Matthew Miller wrote:
> I mean, some of y'all like to maintain and keep obscure dependency
> packages up to date just for their own sake, and that's *awesome* -- but
> we just can't hold everyone to that standard. At least, not if we want
> more than a few dozen packagers.
That is a pretty strong
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 13:30 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 12:53, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only
> > > packages because we don't
On 18/9/20 03:43, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> 'its broke'
>> 'yes I know its broke.. I just need the header files'
>> 'well I need it to work' 'well fix it yourself'
>> 'no that is your job.. it says you OWN THE PACKAGE'.
>> 'I
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-09-18 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname EPEL
#topic
Dne 17. 09. 20 v 18:29 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:39:28PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Looking at rubygem-sinatra-rabbit [1], I wonder if we should not have
>> process for removing "zombie" packages.
>>
>> The issue with this package is that while it keeps building, it is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880129
Bug ID: 1880129
Summary: perl-Log-Log4perl-1.53 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Log-Log4perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879890
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879217
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877405
Todd Cullum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-dbi: NULL profile |CVE-2019-20919 perl-dbi:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877406
Todd Cullum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-DBI: NULL profile |CVE-2019-20919 perl-DBI:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 'its broke'
> 'yes I know its broke.. I just need the header files'
> 'well I need it to work' 'well fix it yourself'
> 'no that is your job.. it says you OWN THE PACKAGE'.
> 'I just own it to build foobar'
> 'too bad.. i am
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200916.1):
ID: 669541 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 12:53, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only
> > packages because we don't want to maintain those packages to a high
> > standard", it is demonstrably
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 03:57:42PM -, Ernestas Kulik wrote:
> You can contact me via the email address you’re spamming, I’m ignoring only
> those automated warnings, not everything.
The email we're sending is coming from ad...@fedoraproject.org which will reach
the Fedora admins if you reply
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only
> packages because we don't want to maintain those packages to a high
> standard", it is demonstrably a viable choice within Fedora to just
> *not maintain those
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 18/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200911.n.0):
ID:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 05:08:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > Since September 5th, we have been emailing daily the following users to
> > notify
> > that the email they have set in FAS
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:19:33PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> ... this or build root overrides, but what about rawhide?
rawhide can use side tags as well... is that the question?
sidetags are in general much better than buildroot overrides (IMHO).
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:39:28PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Looking at rubygem-sinatra-rabbit [1], I wonder if we should not have
> process for removing "zombie" packages.
>
> The issue with this package is that while it keeps building, it is very
> likely not working. The `%check` suite is
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 9:57 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Should be fixed now.
Thank you for the fast action, Miro.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> Since September 5th, we have been emailing daily the following users to notify
> that the email they have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla
> account.
> This is a requirement for
You can contact me via the email address you’re spamming, I’m ignoring only
those automated warnings, not everything.
As I’ve told you privately, I have the Bugzilla address set to the
fedoraproject.org alias. I’m not going to use the same address for both.
On 17. 09. 20 17:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 17. 09. 20 17:45, Jerry James wrote:
F33 builds are currently failing:
DEBUG util.py:621: Error:
DEBUG util.py:621: Problem 1: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:621: - nothing provides lua-srpm-macros needed by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877406
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On 17. 09. 20 17:45, Jerry James wrote:
F33 builds are currently failing:
DEBUG util.py:621: Error:
DEBUG util.py:621: Problem 1: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides lua-srpm-macros needed by
redhat-rpm-config-172-1.fc33.noarch
DEBUG util.py:621: Problem 2:
F33 builds are currently failing:
DEBUG util.py:621: Error:
DEBUG util.py:621: Problem 1: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides lua-srpm-macros needed by
redhat-rpm-config-172-1.fc33.noarch
DEBUG util.py:621: Problem 2: package
rpm-build-4.16.0-0.beta3.2.fc33.3.i686
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
764 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
504 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b
bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7
13
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2390c71f9c
chromium-85.0.4183.83-1.el8
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0214580ca4
mbedtls-2.16.8-1.el8
6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877410
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877423
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877403
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880040
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1715243
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715243=edit
[patch] Update to 1.56 (#1880040)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880040
Bug ID: 1880040
Summary: perl-DBD-Mock-1.56 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-Mock
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879600
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6b9130250e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880014
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880014
Bug ID: 1880014
Summary: perl-PDL-2.024 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PDL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-972f57ea6d
drupal7-7.72-1.el6
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b425525e83
mbedtls-2.7.17-1.el6
1
... this or build root overrides, but what about rawhide?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
There is a new version of jbig2dec which the new version of ghostscript
requires. Given how previous updates went I intend to try a side-tag now. If
you think your package is affected then please follow the discussion at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877889
Also, if there are
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200916.n.0):
ID: 669122 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/669122
ID: 669126 Test: x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879890
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ce3128bde6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ce3128bde6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200916.2):
ID: 669431 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879890
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
OLD: Fedora-33-20200916.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200917.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 325.59 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875827
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
This could be fixed in 0.27 version (bug #1878987).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hello,
The Python based "bokeh" software has a JavaScript component[1].
Building the JS component requires nodejs and lots of nodejs libraries, and
is not tractable[2,3]. Fortunately, upstream includes a built version of
the necessary JS components in the PyPi release and these are installed
in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879947
Bug ID: 1879947
Summary: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.16-3.fc34 FTBFS: tests fail
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Perl-Ti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877410
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f30298614a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f30298614a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877406
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f30298614a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f30298614a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877423
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f30298614a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f30298614a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877403
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On 15. 09. 20 18:18, Troy Dawson wrote:
When a maintainer is done with their package in playground, they must
untag all builds of it out of epel-playground. We do not want
epel-playground cluttered with old test packages. Done means either
the package has been moved to regular EPEL, and / or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877410
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877423
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877406
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 20/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200916.n.0):
ID:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879890
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
I found this on google search [1] "build fails with >=bison-3.7 "
[1] https://gitmemory.com/issue/GoldenCheetah/GoldenCheetah/3586/688148166
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
HI,
when compiling GoldenCheetah on rawhide (fc34) i get this error message [1]:
DataFilter.tab.c:152:10: fatal error: DataFilter.tab.h: No such file or
directory
[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/608/51650608/build.log
How can i solve this issue that only happens on rawhide
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 04:07:11PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 6:05 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >
> > Ondrej Mosnacek writes:
> >
> > > James Cassell wrote:
> > >> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
Looking at rubygem-sinatra-rabbit [1], I wonder if we should not have
process for removing "zombie" packages.
The issue with this package is that while it keeps building, it is very
likely not working. The `%check` suite is disable for ages already.
Upstream is dead. I know I could open BZ
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879217
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879217
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.41-1.fc |perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.41-2.fc
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200916.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200917.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 84
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.82 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
I have orphaned rubygem-erubis. It is dead upstream for almost 10 years
and it is FTBFS with every major version of Ruby. There is available
rubygem-erubi, which is properly maintained and most of the projects
already switched. The only remaining dependency in Fedora is
rubygem-asciidoctor,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879890
Bug ID: 1879890
Summary: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.64 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-BerkeleyDB
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879217
--- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #3)
> I can see that IO-Socket-IP-0.41 moved from ExtUtils::MakeMaker to
> Module::Build. I feel this will make problems, because IO::Socket::IP is a
> dual-lived
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200916.0):
ID: 668763 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
olyso...@redhat.com (Ondřej Lysoněk) writes:
> - some of the packages (libreswan, perl-Event-Lib, sems) fail to build
> for unrelated reasons. Unless these are fixed, they'll become
> uninstallable. I've notified their owners.
Thanks to Petr Písař, perl-Event-Lib now builds, event with the
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:24:26AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> When using Fedora's containers, LTO appears to be broken. I'm not sure
> who to report this to, the container builder or gcc.
>
> $ podman run --pull=always --rm -it registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
> # dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879217
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from
72 matches
Mail list logo
