I like Stephen's idea. That is how we handle python 3 packages in the IUS repo.
python32
python32-setuptools
etc.
python33
python33-setuptools
etc.
python34u
python34u-setuptools
To avoid conflicts/confusion with SCL or EPEL packages, all future IUS packages
will be suffixed with a u (such
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:51:00PM +0200, Honza Horak wrote:
However, there are and will be cases where somebody would like to
create a non-SCL RPM depended on a software collection, which is
something not
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
10
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2325/thunderbird-enigmail-1.7.2-1.el7
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2573/pdns-recursor-3.6.1-1.el7
0
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
873
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
205
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6
92
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 08:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Ok, but on this case we have both vpnc and vpnc-script from
vpnc.spec. If vpnc-script becomes a separate package (with its own
repository), does it qualify as new package? If not (as it is
already there) what would be the process
libinput 0.6 had a soname bump. I've rebuilt clutter, mutter, weston and
xorg-x11-drv-libinput already, there doesn't seem anything else that relies
on it.
Cheers,
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
Compose started at Fri Sep 12 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) = 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
Broken deps for i386
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[audtty]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2014 02:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 08:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Ok, but on this case we have both vpnc and vpnc-script from
vpnc.spec. If vpnc-script becomes a separate package (with its
own
Last long status report of Benedikt about build requires cleanup, he has
to go back to the university full time now. :(
Discussion about fakesystemd and systemd-container, but really need
Lennart for that. Will postpone more of that till later.
Thanks regards, Phil
Minutes:
Agenda:
- Update on draft for /etc changes (Harald Vaclav)
- buildrequires cleanup quick updte
- Open Floor
Thanks regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 7 (TC7)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5940#comment:11 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and
If you have one, please send it to me with some explanation of what it
is and why it is important.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
== The Problem ==
It is very common for users to have systems with encrypted root
partitions (or even just /var and /etc). This may be due to a personal
concern for their data or a corporate policy mandating full-disk
encryption. Disk encryption
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:46:49 -0400,
Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
If you have one, please send it to me with some explanation of what it
is and why it is important.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/ChangeSet#Format_Security
This will make buffer overflow bugs a bit
On 12 September 2014 16:16, Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
Yeah, I almost never use the reboot install method. 90% of the
packages being installed/updated seem foolish to need a reboot to
update.
I've been called worse that foolish I guess...
I typically do a yum update
On 09/12/2014 10:09 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Is there a magic repoquery that I could run, or some other way to search
through all source rpm files?
Unfortunately, no. Some packages compile with their local copy of valgrind.h and
it won't appear in a -devel or -debuginfo package due to special
Am 12.09.2014 um 18:33 schrieb Nathanael d. Noblet:
So I don't use Firefox anymore but I do know back in the day if we had
FF open when we updated it would do a double request for each page/form.
However when updating we just restarted FF and it would work fine after
that. I've never noticed
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 16:47 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 12 September 2014 16:16, Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
Yeah, I almost never use the reboot install method. 90% of the
packages being installed/updated seem foolish to need a reboot to
update.
I've been called
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 06:37:07PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
* lsof | grep DEL | grep /usr and restart services on servers
There is a convenient script called needs-restarting to do this.
Checkrestart on debian even suggest potential init scripts that can be
used to restart the services.
--
On 09/07/2014 12:24 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
However there is a wider problem here. The systemd of Fedora 14/15
is not the systemd of today.
I agree 100%
We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core
package into Fedora 4 years ago, that means you can forever more
Am 12.09.2014 um 18:58 schrieb Till Maas:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 06:37:07PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
* lsof | grep DEL | grep /usr and restart services on servers
There is a convenient script called needs-restarting to do this.
Checkrestart on debian even suggest potential init
On 12/09/14 01:08 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On 09/07/2014 12:24 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
However there is a wider problem here. The systemd of Fedora 14/15
is not the systemd of today.
I agree 100%
We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core
package into Fedora 4
On 09/12/2014 05:09 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
valgrind 3.10.0 was just released and I created packages for rawhide and
f21. Then I noticed some packages include their own copy of valgrind.h
(at least libsecret, gcr, libgnome-keyring, realmd, ipxe and pidgin).
Not directly related to your
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Denys Vlasenko dvlas...@redhat.com wrote:
You are wasting your time. Lennart and his bunch proved to be impervious
to any pleas to stop mad feature creep.
They WANT to extend systemd in every imaginable way to scratch their
favorite itch of the week. It's not
On Sex, 2014-09-12 at 19:08 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On 09/07/2014 12:24 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
However there is a wider problem here. The systemd of Fedora 14/15
is not the systemd of today.
I agree 100%
We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core
Hi Josh,
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 08:47 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
On 09/12/2014 08:09 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Is there a magic repoquery that I could run, or some other way to search
through all source rpm files?
The header should be captured in debuginfo sources, so:
$ repoquery
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 11:25 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 09/12/2014 10:09 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Is there a magic repoquery that I could run, or some other way to search
through all source rpm files?
Unfortunately, no. Some packages compile with their local copy of valgrind.h
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 19:38 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/12/2014 05:09 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
valgrind 3.10.0 was just released and I created packages for rawhide and
f21. Then I noticed some packages include their own copy of valgrind.h
(at least libsecret, gcr, libgnome-keyring,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:18:23 +0100
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
colord creates an extra-profiles subpackage that splits out some
extra, lesser user profiles. These are no-arch, but it appears that on
different architectures
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:33:13AM -0600, Nathanael d. Noblet wrote:
I am curious though. Everyone says the only way to do it securely and
safely is with nothing running. Why can't updates be applied with stuff
running prior to a reboot?
There's no reason, apart from the kernel. You're doing
Am 12.09.2014 um 23:36 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:33:13AM -0600, Nathanael d. Noblet wrote:
I am curious though. Everyone says the only way to do it securely and
safely is with nothing running. Why can't updates be applied with stuff
running prior to a reboot?
On Friday, September 12, 2014, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:46:49 -0400,
Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
If you have one, please send it to me with some explanation of what it
is and why it is important.
bodhi -n -r F20 -t enhancement 'see http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/'
kdiff3-0.9.98-2.fc20
Creating a new update for see
http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/,kdiff3-0.9.98-2.fc20
Password for nbecker:
Creating a new update for see
http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/,kdiff3-0.9.98-2.fc20
On Sep 12, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
The *only* way to do this
securely and safely in the system we have now is in a clean pre-boot
environment,
Mostly clean post-boot environment, with the system we have now?
What we could do is do updates on shutdown by
On 09/12/2014 10:53 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 19:38 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/12/2014 05:09 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
valgrind 3.10.0 was just released and I created packages for rawhide and
f21. Then I noticed some packages include their own copy of valgrind.h
(at
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 11:25 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
You'll have to download all the source and perform a massive grep.
Yeah, that is sadly not going to happen.
FWIW, searchcode.com can search through Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059643
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141117
Bug ID: 1141117
Summary: perl Tk applications crash with perl 5.20.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Tk
Assignee: andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141117
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1136197, 1136237
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136197
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1141117
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136334
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1141117
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141117
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1136334
Referenced
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-12.fc21.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-12.fc21.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-12.fc21.noarch requires
perl-Tk-Pod has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Tk-Pod-0.9942-3.fc21.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
On i386:
perl-Tk-Pod-0.9942-3.fc21.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Tk-Pod-0.9942-3.fc21.noarch requires
perl-Tk-EntryCheck has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Tk-EntryCheck-0.04-7.fc21.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
On i386:
perl-Tk-EntryCheck-0.04-7.fc21.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.18()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
slic3r has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-1.1.5-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
slic3r-1.1.5-1.fc21.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.18()(64bit)
On i386:
slic3r-1.1.5-1.fc21.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141153
Bug ID: 1141153
Summary: perl-Padre-0.90-13.fc22 FTBFS: a test fails due a
warning
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Padre
Assignee:
commit 5ebcd6fb4ebe5584e44084831772e9ea5785eca6
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Fri Sep 12 13:48:06 2014 +0200
Clean up spec file
perl-Math-Random-ISAAC.spec | 20 +++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141117
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141117
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 98831
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141117
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #1)
Applying upstream patches helps. Then all Tk tests pass except one. See CPAN
RT#98831.
liberation-sans-fonts is needed. The test is sensitive to
commit 4f1ab03e14369d6168a082d55c6fada3178acc10
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Sep 12 15:06:54 2014 +0200
Enable X11 tests
perl-Tk.spec | 16 ++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Tk.spec b/perl-Tk.spec
index
commit ac137c122917fa3ca7e7c5be5f8e2e05d5945ffe
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Sep 12 14:03:39 2014 +0200
Fix creating a window with perl 5.20 and freetype detection
...4.032-fix-race-condition-in-errordialog.t.patch | 72
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141222
Bug ID: 1141222
Summary: Perl pulls in unneeded dependencies
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter: vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141222
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
commit a0f6e2739a976c96bec2b44c2258defca3d413dc
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Sep 12 15:48:21 2014 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Tk.spec | 43 +++
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138971
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
commit 5318b5fe8947e4f88611b070717cf63839844c83
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@worldbroken.com
Date: Fri Sep 12 11:10:36 2014 -0400
Update to version 1.35
Update to version 1.35 which returns the module to full functionality
with perl = 5.20
perl-Regexp-Grammars.spec |8
commit 49435d6c9a9719afb6f1476279855a1852898184
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@worldbroken.com
Date: Fri Sep 12 11:32:47 2014 -0400
Add 1.035 source
Apparently this didn't get uploaded before
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
commit 6049c1128b174cd8640593000cc98addfb67a27e
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@worldbroken.com
Date: Fri Sep 12 11:34:48 2014 -0400
Bump release to deal with fedpkg problems I'm having
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Regexp-Grammars.spec |5 -
sources |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126336
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mo:
ca78065005a2a06a20fc3c580a3f7abf Mo-0.39.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a30b82dcbc52271d5eee2b72013d5fe351fed14b
Merge: 7386969 d0901b8
Author: David Dick dd...@cpan.org
Date: Sat Sep 13 08:01:57 2014 +1000
Upgrade to 0.39
perl-Mo.spec |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --cc perl-Mo.spec
index ead269d,6352453..34c894e
commit 7386969c1e62a0b0999f16aa7b3f8835acc9d4b9
Author: David Dick dd...@cpan.org
Date: Sat Sep 13 08:01:08 2014 +1000
Upgrade to 0.39
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Mo.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
Summary of changes:
7386969... Upgrade to 0.39
a30b82d... Upgrade to 0.39
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Summary of changes:
d0901b8... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
7386969... Upgrade to 0.39 (*)
a30b82d... Upgrade to 0.39 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
d0901b8... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
7386969... Upgrade to 0.39 (*)
a30b82d... Upgrade to 0.39 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138279
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Mo-0.39-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mo-0.39-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138279
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Mo-0.39-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mo-0.39-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141389
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141390
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47750
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47750/0001-Ticket-47750-Fix-incomplete-backport-to-1.3.1-1.2.11.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47892/0001-Ticket-47892-coverity-defects-found-in-1.3.3.1.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 09/12/2014 12:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47892/0001-Ticket-47892-coverity-defects-found-in-1.3.3.1.patch
ACK.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
76 matches
Mail list logo
