Re: Self Introduction ljavorsk

Hello, Welcome to the list :-) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

[Bug 1744711] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-IO-SessionData

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744711 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-85b930849d blis-0.6.0-4.el8 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-cb6a4f8130 bird-2.0.6-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-dfc6a36e0d wordpress-5.1.2-1.el6 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-3012c9e1ad bird-1.6.8-1.el6 5

[Bug 1752679] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-SharedFork

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752679 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

Re: plan to orphan cassandra

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:21 PM Honza Horak wrote: > > On 9/8/19 8:19 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 06. 09. 19 20:15, Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira wrote: > >> Honza, > >> > >> Can we discuss the possibility to hand over the package to me? I am > >> the guy who annoyed you on scl mailing list and

Fedora 31 compose report: 20190917.n.2 changes

OLD: Fedora-31-20190916.n.0 NEW: Fedora-31-20190917.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 10 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 12 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:161.21 KiB Size

HEADS UP: License change for rust-adler32

Since 1.0.4 it is lizensed under "Zlib" while previously it was "BSD and Zlib". ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Fedora-31-20190917.n.2 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190916.n.0): ID: 452963 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/452963 ID: 452979 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 399 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 175 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294 cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7 141

[Bug 1752638] perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752638 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1750082] perl-Archive-Zip-1.65 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750082 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Archive-Zip-1.66-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1752718] perl-Archive-Zip-1.66 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752718 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 21:27 +, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote: > > Also, what issues have you run into with x86 other than issues with > the memory limit? Most of my systems do not have more than 4 GiB of > memory to begin with. My laptop is, perhaps, the only exception among > my personal

[Bug 1685192] LWP::Authen::Negotiate fails to authenticate to Red Hat SSO web server because of missing mutual authentication

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685192 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1749912] perl-Test-Timer-2.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749912 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1747714] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747714 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1750685] Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.29

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750685 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1750082] perl-Archive-Zip-1.65 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750082 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

The thing is, i686 still works. The kernel still builds as well, without issue. I have no idea what the issues that have been mentioned are, and I've kept asking. Nobody has given me an answer. Nobody has pointed me to an issue, or I'd be working on that in my free time. LibreOffice and

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 17:28, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote: > > These are generic servers. I can provide a link to the vendor's website when > I get home. It is not Dell, Lenovo or similar, those are currently selling > mostly x86_64. Additionally, many users don't want to buy a new computer just

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.6: RHEL 7.7 vs. CentOS 7.6 EPEL7 retirement problem

On 18. 09. 19 0:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Now that CentOS 7.7 is out shall we retire things again? I guess we do. But I dare to touch it. It works now. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ epel-devel mailing list --

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.6: RHEL 7.7 vs. CentOS 7.6 EPEL7 retirement problem

On 8/11/19 12:28 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 11. 08. 19 2:58, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 17:12, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: >> >>     On 10. 08. 19 21:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > While I really tried to do my best, it seems that I broke >>

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

x86_64 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:

Re: Help needed with failing PPC build: cannot find MPI with openmpi

On 9/17/19 4:06 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 15:37:22 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 9/14/19 2:08 PM, Jerry James wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:38 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: Hello, >> >>> >>> The C++ headers are missing on ppc64le. On other architectures, they >>>

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

These are generic servers. I can provide a link to the vendor's website when I get home. It is not Dell, Lenovo or similar, those are currently selling mostly x86_64. Additionally, many users don't want to buy a new computer just because a software project made the decision to randomly drop

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 16:53, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote: > > I do mean 32 bit. Contrary to what is published in the Magazine article, x86 > systems are still produced to this day, and are not unpopular. I have 14 of > such systems, 4 produced within the last year. > Popularity is a loaded word

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

On 9/17/19 1:52 PM, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote: I do mean 32 bit. Contrary to what is published in the Magazine article, x86 systems are still produced to this day, and are not unpopular. I have 14 of such systems, 4 produced within the last year. Do you have a link to one of those? What do

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

I do mean 32 bit. Contrary to what is published in the Magazine article, x86 systems are still produced to this day, and are not unpopular. I have 14 of such systems, 4 produced within the last year. On September 17, 2019 8:50:23 PM UTC, Samuel Sieb wrote: >On 9/17/19 1:48 PM, John M. Harris,

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

On 9/17/19 1:48 PM, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote: I have 14 systems that failed to update to F31 (predictably so). These are x86 systems, which previously had no major issues. I have reverted to a previous snapshot using a recovery disk. Predictably? Do you have more details than that? Or by

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

I have 14 systems that failed to update to F31 (predictably so). These are x86 systems, which previously had no major issues. I have reverted to a previous snapshot using a recovery disk. On September 17, 2019 2:04:37 PM UTC, Mohan Boddu wrote: >Fedora 31 Beta Released

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

What architecture are you running? On September 17, 2019 8:19:03 PM UTC, sixpack13 wrote: >just upgraded from F30 to F31 Beta *WITHOUT* any errors ! > >neat ! > >thanks Fedora People !!! >___ >devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >To

[Bug 1753028] New: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-CheckManifest

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753028 Bug ID: 1753028 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-CheckManifest Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-CheckManifest Assignee:

[Bug 1752679] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-SharedFork

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752679 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

just upgraded from F30 to F31 Beta *WITHOUT* any errors ! neat ! thanks Fedora People !!! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1752676] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-AnyEvent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752676 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[modularity] Modularity Team Meeting Minutes (Sept 17, 2019)

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2019-09-17/modularity.2019-09-17-15.02.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2019-09-17/modularity.2019-09-17-15.02.txt Log:

[Bug 1753008] New: perl-PDF-API2-2.036 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753008 Bug ID: 1753008 Summary: perl-PDF-API2-2.036 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PDF-API2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT

Happy to have you. :) --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, September 17, 2019 1:09 PM, Adam Jackson

Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 15:12 +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > I'd love to see this not go away. If you can't find another volunteer > before you orphan, I'll take it, FAS: limb. If someone with more > experience with it steps up, give it to them. I can't have mesa-demos break so I'm happy to

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Co on 2019-09-18 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname EPEL #topic

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

On Tuesday, September 17, 2019 12:48:33 PM CEST Dominik Turecek wrote: > we are now able to build for armhfp and s390x architectures in Copr. Important note; the new arch is going to be built by `mock --forcearch` feature (qemu-user-static). We don't have native builders. Pavel

Re: systemd-sysusers versus containers

On 9/17/19 8:04 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: >> systemd-sysusers seeks to unify user creation[1]. It also has the >> benefit of being able to create users on bootup. But, it pulls in the >> entire systemd infrastructure with all it's

Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration

On 9/17/2019 9:39 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:21:31AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: On 9/13/19 12:32 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: ## Anitya integration Currently if you want to tweak the setting for the anitya integration, you need to open a pull-request on the

Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Comp Neuro Lab

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Comp_Neuro_Lab == Summary == This Change will add a new Fedora Lab image to the Fedora repertoire for users working in Computational Neuroscience. == Owner == * Name: [[User:bt0dotninja| Alberto Rodriguez Sanchez]], [[User:Dan1mal| Danny Lee]],

Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Comp Neuro Lab

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Comp_Neuro_Lab == Summary == This Change will add a new Fedora Lab image to the Fedora repertoire for users working in Computational Neuroscience. == Owner == * Name: [[User:bt0dotninja| Alberto Rodriguez Sanchez]], [[User:Dan1mal| Danny Lee]],

Review swap

Hi all, Is anyone interested in a review swap for a Python(-ish) package? cocotb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747574 Happy to review anything in exchange. Cheers, Ben Rosser ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:21:31AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > On 9/13/19 12:32 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > ## Anitya integration > > > > Currently if you want to tweak the setting for the anitya integration, you > > need > > to open a pull-request on the fedora-scm-requests project

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 9/17/19 8:04 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 09. 19 17:00, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: >> If that is not doable what about taking last Rawhide compose and mark >> that as first compose of newly branched Fedora? The only thing I'm >> asking for is to have a base ground which is not available

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190916.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 29.20190916.0 Commit(x86_64): 8fa0298bddb8985b96ad4dc10bc499723a4ea8949ea2b383c86206a17235a8ac Commit(aarch64): 3cd467955b594df240a936f228b8627cc1e10c8756c78637c5a65aa00b85bd1b Commit(ppc64le):

Re: plan to orphan cassandra

On 9/8/19 8:19 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 06. 09. 19 20:15, Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira wrote: Honza, Can we discuss the possibility to hand over the package to me? I am the guy who annoyed you on scl mailing list and I'm red hatter too. I'm interested to have this working on OpenShift since

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

- Original Message - > From: "Dan Horák" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 3:50:59 PM > Subject: Re: Which arch should we add to Copr? > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:01:48 +0200 > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Dne 17. 09. 19 v 13:12 Dan Horák

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

- Original Message - > From: "Ben Cotton" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 4:38:50 PM > Subject: Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:00 AM wrote: > > > > I want to ask for an

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 09:51, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:01:48 +0200 > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Dne 17. 09. 19 v 13:12 Dan Horák napsal(a): > > > sounds great, but are they using a real hw or are they emulated (and > > > how)? > > > > It will be emulated using --forcearch > >

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

- Original Message - > From: "Miro Hrončok" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "Mohan Boddu" , "Lubomir Sedlar" , > "Kevin Fenzi" > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 5:04:10 PM > Subject: Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched > > On 17. 09. 19 17:00,

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting

Agenda item: #13 systemd-sysusers versus containers https://pagure.io/minimization/issue/13 On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:00 PM wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Minimization Team Meeting on 2019-09-18 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 GMT >At

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 10:38 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:00 AM wrote: > > I want to ask for an improvement here. Ideal solution for me would > > be > > to add rule that there have to be compose to do the branching and > > if > > the compose fails then the branching won't

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 09:51, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:01:48 +0200 > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Dne 17. 09. 19 v 13:12 Dan Horák napsal(a): > > > sounds great, but are they using a real hw or are they emulated (and > > > how)? > > > > It will be emulated using --forcearch > >

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 17. 09. 19 17:15, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: Interesting they don't use any linters or just using different one? Don't you know? I usually use flake8 and black. However only upstream, installed via pip via tox. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 16:56 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 09. 19 16:39, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > Hi Miro, > > > > No, I did not wanted to tell that the python 3.8 transition was > > badly > > executed. The problem was more about timing. > > > > I was fighting with Fedora 31 and we

Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT

I'd love to see this not go away. If you can't find another volunteer before you orphan, I'll take it, FAS: limb. If someone with more experience with it steps up, give it to them. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 17. 09. 19 17:00, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: If that is not doable what about taking last Rawhide compose and mark that as first compose of newly branched Fedora? The only thing I'm asking for is to have a base ground which is not available right now. That is actually a nice proposal. I

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 16:31 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 09. 19 15:58, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > I want to ask for an improvement here. Ideal solution for me would > > be > > to add rule that there have to be compose to do the branching and > > if > > the compose fails then the

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Minimization Team Meeting on 2019-09-18 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 GMT At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora Minimization Team Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9598/

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 17. 09. 19 16:39, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Miro, No, I did not wanted to tell that the python 3.8 transition was badly executed. The problem was more about timing. I was fighting with Fedora 31 and we had Rawhide as replacement for F31 tests because the environment is usually not that

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 16:33 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 16:28 Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 17. 09. 19 15:58, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > > > > To make things even worse there was a switch to python 3.8 on > > Rawhide > > > > > which wasn't really prepared (pylint did

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 17. 09. 19 16:33, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 16:28 Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 17. 09. 19 15:58, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > To make things even worse there was a switch to python 3.8 on Rawhide > which

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

Hi Miro, No, I did not wanted to tell that the python 3.8 transition was badly executed. The problem was more about timing. I was fighting with Fedora 31 and we had Rawhide as replacement for F31 tests because the environment is usually not that different. However, when the switch to python 3.8

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:00 AM wrote: > > I want to ask for an improvement here. Ideal solution for me would be > to add rule that there have to be compose to do the branching and if > the compose fails then the branching won't happen. Not sure if this is > doable or how hard it would be to

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 16:28 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 09. 19 15:58, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > To make things even worse there was a switch to python 3.8 on Rawhide > > which wasn't really prepared (pylint did not worked). > > I trust that your intentions were only the best when you wrote

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

Dne 17. 09. 19 v 15:50 Dan Horák napsal(a): > hm, as much as I would like to have more arches in Copr, I don't think the emulation is production quality. At least we can help reveal those bugs. What blocks you from using armv7 VMs on aarch64 hosts? I was not able to do a successful native

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 17. 09. 19 15:58, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: I want to ask for an improvement here. Ideal solution for me would be to add rule that there have to be compose to do the branching and if the compose fails then the branching won't happen. We need to branch before we do the branched compose.

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 17. 09. 19 15:58, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: To make things even worse there was a switch to python 3.8 on Rawhide which wasn't really prepared (pylint did not worked). I trust that your intentions were only the best when you wrote your e-mail, but this statement kinda surprises me. The

Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 31 Beta Released -- We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 31 Beta. A short list of highlights: * GNOME 3.34 (As part of updates) * Farewell to bootable i686 * AArch64 Xfce Desktop image * And more... For more details about the release, read

Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 31 Beta Released -- We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 31 Beta. A short list of highlights: * GNOME 3.34 (As part of updates) * Farewell to bootable i686 * AArch64 Xfce Desktop image * And more... For more details about the release, read

Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

Hello everyone, I'm Anaconda developer and I'm also taking care about our infrastructure and this Fedora release brought me a plenty of "unnecessary" work thanks to the fact that compose for Fedora 31 was not available until a week before beta freeze. That is too late. I wasn't the only one who

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

Le mar. 17 sept. 2019 à 15:51, Dan Horák a écrit : > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:01:48 +0200 > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Dne 17. 09. 19 v 13:12 Dan Horák napsal(a): > > > sounds great, but are they using a real hw or are they emulated (and > > > how)? > > > > It will be emulated using --forcearch

Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, at 9:09 AM, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We (the Anaconda installer team) want to solve multiple problems by one > solution and we want > > *YOUR FEEDBACK!* > > > In short we are proposing to use custom repo files when configuring > Anaconda for

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:01:48 +0200 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 17. 09. 19 v 13:12 Dan Horák napsal(a): > > sounds great, but are they using a real hw or are they emulated (and > > how)? > > It will be emulated using --forcearch >

Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment

Hello everyone, We (the Anaconda installer team) want to solve multiple problems by one solution and we want *YOUR FEEDBACK!* In short we are proposing to use custom repo files when configuring Anaconda for image creation instead of adding even more complexity to the kickstart repo command.

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

Dne 17. 09. 19 v 13:12 Dan Horák napsal(a): sounds great, but are they using a real hw or are they emulated (and how)? It will be emulated using --forcearch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Feature-forcearch -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr,

Self Introduction ljavorsk

Hi everyone, I've become packager today, so I would like to introduce myself to you. I'm 20 years old, currently bachelor student in IT sphere, and from July I've joined Red Hat as intern. I'm looking forward to working with you and making the IT world better. Lukas -- S pozdravom/ Best

Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT

Just and FYI but it looks like the following packages would be affected: $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires "libglut.so.3()(64bit)" --qf "%{name}" -q | sort | uniq asymptote crack-attack embree2-examples fawkes-guis FlightGear FlightGear-Atlas freefem++ freeglut-devel gauche-gl gl-117 glglobe

Re: Fedora package in EPEL

Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I want to have the fctxpd fedora package into the EPEL. > > Iam the maintainer of this fctxpd package in fedora. > > Can anyone help me how can I have the same package in EPEL also.

About to orphan FreeGLUT

Hello, I'm currently maintaining FreeGLUT: there's a new version out (3.2.0) which brought ABI incompatibilities. There are also new things like Wayland support which I think might be interesting for someone to test and enable in Fedora eventually. I simply don't have time for this any more.

Re: systemd-sysusers versus containers

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > systemd-sysusers seeks to unify user creation[1]. It also has the > benefit of being able to create users on bootup. But, it pulls in the > entire systemd infrastructure with all it's dependencies. > > containers do not need systemd to

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:48:33 +0200 Dominik Turecek wrote: > Hello, > > we are now able to build for armhfp and s390x architectures in Copr. sounds great, but are they using a real hw or are they emulated (and how)? Dan ___ devel

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 12:49 Dominik Turecek wrote: > Hello, > > we are now able to build for armhfp and s390x architectures in Copr. > However, due to storage issues, we can enable only one of these > two right now. Which architecture would you prefer to have? > Support for armv7hl would be

Re: No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories

Thank you all for the clarifications. Ciao, A. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Which arch should we add to Copr?

Hello, we are now able to build for armhfp and s390x architectures in Copr. However, due to storage issues, we can enable only one of these two right now. Which architecture would you prefer to have? You can express your opinion either here or in the doodle:

Re: Help needed with failing PPC build: cannot find MPI with openmpi

On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 15:37:22 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 9/14/19 2:08 PM, Jerry James wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:38 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > The C++ headers are missing on ppc64le. On other architectures, they > > are in

Re: Proven packager help request: DCMTK (and dependent packages) require update in F29/F30

On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 07:28:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 4:50 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > I do not know the details well enough to be able to decide which is the > better way here. Both should be doable in principle. > > > As the maintainer of OpenImageIO I

[Bug 1752812] New: Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.30

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752812 Bug ID: 1752812 Summary: Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.30 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext Assignee:

Re: DNF system-upgrade instructions on docs.fp.o

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:21:41AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 13:06:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 08:09:31PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > If there are no objections, I shall file a ticket with infra to > > >

[Bug 1752807] New: Upgrade perl-File-Slurp to 9999.28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752807 Bug ID: 1752807 Summary: Upgrade perl-File-Slurp to .28 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-File-Slurp Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de

[Bug 1752718] perl-Archive-Zip-1.66 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752718 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-866b70ce5f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-866b70ce5f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1750082] perl-Archive-Zip-1.65 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750082 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from

Re: DNF system-upgrade instructions on docs.fp.o

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 13:06:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 08:09:31PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > > > If there are no objections, I shall file a ticket with infra to > > redirect > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade > > > > to

[Bug 1752718] perl-Archive-Zip-1.66 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752718 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration

On 9/13/19 12:32 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > ## Anitya integration > > Currently if you want to tweak the setting for the anitya integration, you > need > to open a pull-request on the fedora-scm-requests project at > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/ > That git repo is pretty

  1   2   >