Compose started at Mon Mar 24 08:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for x86_64
--
2ping-2.0-2.el7.noarch requires perl(Digest::CRC)
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires rdesktop
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires perl-Gtk2
Hello,
I would like, if anyoune have tried to get an Free RHEL Entitlement for EPEL
Developers in the
last few months and tell my anything about how long the processing time have
taken.
I have tried it in January of this years and saw no response until yes. I have
contact
Kevin, but he told
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:25:50 +0400
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-21 16:07 GMT+04:00 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org:
It doesn't exist, it's an idea that Robyn has floated
semi-seriously as a way to provide a repo that moves faster than
EPEL. Rather than try to
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:15:35 +0100
Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote:
Hello,
I would like, if anyoune have tried to get an Free RHEL Entitlement
for EPEL Developers in the last few months and tell my anything
about how long the processing time have taken.
I have tried it in
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
702
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
192
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11560/fail2ban-0.8.10-4.el5
156
Hey Everyone,
I've been trying to use clang package on Amazon linux via EPEL and have
installed version 3.4-9.el6 yet am unable to compile even the simplest of
programs:
#include iostream
int main(){
std::cout Hello World std::endl;
}
Saving the above into a file named
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Tyler Brock tyler.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I've been trying to use clang package on Amazon linux via EPEL and have
installed version 3.4-9.el6 yet am unable to compile even the simplest of
programs:
#include iostream
int main(){
I haven't used perltidy in quite a while so I've released its
ownership in pkgdb, hopefully someone who does goes and grabs it.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 03/11/2014 02:34 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Remember OSTree is a content-addressed object store (like git), not a chain
of deltas (like Subversion, and other systems out there such as Chromium
Autoupdate, and Docker).
On 24/03/14 08:41, Ville Skyttä wrote:
I haven't used perltidy in quite a while so I've released its
ownership in pkgdb, hopefully someone who does goes and grabs it.
Taken. Co-maintainers welcome.
Paul.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim
to be anything more than that, so I don't see the harm in leaving it there.
Le Jeu 20 mars 2014 20:44, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit :
I am giving you a standard enterprise problem.
I can confirm that thanks to the stability of the config file, tcpwrappers
is widely used here.
IPtables has just started getting some adoption (after years of turf wars
between firewall
Le Sam 22 mars 2014 01:20, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
The RHEL documentation, apart from fully describing the abilities,
specifically describes two uses: a ftpd banner
Surprisingly, ftp is still widely used entreprise-side, because ssh is
giving too much access, and no one released an easy to
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:55:34AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
One possible fix would be to rename 'qt' back to 'qt4' explicitly
That will have to happen soon anyway, with the move to Qt 5.
Is qt5 going to be shifted to be packaged as generic qt? Is there value in
doing that over leaving it
Am 24.03.2014 12:57, schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
Le Sam 22 mars 2014 01:20, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
The RHEL documentation, apart from fully describing the abilities,
specifically describes two uses: a ftpd banner
Surprisingly, ftp is still widely used entreprise-side, because ssh is
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Type-Tiny:
e1b0730e699d03cd82c240d79f64635f Type-Tiny-0.040.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/24/2014 01:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.03.2014 12:57, schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
Le Sam 22 mars 2014 01:20, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
The RHEL documentation, apart from fully describing the abilities,
specifically describes two uses: a ftpd banner
Surprisingly, ftp is still widely
Am 24.03.2014 13:21, schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 03/24/2014 01:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.03.2014 12:57, schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
Le Sam 22 mars 2014 01:20, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
The RHEL documentation, apart from fully describing the abilities,
specifically describes two uses: a
On 03/24/2014 01:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
It's still very difficult to securely process uploaded files under a different
user account. Some SFTP clients set
restrictive permissions on upload, and the OpenSSH implementation does not
allow to bypass that.
man umask
[root@rh:/downloads]$
Am 24.03.2014 13:26, schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 03/24/2014 01:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
It's still very difficult to securely process uploaded files under a
different user account. Some SFTP clients set
restrictive permissions on upload, and the OpenSSH implementation does not
allow
- Original Message -
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:55:34AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
One possible fix would be to rename 'qt' back to 'qt4' explicitly
That will have to happen soon anyway, with the move to Qt 5.
Is qt5 going to be shifted to be packaged as generic qt? Is there value
Le Sam 22 mars 2014 03:21, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
And you honestly believe that people who are capable enough of setting
up DNS locally and across the company in a secure way to do something
To set up DNS securely you need a handful of people to manage a master dns
and its slave on the
this is the proverbal security vs. convenience issue safety unfortunately
isn't convenient
Corey W Sheldon
Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine
310.909.7672
www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/24/2014 01:06 PM, Reindl
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim
to be anything more than
On 2014-03-17, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
I think it's time to remove the package from Fedora (21).
Nobody raised a hand, I'm going to retire the package.
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says 80% build
failure rate without saying that all are JavaDoc-related), we really
should do a mass rebuild to identify which packages fail to build *and* to
file bugs soonish, instead of
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
9 packages were orphaned
marco [epel7] was orphaned by raveit65
MATE Desktop window manager
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/marco
caja [epel7] was orphaned by
On 03/24/2014 04:49 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says 80% build
failure rate without saying that all are
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says 80% build
failure rate without saying that all are JavaDoc-related), we really
should do a mass rebuild to
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:46:15 -0600
Eric Smith space...@gmail.com wrote:
In bug #1079767, it is requested that the default configuration for
pam_abl be changed such that multiple root login failures from a
network host will (temporarily) blacklist that host. The existing
default configuration
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Quite a few people have asked me how the AppStream distro metadata is
actually generated for their package. Since F20 we're also doing
things like supply missing AppData files for some key apps, and
replacing some
My personal take is for desktop (normal end-user) that it stays as is or as
a option in an advanced options setting and in the server-land to make the
added DoS environment default as any of us in that realm should know not
only about to determine our environment's needs but how to adjust
Corey W
On 24 March 2014 17:15, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I taking a fundamentally wrong approach, or does something in the appdata
stack need to be taught about file:// URLs?
Are you installing them with the package? I guess file:// could make
sense, so if that's what you're doing can
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.comwrote:
Are you installing them with the package? I guess file:// could make
sense, so if that's what you're doing can you file a bug in
https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/tree/master/libappstream-glib
please and we'll
I'd be willing to host some space on a time-based setup as my server and
home system are not always on (running live-static blogs) but hit me up if
need be also I run fc20 sec xfce x86 if you need help with outreach or
testing on other WMs
Corey W Sheldon
Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine
On Thu, 20.03.14 18:34, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
Heya!
I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in
Fedora. There has been a request in systemd upstream to disable support
for it by default, but I am not sure I want to do that unless we can
On 24 March 2014 12:18, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
It's a pity though that nobody in Fedora is actively working on getting
rid of legacy cruft. I really wished we had some people who oversee
deprecating things more proactively, figure out how to deprecate things,
write
Hi Corey,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Corey Sheldon sheldon.co...@gmail.comwrote:
I'd be willing to host some space on a time-based setup as my server and
home system are not always on (running live-static blogs) but hit me up if
need be also I run fc20 sec xfce x86 if you need help
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:18:58PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I am not going to file a feature for Fedora, to remove support for it
entirely across the whole distro. I still think dropping it is the right
thing to do, but I don't think it's a good use of my own time, to fight
this
The HP Dl140 G3 has MCA based graphics. F20 seems to be mainly fixed
apart from MCA based Anaconda, which gets the resolution wrong, the
screen being too small for the Anaconda graphics.
VESA setup mode works fine however.
On 17 March 2014 22:02, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On
On 03/24/2014 06:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 24 March 2014 12:18, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
mailto:mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
It's a pity though that nobody in Fedora is actively working on
getting
rid of legacy cruft. I really wished we had some
On 03/24/2014 06:18 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
It's a pity though that nobody in Fedora is actively working on getting
rid of legacy cruft. I really wished we had some people who oversee
deprecating things more proactively, figure out how to deprecate things,
write stub code to provide
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:21:51PM +, Aaron Gray wrote:
The HP Dl140 G3 has MCA based graphics. F20 seems to be mainly fixed
apart from MCA based Anaconda, which gets the resolution wrong, the
screen being too small for the Anaconda graphics.
VESA setup mode works fine however.
Ah. You
On 24 March 2014 19:01, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, I appreciate the offer. However, I think I'm going to use my
fedorapeople.org space for this purpose. Hopefully it won't be needed for
long, anyway (/me crosses fingers).
Yes, I think fedorapeople.org is fine for
Am 24.03.2014 20:27, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
But certain people seem to rather want to drown Fedora in bureaucracy and
vague future proposals
and working groups instead of doing what needs to be done.
no, certain people want to do something *useful* with their sytems and precious
Am 24.03.2014 20:30, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
Being at the bleeding edge of things also means deciding that
some things really should go, from time to time... Besides deprecating
old cruft like libwrap, this would also mean removing all the old crap
from comps standard that we still
2014-03-23 3:48 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
When we say that there should be high bar for becoming a Fedora
Product,
that means that there should be few of them,
I see this repeated over and over by several people. This strikes me as
quite the
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC, 17:00 Central Europe, 12:00 (noon)
Boston, 9:00 San Francisco, 1:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
* chair(wo)man - I'm on different meeting, could someone handle it?
* work more on Open Questions:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Any other DE that wants to meet the requirements for Workstation is similarly
welcome.
So if we meet the requirements exactly what happens?
As far as I understand, all MATE would have to do is use gdm as the
display
On Mon, 24.03.14 20:59, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 24.03.2014 20:27, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
But certain people seem to rather want to drown Fedora in bureaucracy and
vague future proposals
and working groups instead of doing what needs to be done.
no,
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Yeah, this idea of having to install GNOME first to be able to install the
desktop you actually want is totally wacky, and if that is really what we
recommend to our users, they will run to other distributions (that
Hi all,
In case readers don't know, this page describes what a merge review is:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Merge_Reviews
In short: when fedora core and extras merged, a Package Review was opened for
every package in core. The idea was that every core package would be reviewed
to ensure it
Am 24.03.2014 21:32, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 24.03.14 20:59, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 24.03.2014 20:27, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
But certain people seem to rather want to drown Fedora in bureaucracy and
vague future proposals
and working groups
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
this through... I'd be happy though if somebody else would pick this
up. Looking at the current FESCO members I am not entirely sure though
whether a proposal to disable libwrap would have a chance in the current
cycle though. (also, M. Miller
On Mon, 24.03.14 21:45, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
and that is the problem with you attitude
Okeydokey, as you wish, you are now in my killfile.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 24.03.2014 21:51, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 24.03.14 21:45, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
and that is the problem with you attitude
Okeydokey, as you wish, you are now in my killfile
so what - why should i case about beeing in the killfile
of people which
I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in
Fedora. There has been a request in systemd upstream to disable support
for it by default, but I am not sure I want to do that unless we can
maybe say goodbye to it for the big picture too.
I have decided now to drop all
Am 24.03.2014 22:22, schrieb Peter Robinson:
Interesting! You sent the email starting this thread a mere 4 days
ago, two of those a weekend. You've not given it a chance to even go
to FESCo meeting for discussion. Did you send it in the same way to
the rest of the distros that depend, or are
On Mar 24, 2014, at 5:38 AM, Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Donald,
welcome to our mailing list.
- Original Message -
From: Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io
To: python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:19:49 PM
Subject: PEP453 // ensurepip
On Mon, 24.03.14 21:22, Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote:
Interesting! You sent the email starting this thread a mere 4 days
ago, two of those a weekend. You've not given it a chance to even go
to FESCo meeting for discussion. Did you send it in the same way to
the rest of the
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 21:22 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in
Fedora. There has been a request in systemd upstream to disable support
for it by default, but I am not sure I want to do that unless we can
maybe say goodbye to
On 03/24/2014 09:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in
Fedora. There has been a request in systemd upstream to disable support
for it by default, but I am not sure I want to do that unless we can
maybe say goodbye to it for the big
Am 24.03.2014 22:53, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
By the way the kernel does not have a proper deprecation process which is
accurately reflected in all the code that
is bit-rotting there so it's not the holy grail of code maintenance as you
let it out to be
the kernel at least has the
2014-03-24 22:53 GMT+01:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
systemd is now, or soon will be, a core component of pretty much all
major and minor distributions out there and it's no longer just about
you Lennart and your thoughts of whether it's Yuck! or not, you are
now similar to
On 03/24/2014 10:23 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
That doesn't work.
On the contrary if it did not the business module Red Hat is build upon
would not exist since Red Hat is making money out of stability promises
to it's customers which upstream is not providing right.
Unfortunately a
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:41:29PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
An alternative would be to reassign every open merge review to the component
in question, and let maintainers handle it as they like.
Thoughts?
Alternative idea -- maybe identify all packages which are not ciritcal and
have an
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:38 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
You always make sense. But nobody listens.
Who the hell wants to install Gnome to install MATE or KDE or XFCE?
Nobody, it's madness.
I'm pretty sure everyone agrees that spins are here to stay. Are spins
the best solution to this problem?
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 19:07 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:38 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
You always make sense. But nobody listens.
Who the hell wants to install Gnome to install MATE or KDE or XFCE?
Nobody, it's madness.
I think this is rather overstating the
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 17:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Saying that nobody wants this, it's madness, totally wacky,
almost all users are NOT going to put up with this is going rather
too
far. I think it's entirely worth the Desktop product making this
possible and I suspect quite a lot of
Is there a policy that for different Fedora.next products, we can
apply different rules?
Or just add comments in the conf?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079528
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47740
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47740/0001-Ticket-47740-Fix-coverity-issues-part-7.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47752
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47752/0001-Ticket-47752-Don-t-add-unhashed-password-mod-if-we-d.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
73 matches
Mail list logo
