Hi Pierre,
On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 14:35, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> I think it's time I make amends and recognize that I've been a terrible
> maintainer for a number of my packages.
> So I'd like to orphan the following packages hoping they can find a better
> home.
On Fri, 09 Aug 2019 23:50:43 +0200, Chris Murphy wrote:
> $ cmake -DPORT=GTK -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo -GNinja
RelWithDebInfo is -O2 -g build. That is not suitable for debugging, for
debugging you should use -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug (that is -g).
RelWithDebInfo is useful for final rpm pac
This package was built over 24 hours ago:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1349103
but it hasn't appeared in Rawhide yet.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.word
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 7:17 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:13:50PM -0400, Tim Zabel wrote:
> >Hello,
> >I'm a little late to this conversation, but is fpaste in Category 4 due
> > to
> >the high legal costs, or because of a lack of a maintainer?
> >It
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 10:09:50AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> This package was built over 24 hours ago:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1349103
>
> but it hasn't appeared in Rawhide yet.
It seems the problem may only apply to this package, as I've just
buil
Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 9.08.2019 22:10 Jerry James wrote:
> > Source: https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gettext/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
>
> Do we need to change ftp to https?
That's the wrong question to ask. The right question is: What reason is
there to choose an insecure protocol when HTTPS is
10.08.2019 13:12 Björn Persson wrote:
> [...]
> Anyway, the answer is yes:
>
> 220 GNU FTP server ready.
> USER anonymous
> 230-NOTICE (Updated October 13 2017):
> 230-
> 230-Because of security concerns with plaintext protocols, we still
> 230-intend to disable the FTP protocol for downloads on
Hi,
> That only works properly on distros that implement the boot loader
> spec and the boot loader interface properly:
>
> https://systemd.io/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION
> https://systemd.io/BOOT_LOADER_INTERFACE
Thanks for the links, I looked briefly when you replied but figured
I'd need a quiet
Hi all,
There is a Mass Branching scheduled for next Tuesday, that is on Aug 13th
2019. There were some modules that are stuck in rawhide that shouldn't be
there, please create a ticket in https://pagure.io/releng with the list of
module builds that shouldn't be there and we will remove them from
On Friday, 09 August 2019 at 17:40, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Next week I will update dav1d to version 0.4.0 which includes a SONAME bump,
> and will do a GIT snapshot of aom, whose library is unstable.
>
> I will push these updates both on F31 and F30, so consumers of these
> li
You meant more like "rebuilding" modules rather than branching, right?
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 3:09 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> There is a Mass Branching scheduled for next Tuesday, that is on Aug 13th
> 2019. There were some modules that are stuck in rawhide that shouldn't be
> there
> "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases providing
> a functional, supported Xen Dom0 and widely used cloud providers
> utilizing Xen."
I am a long time Xen/Fedora user. In fact, I rely on Fedora as my Dom0. I
acknowledge that there are not too many of us, and I further ackn
On Sat, 2019-08-10 at 17:01 +0300, Matt Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 05:56:11PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> [...]
> > So it seems like this would also be a good opportunity to revisit and
> > nail down more specifically exactly what our cloud requirements are.
> > bcotton suggested
On 8/10/19 2:20 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 10:09:50AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> This package was built over 24 hours ago:
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1349103
>>
>> but it hasn't appeared in Rawhide yet.
>
> It seems the pr
On 8/10/19 4:12 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Rafal Luzynski wrote:
>> 9.08.2019 22:10 Jerry James wrote:
>>> Source: https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gettext/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
>>
>> Do we need to change ftp to https?
>
> That's the wrong question to ask. The right question is: What reason is
>
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 12:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 8/10/19 4:12 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> >> 9.08.2019 22:10 Jerry James wrote:
> >>> Source: https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gettext/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
> >>
> >> Do we need to change ftp to https?
> >
> > That'
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:50:43PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
[..]
> Problem and thesis statement:
> Certain workloads, such as building webkitGTK from source, results in
> heavy swap usage eventually leading to the system becoming totally
> unresponsive. Look into switching from disk based swap, t
Why does it take days sometimes just to start the 7 day timer? ___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/projec
Sorry for the top posting, "smart" phone...
What about Qubes OS? Isn't their dom0 using xen, based on Fedora?
Do they use Xen as packaged by Fedora? If not, couldn't they contribute
whatever they do that Fedora doesn't here?
It might be worth getting in touch with them. They look like a signific
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 13:22, Philip Kovacs via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Why does it take days sometimes just to start the 7 day timer?
>
Can we have some examples to track this down? Because without that.. no
idea and no way to fix.
> ___
Just look at the updates pending pages. Here are f30 and f29, resp:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?releases=F30&status=pending
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?releases=F29&status=pending
On Saturday, August 10, 2019, 02:29:24 PM EDT, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
On Sa
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 8/10/19 4:12 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> >> 9.08.2019 22:10 Jerry James wrote:
> >>> Source: https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gettext/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
> >>
> >> Do we need to change ftp to https?
> >
> > That's the wrong question to a
Hi All,
So what I've been reading from the rawhide gating mailthread,
creating the gating rules unfortunately is somewhat convoluted /
involved.
As such I was wondering if maybe it is an idea to automatically
enabled the rpmlint gating test for packages which have a
.rpmlint rc. ?
Alternatively
Hi,
I'm a software developer from Istanbul, Turkey. I want to include some of my
open source projects to Fedora and I submitted my first package review[1].
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739816
--
Ege Gunes
https://ege.dev/publickey.txt
On 8/10/19 11:33 AM, Philip Kovacs via devel wrote:
> Just look at the updates pending pages. Here are f30 and f29, resp:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?releases=F30&status=pending
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?releases=F29&status=pending
Updates are pushed every single d
On 8/10/19 12:48 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 8/10/19 4:12 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
>>> Rafal Luzynski wrote:
9.08.2019 22:10 Jerry James wrote:
> Source: https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gettext/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
Do we need to change ftp to htt
Hello,
I need your help to review these Go packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&classification=Fedora&component=Package%20Review&email1=zebob.m%40gmail.com&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=10401033&product=Fedora&query_format=advance
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Because if we don't, people just gonna ignore FTBFS forever.
And this would be a problem why exactly?
Packages built for older Fedora releases tend to run on newer Fedora
releases just fine. If the package:
* has no broken dependencies, and
* is not reported as completely b
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Obviously, we can prevent this by only orphaning packages with NEW bugz,
> but that doesn't really solve anything, because lot of the retired
> packages were actually ASSIGNED/POST/MODIFIED (for months).
Of course they were, to prevent you from retiring them even sooner.
Hi,
Why we would retire childsplay or gcompris or gdesklets ? IMHO we still
haven't a replacement .
From [1] I strongly disagree with the text, why all python 2 packages
will be removed automatically and why I would have a lot of work if I
want keep one package alive . why not the opposite ? .
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> What would you want to do instead? Keep shipping th Fedora 26 package
> forever?
Since this is actually an MSI blob that is a drop-in replacement for the MSI
blob from WINE upstream (where the version number expected by WINE is
hardcoded and has not changed for years) and t
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 10:28 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Because if we don't, people just gonna ignore FTBFS forever.
>
> And this would be a problem why exactly?
>
> Packages built for older Fedora releases tend to run on newer Fedora
> releases just fine. If the package:
On 11. 08. 19 0:34, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
Obviously, we can prevent this by only orphaning packages with NEW bugz,
but that doesn't really solve anything, because lot of the retired
packages were actually ASSIGNED/POST/MODIFIED (for months).
Of course they were, to prevent you
On 11. 08. 19 1:05, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
Why we would retire childsplay or gcompris or gdesklets ? IMHO we still
haven't a replacement .
If the maintainer wants to, they can request an exception for the package to be
kept.
From [1] I strongly disagree with the text, why all python 2
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Why we would retire childsplay or gcompris or gdesklets ? IMHO we still
> haven't a replacement .
>
> From [1] I strongly disagree with the text, why all python 2 packages
> will be removed automatically and why I would have a lot of work if I
> want keep one package alive
On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 01:35 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11. 08. 19 1:05, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why we would retire childsplay or gcompris or gdesklets ? IMHO we
> > still
> > haven't a replacement .
>
> If the maintainer wants to, they can request an exception for the
> package
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> If the only reason to set the status to ASSIGNED/POST/MODIFIED is to
> prevent **me** from retiring the package, something is fundamentally
> broken.
This is not about you personally, but about the FTBFS process. :-)
> If somebody has a legitimate reason to have a FTBFS pack
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 7:47 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Why we would retire childsplay or gcompris or gdesklets ? IMHO we still
> > haven't a replacement .
> >
> > From [1] I strongly disagree with the text, why all python 2 packages
> > will be removed automatically and
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 7:33 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 11. 08. 19 0:34, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> Obviously, we can prevent this by only orphaning packages with NEW bugz,
> >> but that doesn't really solve anything, because lot of the retired
> >> packages were actually
UTC 00:00:00 has come and gone and nothing was pushed to testing, yet again.
My reference to "7 days" was the time I have to wait until I can request
stable.That timer cannot start until the packages hit testing.
There really should be more than one guy who happens to be at a
conferencetaking
Hi,
My time to work on Fedora cloud-related things has diminished in
recent months, so I have not been able to give the cloud-init and
python-boto packages the care they deserve. They are free to a good
home.
Thanks,
--
Garrett Holmstrom
___
devel mail
I'll take python-goto. FAS: limb.
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On Aug 10, 2019, 8:06 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My time to work on Fedora cloud-related things has diminished in
> recent months, so I have not been able to give the cloud-init and
> pyt
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Maintaining python 2 requires maintaining a *lot* of infrastructure.
What kind of infrastructure do you need to maintain a package that is (will
be) no longer updated upstream? This takes almost no work. The only thing to
do is to backport some security fixes from Pyth
On 8/10/19 5:34 PM, Philip Kovacs via devel wrote:
> UTC 00:00:00 has come and gone and nothing was pushed to testing, yet again.
Updates pushes are not instant. You shouldn't expect them all to finish
at 00:00:01. They did indeed fire off as expected at 00:00 and finished
some hours later, as th
> But there's not anything actually wrong anymore?\
>I'm not sure what else you would like me to do here...>kevin
Yeah it's all good now -- f30 and f29 are all in testing now. Thanks for
checking.Phil___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
Hi Miro,
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 07:21, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> # python-behave
> Leaf.
> Doesn't build yet with Python 3.8, but a patch exists:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706085
>
>
> # python-cligj
> python-rasterio and python-fiona depend on that.
>
I can take this one, sinc
Excellent suggestion!
In fact, as part of the CI Objective we want to enable more such
distribution-wide tests, such as rpminspect [0], installability and reverse
dependency testing. The tests that have been run by Fedora QA are also
being evaluated and those will be used directly or migrated.
At
47 matches
Mail list logo
