Sorry for the short notice everyone, but this week is Graphics Test Week
again. It's time to make sure the major graphics drivers are in shape
for Fedora 16. Tomorrow, 2011-09-06, is Nouveau Test Day [1]. Wednesday,
2011-09-07, is Radeon Test Day [2]. And Thursday, 2011-09-08, is Intel
graphics
Hi,
2011/9/6 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 09/06/2011 02:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) said:
the alpha was release and
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean
05.09.2011 19:17, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
(Well, as you posted your first mail to fedora devel list, please
keep sending your reply also to devel list. This type of private
mails will be very confusing to many people who are also watching
mailing
list because they cannot know what is currently
On 9/1/11 5:05 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Hmmm, turning off SMP is not realistic, as this laptop has a Core 2 Duo.
Sure it is. Boot with maxcpus=1 on the kernel command line.
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 09/06/2011 08:39 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
I created a service for wpa_supplicant. Is there something wrong with it?
Nope Dan had sanctioned it but then another one appear upstream and as
you know we try to avoid deviating from upstream.
Not sure if Bill spoke with Dan about this ( I
Compose started at Tue Sep 6 08:15:03 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit)
On 06/09/11 06:31, Michael Fleming wrote:
I've released ownership of the aforementioned package, as I've not used
it in any meaningful way in some time and don't have the time to
maintain it further.
Upstream development seems to have picked up of late (was dormant for a
long time) so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
policycoreutils has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
policycoreutils-gui-2.1.5-2.fc17.x86_64 requires gtkhtml2
On i386:
policycoreutils-gui-2.1.5-2.fc17.i686 requires gtkhtml2
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:34:32 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote:
policycoreutils has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
policycoreutils-gui-2.1.5-2.fc17.x86_64 requires gtkhtml2
On i386:
policycoreutils-gui-2.1.5-2.fc17.i686 requires gtkhtml2
Please resolve this as soon
Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all
that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with
that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream
(which is a good thing!) but that also means that the patches need
frequent adjustment.
On 09/06/2011 05:16 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all
that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with
that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream
(which is a good thing!) but that also
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Richard Shaw wrote:
Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all
that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with
that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream
(which is a good thing!) but that also means
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 04:26:30PM +0200, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Štěpán Kasal (user kasal)? He is not
answering
e-mails at his listed address (I've
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/06/2011 07:00 PM +9:00:
05.09.2011 19:17, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
First:
* php-devel is not installed when trying to package srpm from spec and
sources. This is
what koji (build server) always does. i.e. koji tries to package srpm first,
at
Am 06.09.2011 13:10, schrieb Adam Jackson:
On 9/1/11 5:05 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Hmmm, turning off SMP is not realistic, as this laptop has a Core 2 Duo.
Sure it is. Boot with maxcpus=1 on the kernel command line
i would recommend nosmp because it really disables the kernel-smp code
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 09:16 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all
that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with
that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream
(which is a good thing!) but
Thanks for the suggestions so far.
I think quilt works ok with Fedora scm (or RPM Fusion cvs) since
everything lives in one directory. I'm trying to get it to place nice
with rpmbuild because not everything I'm working on is in Fedora or
RPM Fusion.
Also, I like to use rpmbuild as kind of a
Compose started at Tue Sep 6 13:15:27 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
Hi,
I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm
getting an error
DEBUG util.py:250: cherokee
##
DEBUG util.py:250: error: unpacking of archive failed on file
/builddir/build/SOURCES/01-drop-privileges.patch;4e664eb5: cpio:
Michał Piotrowski píše v Út 06. 09. 2011 v 19:02 +0200:
Hi,
I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm
getting an error
DEBUG util.py:250: cherokee
##
DEBUG util.py:250: error: unpacking of archive failed on file
2011/9/6 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm
getting an error
DEBUG util.py:250: cherokee
##
DEBUG util.py:250: error: unpacking of archive failed on file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/2011 09:41 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:34:32 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote:
policycoreutils has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On
x86_64: policycoreutils-gui-2.1.5-2.fc17.x86_64 requires
gtkhtml2 On i386:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:00:21 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote:
I guess what I really need is gnome-python2-gtkhtml2, has this been
replaced?
What I could find is a request to drop it (it's a gnome-python2-extras
subpackage):
Disable Python bindings for gtkhtml2 (dead package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735114
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=521730action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
2011/9/6 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz:
Michał Piotrowski píše v Út 06. 09. 2011 v 19:02 +0200:
Hi,
I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm
getting an error
DEBUG util.py:250: cherokee
##
DEBUG util.py:250: error:
2011/9/6 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br:
2011/9/6 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm
getting an error
DEBUG util.py:250: cherokee
##
DEBUG util.py:250:
Dne 6.9.2011 16:29, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
I like the idea of quilt but I can't seem to find the magic recipe to
get it to integrate with rpmbuild.
What's wrong with
quilt setup specname.spec
?
Best,
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Package-Stash-XS:
52ece18842c46da8fb7a4a14dea910ab Package-Stash-XS-0.25.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/06/2011 09:53 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 6.9.2011 16:29, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
I like the idea of quilt but I can't seem to find the magic recipe to
get it to integrate with rpmbuild.
Please mind your quotes, I didn't write the above.
What's wrong with
quilt setup specname.spec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/2011 01:49 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:00:21 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote:
I guess what I really need is gnome-python2-gtkhtml2, has this
been replaced?
What I could find is a request to drop it (it's a
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes:
I like the idea of quilt but I can't seem to find the magic recipe to
get it to integrate with rpmbuild.
I use an %apply macro in ways like
| %apply -n4 -p1
which is equivalent to
| %patch4 -p1
on ordinary hosts. But defining this macro as
|
commit 1a294d28ce820abeef16899d3dbb70a3cec87b74
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Sep 6 20:29:32 2011 +0100
Update to 0.32
- New upstream release 0.32
- Bring the behavior of has_symbol for nonexistant scalars into line with
the
XS version
-
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
On 09/06/2011 09:53 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 6.9.2011 16:29, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
I like the idea of quilt but I can't seem to find the magic recipe to
get it to integrate with rpmbuild.
Please mind your
I think I've gotten over the first hurdle. I ended up using the
following command:
$ quilt setup -d rpmbuild/BUILD --sourcedir rpmbuild/SOURCES/
rpmbuild/SPECS/name.spec
Now that doesn't fix the persistence issue since anything in BUILD/
will be deleted on the next run of rpmbuild... In this
Summary of changes:
1a294d2... Update to 0.32 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
af968d1... Perl mass rebuild (*)
29b6aed... Update to 0.31 (*)
1a294d2... Update to 0.32 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I've gotten over the first hurdle. I ended up using the
following command:
$ quilt setup -d rpmbuild/BUILD --sourcedir rpmbuild/SOURCES/
rpmbuild/SPECS/name.spec
Well not so fast...
I don't know why, but even
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.31-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
29b6aed... Update to 0.31
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.31-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
29b6aed... Update to 0.31
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.32-1.el6' was created pointing to:
1a294d2... Update to 0.32
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.32-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
1a294d2... Update to 0.32
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.32-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
1a294d2... Update to 0.32
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/06/2011 01:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.09.2011 13:10, schrieb Adam Jackson:
On 9/1/11 5:05 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Hmmm, turning off SMP is not realistic, as this laptop has a Core 2 Duo.
Sure it is. Boot with maxcpus=1 on the kernel command line
i would recommend nosmp
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
There is one thing I have learned ( so far in the conversion process )
and that is that the current model surrounding maintainers and
maintainership followed by various policies surrounding that model which
we use here in Fedora as in maintainers Own their
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 20:56 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 09/03/2011 07:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
To look at things at a higher level: it's clearly the goal of the
guidelines that any interested party (with sufficient basic knowledge)
who comes along and checks a Fedora package out
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, yes, that parallel came up in my mind too, but really, the two
aren't particularly similar. I don't think there's any intent to
obfuscate in the case of the glibc spec, it's simply done the way that
seemed
Hi.
I'd be grateful if someone versed in the finer aspects of X clipboard
handling could take a quick look at the patch attached to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667541 and tell me
whether it looks sane.
Thanks!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the
minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that
maintainers cannot upkarma updates they submitted themselves. However,
this seems to be happening - exhibit a):
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the
minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that
maintainers cannot upkarma updates they submitted themselves. However,
this seems to be happening -
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the
minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that
maintainers cannot
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:09:03PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the
minority, and
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 15:04 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On 09/06/2011 09:53 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
What's wrong with
quilt setup specname.spec
Because rpmbuild segregates everything, quilt doesn't seem to know how
to handle that.
When you create the directory tree for rpmbuild it (at
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:00 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the
minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that
maintainers cannot upkarma updates they
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:02:25 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the
minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that
maintainers cannot upkarma updates they submitted themselves. However,
this seems to
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:38:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:00 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the
minority, and AFAIK the current
On Sep 6, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 15:04 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On 09/06/2011 09:53 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
What's wrong with
quilt setup specname.spec
Because rpmbuild segregates everything, quilt doesn't seem to know how
to handle that.
When
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-threads:
0f9965148fa054cf553d7920c35cdd8e threads-1.85.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2a382e16f5e25534942909312304481056bd73b6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 6 08:33:53 2011 +0200
1.85 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-threads.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 85a01a189ac366d190ade67695c885c268db2ade
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 6 08:43:24 2011 +0200
1.39 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-threads-shared.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735775
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735774
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735775
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-threads-shared:
e23c4b3eb6f5a39fed3c0f1761c61c2c threads-shared-1.39.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b5a3f207e3cca4639b43b4834676738032907d0d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 6 08:49:46 2011 +0200
Use correct source tar ball.
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735775
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon:
ead74d03d40c72cd52d4d70771bbd122 Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.91.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4c7bfe3... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
8b58f69... Perl mass rebuild (*)
8ddc36b... Upstream update. (*)
b72283c... Post-merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
8b58f69... Perl mass rebuild (*)
8ddc36b... Upstream update. (*)
b72283c... Post-merge cleanup. (*)
714fe03... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f15' into f14
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 714fe03ba97a283431863162ddb8c8e2df2b8f0c
Merge: 5dc6978 b72283c
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Sep 6 16:45:36 2011 +0200
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f15' into f14
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Plack.spec |5 -
sources |2
perl-Hash-FieldHash has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc15.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
commit d408e62f10caf1ea146dc2f4b1fa38aea16b262e
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Sep 6 20:08:09 2011 +0100
Update to 0.25
- New upstream release 0.25
- Invalid package names (for instance, Foo:Bar) are not allowed
- Invalid stash entry names (anything
Summary of changes:
d408e62... Update to 0.25 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
69f740c... Perl mass rebuild (*)
06d92df... Update to 0.23 (*)
d408e62... Update to 0.25 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-XS-0.25-1.el6' was created pointing to:
d408e62... Update to 0.25
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-XS-0.25-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
d408e62... Update to 0.25
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-XS-0.25-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
d408e62... Update to 0.25
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Load:
2b7d7c5faa72e14095f603a6a1e5496b Class-Load-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712699
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-06
23:41:15 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712699
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
82 matches
Mail list logo
