https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664971
Bug ID: 1664971
Summary: Upgrade perl-URI to 1.76
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-URI
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664970
Bug ID: 1664970
Summary: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.004004
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Type-Tiny
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664968
Bug ID: 1664968
Summary: Upgrade perl-Log-Any-IfLOG to 0.090
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Log-Any-IfLOG
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664967
Bug ID: 1664967
Summary: Upgrade perl-File-ChangeNotify to 0.31
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-ChangeNotify
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664965
Bug ID: 1664965
Summary: Upgrade perl-DBD-MySQL to 4.050
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-MySQL
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:31:38PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:23 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > Do you plan to remove the comps groups? And if yes, in F30 or later?
>
> Yes, Plan is to remove language support group entries from comps
On 1/9/19 10:03 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not finding an updated version of this documentation:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-module-with-the-private-key.html
And when I follow that, copy/pasting the perl script is stomping
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:23 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 02:56:59PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Congratulations to the last System-Wide Change proposal of F30!
> >
> >
>
Hey there,
I think we are missing a large suite of tests from: src/lib389/lib389/tests
Should we move these into the suites? Or should we add this path to the CI?
> On 10 Jan 2019, at 13:10, vashi...@redhat.com wrote:
>
>
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50143
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
crossposting devel@ and kernel@ since it's both kernel and documentation related
I'm not finding an updated version of this documentation:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-module-with-the-private-key.html
And when I follow that,
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-01-10 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-01-10 04:00 PST US/Pacific
2019-01-10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730
Doran Moppert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|impact=important,public=201 |impact=important,public=201
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654918
Doran Moppert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|CVE-2018-18311 perl:|CVE-2018-18311 perl:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50141
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/01/10/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.20-20190110git50e290d.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 01/09/2019 02:50 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Hello,
> AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1]
> is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
> Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody
> interested in setting up a team to
Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> From what I know, and what is pratically done, one would name the
> compatibility package "python-sqlalchemy05".
This had been the practice for years until some pedant decided that the dot
was absolutely indispensable. So they changed it.
Kevin Kofler
Randy Barlow wrote:
> I don't know of a way that integration is useful, but I wanted to see
> if others thought it was useful. So, do you find it useful?
I just find those notifications annoying and pointless. This feature could
possibly be useful if it were filtered so that only activities
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50139
Thanks,
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 11:50 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Hello,
> AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1]
> is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
> Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody
> interested in setting up a
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 02:56:59PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Congratulations to the last System-Wide Change proposal of F30!
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks
>
> == Summary ==
> Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 19:07:09 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:59:38PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > Greetings again!
> >
> > In my quest to kill Bodhi features so I can have a smaller codebase to
> > maintain, I am considering getting rid of the fedmsg
Congratulations to the last System-Wide Change proposal of F30!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks
== Summary ==
Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by langpacks
package. With this Change we want meta-packages like langpacks-ja
Congratulations to the last System-Wide Change proposal of F30!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks
== Summary ==
Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by langpacks
package. With this Change we want meta-packages like langpacks-ja
> Björn 'besser82' Esser writes:
> From what I know, and what is pratically done, one would name the
> compatibility package "python-sqlalchemy05".
Please see the relevant guidelines:
Somehow I completely missed that next line. Thank you for pointing it out.
The docs are correct. Sorry for the noise.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 18:07 +, jd...@penguincomputing.com wrote:
> From the "Guidelines for Naming Fedora Packages" the example in the
> "Multiple packages with the same base name" section
>
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2019, 18:07 + schrieb
jd...@penguincomputing.com:
> From the "Guidelines for Naming Fedora Packages" the example in the
> "Multiple packages with the same base name" section (
>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:59:38PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Greetings again!
>
> In my quest to kill Bodhi features so I can have a smaller codebase to
> maintain, I am considering getting rid of the fedmsg integration in the
> web interface:
>
>
From the "Guidelines for Naming Fedora Packages" the example in the "Multiple
packages with the same base name" section
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name)
seems to contradict the "Separators" section
Greetings again!
In my quest to kill Bodhi features so I can have a smaller codebase to
maintain, I am considering getting rid of the fedmsg integration in the
web interface:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2913
I don't know of a way that integration is useful, but I wanted to see
> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
MH> Aaaand... it's reverted :D
He reverts any of the commits I have made to the packages he maintains
as well. Just mass cleanup things like the removal of defattr.
Reverted with a completely empty commit message.
I really don't want to get into a revert war
Il 1/9/19 1:23 PM, Richard Fearn ha scritto:
>> Just type or paste the full build name.
> That worked - thanks!
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1fec6d2d48
>
> Still curious as to how long it might take for Bodhi to recognise it
> properly though...
>
Actually, Bodhi relies
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:38:07PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Nb. “UUID” sounds terribly technical. Can we use some term which
> is already known and understood by users, e.g. Advertising ID?
Well, it very much is not an "advertising ID", so not that.
But I think we're going to explore the
One of the nice things about Netatalk is that it fully emulates an Apple Time
Machine Volume. Mac clients don't know the difference. This is in contrast to
emulating a time machine volume through NFS. Using NFS for time machine backups
does not have quite the same user experience. That might
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:50:00AM +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Hello,
> AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1]
> is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
> Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody
> interested in
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:46:34AM +, Allan Day wrote:
> > > Update GNOME to the latest upstream release, 3.32.
> > Does this release feature the new lockscreen Allan Day was working on?
> It doesn't include that feature so far. There's a month until GNOME's
> UI freeze, so there's still time,
I'd like to orphan dnsyo. It has one bug open to fix the fact that it
requires both python2 and python3 right now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314043
There's also a PR that was sent to address this, but I haven't had
time to look at it and merge it.
-re
On 1/8/19 7:12 PM, William Brown wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at the installer inf file, and noticed a new parameter:
[backend-userroot]
# require_index (bool)
# Description: Sets this parameter to "True" to refuse unindexed searches in
this database.
# Default value: False
;require_index =
On 09. 01. 19 11:35, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 01. 19 10:31, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 09:34:54AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Today, if I try to uninstall python2 from Xfce spin (rawhide), this is what
gets removed as dependent:
On 1/9/19 4:45 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le 2019-01-08 18:13, Robert Marcano a écrit :
On 1/7/19 2:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
* The Fedora community cares about privacy and is adverse to tracking
measures. We don't want to
* Peter Robinson:
>> > Not if we don't keep them for long. One idea is to rotate them fairly
>> > frequently. But this is mostly a statement of intent and might be more
>> > about
>> > how we build the backend than about what we force in the client.
>>
>> My understanding is that the Fedora
On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:45:16 AM EST Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le 2019-01-08 18:13, Robert Marcano a écrit :
>
> > On 1/7/19 2:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>
> * The Fedora community cares about privacy
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 08:38:01PM +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > We can certainly implement a setup that does not collect or store the
> > UUID together with the IP address or timestamp. Send the UUID as a
> > HTTP header, don't log it, send the UUID off to a counting service
> > (*). If we make
> Just type or paste the full build name.
That worked - thanks!
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1fec6d2d48
Still curious as to how long it might take for Bodhi to recognise it
properly though...
Rich
--
Richard Fearn
richardfe...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:12:35AM +, Richard Fearn wrote:
> > It won't autocomplete the package name and build or it refuses to create
> > the update?
>
> It won't autocomplete.
Just type or paste the full build name.
Zbyszke
___
devel mailing
> It won't autocomplete the package name and build or it refuses to create the
> update?
It won't autocomplete.
Rich
--
Richard Fearn
richardfe...@gmail.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello,
AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1]
is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody
interested in setting up a team to work on it?
Have a nice day
[1]: https://rocm.github.io/
Matthew Miller wrote:
...
> > Update GNOME to the latest upstream release, 3.32.
>
> Does this release feature the new lockscreen Allan Day was working on?
It doesn't include that feature so far. There's a month until GNOME's
UI freeze, so there's still time, but I wouldn't count on the feature
On 09. 01. 19 10:31, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 09:34:54AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Today, if I try to uninstall python2 from Xfce spin (rawhide), this is what
gets removed as dependent:
NetworkManager-openconnect-gnome
blueberry
gnumeric
On 09. 01. 19 11:20, Richard Fearn wrote:
Hi
I had a new package approved yesterday (perl-App-ccdiff) and I've
built packages for F29/rawhide. Bodhi doesn't know about the new
package yet, though, so I can't submit a new package update for F29.
How long does it normally take for Bodhi to start
Hi
I had a new package approved yesterday (perl-App-ccdiff) and I've
built packages for F29/rawhide. Bodhi doesn't know about the new
package yet, though, so I can't submit a new package update for F29.
How long does it normally take for Bodhi to start recognising a
newly-created package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662886
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
On 09. 01. 19 9:52, Johannes Lips wrote:
On 09/01/2019 09:34, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi, we've successfully removed Python 2 from default Workstation installation
years ago, today I'd like to see if we could do it in Xfce Spin as well.
For those not in the picture: Python 2 ill EOL in 11
Le 2019-01-08 18:13, Robert Marcano a écrit :
On 1/7/19 2:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
* The Fedora community cares about privacy and is adverse to
tracking
measures. We don't want to track; just count.
Uh, so what's the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664576
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664576
Bug ID: 1664576
Summary: Upgrade perl-URI to 1.75
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-URI
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
58 matches
Mail list logo
