On Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:32:58 AM CEST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 17:32, Omair Majid wrote:
> > But I know lttng-ust-devel exists in RHEL 8. It was also built by CentOS
> > 8 here: https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1299
> >
> > Am I doing somet
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 03:38:18PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 9:26:43 AM MST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > CentOS 8 repositories are now available, so @msuchy released new
> > `mock-core-configs` (see updates-testing), and so we were allowed to enable
> > epel-8 c
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (x86_64)
ID: 458252 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/458252
Passed openQA tests: 14/15 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-
On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 9:26:43 AM MST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> CentOS 8 repositories are now available, so @msuchy released new
> `mock-core-configs` (see updates-testing), and so we were allowed to enable
> epel-8 chroots in Copr! Feel free to build against them.
>
> Note that it doesn't
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 17:32, Omair Majid wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Pavel Raiskup writes:
>
> > CentOS 8 repositories are now available, so @msuchy released new
> > `mock-core-configs` (see updates-testing), and so we were allowed to enable
> > epel-8 chroots in Copr! Feel free to build against them.
>
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> He might also say that Java is a curse and if it went away.. that
> would just mean people would go back to coding in C++ as they should.
> However that is speculation on my part.
I actually need Java for work, but I don't really need anything beyond
java-1.8.0-openj
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 16:01 -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 11:02, Miroslav Suchý
> wrote:
> > Dne 25. 09. 19 v 4:59 Elliott Sales de Andrade napsal(a):
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1389518
> >
> > I looked at this one and:
> >
> > h
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> I'm quite certain that forbidding people to move to module-only would mean
> that we would not only not have a Java stack in Fedora but also no Java
> module too.
I think that banning module-only packages would actually get Java back to
non-modular-only, since the goal of
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-09-26 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-09-12 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2019-09-12 12:00 ED
Hi,
Pavel Raiskup writes:
> CentOS 8 repositories are now available, so @msuchy released new
> `mock-core-configs` (see updates-testing), and so we were allowed to enable
> epel-8 chroots in Copr! Feel free to build against them.
First, of all, thanks! This is great new!
I wanted to try this
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 08:32:15AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> And for https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6f79c53e44
>
> I don't have permission to untag and retag the f30-signing-pending tag.
>
> Many thanks for your help.
ok. Fixed.
I actually already had this on my list.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 11:02, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 25. 09. 19 v 4:59 Elliott Sales de Andrade napsal(a):
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1389518
>
> I looked at this one and:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37850317
> and build log:
> http
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:08:30AM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
> >> In the fedora 31 install? hhhmm don't have browser and cant install one
> >>
>
> > You should be able to use curl just fine...
>
> $ curl
> 'https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=fedora-31&arch=ppc64le'
> # rep
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:14:54PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> Hi Lokesh,
>
>
> As you know, I have been working on bringing kata containers to Fedora.
>
> Since this adds a new runtime, the docker.service file would need to be
> modified in order to be able to accommodate extra --add
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> I was recently contacted by a fellow Fedora contributor about this.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers says:
>
> > If the push fails with this kind of message:
> >
> > W access for why DENIED to YOUR
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:10 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> Hi Vit,
>
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 24. 09. 19 v 17:47 Todd Zullinger napsal(a):
> >> These srpm's require asciidoctor or rubygems-asciidoctor:
> >>
> >> awesome
> >> booth
> >> hugo
> >> ipmctl
> >> js8call
> >>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:37:28AM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > recently it has been opened a bug against pinta:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755274
> >
> > It seems that for some unknown reason, in F3
Hi Robert-André,
Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Using Igor's whatrequires script
> (https://gist.github.com/ignatenkobrain/a2b21a4db497a2a4b441e3957fcc8483), we
> get:
Nice. I didn't know about that one either.
> PACKAGE DEPENDENT
>
On Wednesday, 25 September 2019 18:20:20 CEST Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi Miro,
>
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 25. 09. 19 17:10, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> >
> >> dnf repoquery -q --qf '%{name}' --archlist=src --releasever=rawhide \
> >>
> >> --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source \
>
CentOS 8 repositories are now available, so @msuchy released new
`mock-core-configs` (see updates-testing), and so we were allowed to enable
epel-8 chroots in Copr! Feel free to build against them.
Note that it doesn't make sense to support `rhelbeta-8-*` chroots anymore,
so we plan to disable th
On 25/09/2019 18:12, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
(At least partly; /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h has only 540
lines, there's no line 913; so whatever #line tricks get played there...)
Ha, that part was easy: I looked at the file with Emacs, but had no
Emacs installed on the F31 system, jus
Hi Miro,
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 25. 09. 19 17:10, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> dnf repoquery -q --qf '%{name}' --archlist=src --releasever=rawhide \
>> --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source \
>> --whatrequires asciidoctor --whatrequires rubygem-asciidoctor
>
> When you don't inclu
On 25/09/2019 17:16, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
~ gcc $(pkg-config -cflags glib-2.0) -c test.c
test.c:2:13: warning: const
2 | G_CONST_RETURN char * f();
| ^~~
emits a cryptic warning (and gets the positioning of the squiggly
underline wrong).
On both F30 and F31, /usr
>> In the fedora 31 install? hhhmm don't have browser and cant install one
> You should be able to use curl just fine...
$ curl
'https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=fedora-31&arch=ppc64le'
# repo = fedora-31 arch = ppc64le country = US
https://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/p
This is the Minimization Objective [0] update.
Status: Discovery phase
== Regular meeting canceled ==
We have decided to cancel the regular Minimization Team Meeting [1] as we
prefer async discussions on #fedora-devel and de...@lists.fp.o. This makes
it more inclusive to people with other commit
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 09:47:27AM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
> >> Is it reproducible?
>
> yes all attempts including
> #dnf upgrade
> #dnf install autoconf
> #dnf install automake
>
> all failed
>
> >> Can you paste what you get if you go to:
> >>
> >> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorl
The upstream download site for the cudd package stopped responding about 8
months ago. About 4 months ago, the DNS entry for the upstream download
site disappeared. Strangely, the author's home page still has a link
pointing to that site.
In any case, nothing in Fedora uses cudd anymore. The cb
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-25/minimization.2019-09-25-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-25/minimization.2019-09-25-15.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-25/minimization.2
On 25. 09. 19 17:10, Todd Zullinger wrote:
dnf repoquery -q --qf '%{name}' --archlist=src --releasever=rawhide \
--disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source \
--whatrequires asciidoctor --whatrequires rubygem-asciidoctor
When you don't include the rawhide repo, virtual provides are
After switching to F31 beta I came across a GCC warning that looks like
it is useful, trying to warn about misguided uses of the G_CONST_RETURN
macro from glib-2.0. However, it leaves me puzzled:
$ cat test.c
#include "glib.h"
G_CONST_RETURN char * f();
On F30:
~ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 9
I was recently contacted by a fellow Fedora contributor about this.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers says:
> If the push fails with this kind of message:
>
> W access for why DENIED to YOUR_ACCOUNT
> fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
> Could not pus
Hi Vit,
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 24. 09. 19 v 17:47 Todd Zullinger napsal(a):
>> These srpm's require asciidoctor or rubygems-asciidoctor:
>>
>> awesome
>> booth
>> hugo
>> ipmctl
>> js8call
>> mod_auth_mellon
>> nanomsg
>> ndctl
>> nng
>> oidentd
>> qpi
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190924.n.1):
ID: 457773 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/457773
ID: 457785 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso ap
Dne 25. 09. 19 v 4:59 Elliott Sales de Andrade napsal(a):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1389518
I looked at this one and:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37850317
and build log:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/317/37850317/build.log
e
OLD: Fedora-31-20190924.n.1
NEW: Fedora-31-20190925.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:315.60 KiB
Size of
>> Is it reproducible?
yes all attempts including
#dnf upgrade
#dnf install autoconf
#dnf install automake
all failed
>> Can you paste what you get if you go to:
>>
>> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=fedora-31&arch=ppc64le
In the fedora 31 install? hhhmm don't have browser and
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 12:04:38PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Long ago, I took over the 'vte' package because the terminal I used
> (xfce4-terminal) needed it at the time. It's long since been ported to
> vte291.
>
> Just to note: vte is the very very old version, its completely
>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:37:28AM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Hi all,
> recently it has been opened a bug against pinta:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755274
>
> It seems that for some unknown reason, in F31, the build process is no
> longer able to determine mono depen
This package has been orphaned as discussed here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738068
--
Paul
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Cond
Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> llvm3.9 provides an old version of llvm and I think it is no longer needed
> by anything as of current F31. It failed the mass rebuild: so it seems a
> reasonable time to retire it now.
Considering that 3.9 is 3 years old and the current version is 9.0, if
nothing in
And for https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6f79c53e44
I don't have permission to untag and retag the f30-signing-pending tag.
Many thanks for your help.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 4:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:12:58PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> >
On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 11:32 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 08:10:21PM +0800, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Given a kickstart file (flatten) and we intend to make an iso using
> > it, is there a tool or service by which we can estimate the size of
> > the fina
Hi Lokesh,
As you know, I have been working on bringing kata containers to Fedora.
Since this adds a new runtime, the docker.service file would need to be
modified in order to be able to accommodate extra --add-runtime options.
Specifically, we would need something like added to the command line
Hi,
llvm3.9 provides an old version of llvm and I think it is no longer needed
by anything as of current F31. It failed the mass rebuild: so it seems a
reasonable time to retire it now.
So just a heads-up that we are thinking to retire llvm3.9 before the final
f31 freeze.
Jens
__
Hi all,
recently it has been opened a bug against pinta:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755274
It seems that for some unknown reason, in F31, the build process is no
longer able to determine mono dependencies correctly.
Do someone have some hint for this?
Thanks!
Andrea
_
On 9/24/19 14:50, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:04 am, Tom Callaway wrote:
or know of some reason it shouldn't be brought back
Well this looks like gstreamer 0.10. I'm really surprised we still have
this in the distro. It's been obsolete for the better part of a decade
Hi,
I'd like to take python-jsonpointer.
Cheers,
Andreas
Am 16.09.19 um 11:56 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
sure
that the package should be retired, please do s
Dne 24. 09. 19 v 17:47 Todd Zullinger napsal(a):
> Hi all,
>
> I'm planning to push asciidoctor-2.0.10 to rawhide in the
> next few days. This is a major bump from our current 1.5.8,
> but upstream has worked hard to fix regressions found since
> the initial 2.0.0 release back in March.
>
> The 2
48 matches
Mail list logo
