[Bug 1543205] perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543205 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1543899] perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.21-4.fc28 FTBFS : t/53_driver_dbi.t test fails with sqlite 3.22.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543899 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented

Richard Shaw wrote: > $ fedpkg request-branch > Could not execute request_branch: The "token" value must be set under the > "fedpkg.pagure" section in your "fedpkg" user configuration WTF?! So, instead of going to a web interface and making the change (old, now discontinued, pkgdb), we now have

Re: Clean up your spec files

Chenxiong Qi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> * rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT >> >> In the past, it was necessary to clean the buildroot at >> the beginning of %install and the end of %clean. This is >> no longer true and not needed since F12. > > Not

Re: Clean up your spec files

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi, > I am sometimes reviewing spec files and I very often see common mistakes. I > mean in packages which are already in > Fedora. For a long time and they have some dust from past times. > > I am not going to file bug

[Bug 1544162] New: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544162 Bug ID: 1544162 Summary: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.28 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

HEADS UP: upcoming giflib-5.1.4 update in rawhide

Hi Per GifLib5 change [1] I plan to start updating to giflib-5.1.4 tomorrow evening. I'll start by building giflib-5.1.4 and then follow with the transition package compat-giflib-4-1.6, which will provide the old giflib-4.x dependency during the transition to giflib-5.x. Subsequently, I'll

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On 10/02/18 12:54, Kevin Kofler wrote: > David Sommerseth wrote: >> I doubt Koji was primarily built for "does this work?"-builds. It exists >> to build proper packages targeting Fedora repositories. > > But that is the point, to build a proper package: > > do { > try build; > } while (!build

Re: -Werror (or any alternatives in different languages)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 15:05 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018, at 2:57 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > I'm thinking about passing --cap-lints warnings to rustc to prevent > > erroring on > > this (and just show warning). Should

Re: -Werror (or any alternatives in different languages)

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018, at 2:57 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I'm thinking about passing --cap-lints warnings to rustc to prevent erroring > on > this (and just show warning). Should we do same for C/C++? Or should I > reconsider decision in Rust land?

Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?

On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 12:32 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:42:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > > A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27... > > > > > > > > Likely

Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:32:47PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:42:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27... > > > > Likely http://gcc.gnu.org/PR83204

Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:42:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27... > > Likely http://gcc.gnu.org/PR83204 . Looks like it, rebuilding with C++11 let it complete. Would rebuilding

Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:42:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27... Likely http://gcc.gnu.org/PR83204 . Jakub ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > I wasn't even aware of this new use of fedpkg, but you could just have > looked > the help instead of searcghinq the source code: Always in the place you don't look... :) Thanks, Richard

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

I must agree with Kevin that taking every single commit message and putting it into changelog without further tweaking might just produce lots of redundant and not really desired lines in the output. But I think something still can be done. When you invoke `rpkg tag` (the same goes for `fedpkg

Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented

On samedi 10 février 2018 14:48:04 CET Richard Shaw wrote: > > So I went to request a new branch of an existing package only to find out > fedrepo-req-branch, which hasn't been around that long is already > depreceated and the facility brought into fedpkg... so: > > $ fedpkg request-branch >

Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented

please see if helps [1] the meassage just have 5 days :) [1]https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproj ect.org/message/KS6QZQHNFCFEVJPJMFWITYWV3AHRSX5E/ On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 07:48 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > So I went to request a new branch of an existing package

Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?

On Sat, 10 Feb 2018, Richard Shaw wrote: A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27... Error during build[1]: *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins. Event                            | Plugins

Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?

On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 06:42 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27... > > Error during build[1]: > *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug > unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins. > Event|

RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented

So I went to request a new branch of an existing package only to find out fedrepo-req-branch, which hasn't been around that long is already depreceated and the facility brought into fedpkg... so: $ fedpkg request-branch Could not execute request_branch: The "token" value must be set under the

Re: vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128 compiles fine on f26 but not on higher fedora version

> On 09/02/18 15:01 -, Martin Gansser wrote: > > This suggests the package is not using the mariadb API correctly, and > should be including a different header. > > > And this is probably for the same reason: is not part of > the public API for mariadb clients. > > Did you try replacing

OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?

A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27... Error during build[1]: *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins. Event| Plugins PLUGIN_FINISH_UNIT | annobin: Generate final

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Atomic, Cloud and Docker images for s390x

On 02/09/2018 03:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:20:09PM +0530, Sinny Kumari wrote: On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote: Not yet. We are working on packaging podman which would give users the same experience as Docker CLI

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

David Sommerseth wrote: > I doubt Koji was primarily built for "does this work?"-builds. It exists > to build proper packages targeting Fedora repositories. But that is the point, to build a proper package: do { try build; } while (!build succeeded); and the output is a working package. >