Re: [rawhide] colord pulling in 32bit packages on 64bit installs

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Hughes
On 10 January 2013 23:55, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote: It's 'mash' that decides what gets multilibbed. If I read it right, it multilibs packages that install files that match the libdir/*.so.* pattern, plus a number of hardcoded special cases. It's a bit like magic, we'll see how

Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Hughes
I've tried to build colord for f18 a few times now. It builds locally fine, but when run on Koji it gets killed: make[3]: *** [FOGRA28L_webcoated.icc] Killed It only seems to happen when the print profiles are being created, which do take some time to complete. It probably takes about 20 minutes

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Dan Horák
Richard Hughes píše v Pá 11. 01. 2013 v 09:01 +: I've tried to build colord for f18 a few times now. It builds locally fine, but when run on Koji it gets killed: make[3]: *** [FOGRA28L_webcoated.icc] Killed It only seems to happen when the print profiles are being created, which do

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Hughes
On 11 January 2013 09:13, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: I'd say it's the OOM killer in kernel what kills your processes. Do the generators run in parallel? No, serially. I've just submitted a scratch build that uses ulimit -Sv 50 which will cause the profiles to be built in chunks rather

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit : - packagereqtelnet/packagereq Nowadays it's commonly used to test if a port is open, not to log in remotely somewhere. What will replace it in this role? -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/11/2013 10:01 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: I've tried to build colord for f18 a few times now. It builds locally fine, but when run on Koji it gets killed: make[3]: *** [FOGRA28L_webcoated.icc] Killed It only seems to happen when the print profiles are being created, which do take some time

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Hughes
On 11 January 2013 10:21, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: builds verbose Good idea. Do I just do this or is there some Fedora macro? @@ -87,10 +91,10 @@ This may be useful for CMYK soft-proofing or for extra device support. --disable-examples \

gsoap updated to version 2.8.12 in rawhide

2013-01-11 Thread Mattias Ellert
Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.12 in rawhide only. Dependent packages (gfal, gridsite, lcgdm, lcgdm-dav, srm-ifce, voms) must rebuild. Mattias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
On 01/11/2013 12:01 AM, William Brown wrote: Nothing I didn't know about it. Will read into it now. Maybe this shows that a documentation component is needed, to bridge the gap to say X tool is replaced by Y IE netstat - ss man netstat: NOTE This program is obsolete.

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:24:00AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit : - packagereqtelnet/packagereq Nowadays it's commonly used to test if a port is open, not to log in remotely somewhere. What will replace it in this role? nc

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
On 01/11/2013 01:17 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: +1, the default info is really a PITA to use, pinfo is much better. -1, pinfo is dispensable: $ info ls --subnodes --output - | less -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/11/2013 11:35 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: On 01/11/2013 12:01 AM, William Brown wrote: Nothing I didn't know about it. Will read into it now. Maybe this shows that a documentation component is needed, to bridge the gap to say X tool is replaced by Y IE netstat - ss man netstat:

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/11/2013 11:27 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: On 11 January 2013 10:21, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: builds verbose Good idea. Do I just do this Is the package autotools-based using a recent version of the autotools? Then its configure script likely honors

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Hughes
On 11 January 2013 11:32, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: Then its configure script likely honors --disable-silent-rules That works a treat, thanks. In both cases, it's worth contacting upstream to tell them about the harmfulness of silent make rules Well, I am upstream :) When I'm

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:12:46PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: On 11 January 2013 11:32, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: Then its configure script likely honors --disable-silent-rules That works a treat, thanks. In both cases, it's worth contacting upstream to tell them about

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Scherer
Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 11:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit : - packagereqtelnet/packagereq Nowadays it's commonly used to test if a port is open, not to log in remotely somewhere. What will replace it in this role? why

Re: libcdio 0.90 update in rawhide

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:44:29 +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:22:18PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate package called libcdio-paranoia.

Re: Feedback wanted: Fedora Formulas

2013-01-11 Thread Ian Malone
On 10 January 2013 23:51, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Brendan Jones wrote: The main problem we have with kickstarts at the moment is that there is no way (according to current packaging guidelines) to alter files owned by other packages. This is just plain impossible anyway

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:35:46PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 11:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit : - packagereqtelnet/packagereq Nowadays it's commonly used to test if a port is open, not

rawhide report: 20130111 changes

2013-01-11 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Jan 11 08:15:05 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [audacious-plugins] audacious-plugins-3.3.3-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libcdio.so.13(CDIO_13)(64bit) audacious-plugins-3.3.3-2.fc19.x86_64 requires

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Xose Vazquez Perez xose.vazq...@gmail.com said: On 01/11/2013 01:17 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: +1, the default info is really a PITA to use, pinfo is much better. -1, pinfo is dispensable: $ info ls --subnodes --output - | less Ah yes, because _that's_ intuitive

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said: Sure, going through the diff: - packagereqbc/packagereq bc and dc are sometimes used for math in shell scripts (and bc is part of POSIX/SUS). - packagereqed/packagereq I don't know how widely it is used, but ed is also

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Scherer
Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 21:14 +0800, Daniel Veillard a écrit : On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:35:46PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 11:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit : -

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:08:21PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: +idlegacy-unix/id +_nameLegacy Unix Support/_name +_descriptionThese packages include clients and commands for legacy unix environments./_description +defaultfalse/default I'm not a big fan of this. It mashes a

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:28:23PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: prelink. Ugh. ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink? What does it get us these days? I'm happy to back a feature to drop it. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ mat...@fedoraproject.org -- devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:21:18PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Remember this is removal from core NOT from the distribution.. Actually, it's about @standard, not @core. Keeping the core minimal makes sense but I think @standard should provide a comfortable working environment. People may

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 05:33:28PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: - packagereqtime/packagereq bash has this builtin; don't think the additional features warrant this on every non-minimal install. However, it has different semantics from the bash builtin, and it's likely that people have

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:09:28PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: telnet is easier, but that's a task that do not happen so often, and people who are able to perform it are also fully able to find the tool I think both the but and the and are not necessarily true. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/11/2013 02:14 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:35:46PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 11:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit : - packagereqtelnet/packagereq Nowadays it's

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Scherer
Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 08:05 -0600, Chris Adams a écrit : Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said: - packagereqed/packagereq I don't know how widely it is used, but ed is also part of POSIX/SUS. based on my understanding, POSIX do not mandate them to be there

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: And while I agree the goal to be POSIX compliant is nice, as far as i know, we are not, so we do not claim to be. ( ie, people cannot and should not expect the system to have theses utilities by default ). Yeah, but it's

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michal Schmidt
Dne 10.1.2013 21:28, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink? What does it get us these days? Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it was discussed here? prelink should not mess with running executables:

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink? What does it get us these days? Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it was discussed here? prelink should not mess with running executables:

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org said: On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink? What does it get us these days? Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it was discussed

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:55:21 -0500 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink? What does it get us these days? Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/11/2013 01:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: On 11 January 2013 11:32, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: Then its configure script likely honors --disable-silent-rules That works a treat, thanks. In both cases, it's worth contacting upstream to tell them about the harmfulness of

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.01.2013 11:35, schrieb Xose Vazquez Perez: On 01/11/2013 12:01 AM, William Brown wrote: Nothing I didn't know about it. Will read into it now. Maybe this shows that a documentation component is needed, to bridge the gap to say X tool is replaced by Y IE netstat - ss man

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:40:40 +0100 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: sarcasmoh yeah ss is a pretty clear and self explaining command/sarcasm if people would develop SMART repalcements they would call the binaries identical with compatible command line switches so a Obsoletes:

Re: gsoap updated to version 2.8.12 in rawhide

2013-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:32:12 +0100 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se wrote: Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.12 in rawhide only. Dependent packages (gfal, gridsite, lcgdm, lcgdm-dav, srm-ifce, voms) must rebuild. Thanks for the heads up. Next time can you

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:16:50 + Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On this theme, one other very useful thing we could improve in Koji for developer debug of failed builds, would be to capture the 'config.log' file from any autoconf based builds. Currently when I get stuck

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Vickery
Lennart, Just my $0.02 on halting the inclusion of these: we might want to make these available in case there is a user out there who can only afford the older hardware. On Jan 10, 2013 7:00 AM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: Heya, I noticed that comps' standard group

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Seth Vidal
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:16:50 + Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On this theme, one other very useful thing we could improve in Koji for developer debug of failed builds, would be to capture the 'config.log' file from any autoconf

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com said: ss is not command line compatible with netstart AFAIK. It provides similar information... And IMHO that is the problem. Why did someone see it as a good idea to develop a replacement for well-known commands (that have existed in various

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Scherer
Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 08:39 -0800, Richard Vickery a écrit : Lennart, Just my $0.02 on halting the inclusion of these: we might want to make these available in case there is a user out there who can only afford the older hardware. They are available, the point is to not install

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Chris Adams wrote: Why do people want to reinvent the wheel (and ignore all previous wheels)? Because choice. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Package Signature Checking During Installation

2013-01-11 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 21:49 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 20:41, Adam Jackson a écrit : For the same reason Firefox doesn't automatically accept self-signed SSL certs, and the same reason that ssh doesn't automatically accept new host keys: it'd be creating trust

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Package Signature Checking During Installation

2013-01-11 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: For the same reason Firefox doesn't automatically accept self-signed SSL certs, and the same reason that ssh doesn't automatically accept new host keys: it'd be creating trust from thin air. With secure boot disabled there's

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Jonathan Masters
Hi Lennart, I would like to remove finger from the list. It is still very much in use. I use it many times daily. I realize my use case is multiuser and server systems - not of interest to Fedora - but the overhead is little, so I would be grateful if it remained. Jon. -- Sent from my iPad

Re: Fedora ARM F18 Beta VFAD - Test Images posted

2013-01-11 Thread Jonathan Masters
Hey Lukas, I think the other (well meaning) responses haven't yet addressed your original question. For the record, for ARM development boards, we (Fedora ARM) ship prebuilt disk images suitable and intended for dd'ing onto a storage card for convenient installation. Other targets support

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 14:11 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, john.flor...@dart.biz john.flor...@dart.biz said: I use finger effectively without a finger server, on a single-user workstation (in multi-user mode, of course). I believe it's getting the data via NSS and in my case

Re: Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2013-01-09)

2013-01-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:15 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: * #963 change of names of configuration files (jwb, 18:15:11) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/963 (jwb, 18:15:12) * AGREED: firstboot is fixed so closing the ticket out and maintainers can fix remaining in the

Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-01-12

2013-01-11 Thread buildsys
Broken upgrade path report for tags f18 - f18-updates - f19: NetworkManager: f18 f19 (1:NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-12.git20121004.fc18 1:NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19) a2jmidid: f18 f19 (a2jmidid-8-3.fc18 a2jmidid-8-2.fc19) anaconda: f18 f19 (anaconda-18.37.11-1.fc18

Re: Fedora Windows Spice/Virtio KVM drivers and tools (was Re: Red Hat QXL GPU Driver for Windows 7?)

2013-01-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Simone Caronni wrote: I'm not asking for WHQL as I understand this is a benefit for the Redhat subscriptions. Actually WHQL simply cannot be done by Fedora even if we wanted to. It's an MSFT test programme that costs money, plus MSFT refuse to do it for

Re: rawhide report: 20130111 changes

2013-01-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:50:18PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: [libguestfs] 1:libguestfs-1.21.2-2.fc19.i686 requires libprocps.so.0 1:libguestfs-1.21.2-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libprocps.so.0()(64bit) Unfortunately FTBFS because of some incompatible change to the Ruby package

Fwd: [Design-team] gnome-shell design bug!

2013-01-11 Thread Christopher Meng
-- 转发的消息 -- 发件人:Marco Scannadinari ma...@scannadinari.co.uk 日期:2013-1-12 AM3:59 主题:[Design-team] gnome-shell design bug! 收件人: design-t...@lists.fedoraproject.org 抄送: Hi, none of you know me - I just joined the mailing list. Everyone can call me zheøffec (pronnounced jeff). I just

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-01-12

2013-01-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:04:54AM +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: ocaml-calendar: f18-updates f19 (ocaml-calendar-2.03.2-2.fc18 ocaml-calendar-2.03.2-1.fc19) ocaml-curses: f18-updates f19 (ocaml-curses-1.0.3-15.fc18 ocaml-curses-1.0.3-14.fc19) ocaml-fileutils:

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-01-12

2013-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:53:06 + Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: When I did the big OCaml codegen fix/update in F18 recently, I just bumped these package versions in Rawhide, merged the change back to F18, and rebuilt them only in F18. The upshot is that these aren't really a

File Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.12.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP: e462400b61c475143d3980ec1d74629a Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.12.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP] 1.12 bump

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 13fdc083a09a5d29330719ca8637c704f8c88c4d Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 11 10:07:55 2013 +0100 1.12 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP.spec | 47 +--- sources |2

[Bug 894195] duplicate directory ownership with perl-libs and perl

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 894179] perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.12 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894179 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 894270] New: perl-Growl-GNTP-0.16 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894270 Bug ID: 894270 Summary: perl-Growl-GNTP-0.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Growl-GNTP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 894271] New: perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.27 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894271 Bug ID: 894271 Summary: perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.27 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MogileFS-Utils Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

File MogileFS-Utils-2.27.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MogileFS-Utils: 9a115213687f651ff7279337d436ace1 MogileFS-Utils-2.27.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-MogileFS-Utils] 2.27 bump

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 5aba4d0fb0ad5b467fb1bf36395fbb9c8e4eaf75 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 11 10:55:59 2013 +0100 2.27 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-MogileFS-Utils.spec | 11 +++ sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5

[Bug 894271] perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.27 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894271 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 884354] CVE-2012-6329 perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884354 --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Created attachment 676781 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=676781action=edit Upstream fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 894195] duplicate directory ownership with perl-libs and perl

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195 --- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- Well, perl requires perl-libs, so the directory would not be unowned in any case ? ( and sorry to have waited to enter this bug, as you have already pushed a update for another

[Bug 894195] duplicate directory ownership with perl-libs and perl

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- (In reply to comment #2) Well, perl requires perl-libs, so the directory would not be unowned in any case ? Are you sure this is correct? I am not. Actually I think

File Growl-GNTP-0.16.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by churchyard

2013-01-11 Thread Miro Hrončok
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Growl-GNTP: c65c0d385c511979001eb0b55d90d159 Growl-GNTP-0.16.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Growl-GNTP] Upstream release 0.16

2013-01-11 Thread Miro Hrončok
commit 3182ceb46db57938a13bc148ff58c5be1400 Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz Date: Fri Jan 11 13:17:18 2013 +0100 Upstream release 0.16 .gitignore |1 + perl-Growl-GNTP.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3

[Bug 894195] duplicate directory ownership with perl-libs and perl

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195 --- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- From my chroot : # rpm -q --requires perl | grep libs perl-libs perl-libs = 4:5.16.2-244.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 894270] perl-Growl-GNTP-0.16 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894270 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[perl] Fix CVE-2012-6329

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit add42744d75d737dcb493ba01b05683774174465 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 11 13:42:11 2013 +0100 Fix CVE-2012-6329 ...5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch | 81 perl.spec | 10 ++- 2

[Bug 884363] perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[perl/f18] Fix CVE-2012-6329

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 6b14b9a82d9cf796ce290dbc29078f5471cb4147 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 11 13:42:11 2013 +0100 Fix CVE-2012-6329 ...5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch | 81 perl.spec | 10 ++- 2

[perl/f17] Fix CVE-2012-6329

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 07cc42ddefaa295b1a194d6a20d47f7da554eb73 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 11 13:42:11 2013 +0100 Fix CVE-2012-6329 ...5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch | 81 perl.spec | 10 ++- 2

[perl/f16] Fix CVE-2012-6329

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 900478ee676e4edd4225f1a569707385586dc8f3 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 11 13:42:11 2013 +0100 Fix CVE-2012-6329 ...5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch | 81 perl.spec | 10 ++- 2

[Bug 884363] perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

[Bug 884363] perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.2-237.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.16.2-237.fc18 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 893768] /usr/share/man/man3/App::Cpan.3pm.gz is duplicated between perl-CPAN and perl-Test-Harness

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893768 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.2-237.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.16.2-237.fc18 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 884363] perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.14.3-205.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.3-205.fc16 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 884363] perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.14.3-220.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.3-220.fc17 -- You are receiving this

File MIME-Types-1.38.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2013-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MIME-Types: 994baebea02be46123cc888da5b32b8d MIME-Types-1.38.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-MIME-Types] Update to 1.38

2013-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 8c99be467b5ef06e73ede4fb793e0f6ac3b8090e Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Fri Jan 11 13:46:06 2013 + Update to 1.38 - New upstream release 1.38: - Add application/vnd.ms-excel.template.macroEnabled.12 and five related from

[perl-MIME-Types] Created tag perl-MIME-Types-1.38-1.fc19

2013-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-MIME-Types-1.38-1.fc19' was created pointing to: 8c99be4... Update to 1.38 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894195] duplicate directory ownership with perl-libs and perl

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195 --- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- Created attachment 677016 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=677016action=edit patch to make the directory owned only by perl-libs Being allowed is not the

[Bug 786080] perl-Shipwright-2.4.33 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786080 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 885594] Upgrade to new upstream version

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885594 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- stompclt-0.7-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 879957] perl-Digest-SHA-5.74 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879957 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Digest-SHA-5.74-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 879957] perl-Digest-SHA-5.74 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879957 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 885741] perl-Test-Module-Used-0.2.4 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885741 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Test-Module-Used-0.2.4-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 885741] perl-Test-Module-Used-0.2.4 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885741 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 886801] perl-XML-Rules-1.15 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886801 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-XML-Rules-1.15-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 887477] perl-XML-Rules-1.16 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887477 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-XML-Rules-1.16-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 872995] perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic-0.14 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872995 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 872995] perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic-0.14 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872995 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic-0.14-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 887458] abi-compliance-checker-1.98.7 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887458 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- api-sanity-checker-1.98-1.fc18, abi-compliance-checker-1.98.7-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please

[Bug 885660] RFE: Upgrade to 1.280 for deps for GLib-GObject-Introspection

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885660 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 885660] RFE: Upgrade to 1.280 for deps for GLib-GObject-Introspection

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885660 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Glib-1.280-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

  1   2   >