Re: Is there a Qt5 rebuild in progress?

Hi, all qt5-* packages + all the packages using private API which needed rebuild were build in a side tag and tagged once the update was complete to make sure I don't break anything. Is this still an issue? Regards, Jan Dne 11. 09. 20 v 22:10 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): Hello, dozens of my

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 33 Beta Go/No-Go and Release Readiness meetings

On Friday, September 11, 2020 4:36:38 AM MST Björn Persson wrote: > John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Thursday, September 10, 2020 11:56:25 PM MST alcir...@posteo.net wrote: > > > But systemd in Fedora is built to use > > > FallbackNTPServers=0.fedora.pool.ntp.org 1.fedora.pool.ntp.org > > >

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-09-14 - 94% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/09/14/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200913git1a9fae6.fc32.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-devel] 389-ds-base repository has migrated to GitHub

Hi team, so the migration to GitHub was successfully completed! 389 Directory Server repo is now available on: https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base The issue tracker is here: https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues Pull-requests are

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma > > == Summary == > Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the > Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop session over the X11-based one. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:Ngompa|Neal Gompa]],

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Modularity provides not only a different way of grouping or delivering > RPM packages, but most importantly, a different way of building RPM > packages. > > You get a side tag in Koji where you can have private build-only > dependencies that are discarded (filtered) once

Re: F32 -> F33 upgrade

On 13. 09. 20 14:10, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: I assume that there will be a proper thread for testing such upgrade some time after Beta point but I had some time today I checked will it work. On my system it looks like deja-dup/duply/duplicity have a problem with dependencies: snip See

Re: F32 -> F33 upgrade

On 9/13/20 5:10 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: On my system it looks like deja-dup/duply/duplicity have a problem with dependencies: [root@puchatek ~]# LANGUAGE=C dnf distrosync --releasever 33 The officially recommended method is "dnf system-upgrade". I often need to add "--allowerasing" to

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Proposing an EPEL packaging SIG

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 03:50:58PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > We discussed the proposal a bit at today's EPEL SC meeting; here's a > revised proposal taking into account the suggestions from the meeting > and earlier in this list. > > ## The SIG > - bstinson pointed out that

Claiming Ownership of a Retired Package: catimg

Hi, As per the wiki [1], I'm announcing that I want to take over the package catimg. The package was orphaned because the current maintainer doesn't have time anymore. The upstream project is still active and I'm in contact with the developer. Since the package is already retired, the review

[Bug 1878516] perl-Mojolicious-8.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878516 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

> If you actually tried to use the memory it says in MemAvailable, you > may very well already get bad side effects as the kernel needs to > reclaim memory used for other purposes (file caches, mmap'ed > executables, heap, …). Depending on the workload, this may already > cause the system to start

Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

> So with > applications started, you might get higher. I think we should protect only basic GUI. On computers with 16G+ RAM locking 1G memory with apps should not be a problem if it helps to improve responsiveness. > Was that with or without swap? It was without swap, but with swap it has the

[Bug 1878516] New: perl-Mojolicious-8.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878516 Bug ID: 1878516 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.59 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: unscribe Fedora

Hi Virginia, I filed a ticket with our infrastructure team to have that sorted out for you, it should happen this week. The ticket can be found here for reference: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9315 Regards, Peter On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 4:24 PM Thomas Gilliard wrote: > >

unscribe Fedora

Thomas Gilliard passed away July 26,2020.  Please unscribe him from all e-mails. Thank You, Virginia Gilliard, wife ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 760 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 500 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7 9

Fedora-IoT-34-20200913.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 664326 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/664326 Passed openQA tests: 15/16

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-96c4037065 ark-19.12.2-3.el8 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2390c71f9c chromium-85.0.4183.83-1.el8 4

Fedora-33-20200913.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/181 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200912.n.0): ID: 664220 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/664220 Soft failed openQA tests: 9/181 (x86_64)

Fedora 33 compose report: 20200913.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20200912.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20200913.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

F32 -> F33 upgrade

I assume that there will be a proper thread for testing such upgrade some time after Beta point but I had some time today I checked will it work. On my system it looks like deja-dup/duply/duplicity have a problem with dependencies: [root@puchatek ~]# LANGUAGE=C dnf distrosync --releasever 33

[Bug 1876378] perl-Mail-DKIM-1.20200907 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876378 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1876823] perl-Text-Table-Tiny-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876823 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1878488 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1876823] perl-Text-Table-Tiny-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876823 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Text-Table-Tiny-1.01

[Bug 1876823] perl-Text-Table-Tiny-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876823 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1714677 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1714677=edit [patch] Update to 1.02 (#1876823) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

Fedora-Rawhide-20200913.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 18/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200911.n.0): ID:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200913.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200911.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200913.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 21 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 274 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 9.48 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200913.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Looking for new Python package maintainers

On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 12:16, Dhanesh B. Sabane wrote: > Hey Andy! > > > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 07:44, Dhanesh B. Sabane > > wrote: > > > > If there are no takers, I'd like to maintain the python-blindspinner > > package. I see there is some room to bring in its "click" dependencies. > > I've

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200913.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 663954 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/663954 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64) -- Mail

[Bug 1878468] New: RPM spec has unnecessary dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878468 Bug ID: 1878468 Summary: RPM spec has unnecessary dependencies Product: Fedora Version: 31 Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-DNS Assignee: pwout...@redhat.com

[Bug 1878466] RPM spec has unnecessary dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878466 Dick Franks changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1878466] New: RPM spec has unnecessary dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878466 Bug ID: 1878466 Summary: RPM spec has unnecessary dependencies Product: Fedora Version: 31 OS: All Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-DNS Assignee:

Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 20:53 +, Alexey Avramov wrote: > > how much memory that amounts to in the usual scenarios > > 700M on F32 without any apps started. That seems like quite a lot. I mean, we get into a similar region of memory that EarlyOOM would be protecting with no apps started. So

Re: Looking for new Python package maintainers

Hello Michel, On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 08:33 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Thanks Dhanesh! I already have an update in testing for F33's Lua > 5.4. > Perfect! Take good care of the package while I'm gone. ;) > > Great to hear! I've been in the same situation before. We are all >