Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Peter Hutterer wrote: > ... Thanks for the 'Heads Up'. As I had said so long ago, I couldn't possibly read every developer's blog to find out what I must do to avoid inevitable doom after updating my system and not taking the required configuration measures -- that I would only know about,

Re: Fedora 13 has been branched!!

2010-02-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/17/2010 05:10 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > That's right folks, we are now branched for Fedora 13. What does this > mean to you? Well that depends on who "you" are, here are some "you"s > that we wrote about: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan#Use_Cases > > The re

Re: Fedora 13 has been branched!!

2010-02-16 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:27 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > > A. How does this affect http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/ ? static-repos will act as it normally does for a released Fedora. The repo seen is what is in the buildroot, which is what is tagged for release, and anything we've ta

Re: Fedora 13 has been branched!!

2010-02-16 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Jesse Keating wrote, at 02/17/2010 01:10 PM +9:00: > That's right folks, we are now branched for Fedora 13. What does this > mean to you? Well that depends on who "you" are, here are some "you"s > that we wrote about: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan#Use_Cases >Fr

Fedora 13 has been branched!!

2010-02-16 Thread Jesse Keating
That's right folks, we are now branched for Fedora 13. What does this mean to you? Well that depends on who "you" are, here are some "you"s that we wrote about: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan#Use_Cases The real take away here is explained at https://fedoraproject.

Re: CVS Outage Notification - 2010-02-17 00:00 UTC

2010-02-16 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 20:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > There will be a CVS outage starting at 2010-02-17 00:00 UTC, which will > last approximately 3 hours. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto > or run: > > date -d '2010

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38:37AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Peter Hutterer wrote: > > evdev and synaptics are updated, so those two are converted. I know fpit > > has an fdi file and there's some exceptions in x11-input.fdi that need to > > be added too. I need to do this tomorrow unless you wa

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > how about keyboard layout ? > f-s-keyboard (now system-setup-keyboard) used to send > /etc/sysconfig/keyboard > conf through hal to X the package is already updated to create /etc/xorg.conf.d/00-system-setup-keyboard.conf (instead o

Re: Color Management Test Day Thursday 2010-02-18

2010-02-16 Thread Dariusz J. Garbowski
Features/ColorManagement describes per-screen / per-output support. I have a dual monitor setup here (potentially even triple-monitor if I could setup SurroundView with on-board Radeon and discrete Radeon card). I don't see test case for multi-monitor setups. Is this planned or supported alrea

Feature Page Deadline

2010-02-16 Thread John J. McDonough
Next Tuesday, 23-Feb, final development of the Alpha Release Notes will begin. If you want the Alpha Release Notes to reflect the current status of your feature, be sure your feature page is up to date by that time. Also, I have cleaned out all the beats (except Virtualization which was already w

Re: CVS Outage Notification - 2010-02-17 00:00 UTC

2010-02-16 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 20:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > There will be a CVS outage starting at 2010-02-17 00:00 UTC, which will > last approximately 3 hours. This outage is starting now. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Des

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Peter Hutterer wrote: > evdev and synaptics are updated, so those two are converted. I know fpit > has an fdi file and there's some exceptions in x11-input.fdi that need to > be added too. I need to do this tomorrow unless you want to beat me to it > :) It's funny how short-lived the "no default x

Re: Fedora 13 Software Translation

2010-02-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Noriko Mizumoto wrote: > It is 16-Feb today, Software String Freeze. > All Fedora translators are expecting NO more String change in any > Fedora13 packages, and looking at to complete as many translation as > possible from now on till the translation deadline. Please make sure > that POT is up-to-

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:40 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote: > > That's how i understand the change. Like do it right and move > everything to /etc/xorg.conf.d/* > Maybe i could have said that in the first place. My bad. The main reason for continuing to read the monolithic xorg.conf file is for bac

Re: Unblocked orphans

2010-02-16 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > There are still a few orphans which are unblocked due to dep issues. > Please somebody take ownership of these: > > Unblocked orphan gtk-sharp > > Orphan: gtk-sharp >    avahi-ui-sharp requires mono(gtk-sharp) = 1.0.0.0 >    avahi-ui-sharp r

Draft wiki page to document the branch freeze

2010-02-16 Thread Jesse Keating
We're moments away from the CVS outage to branch F13 away from rawhide. I've just created a wiki page that seeks to explain the branch event and subsequent "freeze" for the remainder of the Fedora 13 development cycle. Please take a moment to review this page and provide any feedback you may have.

Re: documentation on Bugzilla bug lifecycle/developer procedures?

2010-02-16 Thread Mat Booth
On 16 February 2010 18:43, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 12:52 +, Mat Booth wrote: > >> But you can have page aliases in Media Wiki, right? > > Aliases? I don't know. MW automatically sets up redirects when you move > a page, but it breaks at more than one level of nesting (so

Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update

2010-02-16 Thread Roland McGrath
> Sure? For the libpng case I have a build failure which looks like this > isn't the case (bug 565047): > > > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.4.3/../../../libpng12.so: > undefined reference to symbol 'crc32' > /usr/bin/ld: note: 'crc32' is defined in DSO /lib/libz.so.1 so try >

[Test-Announce] New packaging policy: privilege escalation policy

2010-02-16 Thread Adam Williamson
This is to announce that the privilege escalation policy which has been under discussion and revision in the QA and development groups, and in FESCo, for the last few weeks has been approved at today's FESCo meeting[1]. The policy can be found here for now: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Privileg

Color Management Test Day Thursday 2010-02-18

2010-02-16 Thread Adam Williamson
It's Test Day time again! This Thursday, 2010-02-18, will be Color Management Test Day[1]. There's some exciting new color management features[2] in Fedora 13. That is to say, there are color management features in Fedora 13! We've never had any real color management in Fedora before, so this is g

Re: Unblocked orphans

2010-02-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 02/16/2010 07:11 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > There are still a few orphans which are unblocked due to dep issues. > Please somebody take ownership of these: > > Unblocked orphan SDL_image > Unblocked orphan SDL_mixer > Unblocked orphan SDL_net > Unblocked orphan SDL_ttf Amazing these got or

Re: rawhide report: 20100216 changes

2010-02-16 Thread Bill Nottingham
Jesse Keating (jkeat...@redhat.com) said: > On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 20:09 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:06:16PM +, Rawhide Report wrote: > > > 1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires > > > /lib/libdevmapper-event-lvm2snapshot.so.2.02 > > > 1:libguestfs-1.0

Summary/Minutes for 2010-02-16 FESCo meeting

2010-02-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-02-16) === Meeting started by nirik at 20:00:03 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-16/fesco.2010-02-16-20.00.log.html Meeting summary

Re: rawhide report: 20100216 changes

2010-02-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:39:48 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > We don't necessarily have a soname freeze. I kind of wish we did, but > I'm sure that'd be met with lots of loud yelling. It'd be nice to remind people that soname bumps (typically) create work for other people and that can caus

Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update

2010-02-16 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Gerd Hoffmann writes: > > > [r...@localhost ~]# pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0 > > -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 > > -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype > > -lfont

Re: rawhide report: 20100216 changes

2010-02-16 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 20:09 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:06:16PM +, Rawhide Report wrote: > > 1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires > > /lib/libdevmapper-event-lvm2snapshot.so.2.02 > > 1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires /lib/libntfs-3g.so.73 >

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
the package description need to be changed https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/system-setup-keyboard "Hal keyboard layout callout" it should be something like "track system-wide keyboard layout configuration" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedor

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
how about keyboard layout ? f-s-keyboard (now system-setup-keyboard) used to send /etc/sysconfig/keyboard conf through hal to X please consider the following points: we need to specify two layouts with functional switching (in previous releases we in ojuba.org were forced to hack and patch many pa

Re: rawhide report: 20100216 changes

2010-02-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:06:16PM +, Rawhide Report wrote: > 1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires > /lib/libdevmapper-event-lvm2snapshot.so.2.02 > 1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires /lib/libntfs-3g.so.73 > 1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires > /lib/libdevmapp

rawhide report: 20100216 changes

2010-02-16 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Feb 16 08:15:10 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- balsa-2.4.6-3.fc13.i686 requires libgmime-2.4.so.2 blahtexml-0.6-5.fc12.i686 requires libxerces-c.so.28 doodle-0.6.7-5.fc12.i686 requires libextra

Re: giis-ext4 undelete

2010-02-16 Thread lakshmi pathi
> > Hi Pavel, > Hope you are doing well.I found your reply.Sorry , I think ,there is > miscommunication/misunderstanding. I think I have sent you below mail , but > not sure about receiving replies from you. So I thought , you are busy with > other activities and didn't mail you further. > > This c

Re: rawhide report: 20100215 changes

2010-02-16 Thread Thomas Janssen
2010/2/16 Rawhide Report : > Compose started at Mon Feb 15 08:15:08 UTC 2010 > > Broken deps for i386 > -- >        edje-0.9.9.050-6.fc12.i686 requires libembryo.so.0 > > > Broken deps for x86_64 > -

Re: documentation on Bugzilla bug lifecycle/developer procedures?

2010-02-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 12:52 +, Mat Booth wrote: > But you can have page aliases in Media Wiki, right? Aliases? I don't know. MW automatically sets up redirects when you move a page, but it breaks at more than one level of nesting (so if you rename a page twice, trying to access the *first* na

Re: Performing a mass rebuild at home

2010-02-16 Thread Roberto Bagnara
On 02/05/10 16:19, Roland Grunberg wrote: > I've had to do mock builds as well on packages in Fedora to see how > things build vs. some new version of a build related tool. > > Along with chwang, we used the scripts at this location : > > http://rgrunber.fedorapeople.org/mockbuild-tools/ > > They'r

[Bug 564798] FTBFS ocaml-camlimages-3.0.2-2.fc13

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564798 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-16 12:40:56 EST --- I have no idea about this bug. It seems to be a dependency

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-16 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:21:35 -0800 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting > > things that are tagged for the release a

Re: Performing a mass rebuild at home

2010-02-16 Thread Roberto Bagnara
On 02/05/10 15:50, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:26:39AM +0100, Roberto Bagnara wrote: >> >> Hi there. >> >> I would like to rebuild all the binaries of the current versions >> of Fedora 12 packages (that is, only the latest update of each >> package). The reason I would like to

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-16 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name

background information on the dnssec-conf issue

2010-02-16 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Fedora 11: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-1696 > Fedora 12: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1748 For those interested in some more background information about the chain of events on the dnssec-conf s

KDE-SIG meeting report (07/2010)

2010-02-16 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply to this email or add it to the related meeting page. -- = Weekly KDE Summary

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-16 Thread Adam Miller
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, >> pub/fedora/linux/development/13  That's where we'll be putting things >> that are tagged for the release after the

unit test generator for shared C/C++ library API

2010-02-16 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
Dear colleagues, Linux Verification Center at the Institute for System Programming of RAS and the Linux Foundation have released a free unit test generator for shared C/C++ library API. It helps to quickly generate simple ("sanity" or "shallow"-quality) tests for all functions from the library API

quick hack to reannotate abrt traces with missing debuginfo

2010-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
In case its useful, I've hacked together a quick utility to reannotate abrt traces which had missing debuginfo at the time of report with the correct source lines according to the debuginfo installed on the annotator's box. Should be safe for reports from prelinked binaries. http://people.redhat.c

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Thomas Janssen
2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson : > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote: >> 2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson : >> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:26:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: >> >> configuration can be in xorg.c

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote: > 2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson : > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:26:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > >> configuration can be in xorg.conf or in /etc/xorg.conf.d/. > >

Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update

2010-02-16 Thread Enrico Scholz
Gerd Hoffmann writes: > Well. Even pretty fundamental GNOME stuff like gtk2-devel is still > broken. Look here: > > [r...@localhost ~]# pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0 > -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 > -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0

[Bug 564798] FTBFS ocaml-camlimages-3.0.2-2.fc13

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564798 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-16 10:44:55 EST --- Failing scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ta

Re: help for fixing Fedora rawhide FTBFS

2010-02-16 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:33:29AM +0100, Zoltan Kota wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/x86_64/bazaar-1.4.2-14.fc13.src.rpm/result/build.log > > > > > Are we ready to retire this package yet? It's been ma

Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update

2010-02-16 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On 02/16/10 16:06, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Well. Even pretty fundamental GNOME stuff like gtk2-devel is still >> broken. Look here: >> >> [r...@localhost ~]# pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0 >> -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1

Fedora 13 Software Translation

2010-02-16 Thread Noriko Mizumoto
It is 16-Feb today, Software String Freeze. All Fedora translators are expecting NO more String change in any Fedora13 packages, and looking at to complete as many translation as possible from now on till the translation deadline. Please make sure that POT is up-to-date with latest strings. nor

Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update

2010-02-16 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 15:57 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 02/09/10 09:06, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On 8 February 2010 22:46, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> As a result, you'll be causing dozens of FTBFS bugs just before the feature > >> freeze. I think this is entirely the wrong time in the release

Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update

2010-02-16 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Well. Even pretty fundamental GNOME stuff like gtk2-devel is still > broken. Look here: > > [r...@localhost ~]# pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0 > -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 > -lgdk_pixbuf-2

Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update

2010-02-16 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On 02/09/10 09:06, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 8 February 2010 22:46, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> As a result, you'll be causing dozens of FTBFS bugs just before the feature >> freeze. I think this is entirely the wrong time in the release cycle to do >> such a change, if it is done at all. > > I've bee

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-16 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name

Re: how to have mock use arch i686?

2010-02-16 Thread Paul Howarth
On 16/02/10 13:34, Matt Domsch wrote: > This post suggests I need to be building packages using arch i686 > instead of i386 as mock does by default. If so, how do I go about > doing so? Do you have this in your mock config? config_opts['target_arch'] = 'i686' Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@

Fedora Talk - Asterisk

2010-02-16 Thread Jon Masters
Folks, Perhaps someone can use this to update the wiki if they have time. The current recommendations for Fedora Talk "talking" to a private Asterisk server are incorrect for recent versions. The following snippets are sufficient for two-way friendly chat, and are a simplification of the system I

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Thomas Janssen
2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson : > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:26:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: >> configuration can be in xorg.conf or in /etc/xorg.conf.d/. > > Can it be /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ instead please?  It would suck to have >

Re: Might need to orphan glade3

2010-02-16 Thread Adam Miller
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > Adam Miller wrote: >> Hello all, >>     Recently glade3 was orphaned and I left it alone for about a week >> and nobody had picked it up yet and since I use it I decided to snag

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:26:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > configuration can be in xorg.conf or in /etc/xorg.conf.d/. Can it be /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ instead please? It would suck to have to look in two different places, /

how to have mock use arch i686?

2010-02-16 Thread Matt Domsch
This post suggests I need to be building packages using arch i686 instead of i386 as mock does by default. If so, how do I go about doing so? Thanks, Matt - Forwarded message from bugzi...@redhat.com - Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 565074] FTBFS opencv-2.0.0-4.fc1

Re: documentation on Bugzilla bug lifecycle/developer procedures?

2010-02-16 Thread Mat Booth
On 15 February 2010 21:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 21:08 +0100, Mathieu Bridon wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 21:01, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > It's also worth noting that mediawiki's internal search really isn't >> > that great. I tend to search Google with 'site:fedor

Re: ABRT unusable again

2010-02-16 Thread Karel Klic
On 02/08/2010 06:11 PM, Karel Klic wrote: > On 02/08/2010 02:22 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: >> Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 22:26 +0100 schrieb Karel Klic: >> IMO all lists should be sorted by package owner. I own ~ 120 packages >> and it is a quite lot of work to search all these packages in your

Re: Unblocked orphans

2010-02-16 Thread Paul Howarth
On 16/02/10 06:11, Jesse Keating wrote: > There are still a few orphans which are unblocked due to dep issues. > Please somebody take ownership of these: > > Unblocked orphan python-crypto I've taken this one. Co-maintainers welcome - I notice that there were already some co-maintainers for this

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > > > > So you're running an X server? Well, my lad or lass, sit down and let > > > > me tell you about the neverending story of X server input > > > > configuration changes that has hopefully ended now. > > > > I'm just pushing the l

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Tuesday 16 February 2010 08:47:20 Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:25:54AM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > So you're running an X server? Well, my lad or lass, sit down and let > > > me tell you about the neverending story of X server input > > > configuration

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:54:37AM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 16.2.2010 08:47, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > I can put a giant warning into the log that if input devices don't work then > > the users should have a look at the website above for reconfiguration. How > > does that sound? Do you have an

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 16.2.2010 08:47, Peter Hutterer wrote: > I can put a giant warning into the log that if input devices don't work then > the users should have a look at the website above for reconfiguration. How > does that sound? Do you have any better suggestions? Do we have all currently packaged .fdi files

Re: Final (hopefully) privilege escalation policy draft

2010-02-16 Thread Tim Waugh
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 12:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > That's correct. This is frankly a 'realistic' decision, on the basis > that the PackageKit maintainer believes updating packages should be > allowed for a regular user by default and intends to implement this, and > I don't want to dictate