Alright to answer my own question: It was already orphaned in the last
round before f16. So it's probably worth reviving!
But I think the associated workload with reviving a package could be
lowered, just to make it easier for contributors!
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Johannes Lips
On 02/10/2012 07:12 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Given all that, it seems only logical to conclude that Fedora really
_isn't_ primarily intended for use as a production server.
Bingo, which is why it's important for people like me who do it to
realize what they're getting into and take some
On 13.2.2012 01:12, Kevin Kofler wrote:
IMHO, not only should the KDE spin become the default, but the Xfce spin
should replace the GNOME spin (which of course needs to stop calling itself
the Desktop spin) on the mirrors. GNOME is no longer a major desktop! Xfce
is now the second most popular
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:09:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, you are aware that you reach the biggest compat by just symlinking
/bin to /usr/bin?
Yeah, that's the end goal, but we need rpm to support replacing
directories with symlinks first. Thus we don't rush the change.
Cheers,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools:
72cb59cfe6d6c78d1cb1fc77aaa7ecca CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:09:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, you are aware that you reach the biggest compat by just symlinking
/bin to /usr/bin?
Yeah, that's the end goal, but we need rpm to support replacing
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:25:08PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:09:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, you are aware that you reach the biggest compat by just symlinking
/bin to /usr/bin?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:25:08PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:09:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, you are aware that
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga
l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hello,
Upstream synfig has updated ETL to 0.04.14. The new version of synfig and
synfigstudio depend on the recent update of that package. Is it possible to
update it?
Have you filed a bug against that package
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 11:08 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Let me put it this way, then: Fedora is released on a six month cycle,
which is far faster than is usually considered desirable for server
usage. It has a 13 month lifetime, which is far shorter than is usually
considered desirable for
Le mardi 07 février 2012 14:21:53 Laurent Rineau a écrit :
From release 4.0, the CGAL libraries will be released under LGPLv3+ for the
foundations, and GPLv3+ for the high level packages (instead of LGPLv2 and
QPL respectively).
In the CGAL.spec file, I mentionned License: LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789977
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789571
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 15:29 +0100, Laurent Rineau wrote:
Le mardi 07 février 2012 14:21:53 Laurent Rineau a écrit :
From release 4.0, the CGAL libraries will be released under LGPLv3+ for the
foundations, and GPLv3+ for the high level packages (instead of LGPLv2 and
QPL respectively).
In
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789571
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Dne 11.2.2012 16:42, Steve Grubb napsal(a):
On Monday, February 06, 2012 09:31:50 AM Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Ruby 1.9.3 has finally made it into Rawhide, there are still few more
packages that need to be built, but otherwise the transitions was
successful.
Please note again, that soname has
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:59 PM, David Lehman dleh...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Between TC1 and release of F16 Alpha, something must have changed to the
worse with regard to installing GRUB to a partition's primary sector.
Partitioning hasn't
On 2012-02-09, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
Result is pcre library has changed SONAME from libpcre.so.0 to
libpcre.so.1. Other librararies (pcrecpp, pcreposix) delivered with this
package remain compatible.
Because pcre library is part of minimal build root I choosed following
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 14:47 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 11:08 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Let me put it this way, then: Fedora is released on a six month cycle,
which is far faster than is usually considered desirable for server
usage. It has a 13 month lifetime,
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #799 Issues with maintainer responsiveness
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 12:44 -0500, Omair Majid wrote:
On 02/13/2012 12:35 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
[snip]
For more complete
Matej Cepl wrote:
Kevin?
I am usually close to being on your side in most flamewars here, but
changing the release policy based on the vote of 627 people on a random
website? Really?
It's not just that website. Survey the Fedora blogs a bit to see how many
people switched away from GNOME 3.
As part of the ckremoval feature [1], things have been steadily ported away
from ConsoleKit api to logind.
While we hope to complete this for the desktop spin, we don't expect all spins
to be free of ConsoleKit users in time for F17. Therefore, we need to make sure
that CK continues to
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
On 02/11/2012 02:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Hi all,
a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544
After closer inspection, I see that the RPM
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Matej Cepl wrote:
Kevin?
I am usually close to being on your side in most flamewars here, but
changing the release policy based on the vote of 627 people on a random
website? Really?
It's not just that website.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
There still seems to be problems. I rebuilt it locally with an updated
F16 and now I get:
$ rpm -qp --requires
drago01 wrote:
Why must a desktop resemble the windows 95 UI paradigm? You call that
unconventional I call that progress.
Not even Microsoft is staying with the 95 UI.
@Kevin, Windows 8 will look more like Gnome Shell than KDE. What then?
Will we see millions of Windows users flock to Mac? I
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:33 +, Branched Report wrote:
Hi,
on http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/i386/os/images/
we got boot.iso
on http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/x86_64/os/images/
we got macboot.img and efiboot.img
what happened to boot.iso ? .
To start
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-02-13)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:00:33 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-02-13/fesco.2012-02-13-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
python-mwlib is currently deprecated. We dropped it about a year or two
ago because of hellish dependencies. Some of the issues have been
cleaned up so it's now up for re-review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790154
This email is being sent because of this policy:
Summary of changes:
1e3ce9f... Update to 0.17 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695597
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.17-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
1e3ce9f... Update to 0.17
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.17-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
1e3ce9f... Update to 0.17
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:36:21 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:33 +, Branched Report wrote:
Hi,
on http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/i386/os/images/
we got boot.iso
on
drago01 wrote:
The poll is scientifically useless and you know that; and the one Olav
linked shows the opposite by the way.
The one Olav linked to said only GNOME rather than GNOME 3 or GNOME
Shell and as such people who are still sticking with GNOME 2 will have
voted for GNOME too. Several
On Feb 13, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
The LQ poll proves it was the latter.
I don't like Gnome 3 either. From the largely outsider perspective and new to
linux in general, I get the impression Gnome dev is on a mission, of unknown
origin, and could absolutely care less about any
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2012-02-13 15:46:03
EST ---
Jóhann, if you are PP, feel free to commit
I'm going to reply to both in one go here:
drago01 wrote:
Why must a desktop resemble the windows 95 UI paradigm?
Because that is what all current computer users are used to! And an
inconvenient fact often ignored in usability studies is that the vast
majority of your users will NOT be new
Matthias Clasen wrote:
While we hope to complete this for the desktop spin, we don't expect all
spins to be free of ConsoleKit users in time for F17. Therefore, we need
to make sure that CK continues to function - which is why we've put
pam-ck-connector into the gdm pam stacks today. Spins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
--- Comment #3 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com 2012-02-13
16:19:23 EST ---
Unfortunately I am not however Jon (
On Feb 13, 2012, at 9:16 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
I did Fedora 16 Respin iso install with all latest packages, including
latest Anaconda package, and still had this issue.
There were two ntfs partitions (Windows 7 + data partition) and 30 GB
of free space.
From 30GB free
On 02/13/2012 03:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Fedora DE vs KDE spin download ratio compared to past release ratios would be
more suggestive of a trend, if it exists.
Not necessarily - I always used the standard DVD to install and use
KDE and frankly never used the KDE spin - not once.
gene
On Feb 13, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 02/13/2012 03:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Fedora DE vs KDE spin download ratio compared to past release ratios would
be more suggestive of a trend, if it exists.
Not necessarily - I always used the standard DVD to install and use
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 12:49 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:36:21 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:33 +, Branched Report wrote:
Hi,
on http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/i386/os/images/
we got boot.iso
on
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 19:36 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:33 +, Branched Report wrote:
Hi,
on http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/i386/os/images/
we got boot.iso
on http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/x86_64/os/images/
we got macboot.img
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 14:25 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 13, 2012, at 9:16 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
I did Fedora 16 Respin iso install with all latest packages, including
latest Anaconda package, and still had this issue.
There were two ntfs partitions (Windows 7 +
Hello,
Just as the subject, I made a text table. It's simple. The column name
explains itself. I think it is usefull for somebody.
The table also contains two columns:
'is_fedora_kvm_support?' and 'is_ubuntu_kvm_support?'. The two columns
tell us whether fedora/ubuntn kvm could virtualize
the
Just wanted to make note of the current status of proven testers. As
decided by FESCo late last year, proven tester feedback now has exactly
the same status as non-proven tester feedback, effectively rendering it
pointless to be a proven tester.
I have added a note about this to the proven tester
On Feb 13, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 14:25 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I think the problem is GRUB2's own install script/app, doesn't do a great
job of accounting for disks partitioned where the 1st partition comes less
than 35KB after the MBR, and as
On Mon 13 Feb 2012 04:55:03 AM PST, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Have you filed a bug against that package to alert the maintainer?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
If not, that would be a great first step.
Done. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790249
I found out Lubomir is the maintainer. I
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 19:25 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 13, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 14:25 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I think the problem is GRUB2's own install script/app, doesn't do a great
job of accounting for disks partitioned where
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Capture-Tiny-0.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789973
Summary: perl-Capture-Tiny-0.16 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Module-Runtime-0.012 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789977
Summary: perl-Module-Runtime-0.012 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Classic-Perl-0.05 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789974
Summary: perl-Classic-Perl-0.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Hash-MultiValue-0.11 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789975
Summary: perl-Hash-MultiValue-0.11 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.24 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789976
Summary: perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.24 is available
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ExtractUse:
d09df52dfd1da63aebf1db7bb9485d8b Module-ExtractUse-0.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 671c144ec604057c3d0e6762b8a2fe6dc06a6a39
Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 13 12:08:52 2012 +
Update to 0.24 (rhbz 789976)
.gitignore |5 -
perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec | 14 ++
sources |2
Summary of changes:
671c144... Update to 0.24 (rhbz 789976) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789973
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Capture-Tiny:
3404b614cfe5bbbedb805cc3d4dace4c Capture-Tiny-0.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 54a9e32fc6172215263a1d480f1b14da306e46f3
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 13 13:49:29 2012 +0100
0.16 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Capture-Tiny.spec | 11 +++
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5
Summary of changes:
54a9e32... 0.16 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601:
b7c0a4b5e767a8d3b87f3dc678d8c30c DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789973
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789976
Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789685
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-CallChecker:
2e55804221eaa5fdf2e32749b72e74f2 Devel-CallChecker-0.005.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ae611b0c9a09122f5bade24a925deb21572744b4
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 13 14:35:42 2012 +0100
0.005 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Devel-CallChecker.spec | 25 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Encode-Locale:
de8422d068634e7c1068dab4e18b452f Encode-Locale-1.03.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ed8a0b9a3d2cff74a7a4a86183cfb0c73ce2c7e0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 13 14:45:56 2012 +0100
1.03 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode-Locale.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789687
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789689
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Classic-Perl:
ad0379ebca2b8b6d64cb204df87e7437 Classic-Perl-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6aaf438b07f0b98934909178910121ccd61140e5
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 13 14:59:24 2012 +0100
0.05 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Classic-Perl.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789974
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 6ce500d45b17e387e973e402df4b0477bda40555
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 13 15:16:11 2012 +0100
0.012 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Runtime.spec | 11 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789977
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
6ce500d... 0.012 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6f90734bd92650b8dc8881af018f67a4715f9f62
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 13 15:16:11 2012 +0100
0.012 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Runtime.spec |9 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789977
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-13
12:28:17 EST ---
perl-Module-Runtime-0.012-1.fc16
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt:
363b206e39b24f69d642b337e324aba6 Sys-Virt-0.9.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 97d36697663399e25e3b1d405a9627f6910e7d74
Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 13 17:57:38 2012 +
Update to 0.9.10 release
perl-Sys-Virt.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
97d3669... Update to 0.9.10 release (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Implementation:
748f3540162fc5d761fab3efb266 Module-Implementation-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3e734a030d86e6112f1382a6e3d1b49b5245df29
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 13 19:11:57 2012 +
Update to 0.06
- New upstream release 0.06
- Require Module::Runtime 0.012, which has a number of useful bug fixes
perl-Module-Implementation.spec |
Summary of changes:
3e734a0... Update to 0.06 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789977
--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2012-02-13 14:20:01 EST ---
Can you add a buildroot override for
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Implementation-0.06-1.fc17' was created
pointing to:
3e734a0... Update to 0.06
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Implementation-0.06-1.fc18' was created
pointing to:
3e734a0... Update to 0.06
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Load:
22663b3e350eb95dd3c151c2d84c5eb4 Class-Load-0.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1e3ce9f45aecdcf67a1752e758e85cc44da1726b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 13 19:33:49 2012 +
Update to 0.17
- New upstream release 0.17:
- Require Module::Runtime 0.012, which has a number of useful bug fixes
- A bug in Class::Load caused
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/34
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/34/0001-Trac-Ticket-34-remove-ds.pl-does-not-remove-everythi.patch
Fix description: Introduce an option --all | -a, with which
all the generated files and directories are removed.
--
389-devel mailing list
95 matches
Mail list logo
