On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:09 PM Pascal Terjan wrote:
>
> On 7 August 2018 at 09:50, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 04:36:07PM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >> this mail is a continuation of an FPC [1] and a FESCo [2] tickets.
> >>
> >> A proposal was made
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49895
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
Hi Simo and Alex,
It's come to my attention that there are some discussions underway for
new features being designed for IPA and 389ds. However these are
happening away from the 389-ds mailing lists.
Given that I am still a core team member, and no longer a staff member
at Red Hat, it would be
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-08-09 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2018-08-09 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/08/09/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.13-20180808gitad640e9.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613344
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-7.89 is|perl-Mojolicious-7.90 is
The Fedora today, there was a presentation about a vision for how
applications should have a different life cycle than the operating system:
https://flock2018.sched.com/event/Fjdk/at-long-last-rings-split-lifecycles
For Flatpaks, the future is now - as soon as we start building them, I'd
like
Michael Schroeder wrote:
> I don't think this is hard to implement, but there's a little detail
> that needs to be discussed: what should happen if the filelists.xml
> download fails? This can happen because the metadata has been rewritten
> in the meantime.
Doesn't that race condition already
On 08/08/2018 01:48 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Adding -- and maintaining -- patterns or whitelist exceptions, which moves file
dependencies into primary.xml is actually an approach that solves the problem,
and scales to multiple repos as well, each of which also will have their own
patterns and
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49894
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
On Wednesday, August 08 2018, I wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 08 2018, I wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> libipt v2.0 has been released yesterday and there was an SONAME bump
>> (from 1.6 to 2.0). According to 'dnf repoquery --whatrequires libipt',
>> only two packages depend on it:
>>
>> - GDB
>> -
My issue is the misdirection discussing lazy filelist downloading as a
"solution" to the "problem" of huge amounts of data that is forced to be
downloaded and loaded.
The issue has been discussed repeatedly without a solution.
Adding -- and maintaining -- patterns or whitelist exceptions,
On Wednesday, August 08 2018, I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libipt v2.0 has been released yesterday and there was an SONAME bump
> (from 1.6 to 2.0). According to 'dnf repoquery --whatrequires libipt',
> only two packages depend on it:
>
> - GDB
> - Insight
>
> I am the Fedora GDB maintainer and will
On 07/11/2018 04:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 07/10/2018 04:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:14:43PM -0700, Thomas Daede wrote:
On 07/03/2018 05:15 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
Move to uEFI as the default
Hi,
libipt v2.0 has been released yesterday and there was an SONAME bump
(from 1.6 to 2.0). According to 'dnf repoquery --whatrequires libipt',
only two packages depend on it:
- GDB
- Insight
I am the Fedora GDB maintainer and will rebuild it now. I am also
Cc'ing the insight maintainer in
On 08/08/2018 11:04 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
But "occasionally" downloading file lists does not solve the problems stated,
either then, or now.
I haven't been able to figure out what your problem is with this. Do
you think that "occasionally" is incorrect and it will be "usually"? Or
you
On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 16:43 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> That's a good question. The time window where this can happen is not
> be that big, because without filelists the loading of metadata is
> quicker. But it's still non-zero, so given enough machines and enough
> updates, it'll
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 08:50:25AM +, Michael Schroeder wrote:
>
> Yep, that sounds like an excellent idea.
>
>
> That's a good question. The time window where this can happen is not
> be that big, because without filelists the loading of metadata is
> quicker. But it's still non-zero, so
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
59 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
27 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-d801e05f92
uwsgi-2.0.17.1-1.el6
20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613225
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Text-Quoted-2.10-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 8 August 2018 at 11:43, John Florian wrote:
> On 2018-08-08 10:47, Jason Tibbitts wrote:
>>>
>>> "JF" == John Florian writes:
>>
>> JF> How difficult would it be to provide modern Python (e.g. 35 or 36)
>> JF> in EPEL?
>>
>> Obviously not that difficult, since it is already there.
>
>
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 08:50:25AM +, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 04:36:07PM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > this mail is a continuation of an FPC [1] and a FESCo [2] tickets.
> >
> > A proposal was made is to disallow packages in Fedora from using file
>
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default:
Filesystem for mount /sysroot changed from
/dev/mapper/fedora--atomic_ibm--p8--kvm--03--guest--02-root to
On 2018-08-08 10:47, Jason Tibbitts wrote:
"JF" == John Florian writes:
JF> How difficult would it be to provide modern Python (e.g. 35 or 36)
JF> in EPEL?
Obviously not that difficult, since it is already there.
By that I assume you mean 34, right? Or am I overlooking something?
The
> "JF" == John Florian writes:
JF> How difficult would it be to provide modern Python (e.g. 35 or 36)
JF> in EPEL?
Obviously not that difficult, since it is already there. The main
problem is that the way it was done requires that Fedora specfiles grow
additional complication in order to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613225
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:29 PM, wrote:
>
> A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
>
> Version: 28.20180804.0
> Commit(x86_64): 5633f5b369b166d104720a4da31da1
> ac6b5e3c0de5c5bae70cb40a850dede502
> Commit(aarch64): 99267073f82f4d7161bb36c5229d4d
>
On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 02:11:08 +0200, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> 2) The -get-inventory-id option creates a new inventory id (or 'group') to
> mark new probes by this id. You've created too many inventory ids per day
> and received an error when trying to create more. Usually it's enough to
> have
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 2:19 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> I'm taking a look through these and updating ones that clearly *are*
> testable already to MODIFIED.
>
You're awesome!
> surely the BINUTILS231 change supersedes the BINUTILS230 change?
> Shouldn't the bugs be duped and the wiki pages
Hi,
I notice that this package is in *both* the CentOS 7 base repo and in EPEL.
The filename of the RPM is
mpg123-libs-1.25.6-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
This doesn't look right to me, should it be deleted from EPEL if it's moved
into CentOS itself? It looks new to CentOS 7.5.
FTR, there is
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 11:19:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 10:42 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > In on week, on 2018-08-14, we will reach Fedora 29 Change
> > Checkpoint:Completion deadline (testable) [1].
> >
> > At this point, all accepted changes
W dniu 07.08.2018 o 15:12, Florian Weimer pisze:
> On 08/06/2018 09:58 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> From what I remember there is no architecture supported by Fedora
>> without Valgrind support. We got rid of s390 (32bit) and risc-v does not
>> count yet.
>
> valgrind support is not
Hi epel-devel,
I'm trying to kickstart a CentOS 7.5 node (with Spacewalk) but I am getting
anaconda errors from trying to install the 'mpg123-libs' package.
I notice that this package is in *both* the CentOS 7 base repo and in EPEL.
The filename of the RPM is
On 7.8.2018 16:26, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Available in updates-testing, please karma it:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/python35-3.5.6-1.fc28
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/python35-3.5.6-1.fc27
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/python34-3.4.9-1.fc28
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
Version: 28.20180804.0
Commit(x86_64): 5633f5b369b166d104720a4da31da1ac6b5e3c0de5c5bae70cb40a850dede502
Commit(aarch64):
99267073f82f4d7161bb36c5229d4dcf0518503ea8eda161483278053a68df10
Commit(ppc64le):
Cython-0.28.4-3.fc29 has landed in rawhide.
It moves all stuff in /usr/bin to pytyon3 package only, because the
functionality is the same on whatever Python version.
This might break your package if you BR Cython.
Here are some tips that should be Fedora/EPEL version agnostic:
If you need
Cython-0.28.4-3.fc29 has landed in rawhide.
It moves all stuff in /usr/bin to pytyon3 package only, because the
functionality is the same on whatever Python version.
This might break your package if you BR Cython.
Here are some tips that should be Fedora/EPEL version agnostic:
If you need
Probably a good idea to cc: this to the kernel list :-)
I suspect it's intentional but with the planned changes for iptables
etc to be backed by bpf in the upstream kernel sometime in the future
it's likely going to need to be reviewed.
Peter
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 10:25 PM, Timothée Ravier
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 07 August 2018 at 11:05, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Gerd Hoffman has a nightly edk2 repo which builds arm32 images. If
>> > someone can figure out the magic qemu incantation to get those working
>> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613203
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Upgrade perl-Math-Pari to |Upgrade perl-Math-Pari to
41 matches
Mail list logo
