Proposal [draft]: introduction default ld --as-needed and koji new functionality (Was: Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution)

On 16 March 2017 at 22:11, Kevin Kofler wrote: [..] > FYI, this is what Mandriva (back then), now Mageia and OpenMandriva, have > been doing for years (and still do). > > https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Overlinking_issues_in_packaging > > > As long as I've done many times full

Fedora 26 Alpha 1.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Server boot i386 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 21/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386) ID: 66151 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/66151 ID: 66154 Test:

New packager, needing reviews for some GNOME Shell extensions

I've just been sponsored into the packagers group, but I'm still fairly new. I started out with a few GNOME Shell extensions. I've been working on these for a little while now, and I believe they're ready to ship now -- I just need someone to do a final review, and then approve the packages. *

Re: spice-xpi not working in Firefox 52+

On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 15:00 +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > I guess this is going to be forever, as Firefox 52+ disables the > NPAPI plugins. Do you know any alternative? Is it a standard NPAPI plugin or a custom Firefox XPI extension? If it's just NPAPI then you could try Epiphany, the GNOME

[Bug 1432920] perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432920 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.28-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1429902] perl-Net-Amazon-EC2-0.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429902 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1429728] perl-Module-Data-0.013 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429728 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 617 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 611 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 501

[Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate Alpha-1.1 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Alpha-1.1 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

As part of the discussion at the systemd bugtracker [1], people from Debian said that they prefer 0660 mode, group kvm, because this limits the exposure to kernel bugs in the kvm module. Those are not frequent, but they do happen, so it's hard to argue that increases security at least a bit.

[Bug 1433160] New: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999811 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433160 Bug ID: 1433160 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999811 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Math-BigInt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1433157] perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433157 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.16-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1433157] New: perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433157 Bug ID: 1433157 Summary: perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBIx-RunSQL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1433157] perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433157 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1263913 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1263913=edit [patch] Update to 0.16 (#1433157) -- You are

[Bug 1433156] New: perl-BSON-v1.4.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433156 Bug ID: 1433156 Summary: perl-BSON-v1.4.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-BSON Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Fedora 26-20170316.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Server boot i386 Failed openQA tests: 16/108 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170315.n.0): ID: 65968 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL:

[Bug 1432920] perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432920 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Fedora Rawhide-20170316.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Server boot i386 Failed openQA tests: 9/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170315.n.0): ID: 65745 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL:

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > BuildRequires:qt5-qtbase*-static* There are a few small libraries that Qt upstream ships only as static, because they are not covered by the binary compatibility guarantees: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/qt5-qtbase.git/tree/qt5-qtbase.spec#n874 The main

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 739 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 501 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 203

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > That seems fine, but compat-freerdp12 should've been named freerdp1.2, > according to current naming guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name Hmmm, "compat-" was always controversial, and I

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

Jonathan Wakely wrote: > If glibc-static was removed from Fedora and that change propagated to > RHEL I know of companies that might stop being customers of Red Hat. > > Being unable to statically link their applications would be a > showstopper for some, and would cause them to move to a

[Bug 1430157] perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence-0.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430157 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Event-Recurre

[Bug 1429903] perl-Locale-SubCountry-2.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429903 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-SubCountry-2.02

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Long time ago I've been able to gain minimize number of dependencies by > injecting LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed" into %configure macros. As on mean > time cmake emerged this move will be not so effective as it was decade > ago. Today I think that better solution could apply

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

On 03/16/2017 08:44 AM, Athos Ribeiro wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:33:15PM +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: >> Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 11.10 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: >>> On 16/03/17 10:47, Guido Aulisi wrote: Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto:

Re: How to fix 'E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug"' in cross-gcc?

On 03/16/2017 08:47 AM, David Howells wrote: > Hi, > > When creating an update for cross-gcc, I see: > > cross-gcc.src:388: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug" > > from dist.rpmlint. > > cross-gcc's spec file does stuff to /usr/lib/debug because it's a compiler and > the

[Bug 1430157] perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence-0.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430157 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1429903] perl-Locale-SubCountry-2.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429903 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Fedmsg notifications not work with this options

On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 13:47 +0200, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > reported issue to https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg-notify/issues/29 > > :) maybe I will got a badge Thanks for reporting it. There's also a bad redirect on the infrastructure side:

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

On 03/15/2017 05:32 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > ./r/rust.git/rust.spec:BuildRequires: llvm-static This one is conditional, generally disabled. We use it to break rust's bootstrap dependency when llvm is being rebased to a new soname. ___ devel mailing

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:32:06 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > OK here is full list of spec files which have glibc-static in BuildRequires: > > ./g/gdb.git/gdb.spec:BuildRequires: glibc-static%{bits_local} This is a false positive as it is enclosed by: %if 0%{?_with_testsuite:1} I have no

Re: -Wno-format vs. -Werror=format-security

On 02/27/2017 01:35 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > As you might know, redhat-rpm-config is adding -Wall -Werror=format-security > into $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags} by default. > I've recently fixed a bug #1425825 where -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wall > or -Wall -Werror=format-security

[389-devel] Anyone still building 389 on HPUX?

Hello, Just curious if anyone is building 389 on HPUX? There is very old code in our server that is specific to HPUX that we'd like to remove. Most of it is probably not needed anymore(even on HPUX), but we want to check before we remove it. Thanks, Mark

Re: Rotation logs - use or not to use

On 2017-03-16 2:04 PM, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: Cheers all, I'm trying to do something with a patch in MariaDB, but I need to know current situation about rotation logs. *What's the problem:* Upstream ship rotation log, we drop it out. This started sometimes between F15 and F16. Mostly because

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-03-17)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d

Re: Rotation logs - use or not to use

> Cheers all, > > I'm trying to do something with a patch in MariaDB, but I need to know > current situation about rotation logs. > > *What's the problem:* > Upstream ship rotation log, we drop it out. > This started sometimes between F15 and F16. Mostly because (for what I > read) Fedora didn't

Fedora 26 Alpha status is NO-GO

Release status of the Fedora 26 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting is NO-GO. Due to late blockers we are missing RC of Fedora 26 Alpha release. As such the decision is to slip the Fedora 26 Alpha release for one week. There is going to be one more Go/No-Go meeting the next Thursday, March 23rd, 2017 at 17:00

Fedora 26 Alpha status is NO-GO

Release status of the Fedora 26 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting is NO-GO. Due to late blockers we are missing RC of Fedora 26 Alpha release. As such the decision is to slip the Fedora 26 Alpha release for one week. There is going to be one more Go/No-Go meeting the next Thursday, March 23rd, 2017 at 17:00

[389-devel] Re: Questions related to lib389 issue #1 cn=config

After reinstalling the 389-ds-base I realized that the same error I* am getting even if I don't setup the 389-ds-base using setup-ds-admin.pl * So conclusion from above statement is When I install 389-ds-base then I do setup using this ==> "setup-ds-admin.pl" then I am

Outlook email suport

phone number Microsoft Outlook tech support phone number Microsoft Outlook support phone Number Microsoft Outlook tech support phone number Microsoft Outlook tech support phone phone number Microsoft Outlook tech support phone number Microsoft Outlook tech support phone Number Microsoft Outlook

Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

Hello all, On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came out yesterday[2]. At this time the following Container Images are available in the Fedora

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

On 16 March 2017 at 12:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote: [..] > I can only repeat that such people should consider linking own binaries >> against uClibc as this implementation is not affected by issue with hidden >> loading NSS DSOs which probably make such binaries useless

Self Introduction : Dhanesh B. Sabane [dhanesh95, UTC +5:30]

Aloha! I'm Dhanesh from Maharashtra, India[1]. I've been contributing to Fedora since May 2016. I started off with CommOps and now I've come to the point where I feel I can be a part of this group. I have just finished my first package for Fedora [2] which is Python software and I've got a few

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-YAML-Parser-Syck

perl-YAML-Parser-Syck has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-YAML-Parser-Syck-0.01-35.fc26.x86_64 requires libsyck.so.0()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-YAML-Parser-Syck-0.01-35.fc26.armv7hl requires libsyck.so.0 On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

Re: spice-xpi not working in Firefox 52+

On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > Hi, it looks like the Spice XPI addon no longer works in Firefox 52. > > I guess this is going to be forever, as Firefox 52+ disables the NPAPI > plugins. Do you know any alternative? I manage a RHEV farm and this is going > to be a big deal. > >

Re: spice-xpi not working in Firefox 52+

2017-03-16 15:00 GMT+01:00 Juan Orti Alcaine : > Hi, it looks like the Spice XPI addon no longer works in Firefox 52. > > I guess this is going to be forever, as Firefox 52+ disables the NPAPI > plugins. Do you know any alternative? I manage a RHEV farm and this is >

dist.upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2017-83ab2706c3

dist.upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2017-83ab2706c3 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/0281df9c-0a58-11e7-ad3a-5254008e42f6/task_output/FEDORA-2017-83ab2706c3.log ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

dist.upgradepath PASSED for perl-Text-Glob-0.11-1.fc25

dist.upgradepath PASSED for perl-Text-Glob-0.11-1.fc25 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/0281df9c-0a58-11e7-ad3a-5254008e42f6/task_output/perl-Text-Glob-0.11-1.fc25.log ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

How to fix 'E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug"' in cross-gcc?

Hi, When creating an update for cross-gcc, I see: cross-gcc.src:388: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug" from dist.rpmlint. cross-gcc's spec file does stuff to /usr/lib/debug because it's a compiler and the debuginfo shouldn't be extracted from some of the compiled bits it

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:33:15PM +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 11.10 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > > On 16/03/17 10:47, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > > > > On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: > >

Unretire nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy

Hello! I would like to unretire nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy[0], and have filed a package re-review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432995 [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432995 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-YAML-Parser-Syck

perl-YAML-Parser-Syck has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-YAML-Parser-Syck-0.01-35.fc26.x86_64 requires libsyck.so.0()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-YAML-Parser-Syck-0.01-35.fc26.armv7hl requires libsyck.so.0 On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core

ppisar pushed to perl-Reply (master). "Import"

ppisar pushed to perl-Reply (master). "Import" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Reply.git/commit/?h=master=84a34f63aeea6ca3f93eacdedeca21debf99cb3c ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

ppisar uploaded Reply-0.42.tar.gz for perl-Reply

d60a584b3cf676be97bbe199d965a488d6a869b1f6cd55d6b405da3f9c717cf63b4380408a72e6f1e06d3d32a90aa5633889a907d94da147e35804b9d0387662 Reply-0.42.tar.gz

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Reply (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Reply (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Reply/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Reply (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Reply (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Reply/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Reply (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Reply (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Reply/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Reply (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Reply (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Reply/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

spice-xpi not working in Firefox 52+

Hi, it looks like the Spice XPI addon no longer works in Firefox 52. I guess this is going to be forever, as Firefox 52+ disables the NPAPI plugins. Do you know any alternative? I manage a RHEV farm and this is going to be a big deal. If there is no other alternative to open the Spice consoles

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:47:16PM +0100, Simone Caronni wrote: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob=package=compat-* > > Shall we file a bug for all of them? I don't think it's worth the churn. Eventually, most of these will be retired and we'll move on with the new names.

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Class-Refresh (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Class-Refresh (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Class-Refresh/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Class-Refresh (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Class-Refresh (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Class-Refresh/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Class-Refresh (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Class-Refresh (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Class-Refresh/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Class-Refresh (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Class-Refresh (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Class-Refresh/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: > > Ah, I missed that guidelines. I would need a re-review of it. > Re-review for the rename created: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432975 Dominik, I've added you in CC. Regards, --Simone -- You

[Bug 1432920] perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432920 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.28-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-98301ada4c -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1432920] perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432920 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.28-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d0ec676fb5 -- You are receiving this mail

ppisar pushed to perl-Pod-Perldoc (f25). "3.28 bump"

From 328181437a7bcde8be16b5f91b893fb40fa763cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:59:29 +0100 Subject: 3.28 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Pod-Perldoc.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files

ppisar pushed to perl-Pod-Perldoc (f26). "3.28 bump"

From 2e3822441f42f84369c23195eec72119a3f65ffd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:59:29 +0100 Subject: 3.28 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Pod-Perldoc.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1432920] perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432920 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Pod-Perldoc (master). "3.28 bump"

From 2e3822441f42f84369c23195eec72119a3f65ffd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:59:29 +0100 Subject: 3.28 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Pod-Perldoc.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files

ppisar uploaded Pod-Perldoc-3.28.tar.gz for perl-Pod-Perldoc

166a750bf04a71cc24bebaa2dd309f71f4ec45dbff6109bc98bf4ec7cbfa9750c2ee74f697851d1345e13a6f9c7cbf0eedfa3554b914563e6eadba5434c5f8cb Pod-Perldoc-3.28.tar.gz

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Hello, Simone. > > On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 10:27, Simone Caronni wrote: > [...] > > Guacamole / Vinagre / Weston: latest 1.2 release (compat-freerdp12) > > Remmina: latest snapshot (freerdp)

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

On 15/03/17 19:26 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On 15 March 2017 at 18:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote: There are people who use the static libraries, for their own reasons, and don't expect support when they do so. I can only repeat that such people should consider

[Bug 1432920] New: perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432920 Bug ID: 1432920 Summary: perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.28 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Pod-Perldoc Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1432914] New: perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432914 Bug ID: 1432914 Summary: perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.45 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Cache-FastMmap Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

Hello, Simone. On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 10:27, Simone Caronni wrote: [...] > Guacamole / Vinagre / Weston: latest 1.2 release (compat-freerdp12) > Remmina: latest snapshot (freerdp) - usually the same date as the FreeRDP > snapshot. > > This would also allow me to close a lot of bugs

Re: Fedmsg notifications not work with this options

reported issue to https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg-notify/issues/29 :) maybe I will got a badge 2017-03-16 12:49 GMT+02:00 Cătălin George Feștilă : > Need to fix links from fedmsg-notify-config > > I think is need to fix this into package the corect link >

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 11.10 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > On 16/03/17 10:47, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > > > On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > > > > > I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

On 16/03/17 10:47, Guido Aulisi wrote: Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to package repositories, I think we need at least: /results_* /*.src.rpm This is to ignore

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

On 16 March 2017 at 04:50, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: [..] > > And one more clarification: remove static libraries from glibc distro > > packages does not blocks static linking. > > It will only removes possibility linking against static glibc libraries. > > Yes. This is a

Re: Fedmsg notifications not work with this options

Need to fix links from fedmsg-notify-config I think is need to fix this into package the corect link https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/ The fedmsg-notify-config come with option on/off button and link to the notification event. Just click to the link about Fedora Elections and will give you

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to package > > repositories, I think we need at least: > > > > /results_* > > /*.src.rpm > > > > This is to ignore fedpkg

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to package repositories, I think we need at least: /results_* /*.src.rpm This is to ignore fedpkg mockbuild output What do you think about that? Should I add that gitignore lines by myself in every

Gitignore configuration for packages

Hi list, I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to package repositories, I think we need at least: /results_* /*.src.rpm This is to ignore fedpkg mockbuild output What do you think about that? Should I add that gitignore lines by myself in every package I manintain or should it be

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide and 26): ldns (libldns.so.1 -> libldns.so.2)

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 03/14/2017 12:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:35:17AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: >>> On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 15:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: ldns was updated from

[Bug 1429902] perl-Net-Amazon-EC2-0.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429902 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-Amazon-EC2-0.32-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ea29000e2c -- You are receiving this

  1   2   >