* Tom Callaway [22/08/2019 09:04] :
>
> I don't really want to own it, but I have dependent packages, so if no one
> else does, I will claim it.
Since this one is back, I'm planning to unretire perl-GStreamer and
perl-GStreamer-Interfaces, which depended on this.
Emmanuel
Hi,
Working fine now.
Thanks a lot.
did
dnf install qt5-qtwebchannel qt5-qtsensors qt5-qtlocation
qt5-qtbase-gui qt5-qtx11extras qt5-qtdeclarative
thanks.
--
Thomas Stephen Lee
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:17 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:53 AM Stephen John Smoogen
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749268
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754281
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-85b930849d
blis-0.6.0-4.el8
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-cb6a4f8130
bird-2.0.6-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744683
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-3012c9e1ad
bird-1.6.8-1.el6
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-04a99d9149
seamonkey-2.49.5-2.el6
7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749226
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749226
Bug 1749226 depends on bug 1749268, which changed state.
Bug 1749268 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-UNIVERSAL-require
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749268
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752270
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752235
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754126
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.14-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190920-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-09-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/09/24/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.1-20190923git56ea32d.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747182
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120190913071625.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750082
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120190913071625.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190920-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754126
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.14-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754126
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi
My package usbauth-notifier has passed the review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
The package have a repositiory now:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/usbauth-notifier
I have created a build for my package:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190922.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190923.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 13
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 63.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages
...snip...
I'm going to call this thread over with now, and have placed it on
moderation. Interested parties are welcome to continue in private email
or other forums.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list --
On 9/23/19 5:12 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 04:20:37PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
Then you also understand the entire thread was made *because* Fedora was
being in inconsiderate and disrespectful to both Nvidia, myself, and other
developers, right?
So far, you are the only
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 45 required tests failed, 11 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 04:20:37PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
> Then you also understand the entire thread was made *because* Fedora was
> being in inconsiderate and disrespectful to both Nvidia, myself, and other
> developers, right?
So far, you are the only one being disrespectful here.
> Please,
Hi
My package usbauth-notifier has passed the review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
The package have a repositiory now:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/usbauth-notifier
I have created a build for my package:
On 9/23/19 3:22 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
Ty,
I understand your frustration, but please consider whether your
approach is constructive. "Friends" is one of the four foundations of
the Fedora community and starting the thread with insults goes beyond
the bounds of healthy disagreement. Please keep
Hey all: this is getting out of control and I don't think going anywhere
productive. Please remember the Fedora "friends" foundation, the "be
excellent to each other" guidance, and, of course, our code of conduct.
Thank you.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
On 23 September 2019 22:42:35 CEST, Ty Young wrote:
>
>On 9/23/19 3:16 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23 September 2019 21:58:02 CEST, Ty Young
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >On 9/23/19 1:53 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
>> >> You already have a solution. Use the solution you have.
>> >
>> >
>> >Not a
Am 23.09.19 um 19:06 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Well, except that someone needs to rebuild borgbackup?
Thank you for the reminder. I meant to do this but somehow I forgot to
actually trigger a new build. New rawhide build in progress...
Felix
___
devel
On 9/23/19 3:16 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
On 23 September 2019 21:58:02 CEST, Ty Young
wrote:
>
>On 9/23/19 1:53 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
>> You already have a solution. Use the solution you have.
>
>
>Not a solution, it's a bandaid to a much larger problem.
You said it works fine in
On 23 September 2019 21:58:02 CEST, Ty Young wrote:
>
>On 9/23/19 1:53 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
>> You already have a solution. Use the solution you have.
>
>
>Not a solution, it's a bandaid to a much larger problem.
You said it works fine in Arch. So use Arch.
You say that it can be
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190922.n.0):
ID: 456834 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/456834
ID: 456840 Test: x86_64
OLD: Fedora-31-20190922.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:9
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:367.25 KiB
Size
On 9/23/19 1:53 PM, Markus Larsson wrote:
You already have a solution. Use the solution you have.
Not a solution, it's a bandaid to a much larger problem.
Fedora will not change to cater to this particular need.
Your opinions does not dictate what Fedora should/shouldn't do.
Yet Fedora
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:03 PM Ty Young wrote:
>
> Throwing the baby out with the bathwater, really? Wayland doesn't even
> work on a large selection of hardware(Nvidia) and has many missing
> features deemed to be vital for some people which X. Org does have. This
> has been a common criticism
On 9/23/19 2:02 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:38:13PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
...among a whole lot else I'm probably forgetting.
You're forgetten one very important thing:
On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 22:24 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > > We still offer Workstation. Just use that. :)
> >
> > The unreliable update servers affect Workstation too. Again, upgrades on
> > workstation take forever. Silverblue is much faster.
> >
> >
> > ...but I digress... again.
> >
> >
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:38:13PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
> ...among a whole lot else I'm probably forgetting.
You're forgetten one very important thing:
On 9/23/19 12:55 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:49 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/23/19 9:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:03 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/22/19 9:09 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 7:25 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/22/19 5:51 PM, Samuel
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:50 am, Chris Murphy
wrote:
On my commodity HP Spectre laptop, when thermald is running, it causes
four kidle-inject process to totally soak spare CPU. And now I'm not
able to play even a single youtube video, and any appreciable effort
in Firefox also causes these
You already have a solution. Use the solution you have.
Fedora will not change to cater to this particular need.
Your opinions does not dictate what Fedora should/shouldn't do.
Your rants and all caps won't make anything change. Please try to deal with it
and move on from this rather dead
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:38 pm, Ty Young wrote:
This is entirely unnecessary. You can enable root X. Org via the
config option. A random user's COPR repo isn't a whole lot safer.
Oh nice. Then you can change that and stop complaining. Thanks!
___
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:53 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 12:31, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > download the tar version and extract
> >
> > https://download.teamviewer.com/download/linux/teamviewer_amd64.tar.xz
> >
> > cd to the folder
> >
> > run
>
On 9/23/2019 10:55 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:49 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/23/19 9:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
The problem with that is that if we did it that way, nobody would
adapt to the change. Much in the same manner that we're moving to
cgroups v2 in Fedora 31, if we
On 9/23/19 10:00 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 9:50 am, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
You're wasting your time. We're not going to run the X server as root
just so you can overclock your GPU. Not a chance.
It isn't just to overclock my GPU, you're *BREAKING PEOPLE'S
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:49 PM Ty Young wrote:
>
>
> On 9/23/19 9:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:03 PM Ty Young wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/22/19 9:09 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 7:25 PM Ty Young wrote:
> On 9/22/19 5:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 12:31, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> download the tar version and extract
>
> https://download.teamviewer.com/download/linux/teamviewer_amd64.tar.xz
>
> cd to the folder
>
> run
>
> ./tv-setup checklibs
>
> the output shows
>
> -
> Analyzing
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
>
> == Summary ==
> Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
> including thermald in the default install.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:benzea| Benjamin
On 9/23/19 9:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:03 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/22/19 9:09 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 7:25 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 9/22/19 5:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/22/19 3:10 PM, Ty Young wrote:
I couldn't actually install the drivers
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:50:44AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do anyone know how to subscribe to Bugzilla bugs for a particular component?
>
> I'm trying to watch glib-networking bugs. I'm already watching issues and
> PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glib-networking, but
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Am 19.09.19 um 19:59 schrieb Antonio Trande:
> > libb2-0.98.1 built
>
> Thanks - test suite for borgbackup still passes so I think we're fine :-)
Well, except that someone needs to rebuild borgbackup?
Problem 2: problem with
On 9/23/19 9:50 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Do anyone know how to subscribe to Bugzilla bugs for a particular
component?
Hover on your name at the top-right, then click preferences. There's a
tab for "Component Watching". Direct link:
Hi,
Do anyone know how to subscribe to Bugzilla bugs for a particular
component?
I'm trying to watch glib-networking bugs. I'm already watching issues
and PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glib-networking, but that
only watches for Pagure issues, not Bugzilla.
I'm already watching
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-09-23)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:22 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-23/fesco.2019-09-23-15.00.log.html
Meeting
Hi,
download the tar version and extract
https://download.teamviewer.com/download/linux/teamviewer_amd64.tar.xz
cd to the folder
run
./tv-setup checklibs
the output shows
-
Analyzing dependencies ...
libQt5Positioning.so.5 => not found
libQt5Sensors.so.5 => not found
Alex Chernyakhovsky writes:
> Yeah, I have no idea how I missed that bug. But I've uploaded 1.3.2
> for all active branches and requested an epel8 branch, so that's all I
> can do for now :)
Appreciated.
Thanks,
--Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 9:50 am, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
You're wasting your time. We're not going to run the X server as root
just so you can overclock your GPU. Not a chance.
Anyway, while we won't do that Fedora... since you're clearly
interested in customizing your system, you can do so
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:03 PM Ty Young wrote:
>
>
> On 9/22/19 9:09 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 7:25 PM Ty Young wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/22/19 5:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >>> On 9/22/19 3:10 PM, Ty Young wrote:
> I couldn't actually install the drivers because the
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 2:21 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
>
> == Summary ==
> Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
> including thermald in the default install.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:benzea| Benjamin
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 10:02 pm, Ty Young
wrote:
So, IMO, the correct behavior here would be to disable until at least
other DM(s) support it and other distros enabled it by default so that
Fedora is at least following standards. Once it *actually* gets
adopted
*maybe* Nvidia will allow
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now...
>
> So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality?
Looking at koschei [0], eclipse packages are going to
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:22 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
>
> == Summary ==
> Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
> including thermald in the default install.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:benzea| Benjamin
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
== Summary ==
Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
including thermald in the default install.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:benzea| Benjamin Berg]]
* Email: bb...@redhat.com
* Name: [[User:ckellner| Christian J.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
== Summary ==
Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
including thermald in the default install.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:benzea| Benjamin Berg]]
* Email: bb...@redhat.com
* Name: [[User:ckellner| Christian J.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754281
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8f84208a63 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8f84208a63
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754281
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On ma, 23 syys 2019, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now...
So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality?
Because you cannot include modules in buildroot, I guess.
--
/
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now...
>
> So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality?oo
>
Good question. There are other packages that
"Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:27:21AM +0100, Dave Love wrote:
>> (Is there a way to tell?)
>
> virt-what !
I guess if I'd read the man page I'd have seen that the "kvm" I saw was
distinct from "qemu"; apologies for the noise.
On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now...
So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel
As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now and there are a
number of FTBFS for me as a package I've just orphaned the following:
* eclipse-tm-terminal
* eclipse-swtbot
* cbi-plugins
* eclipse-dtp
* eclipse-ecf
* eclipse-eclemma
* eclipse-egit-github
* eclipse-linuxtools
*
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 04:49, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 06:53, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > >
> > > my attempt to (scratch) build an EPEL 8 package failed with
> > >
> > >
> > >
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
tagsoup was maintained byt he Stewardship SIG and is no longer required by any
of our packages. I have orphaned it.
I don't know much about the package, but several other Java stuff requires it:
icedtea-web-0:1.8.2-3.fc31.src
icedtea-web-0:1.8.2-3.fc31.x86_64
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 8:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hello packagers,
>
> The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
> maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on
> them anymore.
> So, we're looking for someone to take better care of them,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:39:08PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:21:31AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9/13/19 12:32 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > ## Anitya integration
> > >
> > > Currently if you want to tweak the setting for the anitya
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 11:34:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > It does not currently build in f31+ and may require dialogue with
> > upstream to fix.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735221#c7
>
> This build failure (at least the one in the logs posted here) is
On 2019-09-22, Till Hofmann wrote:
> We have an odd issue with a module build of sway for F30: It looks like
> the module was actually built with a F32 buildroot.
>
> BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754167
> Here's the build:
>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-09-23 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Okay, more news:
There's a repo for the porting efforts, with NF's and my patches combined and
split into logical chunks:
https://github.com/mjg/dblatex-py3
Let's hope upstream can work with that ;)
There's a cor rep where I've built dblatex with py3, and where I am rebuilding
all packages
I'm orphaning nodejs-flot. Originally, I picked it up to unbundle
it from one of my own packages, but I really have no NodeJS expertise
to maintain it and I didn't have time to keep it up to date with
all the recent upstream activity this year.
The package build-depends on jarjar which is
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> It does not currently build in f31+ and may require dialogue with
> upstream to fix.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735221#c7
This build failure (at least the one in the logs posted here) is due to
broken dependencies in OpenCV at the time of the build and not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744711
--- Comment #7 from Jan Pazdziora ---
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754281
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754235
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 130559
--- Comment #1 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-d34643e2de has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d34643e2de
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hello,
Could you please also resolve breaking upgrade paths for people who
never run `dnf module` command?
I'll try to explain what happened to me. As I wrote above I never run
`dnf module` until I was forced to run `dnf module reset` to fix my
issue. I'm running Fedora 30.
If I understand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-fd1c851826 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fd1c851826
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-3bacaa907d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3bacaa907d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 06:53, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >
> > my attempt to (scratch) build an EPEL 8 package failed with
> >
> >
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9259/37759259/root.log
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744683
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
All right. You were the only one interested in taking FreeGLUT. It should be
yours now.
Thank you.
--ts
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:10:21 +
Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> Happy to have you. :)
>
>
> --
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
>
> in your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754415
Bug ID: 1754415
Summary: Upgrade perl-Server-Starter to 0.35
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Server-Starter
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754414
Bug ID: 1754414
Summary: Upgrade perl-HTML-Scrubber to 0.18
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTML-Scrubber
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754126
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-8304d409ff has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8304d409ff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
