On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:58:45PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-case mrunge
Thank you for pointing this out, it is fixed in rawhide.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Dne 28. 04. 19 v 22:55 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> Hi everyone,
>
> currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
> returns 4632 entries on my laptop.
>
> This has always felt backward to m
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-04-30 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
Docs](https://docs.pagure.o
Hi,
white_dune (3D modeler and animation-tool) reached version 1 cause it could
render any visible node of VRML87/X3D 3.3.
It needs fedora sponsoring.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
Petr Mensik wrote
| find anyone to sponsor your account on devel list. I think this
pack
python-requests-cache has already been fixed in rawhide...
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-c
On Monday, April 29 2019, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 04. 19 8:26, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> This is what wiki says:
>>
>> * |/usr/bin/gdb.minimal| — GDB executable built without optional unneeded
>> features
>> * |/usr/bin/gdb-add-index| — Executable script shared with gdb-headless
>> pac
On 29. 04. 19 23:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 04. 19 23:05, Peter Robinson wrote:
There are 2 Python related changes in Fedora 31 that unfortunately interact with
each other.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sphinx2
The following package
On 29. 04. 19 23:05, Peter Robinson wrote:
There are 2 Python related changes in Fedora 31 that unfortunately interact with
each other.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sphinx2
The following packages (owners bcc'ed) BuildRequire both python
> There are 2 Python related changes in Fedora 31 that unfortunately interact
> with
> each other.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sphinx2
>
> The following packages (owners bcc'ed) BuildRequire both python2-sphinx AND
> python3-devel.
Hey!
There are 2 Python related changes in Fedora 31 that unfortunately interact with
each other.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sphinx2
The following packages (owners bcc'ed) BuildRequire both python2-sphinx AND
python3-devel. Hence t
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
Version: 29.20190429.0
Commit(x86_64): 50310e46520cd08a28634d575fd78db9629c15263b4491d1b6cd20e141c25c17
Commit(aarch64):
ca5a00b8558b6cec0a791a3788799c475c36b817e569e53a4bf975c124c5608c
Commit(ppc64le):
83e2f74648b7bc41b232f3ec6
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:20 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:00:41PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Proposal: let's drop the autogenerated dependency on /usr/bin/pkg-config
> > > (this would require a trivial chang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 20:17 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a fuse repo on pagure at 2.99 and a PR regarding fuse3 from 'dwd'. We
> also have a fuse3 repo that has been created on pagure. What is the situation
> at
> present and how we
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:00:41PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
>
> > Proposal: let's drop the autogenerated dependency on /usr/bin/pkg-config
> > (this would require a trivial change in /usr/lib/rpm/pkgconfigdeps.sh).
> >
> > Note: autogenerated Provides/Requi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We have a fuse repo on pagure at 2.99 and a PR regarding fuse3 from 'dwd'. We
also have a fuse3 repo that has been created on pagure. What is the situation at
present and how we will be moving forward with fuse 3?
Regards
Phil
- --
*** If
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
...
> Request package ownership via releng ticket:
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues
> lightdm-gtk cwickert, dbenoit, orphan, 3 weeks
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8315
-- Rex
__
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Proposal: let's drop the autogenerated dependency on /usr/bin/pkg-config
> (this would require a trivial change in /usr/lib/rpm/pkgconfigdeps.sh).
>
> Note: autogenerated Provides/Requires like pkgconfig(foo) are not
> part of this proposal.
>
> Advantages:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:33:43 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019, 20:24 Tim Flink wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:42:30 +0200
> > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've noticed that my bodhi updates started showing rpmlint errors
> > > for my packages again
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 05:11:53PM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> John Reiser writes:
[..]
> > What is the nature of the incompatibilities, and what are specific
> > examples?
>
> We switched to from the POSIX regex library to as it should be
> provided by a C++11 compatible compiler. Unfortunately
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 10/137 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 2/24 (i386)
ID
$SUBJ, as I have no use for it.
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://g
Hello,
please could you tell me if any decisions have been made on how this thread
is going to be handled? Is it defined somewhere, where I could read, what
the behaviour will be like?
Thanks.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:19 PM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:50 PM Stephen Gallag
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 21:13 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 25. 04. 19 20:33, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 19:33 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 25. 04. 19 18:38, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > > How much is going to be needed for "mock" to still work for older
> > > > operatin
John Reiser writes:
> It would be useful for posts to be specific, and/or to include a link
> to a detailed explanation. Such information might attract the interest
> of others, and tend to encourage the discovery of multiple approaches
> towards dealing with the underlying problems.
>
>
> On 4/
On 2019-04-29 10:31 a.m., Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 29/04/2019 15:21, Jan Staněk wrote:
>
>> Only other option I can think of is going the Rust route (packages only
>> in rawhide, anything depending on them must be a module), which I'm not
>> a fan of.
>
> Module don't work for Node.js though.
>
> The
It would be useful for posts to be specific, and/or to include a link
to a detailed explanation. Such information might attract the interest
of others, and tend to encourage the discovery of multiple approaches
towards dealing with the underlying problems.
On 4/29/19 1210 UTC, Jonathan Wakely w
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190428.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190429.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:14
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 24
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 8.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi,
I am orphaning system-config-firewall. It currently FTBFS and is
unmaintained upstream.
Migration to firewalld can be done with
# firewall-offline-cmd --migrate-system-config-firewall=file
Thanks.
Eric.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe
On 29/04/2019 15:21, Jan Staněk wrote:
Only other option I can think of is going the Rust route (packages only
in rawhide, anything depending on them must be a module), which I'm not
a fan of.
Module don't work for Node.js though.
They work for rust and go because of static linking, so differ
On 29. 04. 19 15:42, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> One of the frustrating things with NodeJS packaging in Fedora is that
> because of the crazy number of dependencies between NodeJS packages, a
> simple version bump in one package could cause a whole cascade of other
> packages that need to be updated to
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:49 AM Jan Staněk wrote:
> Hello,
> I have recently (last week) taken on maintenance of several to-be
> orphaned nodejs packages. Since the packages were not upgraded for a
> while, they are usually a major version behind the upstream release.
> I have started to remedy t
On 29/04/19 07:52 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:50 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
Hi list,
I'm co-maintaining a C++ library that has been continuously updated in
CentOS 7 but a recent change made it incompatible with the default GCC
version available in el7. I.e. the next release (
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:29:06AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:04 AM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> >
> > On So, 28.04.19 20:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-co
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 8:05 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:29:06AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:04 AM Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On So, 28.04.19 20:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
> > > wrote:
>
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:51, Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm co-maintaining a C++ library that has been continuously updated in
> CentOS 7 but a recent change made it incompatible with the default GCC
> version available in el7. I.e. the next release (scheduled for the end
> of 2019) will F
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:50 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I'm co-maintaining a C++ library that has been continuously updated in
> CentOS 7 but a recent change made it incompatible with the default GCC
> version available in el7. I.e. the next release (scheduled for the end
> of 2019) wil
Hi list,
I'm co-maintaining a C++ library that has been continuously updated in
CentOS 7 but a recent change made it incompatible with the default GCC
version available in el7. I.e. the next release (scheduled for the end
of 2019) will FTBFS in CentOS/RHEL 7.
Would it be fine to require a gcc ver
Hello,
I have recently (last week) taken on maintenance of several to-be
orphaned nodejs packages. Since the packages were not upgraded for a
while, they are usually a major version behind the upstream release.
I have started to remedy this, but given the relatively large jump in
version numbers, t
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:04 AM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On So, 28.04.19 20:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> > that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019, 11:47 Jan Staněk wrote:
> On 27. 04. 19 10:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Zuzka, Jan, I've seen you requested soem nodejs packages recently. Would
> > you be able to take some more?
>
> If needed to keep them from orphaning, yes; but I cannot promise any
> really active mainten
On 27. 04. 19 10:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Zuzka, Jan, I've seen you requested soem nodejs packages recently. Would
> you be able to take some more?
If needed to keep them from orphaning, yes; but I cannot promise any
really active maintenance. The best I can promise is that I will *try*
to keep t
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 8:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 04. 19 8:26, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > This is what wiki says:
> >
> > * |/usr/bin/gdb.minimal| — GDB executable built without optional
> unneeded features
> > * |/usr/bin/gdb-add-index| — Executable script shared with gdb-headless
>
On So, 28.04.19 20:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
> returns 4632 entries on my laptop.
You probably need som
Hi all,
since backintime released a new, major update we need to transition away from
Qt4 to Qt5. I would like to ask for an informal review on the newly created
spec file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703680
Additionally, I would like to ask if we should get rid of the -common
45 matches
Mail list logo
