Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 18 February 2018 at 12:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by analyzing >

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 19:41 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler > wrote: > > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a > > > "%global sover " and using it in %files? > > > > > >

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote: > > Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a > > "%global sover " and using it in %files? > > > > If nothing else it should at least be documented as a best practice. > >

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

Richard Shaw wrote: > Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a > "%global sover " and using it in %files? > > If nothing else it should at least be documented as a best practice. Not yet another bureaucratic guideline making it harder to maintain packages! Hardcoded

[Bug 1549884] New: perl-RDF-NS-20180227 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884 Bug ID: 1549884 Summary: perl-RDF-NS-20180227 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-RDF-NS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi

[389-devel] Please review: 49369 merge svrcore

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49369 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49589 -- Thanks, William Brown ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.93

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/27/2018 10:47 AM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.93 > Commit(x86_64): > da0bd968610aa1e29c5bb37065649407fbbfffa53e63831afdadbd34a3b05327 >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Better late then never, vsqlite++ updated and rebuilt On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Will you be doing such rebuild every

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1086 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 849 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 431

Re: Review Request: swift-lang (Apple's Swift programming language)

I forgot to mention that I'd be willing to do a review-swap for this as well. Ron On 27 Feb 2018, at 14:08, Ron Olson wrote: Hi all- I'm looking for a package review of Apple's Swift programming language: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 I greatly appreciate any and

[Bug 1542727] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542727 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-experimental-0.019-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

On mardi 27 février 2018 19:39:47 CET you wrote: > > 6) When I finally got the macros right enough for %prep, %build, and > > %install to proceed, the build failed due to missing debuginfo files (and > > warnings about duplicate files) - well, it's a source-only library > > package, > > how do I

Review Request: swift-lang (Apple's Swift programming language)

Hi all- I'm looking for a package review of Apple's Swift programming language: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 I greatly appreciate any and all assistance in getting Swift available on Fedora. Ron ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 12:27 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate > > rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of

Re: runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run

On 02/26/2018 04:59 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 02/26/2018 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote >> This is not the case with any of the bodhi enabled releases. They only >> update the buildroot from base packages + stable updates + specific >> packages that are added as buildroot overrides. > > Yeah

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> >> Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate >> rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of both >> packages and could have rebuilt

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 959 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 849 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 820

Add ability to check ABI compliance from fedpkg?

I don't have to do it for many of my packages, but I do regularly check ABI compliance before performing an update so I know if I need to rebuild dependencies or not. Currently my workflow is something like: $ cd abicompare/ $ mkdir $ cd (unpack pakage and -devel package) (same for ) $

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and > co-ordinate > rebuilds. (In fact it looks like

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

On mardi 27 février 2018 15:49:44 CET Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go packaging > in fedora, and since I saw that packages are starting to make use of the > new mechanisms, I wanted to finally check it out and started

[Bug 1529811] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529811 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts --- Thanks for doing this. It's not a big deal, but it does simplify things for me. Also note that the module exists basically to run the cyrus-imapd test suite and it is maintained by

[Bug 1549550] perl-Clownfish-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549550 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Clownfish-0.6.3-1.fc27, perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in

[Bug 1549551] perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549551 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Clownfish-0.6.3-1.fc27, perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in

[Bug 1529811] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529811 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson < adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate > rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the maintainer of both > packages and could have rebuilt cups-filters, but just forgot

Re: Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

Le mardi 27 février 2018 à 18:34 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : > > > How do we test this? I installedtho go-srpm-macros from Rawhide but it > doesn't seem to have the required macros? Yes in rawhide go-compilers and go-srpm-macros are in an intermediary not fully tested/integrated

Re: News in net-snmp package

On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 09:02 -0500, Josef Ridky wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to inform you, that net-snmp package will use Python3 package > instead of Python2. > With this change, python2-net-snmp package will be renamed to > python3-net-snmp package. > This change will be applied in

Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

qpdf was updated from 7.1.1-4 to 8.0.0-1 in Rawhide on 2018-02-26. This update bumped the soname from libqpdf.so.18 to libqpdf.so.21 . This soname bump was not announced, as it is supposed to be, and dependent packages were not rebuilt. cups-filters depends on qpdf, so anything that includes

[Bug 1549550] perl-Clownfish-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549550 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1549551] perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549551 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1489529] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0129-7.fc28 FTBFS: tests fail with libxml2-2.9.5

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489529 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1529811] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529811 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-02-28 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: The EPEL Steering Committee will have a weekly meeting to cover current tasks and problems needed to keep EPEL

Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27

On 26.02.2018 13:06, Kamil Paral wrote: I believe this means the compose wasn't done correctly (apitrace-libs was considered multilib initially, and is not considered multilib now). You can file a ticket for releng: https://pagure.io/releng Done [1], thanks. [1]

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

On mardi 27 février 2018 16:03:36 CET Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-02-27 15:49, Fabio Valentini a écrit : > > Hi Fabio, > > Thanks a lot for testing, we need more input to produce great Go > packaging tooling. > > > > I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go > >

[Bug 1547296] perl-libwww-perl-6.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547296 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-libwww-perl-6.32-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1459433] Unescaped % character in changelog

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459433 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Plack-1.0047-1.fc26

[Bug 1544753] perl-RDF-NS-20180213 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544753 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RDF-NS-20180213-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress? > > ;) > > My plan is to do this bi-weekly ;) So this weekend then. Hello, So I made a fix for clamsmtp, and

[Bug 1459433] Unescaped % character in changelog

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459433 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1544753] perl-RDF-NS-20180213 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544753 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RDF-NS-20180213-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1549515] perl-Mason-Tidy-2.57-8.fc29 FTBFS: t/ CLI.t test fails with perltidy ≥ 20180219

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549515 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com --

[Bug 1549515] perl-Mason-Tidy-2.57-8.fc29 FTBFS: t/ CLI.t test fails with perltidy ≥ 20180219

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549515 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1549515] perl-Mason-Tidy-2.57-8.fc29 FTBFS: t/ CLI.t test fails with perltidy ≥ 20180219

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549515 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In

News in net-snmp package

Hi folks, I would like to inform you, that net-snmp package will use Python3 package instead of Python2. With this change, python2-net-snmp package will be renamed to python3-net-snmp package. This change will be applied in Fedora Rawhide and Fedora 28. I would be glad for any feedback.

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On 02/27/2018 03:22 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > AA. Fedora is not (at this time) concerned about license compatibility > issues arising from the relicensing of CUPS to Apache 2.0, in as much > as this applies to linking of components together (our use case). > > BB. If you are planning on (or have)

[package review] f28-backgrounds ready for review

Hello team, f28-backgrounds is looking for package review needed for beta release. The location is on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549686 Thanks in advance. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net signature.asc

[Bug 1549556] perl-libwww-perl-6.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549556 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-libwww-perl-6.33-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d007de5566 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

Le 2018-02-27 15:49, Fabio Valentini a écrit : Hi I'll answer in more detail since I have a little more time now 2) Additionally, I wasn't able to figure out why I have to set both "%gobaseipath" and "%provider_prefix". That's one of the changes Jan made I don't understand either. It's

[Bug 1549556] perl-libwww-perl-6.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549556 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now

- Original Message - > From: "Sergio Pascual" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:18:47 PM > Subject: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now > >

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

Le 2018-02-27 15:49, Fabio Valentini a écrit : Hi Fabio, Thanks a lot for testing, we need more input to produce great Go packaging tooling. I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go packaging in fedora, and since I saw that packages are starting to make use of the

[Bug 1549550] perl-Clownfish-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549550 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Clownfish-0.6.3-1.fc26 perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4835c867a4

Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:26 -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos > wrote: > > regarding the strong crypto change in Fedora28 [0], we have > > identified > > few (usually internal) sites which break under firefox or other >

Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

Hi everybody, I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go packaging in fedora, and since I saw that packages are starting to make use of the new mechanisms, I wanted to finally check it out and started "converting" one of my own (one of ~50) golang packages

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

AA. Fedora is not (at this time) concerned about license compatibility issues arising from the relicensing of CUPS to Apache 2.0, in as much as this applies to linking of components together (our use case). BB. If you are planning on (or have) copying code from CUPS and including it in a GPLv2

[Bug 1549551] perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549551 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4835c867a4 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1549551] perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549551 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-53c387dbd8 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1549551] perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549551 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1489529] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0129-7.fc28 FTBFS: tests fail with libxml2-2.9.5

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489529 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-XML-LibXML-2.0129-3.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7efc906066 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1549556] New: perl-libwww-perl-6.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549556 Bug ID: 1549556 Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.33 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-libwww-perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1549551] New: perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549551 Bug ID: 1549551 Summary: perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Clownfish-CFC Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1549550] New: perl-Clownfish-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549550 Bug ID: 1549550 Summary: perl-Clownfish-0.6.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Clownfish Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

Hi Gerald, I'll try to explain how I understood it: On 02/26/2018 03:45 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > I must be missing something what is sad?  It has been stated that > CUPS does > not need any GPLv2 only component for building or linking. The issue is about packages, which have GPLv2only

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 22:00 +, n...@redhat.com wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Modularity Office Hours on 2018-02-27 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 > US/Eastern >At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity NB: I've just noticed that this reminder is a near

[Bug 1549515] perl-Mason-Tidy-2.57-8.fc29 FTBFS: t/ CLI.t test fails with perltidy ≥ 20180219

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549515 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 124604 -- You

[Bug 1549515] New: perl-Mason-Tidy-2.57-8.fc29 FTBFS: t/ CLI.t test fails with perltidy ≥ 20180219

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549515 Bug ID: 1549515 Summary: perl-Mason-Tidy-2.57-8.fc29 FTBFS: t/CLI.t test fails with perltidy ≥ 20180219 Product: Fedora Version: 28 Component: perl-Mason-Tidy

[Bug 1549504] perl-Event-Lib-1.03-35.fc29 FTBFS: Lib.xs:131:14: error: ' struct event' has no member named 'ev_arg'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549504 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 124603 -- You

REMINDER: Software Translation Deadline in 1 week

In one week on 2018-Mar-06 [1] we will reach the Software Translation Deadline [2]. At the time of the deadline all the strings translations should be substantially finished. Any help with the translations is welcomed. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule [2]

[Bug 1549504] perl-Event-Lib-1.03-35.fc29 FTBFS: Lib.xs:131:14: error: ' struct event' has no member named 'ev_arg'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549504 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- PLD Linux has a patch

F28 Software String Freeze is today

Today (2018-Feb-27) we have reached the "Software String Freeze" deadline. Beyond this deadline there should not be any changes in strings, ideally. If you want to help with translations then, please check the packages that follow Fedora release cycle (Main projects):

[Bug 1549504] New: perl-Event-Lib-1.03-35.fc29 FTBFS: Lib.xs:131:14: error : 'struct event' has no member named 'ev_arg'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549504 Bug ID: 1549504 Summary: perl-Event-Lib-1.03-35.fc29 FTBFS: Lib.xs:131:14: error: 'struct event' has no member named 'ev_arg' Product: Fedora Version: 28 Component:

Fedora 28 Spins page: spin/labs owners please test

Greetings. Per this fesco ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1714 I have created the Fedora 28 spins/labs page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Spins All spin maintainers/owners/interested parties should test their spins and at least update this wiki page with beta/final testing.

REMINDER: Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline & Beta Freeze in 1 week

The next Tuesday, on 2018-Mar-06, we will reach two important milestones of the Fedora 28 release [1]: == Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline [2] == * New accepted changes must be code complete, meaning all the code required to enable to the new change is finished. * The level of code

Fedora 28 Spins page: spin/labs owners please test

Greetings. Per this fesco ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1714 I have created the Fedora 28 spins/labs page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Spins All spin maintainers/owners/interested parties should test their spins and at least update this wiki page with beta/final testing.

REMINDER: Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline & Beta Freeze in 1 week

The next Tuesday, on 2018-Mar-06, we will reach two important milestones of the Fedora 28 release [1]: == Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline [2] == * New accepted changes must be code complete, meaning all the code required to enable to the new change is finished. * The level of code

[Bug 1549344] perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549344 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1549344] perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549344 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1529811] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529811 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6b02e39b11 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1529811] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529811 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-66db3816ef -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1529811] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529811 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- It seems nobody reported any bug in 0.10 and I'm not aware about any API changes. I will upgrade it in F27 and F26. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1549338] perl-Data-Peek-0.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549338 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1479860] perl-Net-SFTP-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479860 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed