All right. You were the only one interested in taking FreeGLUT. It should be
yours now.
Thank you.
--ts
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:10:21 +
Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> Happy to have you. :)
>
>
> --
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
>
> in your
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 06:53, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >
> > my attempt to (scratch) build an EPEL 8 package failed with
> >
> >
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9259/37759259/root.log
> >
> >
Hello,
Could you please also resolve breaking upgrade paths for people who
never run `dnf module` command?
I'll try to explain what happened to me. As I wrote above I never run
`dnf module` until I was forced to run `dnf module reset` to fix my
issue. I'm running Fedora 30.
If I understand corre
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> It does not currently build in f31+ and may require dialogue with
> upstream to fix.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735221#c7
This build failure (at least the one in the logs posted here) is due to
broken dependencies in OpenCV at the time of the build and not
I'm orphaning nodejs-flot. Originally, I picked it up to unbundle
it from one of my own packages, but I really have no NodeJS expertise
to maintain it and I didn't have time to keep it up to date with
all the recent upstream activity this year.
The package build-depends on jarjar which is orphaned
Okay, more news:
There's a repo for the porting efforts, with NF's and my patches combined and
split into logical chunks:
https://github.com/mjg/dblatex-py3
Let's hope upstream can work with that ;)
There's a cor rep where I've built dblatex with py3, and where I am rebuilding
all packages whic
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-09-23 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be d
On 2019-09-22, Till Hofmann wrote:
> We have an odd issue with a module build of sway for F30: It looks like
> the module was actually built with a F32 buildroot.
>
> BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754167
> Here's the build:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildI
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 11:34:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > It does not currently build in f31+ and may require dialogue with
> > upstream to fix.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735221#c7
>
> This build failure (at least the one in the logs posted here) is
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:39:08PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:21:31AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9/13/19 12:32 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > ## Anitya integration
> > >
> > > Currently if you want to tweak the setting for the anitya integra
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 8:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hello packagers,
>
> The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
> maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on
> them anymore.
> So, we're looking for someone to take better care of them, preferab
tagsoup was maintained byt he Stewardship SIG and is no longer required by any
of our packages. I have orphaned it.
I don't know much about the package, but several other Java stuff requires it:
icedtea-web-0:1.8.2-3.fc31.src
icedtea-web-0:1.8.2-3.fc31.x86_64
javadocofflinesearch-0:2.2-9.fc31.
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 04:49, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 06:53, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > >
> > > my attempt to (scratch) build an EPEL 8 package failed with
> > >
> > >
> > > https://kojipkgs.f
As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now and there are a
number of FTBFS for me as a package I've just orphaned the following:
* eclipse-tm-terminal
* eclipse-swtbot
* cbi-plugins
* eclipse-dtp
* eclipse-ecf
* eclipse-eclemma
* eclipse-egit-github
* eclipse-linuxtools
* eclipse-mor
On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now...
So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing
"Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:27:21AM +0100, Dave Love wrote:
>> (Is there a way to tell?)
>
> virt-what !
I guess if I'd read the man page I'd have seen that the "kvm" I saw was
distinct from "qemu"; apologies for the noise.
__
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now...
>
> So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality?oo
>
Good question. There are other packages that requir
On ma, 23 syys 2019, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now...
So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality?
Because you cannot include modules in buildroot, I guess.
--
/ Alexander
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
== Summary ==
Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
including thermald in the default install.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:benzea| Benjamin Berg]]
* Email: bb...@redhat.com
* Name: [[User:ckellner| Christian J. K
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:22 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
>
> == Summary ==
> Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
> including thermald in the default install.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:benzea| Benjamin Berg]]
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now...
>
> So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality?
Looking at koschei [0], eclipse packages are going to
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 10:02 pm, Ty Young
wrote:
So, IMO, the correct behavior here would be to disable until at least
other DM(s) support it and other distros enabled it by default so that
Fedora is at least following standards. Once it *actually* gets
adopted
*maybe* Nvidia will allow overcl
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 2:21 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
>
> == Summary ==
> Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
> including thermald in the default install.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:benzea| Benjamin Berg]]
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:03 PM Ty Young wrote:
>
>
> On 9/22/19 9:09 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 7:25 PM Ty Young wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/22/19 5:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >>> On 9/22/19 3:10 PM, Ty Young wrote:
> I couldn't actually install the drivers because the up
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 9:50 am, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
You're wasting your time. We're not going to run the X server as root
just so you can overclock your GPU. Not a chance.
Anyway, while we won't do that Fedora... since you're clearly
interested in customizing your system, you can do so
Alex Chernyakhovsky writes:
> Yeah, I have no idea how I missed that bug. But I've uploaded 1.3.2
> for all active branches and requested an epel8 branch, so that's all I
> can do for now :)
Appreciated.
Thanks,
--Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-09-23)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:22 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-23/fesco.2019-09-23-15.00.log.html
Meeting summa
Hi,
Do anyone know how to subscribe to Bugzilla bugs for a particular
component?
I'm trying to watch glib-networking bugs. I'm already watching issues
and PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glib-networking, but that
only watches for Pagure issues, not Bugzilla.
I'm already watching
On 9/23/19 9:50 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Do anyone know how to subscribe to Bugzilla bugs for a particular
component?
Hover on your name at the top-right, then click preferences. There's a
tab for "Component Watching". Direct link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=component
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Am 19.09.19 um 19:59 schrieb Antonio Trande:
> > libb2-0.98.1 built
>
> Thanks - test suite for borgbackup still passes so I think we're fine :-)
Well, except that someone needs to rebuild borgbackup?
Problem 2: problem with insta
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:50:44AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do anyone know how to subscribe to Bugzilla bugs for a particular component?
>
> I'm trying to watch glib-networking bugs. I'm already watching issues and
> PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glib-networking, but
On 9/23/19 9:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:03 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/22/19 9:09 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 7:25 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/22/19 5:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/22/19 3:10 PM, Ty Young wrote:
I couldn't actually install the drivers
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
>
> == Summary ==
> Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
> including thermald in the default install.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:benzea| Benjamin Berg]]
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:49 PM Ty Young wrote:
>
>
> On 9/23/19 9:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:03 PM Ty Young wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/22/19 9:09 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 7:25 PM Ty Young wrote:
> On 9/22/19 5:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
On 9/23/19 10:00 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 9:50 am, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
You're wasting your time. We're not going to run the X server as root
just so you can overclock your GPU. Not a chance.
It isn't just to overclock my GPU, you're *BREAKING PEOPLE'S SOFTW
On 9/23/2019 10:55 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:49 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/23/19 9:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
The problem with that is that if we did it that way, nobody would
adapt to the change. Much in the same manner that we're moving to
cgroups v2 in Fedora 31, if we did
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:38 pm, Ty Young wrote:
This is entirely unnecessary. You can enable root X. Org via the
config option. A random user's COPR repo isn't a whole lot safer.
Oh nice. Then you can change that and stop complaining. Thanks!
___
d
You already have a solution. Use the solution you have.
Fedora will not change to cater to this particular need.
Your opinions does not dictate what Fedora should/shouldn't do.
Your rants and all caps won't make anything change. Please try to deal with it
and move on from this rather dead thread
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:50 am, Chris Murphy
wrote:
On my commodity HP Spectre laptop, when thermald is running, it causes
four kidle-inject process to totally soak spare CPU. And now I'm not
able to play even a single youtube video, and any appreciable effort
in Firefox also causes these proc
On 9/23/19 12:55 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:49 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/23/19 9:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:03 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/22/19 9:09 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 7:25 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/22/19 5:51 PM, Samuel
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:38:13PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
> ...among a whole lot else I'm probably forgetting.
You're forgetten one very important thing:
https://web.archive.org/save/_embed/http://safr.kingfeatures.com/idn/ck3/email/zone.php?r=a%3A5%3A%7Bs%3A32%3A%2254d8566c10474186daf7afad5e2
On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 22:24 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > > We still offer Workstation. Just use that. :)
> >
> > The unreliable update servers affect Workstation too. Again, upgrades on
> > workstation take forever. Silverblue is much faster.
> >
> >
> > ...but I digress... again.
> >
> >
>
On 9/23/19 2:02 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:38:13PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
...among a whole lot else I'm probably forgetting.
You're forgetten one very important thing:
https://web.archive.org/save/_embed/http://safr.kingfeatures.com/idn/ck3/email/zone.php?r=a%3A5
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:03 PM Ty Young wrote:
>
> Throwing the baby out with the bathwater, really? Wayland doesn't even
> work on a large selection of hardware(Nvidia) and has many missing
> features deemed to be vital for some people which X. Org does have. This
> has been a common criticism o
On 9/23/19 1:53 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
You already have a solution. Use the solution you have.
Not a solution, it's a bandaid to a much larger problem.
Fedora will not change to cater to this particular need.
Your opinions does not dictate what Fedora should/shouldn't do.
Yet Fedora
OLD: Fedora-31-20190922.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:9
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:367.25 KiB
Size of
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190922.n.0):
ID: 456834 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/456834
ID: 456840 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree
On 23 September 2019 21:58:02 CEST, Ty Young wrote:
>
>On 9/23/19 1:53 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
>> You already have a solution. Use the solution you have.
>
>
>Not a solution, it's a bandaid to a much larger problem.
You said it works fine in Arch. So use Arch.
You say that it can be configure
On 9/23/19 3:16 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
On 23 September 2019 21:58:02 CEST, Ty Young
wrote:
>
>On 9/23/19 1:53 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
>> You already have a solution. Use the solution you have.
>
>
>Not a solution, it's a bandaid to a much larger problem.
You said it works fine in Arch
Am 23.09.19 um 19:06 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Well, except that someone needs to rebuild borgbackup?
Thank you for the reminder. I meant to do this but somehow I forgot to
actually trigger a new build. New rawhide build in progress...
Felix
___
devel m
On 23 September 2019 22:42:35 CEST, Ty Young wrote:
>
>On 9/23/19 3:16 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23 September 2019 21:58:02 CEST, Ty Young
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >On 9/23/19 1:53 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
>> >> You already have a solution. Use the solution you have.
>> >
>> >
>> >Not a
Hey all: this is getting out of control and I don't think going anywhere
productive. Please remember the Fedora "friends" foundation, the "be
excellent to each other" guidance, and, of course, our code of conduct.
Thank you.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
_
On 9/23/19 3:22 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
Ty,
I understand your frustration, but please consider whether your
approach is constructive. "Friends" is one of the four foundations of
the Fedora community and starting the thread with insults goes beyond
the bounds of healthy disagreement. Please keep o
Hi
My package usbauth-notifier has passed the review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
The package have a repositiory now:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/usbauth-notifier
I have created a build for my package:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c486836b68
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 04:20:37PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
> Then you also understand the entire thread was made *because* Fedora was
> being in inconsiderate and disrespectful to both Nvidia, myself, and other
> developers, right?
So far, you are the only one being disrespectful here.
> Please, d
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 45 required tests failed, 11 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.cl
On 9/23/19 5:12 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 04:20:37PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
Then you also understand the entire thread was made *because* Fedora was
being in inconsiderate and disrespectful to both Nvidia, myself, and other
developers, right?
So far, you are the only on
...snip...
I'm going to call this thread over with now, and have placed it on
moderation. Interested parties are welcome to continue in private email
or other forums.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190922.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190923.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 13
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 63.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi
My package usbauth-notifier has passed the review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
The package have a repositiory now:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/usbauth-notifier
I have created a build for my package:
https://bodhi.fedora
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-09-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
Docs](https://docs.pagure.o
* Tom Callaway [22/08/2019 09:04] :
>
> I don't really want to own it, but I have dependent packages, so if no one
> else does, I will claim it.
Since this one is back, I'm planning to unretire perl-GStreamer and
perl-GStreamer-Interfaces, which depended on this.
Emmanuel
63 matches
Mail list logo
