Looking for co-maintainer(s)

Hi, I would be glad to have some co-maintainers for the following packages that I took over from cicku: RemoteBox - b0rken appstream-util validate (reported to upstream, no response so far) lnav - randomly failing tests, no idea how to solve (tests success is not mandatory for now) lookat will

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: lgao

Hi, Sorry, I did not notice that, the notification must be in the flooding emails... Just give the 2 packages: shrinkwrap-descriptors, arquillian-core to user: 'gil' Best Regards -- Lin Gao Software Engineer JBoss by Red Hat - Original Message - > From: "gil" > To: "Development d

Unresponsive maintainer: lgao

Hi Is already for some time (a few months) that I have no news, I did request to become co maintainer for this package https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/shrinkwrap-descriptors/ This package suffer of F24FTBFS, i submitted patch for solve the issues: shrinkwrap-descriptors: https:

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 19:51 -0700, linux guy wrote: > 28.3 has most of the fixes that I want to test.  A build of it would > be > appreciated. > > I guess if I want more timely builds in the future, I'll have to do > them > myself. Well we want to package up the latest release in the stable serie

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

28.3 has most of the fixes that I want to test. A build of it would be appreciated. I guess if I want more timely builds in the future, I'll have to do them myself. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:18 PM, linux guy wrote: > > As far as I know t

Fedora Rawhide-20160303.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Cloud raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160302.n.0 No images in Rawhide-20160302.n.0 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 64 of 78 ID: 7243Test: i386 universal package_set_kde URL: h

Re: Fedora 24-20160303.n.0 compose check report

On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 00:11 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Kde live i386 > Workstation live i386 > Server dvd i386 > Server boot x86_64 > Server dvd x86_64 > Kde live x86_64 > Cloud raw-xz i386 > Server boot i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > Cloud raw-xz x86_64 > M

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:07:26 -0500 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 03/03/2016 04:59 PM, linux guy wrote: > > I'm not sure this is the right venue to ask, but... could someone > > build the latest version of Rygel and put it in the repos ? > > Currently the repos have 0.28.2-1. I think the latest a

Fedora 24-20160303.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Server dvd i386 Server boot x86_64 Server dvd x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Cloud raw-xz i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Cloud raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Images in this compose but

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:18 PM, linux guy wrote: > As far as I know there are no special requirements for 0.29.x that prevent > it from being built for F23. The 0.29 series is the development release, we won't be updating it in stable Fedora releases. It is already in Fedora 24+ and that is the

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

As far as I know there are no special requirements for 0.29.x that prevent it from being built for F23. I've emailed the package maintainer with my request. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:59 PM, linux guy wrot

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:59 PM, linux guy wrote: > I'm not sure this is the right venue to ask, but... could someone build the > latest version of Rygel and put it in the repos ? Currently the repos have > 0.28.2-1. I think the latest available from git is 0.29.2. There are several 0.29.x ry

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

Many thanks for the reply and the tone you used in it. Fedora rocks ! ​ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

On 03/03/2016 04:59 PM, linux guy wrote: > I'm not sure this is the right venue to ask, but... could someone build the > latest version of Rygel and put it in the repos ? Currently the repos have > 0.28.2-1. I think the latest available from git is 0.29.2. > > I need it because I helped troub

Re: [HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

On 03/03/2016 02:39 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> I'm attaching the current fedora-release.spec and convert-to-edition bash >> script >> for perusal. > > I'm attaching a lightly tested Lua conversion. I'm not familiar with > all the scenarios to

Please update Rygel in F23 ?

I'm not sure this is the right venue to ask, but... could someone build the latest version of Rygel and put it in the repos ? Currently the repos have 0.28.2-1. I think the latest available from git is 0.29.2. I need it because I helped troubleshoot a couple issues and the fixes are in 0.29.

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2016

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:55:56 +0100 Marek Polacek wrote: > In the past few days and weeks we did a mass rebuild of Fedora > rawhide packages in mock with GCC 6 (and corresponding libtool) and > for those packages that failed also rebuilt the same package with > gcc-5.3.1-2.fc23.x86_64 to quickly r

Re: F25 feature Parallel Installable Debuginfo packages

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:26:26PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Now that f24 has branched I thought I would start early with a proposal > for a system wide change for f25: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ParallelInstallableDebuginfo > > This is because I never proposed a system wide cha

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:58:16PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Of course, but surely we can still do soname bumps when removing > previously-released API, to detect such breakage before it reaches > rawhide users. No, we cannot. If we did, then changes to any new API added to gtk+ during the

Re: [HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'm attaching the current fedora-release.spec and convert-to-edition bash > script > for perusal. I'm attaching a lightly tested Lua conversion. I'm not familiar with all the scenarios to test, so I thought I'd post what I have quite early. Mos

OCaml 4.03.0 (beta)

Since Rawhide was branched from F24 and OCaml 4.03.0 beta1 has been released, I'd like to update Rawhide to that new version of OCaml. However it probably won't be in the next week. In the meantime, read about the new features in 4.03 here: https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2016-03/m

Re: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747339#c20 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 16:08 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > This was a symbol that was added and removed in the 3.19.x unstable > development cycle. We don't guarantee ABI stability between two > unstable > development releases. ABI stability guarantees are only from one > stable > version to another

Re: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? > > I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the > Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is > logged in ... That's how GDM (and pretty much everyone e

Self Introductoin: Jun Aruga

Hi, Fedora developers! My name is Jun Aruga. I live in Brno, Czech Republic, working in RedHat. I mainly have lived in open source world over than 10 years. I worked as Software Engineer in Japan for a long time, and in Singapore for 3 years. Now I am preparing my first Fedora package for Ruby

Re: [HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

On 03/03/2016 05:55 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Stephen Gallagher: On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert these scripts over so that they can run entirely under

Re: [HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

On 03/03/2016 10:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Stephen Gallagher: > >> On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert these scripts over so that they can

Re: [HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

* Stephen Gallagher: > On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >>> So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert >>> these scripts over so that they can run entirely under the built-in LUA >>> interpreter o

Re: [HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert >> these scripts over so that they can run entirely under the built-in LUA >> interpreter of RPM and eliminate this prob

Re: [HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert > these scripts over so that they can run entirely under the built-in LUA > interpreter of RPM and eliminate this problem. I know that the language is spelled “Lua”, not

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

On 03/03/2016 03:51 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 3.3.2016 v 15:42 Kalev Lember napsal(a): Should be fixed in gnome-terminal-3.19.91-1.fc24, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=741368 The broken ABI was in vte291, so how could possibly update of gnome-terminal fix that? It fixe

[HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

As part of efforts in Fedora 24 to address certain issues with the edition-specific fedora-release content (such as /etc/os-release, /etc/issues and edition-specific presets), I built a moderately complex series of bash scripts to run in %post and %posttrans to ensure that all of the right files we

Re: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

On 03/03/16 14:47, Vít Ondruch wrote: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is logged in ... Exactly the as X does in recent releases you mean? Tom -- Tom

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

Dne 3.3.2016 v 15:42 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > On 03/03/2016 03:37 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained >> following message: >> >> >> Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost >> org.gnome.Terminal[1965]:*/usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: >> symb

Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is logged in ... Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@

Re: Gnome in Rawhide broken

On 03/03/2016 03:37 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained following message: Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost org.gnome.Terminal[1965]:*/usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: symbol lookup error: /usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: undefin

Gnome in Rawhide broken

After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained following message: Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost org.gnome.Terminal[1965]: */usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: symbol lookup error: /usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: undefined symbol: vte_**terminal**_search_set_rege

Re: bash completion dirs

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Ondřej Vašík wrote: > Ville Skyttä píše v Po 22. 02. 2016 v 14:12 +0200: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Thomas Moschny >> >> Why not. Note however that if going this route, the dirs >> /usr/share/bash-completion and /usr/share/bash-completion/helpers >> should

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

Thanks for your package. Maybe you want to join Games SIG. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

Thanks for your package! Maybe you want to join Games SIG. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Running CLI uitilities not available in Fedora?

Hello All! I'd like to ask you for advice. I've packaged an application which can use external CLI tools (not available in Fedora for various non-legal reasons). Shall I remove support for these tools or better keep it? Hello, if your application has a preference for that CLI name modificat

Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenSSH 7.2 to Fedora 23

On 03/03/2016 09:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi Jakub, On Mar 2 17:48, Jakub Jelen wrote: Hi there, I just pushed openssh-7.2 update [1] into Fedora 23 testing. There are no incompatible changes except these: As I reported to the openssh-unix-dev list, as well as in https://bodhi.fedorapro

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

Hello guys, I finally get the playonlinux to bodhi. So for everyone who enjoy PlayOnLinux you can test it and give karma: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1430c7fcdb Jirka -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@list

Re: Fedora 24 compose report: 20160302.n.0 changes

On 2016-03-02, Fedora Branched Report wrote: > Broken deps for armhfp > -- > [perl-Dumbbench] > perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT) This is a new bug in compose process