One of the other guys did the tests, so I'm not complete
