Hi,
I would be glad to have some co-maintainers for the following packages that I
took over from cicku:
RemoteBox - b0rken appstream-util validate (reported to upstream, no response
so far)
lnav - randomly failing tests, no idea how to solve (tests success is not
mandatory for now)
lookat
Hi,
Sorry, I did not notice that, the notification must be in the flooding
emails...
Just give the 2 packages: shrinkwrap-descriptors, arquillian-core to user:
'gil'
Best Regards
--
Lin Gao
Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
- Original Message -
> From: "gil"
Hi
Is already for some time (a few months) that I have no news,
I did request to become co maintainer for this package
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/shrinkwrap-descriptors/
This package suffer of F24FTBFS, i submitted patch for solve the issues:
shrinkwrap-descriptors:
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 19:51 -0700, linux guy wrote:
> 28.3 has most of the fixes that I want to test. A build of it would
> be
> appreciated.
>
> I guess if I want more timely builds in the future, I'll have to do
> them
> myself.
Well we want to package up the latest release in the stable
From 11a499c678630e3d3066eb0f7daa4454c8556e9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:07:47 -0600
Subject: 1.59
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-XML-RSS.spec | 6 +-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2
From 11a499c678630e3d3066eb0f7daa4454c8556e9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:07:47 -0600
Subject: 1.59
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-XML-RSS.spec | 6 +-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2
273b54a0dbfa54f43912515a1d3bf123 XML-RSS-1.59.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-XML-RSS/XML-RSS-1.59.tar.gz/md5/273b54a0dbfa54f43912515a1d3bf123/XML-RSS-1.59.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From f93f896978767fdab076838b53953c36d62cca8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:02:46 -0600
Subject: 1.21
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-Which.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
From f93f896978767fdab076838b53953c36d62cca8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:02:46 -0600
Subject: 1.21
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-Which.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
115a6efe5d7e9621237fcb655c7a0980 File-Which-1.21.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-File-Which/File-Which-1.21.tar.gz/md5/115a6efe5d7e9621237fcb655c7a0980/File-Which-1.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
28.3 has most of the fixes that I want to test. A build of it would be
appreciated.
I guess if I want more timely builds in the future, I'll have to do them
myself.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:18 PM, linux guy
Missing expected images:
Cloud raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Cloud raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160302.n.0
No images in Rawhide-20160302.n.0 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 64 of 78
ID: 7243Test: i386 universal package_set_kde
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314577
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13219618
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314577
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1132972
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1132972=edit
[patch] Update to 0.09 (#1314577)
--
You are
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 00:11 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Kde live i386
> Workstation live i386
> Server dvd i386
> Server boot x86_64
> Server dvd x86_64
> Kde live x86_64
> Cloud raw-xz i386
> Server boot i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> Cloud raw-xz x86_64
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314577
Bug ID: 1314577
Summary: perl-LWP-Protocol-PSGI-0.09 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-LWP-Protocol-PSGI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:07:26 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 04:59 PM, linux guy wrote:
> > I'm not sure this is the right venue to ask, but... could someone
> > build the latest version of Rygel and put it in the repos ?
> > Currently the repos have 0.28.2-1.
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Server dvd i386
Server boot x86_64
Server dvd x86_64
Kde live x86_64
Cloud raw-xz i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Cloud raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Images in this compose
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:18 PM, linux guy wrote:
> As far as I know there are no special requirements for 0.29.x that prevent
> it from being built for F23.
The 0.29 series is the development release, we won't be updating it in
stable Fedora releases. It is already in
As far as I know there are no special requirements for 0.29.x that prevent
it from being built for F23.
I've emailed the package maintainer with my request.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:59 PM, linux guy
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:59 PM, linux guy wrote:
> I'm not sure this is the right venue to ask, but... could someone build the
> latest version of Rygel and put it in the repos ? Currently the repos have
> 0.28.2-1. I think the latest available from git is 0.29.2.
Many thanks for the reply and the tone you used in it.
Fedora rocks !
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/03/2016 04:59 PM, linux guy wrote:
> I'm not sure this is the right venue to ask, but... could someone build the
> latest version of Rygel and put it in the repos ? Currently the repos have
> 0.28.2-1. I think the latest available from git is 0.29.2.
>
> I need it because I helped
On 03/03/2016 02:39 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> I'm attaching the current fedora-release.spec and convert-to-edition bash
>> script
>> for perusal.
>
> I'm attaching a lightly tested Lua conversion. I'm not familiar with
> all the scenarios to
I'm not sure this is the right venue to ask, but... could someone build the
latest version of Rygel and put it in the repos ? Currently the repos
have 0.28.2-1. I think the latest available from git is 0.29.2.
I need it because I helped troubleshoot a couple issues and the fixes are
in 0.29.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:55:56 +0100
Marek Polacek wrote:
> In the past few days and weeks we did a mass rebuild of Fedora
> rawhide packages in mock with GCC 6 (and corresponding libtool) and
> for those packages that failed also rebuilt the same package with
>
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:26:26PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Now that f24 has branched I thought I would start early with a proposal
> for a system wide change for f25:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ParallelInstallableDebuginfo
>
> This is because I never proposed a system wide
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
360 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
123 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
11
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
256 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
239 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
233
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
866 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893
libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
630 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
480
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312568
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Text-Diff-1.44-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313702
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.22.1-351.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313702
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:58:16PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Of course, but surely we can still do soname bumps when removing
> previously-released API, to detect such breakage before it reaches
> rawhide users.
No, we cannot. If we did, then changes to any new API added to gtk+
during
On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I'm attaching the current fedora-release.spec and convert-to-edition bash
> script
> for perusal.
I'm attaching a lightly tested Lua conversion. I'm not familiar with
all the scenarios to test, so I thought I'd post what I have quite
early.
Since Rawhide was branched from F24 and OCaml 4.03.0 beta1 has been
released, I'd like to update Rawhide to that new version of OCaml.
However it probably won't be in the next week.
In the meantime, read about the new features in 4.03 here:
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?
See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747339#c20
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 16:08 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> This was a symbol that was added and removed in the 3.19.x unstable
> development cycle. We don't guarantee ABI stability between two
> unstable
> development releases. ABI stability guarantees are only from one
> stable
> version to another
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?
>
> I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the
> Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is
> logged in ...
That's how GDM (and pretty much everyone
Hi, Fedora developers!
My name is Jun Aruga.
I live in Brno, Czech Republic, working in RedHat.
I mainly have lived in open source world over than 10 years.
I worked as Software Engineer in Japan for a long time, and in Singapore for 3
years.
Now I am preparing my first Fedora package for Ruby
On 03/03/2016 05:55 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Stephen Gallagher:
On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert
these scripts over so that they can run entirely
On 03/03/2016 10:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Stephen Gallagher:
>
>> On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>>
So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert
these scripts over so that they
* Stephen Gallagher:
> On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert
>>> these scripts over so that they can run entirely under the built-in LUA
>>> interpreter
On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert
>> these scripts over so that they can run entirely under the built-in LUA
>> interpreter of RPM and eliminate this
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > > As for replacing much of the existing boilerplate with macros, I'm
> > > personally less keen on that because I think it actually makes specs
> > > harder
> > > to read, at least until I know what each of those macros actually
On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert
> these scripts over so that they can run entirely under the built-in LUA
> interpreter of RPM and eliminate this problem.
I know that the language is spelled “Lua”, not
On 03/03/2016 03:51 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 3.3.2016 v 15:42 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
Should be fixed in gnome-terminal-3.19.91-1.fc24,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=741368
The broken ABI was in vte291, so how could possibly update of
gnome-terminal fix that?
It
As part of efforts in Fedora 24 to address certain issues with the
edition-specific fedora-release content (such as /etc/os-release, /etc/issues
and edition-specific presets), I built a moderately complex series of bash
scripts to run in %post and %posttrans to ensure that all of the right files
On 03/03/16 14:47, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?
I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the
Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is
logged in ...
Exactly the as X does in recent releases you mean?
Tom
--
Tom
Dne 3.3.2016 v 15:42 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
> On 03/03/2016 03:37 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained
>> following message:
>>
>>
>> Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost
>> org.gnome.Terminal[1965]:*/usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server:
>>
Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?
I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the
Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is
logged in ...
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
* Petr Šabata [03/03/2016 14:44] :
>
> I'm not sure it would be possible to do it the way you suggest, supporting
> both versioning schemes at the same time. The conversion could be largely
> automated and all packages could be altered & rebuilt during the next
> Perl mass rebuild, for example.
On 03/03/2016 03:37 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained
following message:
Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost
org.gnome.Terminal[1965]:*/usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: symbol lookup
error: /usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server:
After update, my gnome-terminal failed to start. The journal contained
following message:
Mar 03 15:01:17 localhost org.gnome.Terminal[1965]:
*/usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: symbol lookup error:
/usr/libexec/gnome-**terminal**-server: undefined symbol:
perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 04:17:45PM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 29/01/16 12:34, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >Compatibility
> >=
> >
> >Introducing this normalization requires changing both build-requires and
> >run-requires at the same time (you cannot provide "perl(Foo) = 1.2" and
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> Ville Skyttä píše v Po 22. 02. 2016 v 14:12 +0200:
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Thomas Moschny
>>
>> Why not. Note however that if going this route, the dirs
>> /usr/share/bash-completion and
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Test-Synopsis.git/commit/?h=perl-Test-Synopsis-0.15-1.fc25=29c128769a230da22037031f23ed8bee5a19e1f6
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 29c128769a230da22037031f23ed8bee5a19e1f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:19:01 +
Subject: Update to 0.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- New upstream release 0.15
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314116
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.53-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8050d1b3fb
--
You are receiving this mail
From af6c76c5b995ab3ec39e84531b17c48bd2cbf1a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:12:19 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-Date-Manip.spec | 5 -
1 file changed,
From 1be6cb0cc4f778af1e51f519b717667392f3ea8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:56:30 +0100
Subject: 6.53 bump
- Various bugfixes
- Timezone data updated
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Date-Manip.spec | 10 --
From 1be6cb0cc4f778af1e51f519b717667392f3ea8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:56:30 +0100
Subject: 6.53 bump
- Various bugfixes
- Timezone data updated
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Date-Manip.spec | 10 --
From 1be6cb0cc4f778af1e51f519b717667392f3ea8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:56:30 +0100
Subject: 6.53 bump
- Various bugfixes
- Timezone data updated
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Date-Manip.spec | 10 --
d78f6e1857e74aa4883482348fca4668 Date-Manip-6.53.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Date-Manip/Date-Manip-6.53.tar.gz/md5/d78f6e1857e74aa4883482348fca4668/Date-Manip-6.53.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 29c128769a230da22037031f23ed8bee5a19e1f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:19:01 +
Subject: Update to 0.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- New upstream release 0.15
-
From 29c128769a230da22037031f23ed8bee5a19e1f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:19:01 +
Subject: Update to 0.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- New upstream release 0.15
-
8446ba9321174f95d273bb4d2aafbe8f Test-Synopsis-0.15.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Synopsis/Test-Synopsis-0.15.tar.gz/md5/8446ba9321174f95d273bb4d2aafbe8f/Test-Synopsis-0.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
164a5908bcfb79a8fbbca1a2182416ae Devel-StackTrace-2.01.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Devel-StackTrace/Devel-StackTrace-2.01.tar.gz/md5/164a5908bcfb79a8fbbca1a2182416ae/Devel-StackTrace-2.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Thanks for your package.
Maybe you want to join Games SIG.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thanks for your package!
Maybe you want to join Games SIG.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello All!
I'd like to ask you for advice. I've packaged an application which can
use external CLI tools (not available in Fedora for various non-legal
reasons). Shall I remove support for these tools or better keep it?
Hello,
if your application has a preference for that CLI name
On 03/03/2016 09:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Jakub,
On Mar 2 17:48, Jakub Jelen wrote:
Hi there,
I just pushed openssh-7.2 update [1] into Fedora 23 testing. There are no
incompatible changes except these:
As I reported to the openssh-unix-dev list, as well as in
Hello guys,
I finally get the playonlinux to bodhi. So for everyone who enjoy
PlayOnLinux you can test it and give karma:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1430c7fcdb
Jirka
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 2016-03-02, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
> Broken deps for armhfp
> --
> [perl-Dumbbench]
> perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
This is a new bug in compose process
77 matches
Mail list logo