Hey, everyone. There are pending updates for livecd-tools in F14, F15
and F16:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15442
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15374
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15386
It's quite important that we get these appro
WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting
WHEN: 15:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
WHERE: #fedora-meeting
It's meeting time again! It's the first meeting of the post-Fedora 16
era, so time to dust off anything you've been sitting on through the
release crunch. Also note that clocks went back in North America today,
b
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 03:24 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Mathieu Bridon fedoraproject.org> writes:
>
> > [..snip..] and thanks to my incredibly poor focus [..snip..]
>
> > Oh, and I don't think I am a "Joe Average" or an "Aunt Tillie": I'm a
> > Fedora package maintainer, Python developer, a re
Mathieu Bridon fedoraproject.org> writes:
> [..snip..] and thanks to my incredibly poor focus [..snip..]
> Oh, and I don't think I am a "Joe Average" or an "Aunt Tillie": I'm a
> Fedora package maintainer, Python developer, a release engineer for an
> in-house Linux distribution at $dayjob, and
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 23:33 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Please, just give me the name of _one_ user that got _distracted_ by the
> taskbar in Gnome (or any other OS, for that matter).
Look at the value of the « From: » header of this email for a name of
such a user.
> The name of one user that
Mathieu Bridon fedoraproject.org> writes:
> instead of complaining and being insulting?
Point to one insult please.
Constructive criticism is not complaining.
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 23:25 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> I did not imply that users that use gnome-shell as is are insane. What I said
> was that GUI behaviour that introduces many _unnecessary_ steps for _no_
> _benefit_ is insane.
Did you even read my answer to you earlier where I said that I w
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:23:02 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
> > different bugzilla accounts by now.
>
> So what? Maintainers are not messengers, they have other work to do than
> forwarding the bugs you're too lazy to file directly
Frederic Muller cm17.com> writes:
> me! I'd click to see what was 'happening' on the other workspace.
:-)
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 11/07/2011 07:33 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> The name of one user that
> was tempted to switch tasks just because the taskbar/workspace switcher
me! I'd click to see what was 'happening' on the other workspace.
Fred
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
drago01 gmail.com> writes:
Again, rebuttal only.
> I didn't comment on whether your arguments are valid or not I simply
> said that "confused users" was *not* the reason for the lack of
> taskbar. distraction != confusion.
Now we're splitting hairs, eh? A distracted user is not a confused user,
Florian Müllner gnome.org> writes:
Rebuttal only here. No new material.
> Does that mean that the existence of terminal emulators for X11 is proof
> of graphical user interfaces being a mistake?
Terminal and (I guess other) GUI apps do entirely _different_ things. Apps menu
in overview and apps
On dom, 2011-11-06 at 22:42 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> The existence of all those extensions that bring back sanity (apps menu in
> normal view, workspaces in normal view, persistent dash for switching tasks in
> normal view etc.) is the proof of the ultimate irony - the (supposedly)
> biggest
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> drago01 gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Not true ... I recommend reading
>> https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/#Activities_Overview
>
> Just one link, so you wouldn't say I'm plucking things out of thin air:
>
> https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShe
drago01 gmail.com> writes:
> Not true ... I recommend reading
> https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/#Activities_Overview
Just one link, so you wouldn't say I'm plucking things out of thin air:
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/FAQ#Why_no_window_list_or_dock.3F
This explains... ...
drago01 gmail.com> writes:
> Not true ... I recommend reading
> https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/#Activities_Overview
I read that a long, long time ago, of course. In fact, I have written a
constructive critique of Gnome 3 many months ago, based to a large degree on the
very document you
On 11/06/2011 12:26 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Puzzles me. The F-16 build doesn't depend on libpng* directly:
>
> $ rpm -qR geeqie|grep png
> $ rpm -q geeqie
> geeqie-1.0-13.fc16.x86_64
I noticed a similar thing with gkrellm-volume -- the F-15 build did have
a dependency on it, but the F-16 o
Compose started at Sun Nov 6 08:16:08 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.15
1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i6
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Kevin Kofler chello.at> writes:
>
>> I, for
>> one, want my computer to work the way I learned and interiorized a computer
>> works, any "innovative" interface destroys my automatisms and confuses me.
>>
>> I'm using Plasma Desktop with the C
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:35:21 -0400, TL (Tom) wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:07:44 -0400, TL (Tom) wrote:
> >> My list was just the result of "repoquery --whatrequires".
>
> > The last Rawhide build of "geeqie" also doesn't depend on libpng*.
> > F-15 does, however, which might be where you've
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 11:58 +0400, Lucas wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I was trying to setup nfs server on fedora 16 and first off all started from
> nfs-server. I checked
> "chkconfig" - nothing, then "systemctl --all | grep nfs" - nothing again.
> Then I searched in "rpm -q
> nfs-utils -l" and found
Thanks.
I totally forgot about that difference. There is loaded, dead, ... and disabled.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Kalpa and Buddhika,
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> I'm willing to package PicoLisp. Any assistance is highly appreciated.
Great! I'm glad to hear that
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 10:49:15PM +0530, Buddhika Kurera wrote:
> But I would like to learn about that(have a li
Dear All
I was trying to setup nfs server on fedora 16 and first off all started from
nfs-server. I checked
"chkconfig" - nothing, then "systemctl --all | grep nfs" - nothing again. Then
I searched in "rpm -q
nfs-utils -l" and found out that I have it:
/lib/systemd/system/nfs-blkmap.service
/
24 matches
Mail list logo
