Thinkpad W540, with two finger right click on (which I think is off by
default):
https://people.xiph.org/~tdaede/w540.evemu.xz
On 11/13/2016 07:20 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> [Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to desktop@
> but I only got one recording. That's not quit
On Pá, 2016-11-11 at 13:20 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I think this is extreme overkill for something that doesn't need to
> be
> cryptographically sound. It literally just needs to be eight
> characters with a
> sensible random distribution. I considered using some non-reversible
> transform
On 11.11.2016 19:25, Japheth Cleaver wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 9:08 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> I still believe we should stick to a generic hostname by default,
>> (though I'd rather use "localhost" than "localhost.localdomain" in
>> order to drop the redhatism that "localdomain" is), and make t
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2016-11-14 22:26 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer :
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Andreas Tunek
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-11-14 14:01 GMT+01:00 Stephen Gallagher :
On 11/13/2016 01:46 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/16 14:33, Steph
>>> Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant
>>> for
>>> stuffing their machines with hardware from vendors that don't play well
>>> with
>>> open-source (for example, switching to wifi-only devices and shipping
>>> Broadcom
>>> chipsets w
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant
for
stuffing their machines with hardware from vendors that don't play
well with
open-source (for example, switching to wifi-o
OLD: Fedora-25-20161114.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161115.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
hi
see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a04534101f
regards
.g
Il 15/11/2016 15:02, build...@fedoraproject.org ha scritto:
wildfly has broken dependencies in the F-25 tree:
On x86_64:
wildfly-8.1.0-3.fc22.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.cxf:cxf-api)
wildfly-8.1
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 10:57 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On Monday 14 November 2016 02:18 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Is this really necessary? It's not the way ld currently works.
>
> It is necessary because the idea of unexpectedly finding debuginfo in
> their binaries when one did not
On 15 November 2016 at 01:35, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2016-11-15 1:06 GMT+01:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
>> You seem to confuse something being in the release criteria, and
>> something being possible. But that's secondary. If you would like this
>> scenario to be supported, then commit to te
limb created the branch 'el5' for the package 'perl-Crypt-IDEA'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-IDEA/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists
On Tuesday 15 November 2016 08:03 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> One does not build _programs_ with/out -g. One builds objects, and
> links objects into programs.
Sorry I did not word that correctly - I do know that emitting debuginfo
is a compile time operation but I wanted to make the case that when
ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Mail-IMAPTalk (f24)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Mail-IMAPTalk/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send a
> On 14 Nov 2016, at 13:25, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 09:42 PM, Barry Scott wrote:
> In this bug
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360797
>
> It is implied that rpkg has an unspecif
2016-11-15 15:35 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen :
> On 15 November 2016 at 01:35, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> 2016-11-15 1:06 GMT+01:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
>
>>> You seem to confuse something being in the release criteria, and
>>> something being possible. But that's secondary. If you would
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 16:05 +, Barry wrote:
> I was hoping to find out if there is in fact a patch to rpkg is
> required.
Try, and you'll see?
--
Mathieu
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
2016-11-15 13:45 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer :
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Andreas Tunek
> wrote:
>> 2016-11-14 22:26 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer :
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Andreas Tunek
>>> wrote:
2016-11-14 14:01 GMT+01:00 Stephen Gallagher :
> On 11/13/2016 01:46 PM, Ms Sanchez
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2016-11-15 15:35 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen :
>> On 15 November 2016 at 01:35, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>> 2016-11-15 1:06 GMT+01:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
>>
You seem to confuse something being in the release criteria, and
>>>
2016-11-15 8:43 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 07:35 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> If something is in the release criteria I expect the feature to be
>> present in the release. If the feature in question has worked for ~20
>> Fedora releases it is not my first priority to test
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161114.n.0):
ID: 48244 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/48244
ID: 48246 Test: x86_
2016-11-15 17:12 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer :
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Andreas Tunek
> wrote:
>> 2016-11-15 15:35 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen :
>>> On 15 November 2016 at 01:35, Andreas Tunek wrote:
2016-11-15 1:06 GMT+01:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
>>>
> You seem to confus
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2016-11-15 17:12 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer :
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Andreas Tunek
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-11-15 15:35 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen :
On 15 November 2016 at 01:35, Andreas Tunek
wrote:
> 2016-11-15 1:06
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2016-11-15 8:43 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 07:35 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> > > If something is in the release criteria I expect the feature to be
> > > present in the release. If the feature in question has wor
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 17:27 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Maybe the release criteria should reflect that then. Right now it says
> that mac support is a criteria for release.
You do remember the topic of this thread, right?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 14:30 -0800, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Josh Boyer
>> wrote:
>>
>> > If the features were developed and tested during the creation of the
>> > release, why would they fail criteria at the
- Original Message -
> Further, from a purely technical perspective, I think I've been swayed by
> arguments around the generation of the hostname:
>
> * I'm fine with the lowercase "fedora-" prefix. It makes sense since
> hostnames
> are generally normalized to lower-case in common usa
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 00:05, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:57:14 -0700
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> > Anyone else seeing errors like this?
> >
> > reading sources... [ 27%]
> > api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic1D reading sources...
> > [ 27%] api/astropy.modelin
Josh Boyer (jwbo...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > If that is not the case anymore it would be good if that would be
> > communicated in advance so that all users on mac hw could either
> > switch distros or gang together to make a remix or something.
>
> You are confusing Fedora with a company. T
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 08:36 -0800, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 14:30 -0800, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Josh Boyer
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > If the features were developed and tested du
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 11:57 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Josh Boyer (jwbo...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > > If that is not the case anymore it would be good if that would be
> > > communicated in advance so that all users on mac hw could either
> > > switch distros or gang together to make a re
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> How do you fix it if you can't install the release? Do you make a new
>> release with all the testing again (to make sure you do not have other
>> regression bugs)?
>
> Anaconda has updates
On 15 Nov 2016, at 11:37, Bastien Nocera wrote:
As mentioned in the fedora-desktop thread about branding, I don't
like seeing
this sort of randomly generated and nonsensical (and I mean that in
that a string
of hex characters obviously don't *mean* something) shouldn't be
user-visible.
R
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Andreas Tunek
> wrote:
>>> How do you fix it if you can't install the release? Do you make a new
>>> release with all the testing again (to make sure you
2016-11-15 17:31 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 17:27 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> Maybe the release criteria should reflect that then. Right now it says
>> that mac support is a criteria for release.
>
> You do remember the topic of this thread, right?
There is a difference
2016-11-15 17:30 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> 2016-11-15 8:43 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
>> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 07:35 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> > > If something is in the release criteria I expect the feature to be
>> > > present
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 56/79 (x86_64), 14/15 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-2016111
On 14/11/16 14:05, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/13/2016 02:01 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
To me, the default hostname should be fedora-xx. There are thousands if not
millions of computers using Fedora so it's quite anonymous.
I don't think copying Windows behaviour is a good idea, they aren't kno
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 19:00 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2016-11-15 17:31 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 17:27 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> > > Maybe the release criteria should reflect that then. Right now it says
> > > that mac support is a criteria for release.
> >
> >
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 19:01 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> I must have missed that. Sorry. Is there a wiki where you can see what
> has been tested like the "normal" test days?
Well, yes. That's what the results pages, that all the announcement
emails link to, show. The announcement emails also lin
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> It is entirely possible, of course, to be 'greatly improved' and still
> 'excessive'. You didn't argue that the installer is too buggy, you
> argued that it hasn't got any less buggy ('stability or blocker bugs')
> since Fedora 17. So no
On 11/14/2016 03:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Anyone else seeing errors like this?
>
> reading sources... [ 27%] api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic1D
> reading sources... [ 27%] api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic2D
> Sphinx Documentation subprocess failed with return code
Hi,
Something I stumbled upon today is that there is no convenient way by default
to make some custom script accessible via sudo without specifying full path.
Found out that sudo have limited set of paths in its environment that is
looking into [1]. Sadly, none of it is appropriate for custom s
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:32:57 +0100
gil wrote:
> hi
>
> see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a04534101f
So, the two things you can do:
1. Just wait and after a release candidate is voted 'go' for release,
we will be setting up the Fedora 25 updates repo, and this update will
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 10:28 -0800, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> I'm not counting change sets. I'm counting user distinguishable UIs,
> and those are four distinctly different interfaces and experiences and
> they each even have their own names:
> oldui
> newui auto
> newui custom
> blivet-gui
I under
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>> What's in place right now is a release blocking criterion that was not
>> being met, so the release was blocked. The criterion is not a secret
>> or new, the process is not secret or
Hi,
Here are my data: http://mysharegadget.com/104651530
On 11/13/2016 10:20 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> [Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to desktop@
> but I only got one recording. That's not quite enough to call it a dataset,
> let alone do any analysis on it. Plea
hi
Il 15/11/2016 20:33, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
1. Just wait and after a release candidate is voted 'go' for release,
we will be setting up the Fedora 25 updates repo, and this update will
be in there as a 0 day update as soon as we release.
for me is ok
thanks
.g
_
On 11/15/2016 11:33 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/14/2016 03:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Anyone else seeing errors like this?
>>
>> reading sources... [ 27%] api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic1D
>> reading sources... [ 27%] api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic2D
>> Sph
> I am fighting against human unreadable names in hostnames (specifically in
> datacenters)
Hurrah!
> and I created a little tool [1] that generates human readable and memorizable
> names made
> out of frequently occurring given names and surnames from the 1990 US Census
I like this idea, but
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 21:23, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 11:33 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 11/14/2016 03:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >> Anyone else seeing errors like this?
> >>
> >> reading sources... [ 27%] api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic1D
> >> readin
On 11/15/2016 03:42 PM, Peter Oliver wrote:
I like this idea, but I wonder if the potential for confusion or even offence
is too high for it to be workable. I'm thinking
ofhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudanese_teddy_bear_blasphemy_case.
>we can swap these with colors or other words to make
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 18:04 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
> Atomic qcow2 x86_64
> Workstation live i386
> Kde live x86_64
> Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> Workstation live x86_64
> Kde live i386
>
> Failed openQA tes
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:03:32AM -0800, Thomas Daede wrote:
> Thinkpad W540, with two finger right click on (which I think is off by
> default):
>
> https://people.xiph.org/~tdaede/w540.evemu.xz
got it, thanks.
Cheers,
Peter
> On 11/13/2016 07:20 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > [Disclaimer:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:56:27PM -0500, Andrej Manduch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are my data: http://mysharegadget.com/104651530
got it, thanks.
Cheers,
Peter
>
> On 11/13/2016 10:20 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > [Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to desktop@
> > b
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 17:18 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 03:42 PM, Peter Oliver wrote:
> > I like this idea, but I wonder if the potential for confusion or even
> > offence is too high for it to be workable. I'm thinking
> > ofhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudanese_teddy_bear_
On 11/14/2016 05:20 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
If you are going to remove functionality/hardware support you should
at least announce it someway otherwise people (users and contributors)
will lose faith in your project.
I do not have an agenda here---I am just a Fedora-using grandpa on the
sidel
TL;DR: There is a conflict when a user opts to install more than one
desktop environments that come with a FileManager1 (and probably any
other identical) D-Bus service provider, at least when one of them is
GNOME. This might be considered an oversight on upstream's part, but
it causes troubles dow
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.3 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
On 14/11/16 01:47 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 07:40:21PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>> This is Luya Tshimbalanga, one of Fedora Design Team member. I am
>> sending you the data you need.
> thanks, much appreciated. I should've mentioned: please reply to me
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25 RC 1.2):
ID: 48541 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/48541
Old failures (same test failed in 25 RC 1.2):
ID: 48566
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 01:47 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 1/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in 25 RC 1.2):
>
> ID: 48541 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproje
On 11/12/2016 01:01 AM, Barry wrote:
Barry
On 10 Nov 2016, at 15:21, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
On 11/10/2016 09:42 PM, Barry Scott wrote:
In this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360797
It is implied that rpkg has an unspecified problem with GitPython 2.0.
This is prev
Good question! I'm interested in the answer also!
/raj
(sent from iPhone)
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 3:19 AM, amitk...@redhat.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I want to contribute to sssd project. I have builded and installed source
> code on my VM
> These are my queries:
> 1. I tried to pick up a easyfix bug
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 18:42 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Something I stumbled upon today is that there is no convenient way by default
> to make some custom
> script accessible via sudo without specifying full path.
What about -E option?
> Found out that sudo have limited set of pa
> On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 18:42 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
>
> What about -E option?
Thanks for that, didn't take this into consideration. -E option however seems
to have no effect on PATH environment variable.
$ sudo -E env | grep ^PATH
PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
Following however
65 matches
Mail list logo
