* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [05/11/2018 23:24] :
>
> The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
> (and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=, etc.) in all spec files.
[snip ]
> perl-libintl-perleseyman
This package had a test in its test suite that only worked if
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
150 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-4b684248e8
drupal7-7.60-2.el6
6
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
150 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7
101 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a
bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646997
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RT-Client-REST-0.53-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646993
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646997
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RT-Client-REST-0.53-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646997
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
ID: 305825 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305825
ID: 305826 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in updates-20181106.1):
ID: 305823 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305823
ID: 305824 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/11/07/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-1.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
Thanks, transfer of main-admin rights should be complete.
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:13 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Hi Leigh,
>
> Please give them all to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave.
> >
> > glslang
> > spirv-headers
> > spirv-tools
> > vulkan-headers
> > vulkan-loader
> > vulkan-tools
> >
> Hi Leigh,
>
> Please give them all to me.
>
> Thanks,
Oh and thanks for all the work you've done on packaging them up until now!
Dave.
> Dave.
> >
> > glslang
> > spirv-headers
> > spirv-tools
> > vulkan-headers
> > vulkan-loader
> > vulkan-tools
> > vulkan-validation-layers
> >
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:13 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> I haven't got the time or energy to maintain these packages any more, any
> takers?
Hi Leigh,
Please give them all to me.
Thanks,
Dave.
>
> glslang
> spirv-headers
> spirv-tools
> vulkan-headers
> vulkan-loader
> vulkan-tools
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RDF-NS-20181102-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646141
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTML-Selector-XPath-0.25-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DB_File-1.843-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
I haven't got the time or energy to maintain these packages any more, any
takers?
glslang
spirv-headers
spirv-tools
vulkan-headers
vulkan-loader
vulkan-tools
vulkan-validation-layers
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
I haven't got the time or energy to maintain these packages any more, any
takers?
glslang
spirv-headers
spirv-tools
vulkan-headers
vulkan-loader
vulkan-tools
vulkan-validation-layers
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC229
== Summary ==
Switch glibc in Fedora 30 to glibc version 2.29.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Codonell|Carlos O'Donell]]
* Email: car...@redhat.com
* Release notes owner: car...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
The GNU C Library version 2.29 will
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC229
== Summary ==
Switch glibc in Fedora 30 to glibc version 2.29.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Codonell|Carlos O'Donell]]
* Email: car...@redhat.com
* Release notes owner: car...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
The GNU C Library version 2.29 will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RDF-NS-20181102-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DB_File-1.843-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 10:14:58PM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 6.11.2018 00:24 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > Dear maintainers,
> >
> > I'm working again on implementing
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
> > [...]
> >
> > Once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646141
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643855
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
ID: 305773 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305773
ID: 305774 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 6:06 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> I find myself repeating this reply over and over again in various places...
Sorry about that.
> The feedback that we (Red Hat) got about SCLs that was filtered down
> to Engineering was this:
>
> 1) Customers really like having the
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in updates-20181105.0):
ID: 305771 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305771
ID: 305772 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso
Further, I hereby announce to remove myself from this package as a
co-maintainer.
Please feel free to step into and request ACL. I added kalev as the new
maintainer.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Hi Kalev,
thanks again for the fix. Really appreciated for this critical package with its
obviously important dependencies and their cases for our users.
Regards, Raphael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Missing link in previous email
https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/cinnamon.git/commit/?id=cfb06e44527f6d4fd6be1ef138ee29eb277e62fd
El 6/11/18 a las 17:27, Pablo Sebastián Greco escribió:
Here's the removal patch. It would be good to know if the reason is
technical or personal, to see if
6.11.2018 00:24 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> Dear maintainers,
>
> I'm working again on implementing
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
> [...]
>
> Once that's done, I'll file the PRs to actually replace
> glibc-langpacks-all
> with
Here's the removal patch. It would be good to know if the reason is
technical or personal, to see if we can come up with a solution.
Pablo.
El 6/11/18 a las 17:00, Pat Riehecky escribió:
Looks like cinnamon needs some work for RHEL 7.6 and someone to do it...
Pat
Forwarded Message
Hi everyone,
We released Fedora 29 last week. That's great! Now let's take a little
bit of time and look back at the past. I've scheduled a Very Special
Edition of the weekly FPgM office hours on Wednesday 14 November[1].
From 1330 to 1500 UTC, you can join the Jit.si meeting[2] or
Hi everyone,
We released Fedora 29 last week. That's great! Now let's take a little
bit of time and look back at the past. I've scheduled a Very Special
Edition of the weekly FPgM office hours on Wednesday 14 November[1].
From 1330 to 1500 UTC, you can join the Jit.si meeting[2] or
Looks like cinnamon needs some work for RHEL 7.6 and someone to do it...
Pat
Forwarded Message
Subject:[Bug 1647181] Cinnamon missing deps in 7.6
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:57:06 +
From: bugzi...@redhat.com
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed
On 11/6/18 6:21 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Samuel Sieb píše v Po 05. 11. 2018 v 17:07 -0800:
On 11/5/18 12:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2018-11-04 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't know about the other bugs, but not working on Wayland
can't be
held against it. Nothing works
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:26 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> As a hypothetical example, maybe python-sphinx has a major
> backwards-incompatible update that becomes the default in Fedora 30.
> The package you maintain will only build its docs with the older Sphinx.
> Without Ursa Major, you
Planned Outage - System Updates/reboots - 2018-11-07 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2018-11-07 21:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-11-07
Planned Outage - System Updates/reboots - 2018-11-07 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2018-11-07 21:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-11-07
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2018-11-07 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:21 AM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> > "FW" == Florian Weimer writes:
>
> FW> Modules do not support parallel installations of different module
> FW> versions. Many SCLs are constructed in such a way that this is
> FW> possible. So I'm not sure if modules are a
> "FW" == Florian Weimer writes:
FW> Modules do not support parallel installations of different module
FW> versions. Many SCLs are constructed in such a way that this is
FW> possible. So I'm not sure if modules are a clear improvement over
FW> SCLs.
And the really fun thing is that once
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:47 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Nicolas Mailhot:
>
> > My current understanding of modules benefits is that they’re just
> > improved SCLs. ie something EL oriented that the average Fedora packager
> > has little interest or use for.
> >
> > Practically, being improved
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 09:21:09AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> What is the change you are planning to put into mock and koji?
In both cases, we know that bash and other utilities will pull in
glibc, which Requires glibc-langpack, and pulls in glibc-all-langpacks
by default. My plan is to add
* Nicolas Mailhot:
> My current understanding of modules benefits is that they’re just
> improved SCLs. ie something EL oriented that the average Fedora packager
> has little interest or use for.
>
> Practically, being improved SCLs just means:
>
> 1. rawhide has the latest version of each module
El lun, 05-11-2018 a las 23:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
escribió:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> I'm working again on implementing
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
> The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
> (and
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:49:30PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 21:48:16 +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > libocrdma had been merged into rdma-core in upstream, so libocrdma is
> > obsoleted by rdma-core.
> >
> > The package owner Selvin tried to retire this
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:53:56PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 23:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Dear maintainers,
> >
> > I'm working again on implementing
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
> > The
* David Woodhouse:
> The self-tests for OpenConnect explicitly use cs_CZ.ISO8859-2 for
> pathological password handling — using a password of "ĂŻ" (U+0102
> U+017B) in the local charset and making sure it works correctly.
>
> Do I just need to BuildRequire glibc-langpacks-all manually to make
>
* Panu Matilainen:
> On 11/06/2018 02:13 PM, Mike FABIAN wrote:
>> Panu Matilainen さんはかきました:
>>
>>> On 11/06/2018 12:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:10:04PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 11/06/2018 03:05 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Zbigniew
On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 23:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> I'm working again on implementing
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
> The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
> (and
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 21:48:16 +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
> hi,
>
> libocrdma had been merged into rdma-core in upstream, so libocrdma is
> obsoleted by rdma-core.
>
> The package owner Selvin tried to retire this package, but failed
> with authentication.
>
> We need someone who manages/maintains
On 11/06/2018 02:13 PM, Mike FABIAN wrote:
Panu Matilainen さんはかきました:
On 11/06/2018 12:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:10:04PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 11/06/2018 03:05 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
The first step is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646994
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Samuel Sieb píše v Po 05. 11. 2018 v 17:07 -0800:
> On 11/5/18 12:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-04 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > I don't know about the other bugs, but not working on Wayland
> > > can't be
> > > held against it. Nothing works to record the desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646993
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-2.48-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-323b80f825
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646997
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RT-Client-REST-0.53-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-98cd91cca0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646993
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Dear maintainers,
I'm working again on implementing
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
(and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=, etc.) in all spec files. This
will be backwards and
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 8:58 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 06 November 2018 at 00:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Dear maintainers,
> >
> > I'm working again on implementing
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646997
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RT-Client-REST-0.53-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b8a17ccf7b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646997
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RT-Client-REST-0.53-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fb29056b83
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646997
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
hi,
libocrdma had been merged into rdma-core in upstream, so libocrdma is
obsoleted by rdma-core.
The package owner Selvin tried to retire this package, but failed
with authentication.
We need someone who manages/maintains fedora package repos to retire
libocrdam for us.
thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646997
Bug ID: 1646997
Summary: Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.53
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-RT-Client-REST
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646994
Bug ID: 1646994
Summary: Upgrade perl-Meta-Builder to 0.004
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Meta-Builder
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:05:03PM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:25:58 +
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > pghmcfcperl-Perl-Critic perl-Perl-OSType perl-Text-Hunspell
> > perl-Text-SpellChecker
>
> These packages all set either LANG or LC_ALL to en_US for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646993
Bug ID: 1646993
Summary: Upgrade perl-CPAN-FindDependencies to 2.48
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-FindDependencies
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 02:05:06PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 06 November 2018 at 13:13, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> >
> > > Dear maintainers,
> > >
> > > I'm working again on implementing
> > >
Hi all,
If you are maintaining a nautilus extension package written in Python,
please check that it supports Python 3 in rawhide/F30 (and fix it up if
it doesn't). Up until F29, nautilus-python used Python 2, but in rawhide
it's now switched to use Python 3.
More info:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 02:07:06PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 06 November 2018 at 00:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Dear maintainers,
> >
> > I'm working again on implementing
> >
On Tuesday, 06 November 2018 at 00:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> I'm working again on implementing
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
> The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
> (and
On Tuesday, 06 November 2018 at 13:13, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>
> > Dear maintainers,
> >
> > I'm working again on implementing
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
> > The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8
Le mardi 06 novembre 2018 à 11:05 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune a écrit :
> > I'm with you in the sense that I too fail to see practical benefits
> > of
> > modules so far. But e.g. the java-sig says it makes their life
> > easier,
> > and it is their choice. The decision was made to proceed with
> >
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> I'm working again on implementing
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
> The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
> (and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=, etc.) in all
Panu Matilainen さんはかきました:
> On 11/06/2018 12:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:10:04PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>> On 11/06/2018 03:05 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:25:58 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> pghmcfcperl-Perl-Critic perl-Perl-OSType perl-Text-Hunspell
> perl-Text-SpellChecker
These packages all set either LANG or LC_ALL to en_US for the purposes
of setting the correct language for the spell check in their
Dne 06. 11. 18 v 9:49 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> Dne 04. 11. 18 v 14:08 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
>> Unless you're building packages for EPEL locally using mock,
>> but then you can use mock --dnf.
> Or `mock --bootstrap-chroot`, which build in two stages. First install small
>
On 11/06/2018 12:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:10:04PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 11/06/2018 03:05 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
(and similarly for
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 10:08:04AM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 05/11/2018 23:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> >I'll do a mass update to use C.UTF-8 for the packages in the list that
> >follows, next week. I'll do test builds locally, and I'll only push to
> >dist-git if the local
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:10:04PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 11/06/2018 03:05 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
> >>(and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=, etc.) in all spec files.
> >
> >But
On 11/06/2018 03:05 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
(and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=, etc.) in all spec files.
But there are probably many more packages where the setting is hidden in
upstream
> I'm with you in the sense that I too fail to see practical benefits of
> modules so far. But e.g. the java-sig says it makes their life easier,
> and it is their choice. The decision was made to proceed with
> modularity in Fedora. Once that decision was made, we cannot forbid
> packagers from
On 06. 11. 18 0:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Dear maintainers,
I'm working again on implementing
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
(and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=,
Dne 04. 11. 18 v 14:08 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
> Unless you're building packages for EPEL locally using mock,
> but then you can use mock --dnf.
Or `mock --bootstrap-chroot`, which build in two stages. First install small
root with DNF from e.g. F29 and then will
use this DNF
Je lun, 2018-11-05 je 17:07 -0800, Samuel Sieb skribis:
> > GNOME's inbuilt screen recorder does it fine.
>
> Does that use a Gnome shell-specific API or does Wayland have support
> for that now?
I believe the recording happens in the same process as the Wayland
compositor.
signature.asc
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 01:54:54AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I have to say, making core, non-leaf packages available as modules
> > only sounds like a *terrible* idea to me.
> > I don't want to have to deal with this uncooked mess if I just want to
> > do standard
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 02:05:27AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
> > (and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=, etc.) in all spec files.
>
> But there are probably many more packages where the
91 matches
Mail list logo
