Fedora Rawhide-20161105.n.2 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 15/79 (x86_64), 3/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161031.n.0): ID: 45968 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso

[Bug 1391478] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391478 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.01-5.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1390797] perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390797 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Broken dependencies: perl-Socket-Netlink-Route

perl-Socket-Netlink-Route has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On ppc64: perl-Socket-Netlink-Route-0.05-9.fc25.noarch requires perl(IO::Socket::Netlink) >= 0:0.04 perl-Socket-Netlink-Route-0.05-9.fc25.noarch requires perl(IO::Socket::Netlink::_Message)

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On armhfp: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 608 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 370 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 88

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 486 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 480 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 411

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-11-04)

On Nov 5, 2016 6:54 AM, "Ms Sanchez" wrote: > > > Hello, > > I know that isn't the same and I'm not in FESCo, but I've seen this happening in other Fedora IRC meetings. Maybe is it symptom of something else? Don't think so. Many said they would be missing this week in

[Bug 1391797] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391797 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1391478] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391478 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: Private Bugzilla bugs

> The UID can actually matter. We have a frequently reported non-bug that > graphical KDE applications will not work (and abort with a qFatal, which > fires the SIGABRT signal) if you run them under tools like su or sudo > because they won't find some resources (usually the D-Bus session

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:44:05 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Actually we have autosigning all setup, but it needs a fedpkg update > > flag day. (Which we hope to do after f25 is out). So, it doesn't > > depend on this feature. > > Why does a pure

Fedora 25-20161105.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161104.n.0): ID: 45744 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/45744 ID: 45745 Test: x86_64

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161105.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-25-20161104.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161105.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size

Re: Strange mldonkey build error

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 12:45:07PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > Should be easy enough to cherry-pick the commit to all the branches and > push the fix without a new build so it doesn't catch the next person out. OK all fixed now, thanks. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat

Re: BUG - Moving many files in Nautilus often takes a very long time to complete

Hello Jack, I just commented and added the link you sent to your bug report. Hope this get solved soon. Cheers, Sylvia On 04/11/16 13:01, jack smith wrote: Hello, are you aware of this bug ? Moving many files in Nautilus often but not always takes a very long time to complete

Re: Strange mldonkey build error

On 5 Nov 2016 12:24, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 12:12:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > $ fedpkg build --target=f26-ocaml > > > Building mldonkey-3.1.5-10.fc26 for f26-ocaml > > > Created task: 16300957 > > > Task info:

Re: Strange mldonkey build error

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 12:12:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > $ fedpkg build --target=f26-ocaml > > Building mldonkey-3.1.5-10.fc26 for f26-ocaml > > Created task: 16300957 > > Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16300957 > > Watching tasks (this may be safely

Re: Strange mldonkey build error

> $ fedpkg build --target=f26-ocaml > Building mldonkey-3.1.5-10.fc26 for f26-ocaml > Created task: 16300957 > Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16300957 > Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... > 16300957 build (f26-ocaml, >

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE (perl-MCE-1.808-1.fc26). "Update to 1.808 (..more)"

From 3d0b1186f0edaa1ec8494062577838bde1d2ec1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 11:48:19 + Subject: Update to 1.808 - New upstream release 1.808 - Workers persist unless shutdown explicitly while running alongside the Mojolicious

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE (master). "Update to 1.808 (..more)"

From 3d0b1186f0edaa1ec8494062577838bde1d2ec1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 11:48:19 + Subject: Update to 1.808 - New upstream release 1.808 - Workers persist unless shutdown explicitly while running alongside the Mojolicious

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-11-04)

Hello, I know that isn't the same and I'm not in FESCo, but I've seen this happening in other Fedora IRC meetings. Maybe is it symptom of something else? Cheers, Sylvia On 04/11/16 17:14, Jared K. Smith wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jared K. Smith

pghmcfc uploaded MCE-1.808.tar.gz for perl-MCE

5e76a7afde92d3f0c7161711fe4be303 MCE-1.808.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-MCE/MCE-1.808.tar.gz/md5/5e76a7afde92d3f0c7161711fe4be303/MCE-1.808.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Python3-numpy

Oh, perfect, thank you Cheers, Sylvia On 04/11/16 19:44, Christian Dersch wrote: Hi, for Fedora it is part (subpackage) of the regular numpy source package. So you can install python3-numpy there too ;) Greetings, Christian On 11/04/2016 07:42 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote: Hello everybody, I

Re: dnf should not update debuginfo if not updating packgages

On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 05:20:10 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Because -debuginfo is per SRPM, not per subpackage, so you can need the > -debuginfo without having all subpackages (or even the main package) > installed. There could be for example: Conflicts: %{name} != %{version}-%{release} But that

Strange mldonkey build error

$ fedpkg build --target=f26-ocaml Building mldonkey-3.1.5-10.fc26 for f26-ocaml Created task: 16300957 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16300957 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 16300957 build (f26-ocaml,

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: why the Group tag is obsolete ?]

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: >> yeah, so the group tag shouldn't be obsolete , we should use it as >> fallback . > > I don't see how the text you quoted support this in any way. None of the KDE > tools support the Group tag.

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 05:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Otherwise, you have to hunt down the old builds > directly in Koji "hunt down"? koji download-build (nvr) works fine. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net