On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Raphael Groner
wrote:
> Why is it possible to give +1 to stable packages? Bodhi may deny or at least
> impede such actions, -1 or neutral comments should be still possible though
> for users having issues.
I disagree with allowing -1. At best, it's meaningless
Hi,
the 3.21.4 release of the evolution-data-server changes soname version
for libcamel and libedataserver, due to some API changes in those
sub-libraries.
I will rebuild packages for which I have commit rights, the same as I
can help with the API change fixes, thus feel free to ping me or
jplesnik changed mmaslano's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-PerlIO-Layers
(f23) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-PerlIO-Layers/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
I got karma on packages that were in stable already for a long time. The karma
system is too tolerant in my eyes.
Why is it possible to give +1 to stable packages? Bodhi may deny or at least
impede such actions, -1 or neutral comments should be still possible though for
users having issues.
In
jplesnik changed mmaslano's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-PerlIO-Layers
(f24) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-PerlIO-Layers/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproj
jplesnik changed mmaslano's 'commit' permission on perl-PerlIO-Layers (f22) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-PerlIO-Layers/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.or
jplesnik changed mmaslano's 'commit' permission on perl-PerlIO-Layers (f23) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-PerlIO-Layers/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 11:22 +0530, Buvanesh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Sayan,
> I have tested your package and verified it in Fedora 24 release. It works
> fine. Thanks for pushing it to bodhi for testing. Since there was no test
> case, I just installed it but after careful evaluation, I installed Fedor
On 07/08/16 20:41, Bastien Nocera-san wrote:
I think that the emoji input method should be a separate input method, so that
most users would have the choice between inputting using the keyboard layout
that matches their keyboard, and a separate input method for emojis.
I think the emoji typin
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's QA meeting. I think we
pretty much covered all the necessary business in the last couple of
weeks and I don't have any agenda topics in mind. If anyone does have
something we need to talk about, please reply to this mail and we can
schedule the meeting f
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 21:30 +0530, Sayan Chowdhury wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently packaged and pushed an update for fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure
> to bodhi and exactly 40 secs[1] later I got a +1 to the update. I am sure that
> testing a package surely takes more than 40 secs. This makes me real
Hi,
positive karma on a set of packages within short time can happen when
people use fedora-easy-karma. Thats my way of giving karma too, I use
the stuff for some hours, the I run fedora-easy-karma and give feedback
on all packages i've tested (and of course skip the ones I did not test ;).
But +
Hi,
I recently packaged and pushed an update for fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure
to bodhi and exactly 40 secs[1] later I got a +1 to the update. I am sure that
testing a package surely takes more than 40 secs. This makes me really curious
that are the packages really being tested before giving o
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Server boot x86_64
Server dvd x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 3/13 (x86_64)
ID: 25126 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160709.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160710.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 210
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 63.47 KiB
Size of dropped packages
15 matches
Mail list logo
