Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:50:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > em* and p?p? come from biosdevname, which should not be used and is > > deprecated. > > I'm merely observing what happened when I updated a bunch of servers > from F22 to F23. I didn't intentionally install nor uninstall bio

Re: What's the current status of mp3-licensing issues?

I believe that the current status of mp3 is it is patent free in the US and most or all of the rest of the world. Analysis after the quoted portion. On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:36:07 -0400, "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 10:47 +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> What about US? > >

COPR service announcement: builds failed last night

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, Due to issues with the metalink for f22 and f23 updates on ppc64 last night, a lot of COPR tasks have failed their ppc64le chroot builds. If you see that the x86_64 builds of of your task have succeeded, but the ppc64le builds failed, please

Re: Review requests that need reviewers

Hi Tom, Taken! can you take these for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995433 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995435 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995444 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258274 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266805

Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 17:11 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 13:56 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Kamil Paral wrote: > > > So we could ignore freeze just for packages not being on any install > > > medium. But then I'm not sure how much that is helpful and it might be > > > dif

Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 13:56 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kamil Paral wrote: > > So we could ignore freeze just for packages not being on any install > > medium. But then I'm not sure how much that is helpful and it might be > > difficult to implement this in Bodhi. > > In the old manual process, I

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On 11/09/2015 03:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.11.2015 um 23:57 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 11/09/2015 02:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Samuel Sieb: So yes, I'm using 10 year old hardware with the latest Fedora and it works great. (I'll update them to F23 next t

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > about money: with the energy costs i saved going away from P4 computers many > years ago my current one is already paied Nobody is saying that a newer computer won't save you money on the power bill. What they have repeatedly stated and for

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Am 09.11.2015 um 23:57 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 11/09/2015 02:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Samuel Sieb: So yes, I'm using 10 year old hardware with the latest Fedora and it works great. (I'll update them to F23 next time I'm there.) well, i tell you know the sa

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Reindl Harald composed on 2015-11-09 23:22 (UTC+0100): > *yes* capable hardware these days is cheap if you don't need that much > performance Unless and until hardware prices drop to zero, there will be users for whom any cost is an insurmountable hurdle. And, there will remain users content wit

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On 11/09/2015 02:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Samuel Sieb: I manage all the IT for a private school. There is a computer lab for the students to use. They don't have the money to buy new computers, the computers they have were donated. They are P4 desktops from a

Review requests that need reviewers

The easy ones (some R packages I need as deps for updating R-DBI): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277933 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277956 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277961 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277966 https://bugzilla.redhat.

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Am 09.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 11/07/2015 10:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: these days (and i talk about hardware from 2011) you can virtualize things fast, easy and efficient and consolidate machines on more or less cheap hardware For servers, sure, but that doesn't work for de

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On 11/07/2015 10:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: these days (and i talk about hardware from 2011) you can virtualize things fast, easy and efficient and consolidate machines on more or less cheap hardware For servers, sure, but that doesn't work for desktops. talking about a rapid moving distribu

Re: Orphaning JBoss Tools package

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:22:57PM +, Gerard Ryan wrote: > On 11/02/2015 11:49 PM, Marcus Karlsson wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 03:56:15PM +, Gerard Ryan wrote: > >> Hi devel list (and cc'ed eclipse-sig list), > >> > >> I'm going to orphan the eclipse-jbosstools package in rawhide, as

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:55:40PM +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Am 08.11.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: > >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most > >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb

Re: daveisfera's odb_2.3_cern copr build of odb for epel-5-i386 finished with 'failed'

I finally open a ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273738 On Qua, 2015-10-28 at 18:17 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > On Dom, 2015-10-25 at 20:50 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > > The links in the above email don't work. For example, the "Build log" > > link says "Content

Re: koschei/koji build failures

On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 13:40:16 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > ok. I think this might be: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264198 > which is an rpm bug fixed in rawhide, but not yet in f23. > > We need a f23 update with that fixed and we can try again. There's now a f23 update, I have

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Sun, 2015-11-08 at 20:36 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 08.11.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: > >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most > >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb se

Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

> From: "Matthew Miller" > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 04:24:07PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Btw, it's odd already that "dnf update rpm*.rpm" refuses to install > > packages that are not installed as older version. Compare that with > > "rpm -Uvh …" and "rpm -Fvh …". It would make sense to

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Am 08.11.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Björn Persson: > Christopher wrote: >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from >> em1 to eno1. > > On any computer where it matters which network interface i

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Am 08.11.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from >> em1 to eno1. >> >> Is this som

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 7 packages were orphaned bouncycastle [el6, epel7, el5] was orphaned by stevetraylen Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Java https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/pack

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On 11/08/2015 07:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from em1 to eno1. Is this something that

Re: [HEADS UP] Ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in Rawhide

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/04/2015 06:23 AM, Robert Kuska wrote: > There is ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in rawhide's side-tag > f24-python3. > > I would like to ask all maintainers to rebuild their packages > (which depend on python3) within the f24-python3 side-tag. >

Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 04:24:07PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Btw, it's odd already that "dnf update rpm*.rpm" refuses to install > packages that are not installed as older version. Compare that with > "rpm -Uvh …" and "rpm -Fvh …". It would make sense to mimic those > two commands in tools t

Fedora Rawhide 20151109 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Generic boot i386 Generic boot x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151108: Workstation disk raw armhfp No images in Rawhide 20151108 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 4 of 5 ID: 8054

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Their NICs changed from p6p1 -> enp3s0. It was annoying because I had > to boot each one with a display and keyboard and change the network > configuration by hand. > > "predictable, stable network interface names" > https://wiki.freedesktop.org/www/Software/systemd/Pr

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Kalev Lember wrote: > I wonder if it might be a good time to bump the i686 minimal > requirements for F24 to include sse2. Not for performance reasons, but > for compatibility: almost all developers are on x86_64 these days and > i686 is pretty much just limping along. If we include sse2 on i686, t

Re: COPR for ARM?

On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 18:36 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 7 November 2015 at 17:51, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Stephen John Smoogen < > > smo...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Nov 7, 2015 13:50, "Neal Gompa" wrote: > > > > > > > > Why don't we d

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Rex Dieter wrote: > Qt5 (Gui and Declarative) pretty much requires sse2, and I/kde-sig asked > about pushing the minimum i686 fedora spec to include sse2, but fesco was > against that idea at the time. For what it's worth, I was against it. Using /usr/lib/sse2 as we do now works just fine as a so

Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

Kamil Paral wrote: > So we could ignore freeze just for packages not being on any install > medium. But then I'm not sure how much that is helpful and it might be > difficult to implement this in Bodhi. In the old manual process, I just had to ask rel-eng and they'd blanket-OK freeze overrides fo

Re: F24: no rsyslog forwarding

Am 07.11.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 01:31:11PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 07.11.2015 um 12:59 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 06:20:39PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 06.11.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Subhendu Gh

Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

> Very frequently in such cases the entire test matrix is not completely > retested. A lot of prior tests a carried over because they're known > (or strongly suspected) of not having been touched in any way by the > fix of one or two blocker bugs. > > If hundreds of packages get unfrozen and sync'

Re: Review swap: openmx

Thanks, I take yours gil. On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Marcin Dulak wrote: > Hi, > > I have this review for exchange > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086 > > Best regards, > > Marcin > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

08.11.2015 23:38, Neal Gompa пишет: On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Pavel Alexeev >wrote: Hello. More than half year in the past freerdp was updated and then reverted version to current present [1], mostly to allow built guacamole-server [2]. A

rawhide report: 20151109 changes

Compose started at Mon Nov 9 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0