Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

And openpgpkey-milter :) And put in a TLSA record for their MX :) Paul Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 5, 2015, at 10:58, Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > On a related note to that, it would be great if active Fedora contributors do > get to use an SMTP server with

Re: bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:00:27 + (UTC) Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2015-10-03, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:46:02 +0300 > > Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > >> For the last couple of days I have been submitting updates

[Bug 1250756] perl-REST-Client-273 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250756 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

2015-10-05 Fedora QA Devel Meeting Minutes

= #fedora-meeting-1: fedora-qadevel = Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-05/fedora-qadevel.2015-10-05-14.00.html Minutes (text):

Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

Am 05.10.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen: On 4 October 2015 at 03:03, Reindl Harald wrote: is there a reason that the list-subdomain has a SPF record but the main domain not? now that as example "bo...@fedoraproject.org" sends a lot of mails it would make

[Bug 1268778] CVE-2015-7686 perl-Email-Address: denial of service when parsing crafted email address list [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268778 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- There is no clear fix to this issue yet. As the CVE email notes, updating to 1.908 does not resolve the problem entirely. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

Self Introduction: Florian Weimer

I recently joined the Red Hat tools team, to work on glibc with Carlos O'Donell. As a result, I will co-maintain glibc in Fedora. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 97 packages were orphaned - SDL_gfx [f23, f22, f21, master, el6, epel7, el5] was orphaned by kevin SDL graphics drawing primitives and other support functions

psabata pushed to perl-Module-ScanDeps (f23). "1.20 bump"

From ec572c2b43d87ac9dab009513148ac5c8f125876 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:07:37 +0200 Subject: 1.20 bump diff --git a/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec b/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec index 1de47fb..2d74dcb 100644 ---

Re: Self Introduction: Florian Weimer

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 03:11:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 03:47:22PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > I recently joined the Red Hat tools team, to work on glibc with Carlos > > O'Donell. As a result, I will co-maintain glibc in Fedora. > > Welcome to the

spot pushed to perl-Devel-Cover (f21). "rebuild to squelch noise"

From 687b5a2182482fe5f80763e5573d063df882ca72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:28:49 +0100 Subject: rebuild to squelch noise diff --git a/perl-Devel-Cover.spec b/perl-Devel-Cover.spec index 62c0c1a..f5b2528 100644 ---

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 00:01:11 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:53:35PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:46:57PM +, Zbigniew > > Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > > > >

psabata pushed to perl-Module-ScanDeps (master). "1.20 bump"

From ec572c2b43d87ac9dab009513148ac5c8f125876 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:07:37 +0200 Subject: 1.20 bump diff --git a/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec b/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec index 1de47fb..2d74dcb 100644 ---

psabata uploaded Module-ScanDeps-1.20.tar.gz for perl-Module-ScanDeps

283e4d4f215d6ce6a05c13e9b740f842 Module-ScanDeps-1.20.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Module-ScanDeps/Module-ScanDeps-1.20.tar.gz/md5/283e4d4f215d6ce6a05c13e9b740f842/Module-ScanDeps-1.20.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1237116] perl-Compress-LZF-3.8 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237116 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1268881 --- Comment

Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

On 4 October 2015 at 03:03, Reindl Harald wrote: > is there a reason that the list-subdomain has a SPF record but the main > domain not? now that as example "bo...@fedoraproject.org" sends a lot of > mails it would make sense to shortciruit them as ham on spamfilters as it

Re: scriplet issues installing deps in f23 mock

Tracked under: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268883 What we know so far is: * it happen under F23 * it works in F22 * it works with dnf * it does not work with yum. So "mock --dnf" can be used as temporary workaround for those who are blocked by this. -- Miroslav Suchy,

spot pushed to perl-Devel-Cover (f22). "rebuild"

From c0ecc98b72f0ea50ecf16d93e20f45a6063a6b9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:33:20 +0100 Subject: rebuild diff --git a/perl-Devel-Cover.spec b/perl-Devel-Cover.spec index d6c8619..cd68869 100644 --- a/perl-Devel-Cover.spec +++

Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

On a related note to that, it would be great if active Fedora contributors do get to use an SMTP server with SPF and DKIM set up. -- Michel On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:43, Reindl Harald pisze: > >> well, that

Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:47:09 +0200 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:43, Reindl Harald pisze: > > well, that people should send their mail from the Fedora servers and > > not from a wrong configured random MTA allowing random envelope > > senders > >

Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:04:40 -0400 Paul Wouters wrote: > And openpgpkey-milter :) > > And put in a TLSA record for their MX :) I don't think it makes much sense for Fedora Infrastructure to get into the business of being a SMTP server provider. Is this something that would help

Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

Am 05.10.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz: W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:43, Reindl Harald pisze: well, that people should send their mail from the Fedora servers and not from a wrong configured random MTA allowing random envelope senders Many of those people send their mail from properly

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

On 10/01/2015 06:34 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> suitesparse (el5) >> suitesparse (f21) >> suitesparse (f22) >> suitesparse (f23) >> suitesparse (master) > > I checked - the package is orphaned, but it does have 3 > "administrators" - should I

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

On Oct 5, 2015 6:23 AM, "Michael Catanzaro" wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 13:58 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > The rawhide chrony package is now compiled with the seccomp support, > > but the filtering is not enabled by default. The trouble is it has to > > cover all

Re: Self Introduction: Florian Weimer

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 03:47:22PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > I recently joined the Red Hat tools team, to work on glibc with Carlos > O'Donell. As a result, I will co-maintain glibc in Fedora. Welcome to the Fedora development community. Let me know if you have any questions about how to

[Bug 1268706] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268706 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.20-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-a967da8f7c -- You are receiving this

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 5 October 2015 at 05:09, Dave Love wrote: > Tom Hughes writes: > >> Recently I even saw a case of a header only C++ library bundling >> another C++ head library which raises slightly metaphysical questions >> since dependants of a header only library

[Bug 1268823] Rebuild perl-Devel-Cover against the latest perl in stable branches

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268823 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1268823] Rebuild perl-Devel-Cover against the latest perl in stable branches

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268823 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Devel-Cover-1.03-6.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-09fc819bca -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 07:02 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Why is the filter causing SIGSYS instead of forcing an ENOSYS return? > > I'll look into the abrt thing. It might be an easy fix. > > --Andy Simply because it's an experimental project, and it's much easier to crash with a core dump

Re: bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

On 2015-10-05, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:00:27 + (UTC) > Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2015-10-03, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> > Almost all notifications from bodhi (with the exception currently of >> > adding comments on updates) is

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

On 10/05/2015 04:52 PM, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi Kalev, > > > > i am the packager of the package vdr-live (martinkg). > > > > vdr-live has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: > On x86_64: > vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.x86_64 requires > libtntnet.so.12()(64bit) >

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 17:27 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > Another possibility is to add a new level to the chrony seccomp > support that would use a blacklisting approach, disabling syscalls or > their arguments that historically are most dangerous and we can be > sure won't be ever needed. I

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 07:02 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> Why is the filter causing SIGSYS instead of forcing an ENOSYS return? >> >> I'll look into the abrt thing. It might be an easy fix. >> >> --Andy > >

Fedora 23 Branched 20151005 compose check report

No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151004 No images in 23 Branched 20151004 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 9 of 52 ID: 4796Test: x86_64 universal server_scsi_updates_img ID: 4793Test: i386 kde_live default_install ID: 4792

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:23:05AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > (Also fun is to try making the same list of filters work across > distros.) And across supported architectures. So far, I tested it only on x86_64 and i686 and there were quite a few differences. I would be surprised if it

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

Dne 5.10.2015 v 17:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > On 10/05/2015 04:52 PM, Martin Gansser wrote: >> Hi Kalev, >> >> >> >> i am the packager of the package vdr-live (martinkg). >> >> >> >> vdr-live has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: >> On x86_64: >>

[no subject]

Hi, My name is Martin Hagström and I have just submitted my first package review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268910 I have been using Linux for about a decade and have been a Linux Systems Administrator for the last three years. In this job I have done quite a bit of

Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:58, Reindl Harald pisze: Am 05.10.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz: Many of those people send their mail from properly configured MTA allowing random envelope senders for authenticated users well, and that's why spamfighting is that complicated a MTA

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

mån 2015-10-05 klockan 14:59 +0200 skrev Kalev Lember: > Hi all, > > Here's another look at F23 broken dependencies. A number of packages > have been fixed last week, but there's also a new broken dependency, > CableSwig, due to gccxml retirement. There is a replacement for gccxml available

Re: bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

On 10/05/2015 09:21 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:00:27 + (UTC) > Petr Pisar wrote: > >> On 2015-10-03, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:46:02 +0300 >>> Alexander Ploumistos wrote: For the last

Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

Am 05.10.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:04:40 -0400 Paul Wouters wrote: And openpgpkey-milter :) And put in a TLSA record for their MX :) I don't think it makes much sense for Fedora Infrastructure to get into the business of being a SMTP server

Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

Am 05.10.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz: W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:58, Reindl Harald pisze: Am 05.10.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz: Many of those people send their mail from properly configured MTA allowing random envelope senders for authenticated users well, and

Re: SPF records @fedoraproject.org versus @lists.fedoraproject.org

On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:04:40 -0400 Paul Wouters wrote: And openpgpkey-milter :) And put in a TLSA record for their MX :) I don't think it makes much sense for Fedora Infrastructure to get into the business of being a SMTP server

<    1   2