Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Kalev Lember wrote: > I wonder if it might be a good time to bump the i686 minimal > requirements for F24 to include sse2. Not for performance reasons, but > for compatibility: almost all developers are on x86_64 these days and > i686 is pretty much just limping along. If we include sse2 on i686,

[Bug 1277233] Please branch and build for EPEL 7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277233 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug 1264888] perl-PDF-API2-2.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264888 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 04:24:07PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Btw, it's odd already that "dnf update rpm*.rpm" refuses to install > packages that are not installed as older version. Compare that with > "rpm -Uvh …" and "rpm -Fvh …". It would make sense to mimic those > two commands in tools

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Rex Dieter wrote: > Qt5 (Gui and Declarative) pretty much requires sse2, and I/kde-sig asked > about pushing the minimum i686 fedora spec to include sse2, but fesco was > against that idea at the time. For what it's worth, I was against it. Using /usr/lib/sse2 as we do now works just fine as a

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Their NICs changed from p6p1 -> enp3s0. It was annoying because I had > to boot each one with a display and keyboard and change the network > configuration by hand. > > "predictable, stable network interface names" >

jplesnik uploaded File-LibMagic-1.15.tar.gz for perl-File-LibMagic

e5753a9f1e992da5f79fdbe253b02cf9 File-LibMagic-1.15.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-File-LibMagic/File-LibMagic-1.15.tar.gz/md5/e5753a9f1e992da5f79fdbe253b02cf9/File-LibMagic-1.15.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1265933] Upgrade perl-File-LibMagic to 1.15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265933 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

pghmcfc uploaded Math-BigInt-GMP-1.45.tar.gz for perl-Math-BigInt-GMP

0bd52131d369a9dfe4110099a582cae6 Math-BigInt-GMP-1.45.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP/Math-BigInt-GMP-1.45.tar.gz/md5/0bd52131d369a9dfe4110099a582cae6/Math-BigInt-GMP-1.45.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1264888] perl-PDF-API2-2.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264888 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-PDF-API2-2.025-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=697051 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1264888] perl-PDF-API2-2.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264888 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PDF-API2-2.025-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-32cfa7ac52 -- You are receiving this mail

jplesnik pushed to perl-File-LibMagic (master). "1.15 bump"

From 6485c34e0b7f8b8bbef0ad832f683ae1b0661d4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:34:04 +0100 Subject: 1.15 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-File-LibMagic.spec | 6 +- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

Kamil Paral wrote: > So we could ignore freeze just for packages not being on any install > medium. But then I'm not sure how much that is helpful and it might be > difficult to implement this in Bodhi. In the old manual process, I just had to ask rel-eng and they'd blanket-OK freeze overrides

jplesnik uploaded PDF-API2-2.025.tar.gz for perl-PDF-API2

d8b5e8a8a08986816a0e97d5236de979 PDF-API2-2.025.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-PDF-API2/PDF-API2-2.025.tar.gz/md5/d8b5e8a8a08986816a0e97d5236de979/PDF-API2-2.025.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

jplesnik pushed to perl-PDF-API2 (master). "2.025 bump"

From 1468bc045227b3edb80bd0e0ebbe2858887b823d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:38:17 +0100 Subject: 2.025 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-PDF-API2.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+),

jplesnik pushed to perl-PDF-API2 (f23). "2.025 bump"

From 83636549becbda274e4f2faa3e852d7f7875 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:38:17 +0100 Subject: 2.025 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-PDF-API2.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+),

jplesnik pushed to perl-PDF-API2 (f23). "Add require perl(Storable)"

From 1c5e86dcb5b751ed2d05b935873bded54a959518 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:28:39 +0200 Subject: Add require perl(Storable) --- perl-PDF-API2.spec | 8 +++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: COPR for ARM?

On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 18:36 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 7 November 2015 at 17:51, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Stephen John Smoogen < > > smo...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Nov 7, 2015 13:50, "Neal Gompa"

limb requested branch epel7 for package perl-BZ-Client

limb requested branch epel7 for package perl-BZ-Client https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BZ-Client/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide 20151109 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Generic boot i386 Generic boot x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151108: Workstation disk raw armhfp No images in Rawhide 20151108 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 4 of 5 ID: 8054

Re: [EPEL-devel] Darktable major update

Il 09/11/2015 21:46, Stephen John Smoogen ha scritto: > On 9 November 2015 at 13:30, Germano Massullo > wrote: >> Hi, I am one of the Darktable maintainers. >> Darktable 2.0 is going too be released soon. According to EPEL policies, I >> could not release such major

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Am 09.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 11/07/2015 10:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: these days (and i talk about hardware from 2011) you can virtualize things fast, easy and efficient and consolidate machines on more or less cheap hardware For servers, sure, but that doesn't work for

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On 11/07/2015 10:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: these days (and i talk about hardware from 2011) you can virtualize things fast, easy and efficient and consolidate machines on more or less cheap hardware For servers, sure, but that doesn't work for desktops. talking about a rapid moving

[Bug 1275445] perl-Devel-Pragma-0.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275445 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: What's the current status of mp3-licensing issues?

I believe that the current status of mp3 is it is patent free in the US and most or all of the rest of the world. Analysis after the quoted portion. On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:36:07 -0400, "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 10:47 +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> What about US? > >

COPR service announcement: builds failed last night

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, Due to issues with the metalink for f22 and f23 updates on ppc64 last night, a lot of COPR tasks have failed their ppc64le chroot builds. If you see that the x86_64 builds of of your task have succeeded, but the ppc64le builds failed,

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:50:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > em* and p?p? come from biosdevname, which should not be used and is > > deprecated. > > I'm merely observing what happened when I updated a bunch of servers > from F22 to F23. I didn't intentionally install nor uninstall

Re: Review requests that need reviewers

Hi Tom, Taken! can you take these for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995433 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995435 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995444 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258274 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266805

Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

> From: "Matthew Miller" > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 04:24:07PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Btw, it's odd already that "dnf update rpm*.rpm" refuses to install > > packages that are not installed as older version. Compare that with > > "rpm -Uvh …" and "rpm -Fvh

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 141 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 124 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 118

Re: [HEADS UP] Ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in Rawhide

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/04/2015 06:23 AM, Robert Kuska wrote: > There is ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in rawhide's side-tag > f24-python3. > > I would like to ask all maintainers to rebuild their packages > (which depend on python3) within the f24-python3 side-tag. >

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Am 08.11.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from >> em1 to eno1. >> >> Is this

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Sun, 2015-11-08 at 20:36 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 08.11.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: > >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most > >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 7 packages were orphaned bouncycastle [el6, epel7, el5] was orphaned by stevetraylen Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Java

jplesnik uploaded Locale-Currency-Format-1.35.tar.gz for perl-Locale-Currency-Format

3eb24b6459a3a3f6201773c4cbac2b32 Locale-Currency-Format-1.35.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Locale-Currency-Format/Locale-Currency-Format-1.35.tar.gz/md5/3eb24b6459a3a3f6201773c4cbac2b32/Locale-Currency-Format-1.35.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1265942] Upgrade perl-Graph to 0.97

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265942 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

mitr pushed to perl-IPTables-Parse (master). "Update to IPTables-Parse-1.6"

From 23919676ed89768f1d9f29a1eb1164350f4ca5d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Miloslav=20Trma=C4=8D?= Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:41:27 +0100 Subject: Update to IPTables-Parse-1.6 --- .gitignore | 2 ++

jplesnik pushed to perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose (master). "0.07 bump"

From 8112d74aded6c0f9602d80fa5b1a5b39b8a76076 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:05:41 +0100 Subject: 0.07 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3

jplesnik pushed to perl-Graph (master). "0.9704 bump"

From 2c12ae9e96d7ae5861ea784edd0ae13fb60e3db0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:43:48 +0100 Subject: 0.9704 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Graph.spec | 22 -- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 18

jplesnik pushed to perl-Locale-Currency-Format (master). "1.35 bump"

From 34d15d4b7e49c0d76ff5b57b849d0b52d85c04cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:33:05 +0100 Subject: 1.35 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Locale-Currency-Format.spec | 16 +--- sources

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On 11/08/2015 07:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from em1 to eno1. Is this something that

jplesnik uploaded Graph-0.9704.tar.gz for perl-Graph

1ab4e49420e56eeb1bc81d842aa8f3af Graph-0.9704.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Graph/Graph-0.9704.tar.gz/md5/1ab4e49420e56eeb1bc81d842aa8f3af/Graph-0.9704.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 750 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893 libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 515 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 365

mitr uploaded IPTables-Parse-1.6.tar.bz2 for perl-IPTables-Parse

1bab1e81bbb9455f4bcbf4e5be4bef60 IPTables-Parse-1.6.tar.bz2 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-IPTables-Parse/IPTables-Parse-1.6.tar.bz2/md5/1bab1e81bbb9455f4bcbf4e5be4bef60/IPTables-Parse-1.6.tar.bz2 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

mitr uploaded IPTables-Parse-1.6.tar.bz2.asc for perl-IPTables-Parse

f03997bfca8a2d51c617ef9ed051846c IPTables-Parse-1.6.tar.bz2.asc http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-IPTables-Parse/IPTables-Parse-1.6.tar.bz2.asc/md5/f03997bfca8a2d51c617ef9ed051846c/IPTables-Parse-1.6.tar.bz2.asc -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1265952] Upgrade perl-Locale-Currency-Format to 1.34

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265952 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik uploaded Pod-Coverage-Moose-0.07.tar.gz for perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose

b63b043c7cc2f11c77231a83d6a178c7 Pod-Coverage-Moose-0.07.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose/Pod-Coverage-Moose-0.07.tar.gz/md5/b63b043c7cc2f11c77231a83d6a178c7/Pod-Coverage-Moose-0.07.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1266051] Upgrade perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose to 0.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266051 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

mitr pushed to perl-IPTables-Parse (perl-IPTables-Parse-1.6-1.fc24). "Update to IPTables-Parse-1.6"

From 23919676ed89768f1d9f29a1eb1164350f4ca5d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Miloslav=20Trma=C4=8D?= Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:41:27 +0100 Subject: Update to IPTables-Parse-1.6 --- .gitignore | 2 ++

[Bug 1265945] Upgrade perl-HTTP-Server-Simple to 0.51

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265945 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Am 08.11.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Björn Persson: > Christopher wrote: >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from >> em1 to eno1. > > On any computer where it

Re: koschei/koji build failures

On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 13:40:16 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > ok. I think this might be: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264198 > which is an rpm bug fixed in rawhide, but not yet in f23. > > We need a f23 update with that fixed and we can try again. There's now a

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 245 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 141 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7 49

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 48325 - lib389 verification script for replica promotion bug

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48325 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48325/0001-Ticket-48325-Add-lib389-test-script.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [EPEL-devel] Darktable major update

On 9 November 2015 at 13:30, Germano Massullo wrote: > Hi, I am one of the Darktable maintainers. > Darktable 2.0 is going too be released soon. According to EPEL policies, I > could not release such major release for EPEL/RHEL 7. > Do you usually apply this rule

[EPEL-devel] Darktable major update

Hi, I am one of the Darktable maintainers. Darktable 2.0 is going too be released soon. According to EPEL policies, I could not release such major release for EPEL/RHEL 7. Do you usually apply this rule strictly or sometimes you make an exception? New version of Darktable will rely on GTK3, but

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:55:40PM +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Am 08.11.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: > >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most > >> part. However, it broke my

Re: daveisfera's odb_2.3_cern copr build of odb for epel-5-i386 finished with 'failed'

I finally open a ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273738 On Qua, 2015-10-28 at 18:17 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > On Dom, 2015-10-25 at 20:50 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > > The links in the above email don't work. For example, the "Build log" > > link says "Content

eseyman pushed to perl-SQL-SplitStatement (f22). "Patch package to fix incompatibility with perl-Getopt-Long"

From 22f2292c34234493977d435d6177eaba6b93a985 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 22:12:49 +0100 Subject: Patch package to fix incompatibility with perl-Getopt-Long --- .gitignore | 1 +

[Bug 1264888] perl-PDF-API2-2.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264888 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[389-devel] Please review: lib389 krb5 realm management

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48343 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48343/0001-Ticket-48343- lib389-krb5-realm-management.patch -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Brisbane signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --

Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

> Very frequently in such cases the entire test matrix is not completely > retested. A lot of prior tests a carried over because they're known > (or strongly suspected) of not having been touched in any way by the > fix of one or two blocker bugs. > > If hundreds of packages get unfrozen and

Re: F24: no rsyslog forwarding

Am 07.11.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 01:31:11PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 07.11.2015 um 12:59 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 06:20:39PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 06.11.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Subhendu

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Am 09.11.2015 um 23:57 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 11/09/2015 02:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Samuel Sieb: So yes, I'm using 10 year old hardware with the latest Fedora and it works great. (I'll update them to F23 next time I'm there.) well, i tell you know the

Re: Orphaning JBoss Tools package

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:22:57PM +, Gerard Ryan wrote: > On 11/02/2015 11:49 PM, Marcus Karlsson wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 03:56:15PM +, Gerard Ryan wrote: > >> Hi devel list (and cc'ed eclipse-sig list), > >> > >> I'm going to orphan the eclipse-jbosstools package in rawhide,

[Bug 1275445] perl-Devel-Pragma-0.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275445 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Devel-Pragma-0.62-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Review requests that need reviewers

The easy ones (some R packages I need as deps for updating R-DBI): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277933 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277956 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277961 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277966

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On 11/09/2015 02:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Samuel Sieb: I manage all the IT for a private school. There is a computer lab for the students to use. They don't have the money to buy new computers, the computers they have were donated. They are P4 desktops from

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Reindl Harald composed on 2015-11-09 23:22 (UTC+0100): > *yes* capable hardware these days is cheap if you don't need that much > performance Unless and until hardware prices drop to zero, there will be users for whom any cost is an insurmountable hurdle. And, there will remain users content

[Bug 1278707] perl-SQL-SplitStatement: Failed test t/95-script.t

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278707 --- Comment #5 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Please add the fix also to rawhide. Currently, it is only in F23 branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

yaneti pushed to perl-HTTP-CookieJar (master). "Update to 0.008. Upstream dropped minimal perl requirement to 5.8.1"

From fd3439316b40fa10a3cd7682d40899f88395054a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yanko Kaneti Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 11:15:22 +0200 Subject: Update to 0.008. Upstream dropped minimal perl requirement to 5.8.1 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-HTTP-CookieJar.spec | 7

Re: Review swap: openmx

Thanks, I take yours gil. On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Marcin Dulak wrote: > Hi, > > I have this review for exchange > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086 > > Best regards, > > Marcin > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1268518] perl-Test-Strict-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268518 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc2

[Bug 1274981] perl-Test-Strict-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274981 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc2

[Bug 1274981] perl-Test-Strict-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274981 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1268518] perl-Test-Strict-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268518 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > about money: with the energy costs i saved going away from P4 computers many > years ago my current one is already paied Nobody is saying that a newer computer won't save you money on the power bill. What they have

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On 11/09/2015 03:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.11.2015 um 23:57 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 11/09/2015 02:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Samuel Sieb: So yes, I'm using 10 year old hardware with the latest Fedora and it works great. (I'll update them to F23 next

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

08.11.2015 23:38, Neal Gompa пишет: On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Pavel Alexeev >wrote: Hello. More than half year in the past freerdp was updated and then reverted version to current present [1], mostly to allow built

yaneti uploaded HTTP-CookieJar-0.008.tar.gz for perl-HTTP-CookieJar

e30a933e9cc0cf6f0b67054cbb01141f HTTP-CookieJar-0.008.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-HTTP-CookieJar/HTTP-CookieJar-0.008.tar.gz/md5/e30a933e9cc0cf6f0b67054cbb01141f/HTTP-CookieJar-0.008.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

rawhide report: 20151109 changes

Compose started at Mon Nov 9 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

[Bug 1278707] perl-SQL-SplitStatement: Failed test t/95-script.t

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278707 --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman --- (In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #5) > > Please add the fix also to rawhide. Currently, it is only in F23 branch. My bad. I've cherry-picked the commit to master and the

[Bug 1278707] perl-SQL-SplitStatement: Failed test t/95-script.t

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278707 --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar --- You can put to perl-Getopt-Long into built root overrides, build the perl-SQL-Splitstatment and then I can append the new perl-SQL-Splitstatment builds to perl-Getopt-Long errata so they

eseyman pushed to perl-SQL-SplitStatement (master). "Patch package to fix incompatibility with perl-Getopt-Long"

From a8682f75804a66165ebb7c5d5343fb7f039c9767 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 22:12:49 +0100 Subject: Patch package to fix incompatibility with perl-Getopt-Long --- ...QL-SplitStatement-1.00020-getopt-long-compat.patch | 19

eseyman set the monitor flag of perl-ParseUtil-Domain to True

eseyman set the monitor flag of perl-ParseUtil-Domain to True -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

ppisar pushed to perl-Padre (master). "Do scan documentation for dependencies"

From a11a49f68ed89780bc9e32564ff1163c8c7d3b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:38:11 +0100 Subject: Do scan documentation for dependencies --- perl-Padre.spec | 8 +++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1

Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 13:56 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kamil Paral wrote: > > So we could ignore freeze just for packages not being on any install > > medium. But then I'm not sure how much that is helpful and it might be > > difficult to implement this in Bodhi. > > In the old manual process,

Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 17:11 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 13:56 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Kamil Paral wrote: > > > So we could ignore freeze just for packages not being on any install > > > medium. But then I'm not sure how much that is helpful and it might be > > >