Rawhide broken by mutter-40.0~alpha.1-1.fc34

Hi, Yesterday, after I updated my Rawhide, the machine would not start anymore. To fix the issue, I have downgraded from mutter-40.0~alpha.1-1.fc34 back to mutter-40.0~alpha-1.fc34. It seems that while the mutter-40.0~alpha.1-1.fc34 was untagged, it got into compose. There is also mutter-40.0

Software Management (RPM, DNF) 2020 retrospective

Hi, On behalf of RPM and DNF teams, I would like to highlight changes that have appeared in our packages in 2020. Thanks everyone for your bug reports and patches! RPM --- $ rpm --eval '%[0 < 1 ? "true" : "false"]' * Support for complex expressions and conditionals with short-circuit logi

Re: How to properly go from arch-specific to noarch? (Finnish spell-checking)

Dne 17. 01. 21 v 11:12 Ville-Pekka Vainio napsal(a): Hi, I am working on updating the Finnish spell-checking stack to the current upstream versions. Currently Fedora has the malaga-suomi-voikko package, which is arch-specific. For example, my own system has malaga-suomi-voikko-1.19-12.fc33.x86

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Remove Python2 RPM Macros (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Dne 16. 01. 21 v 8:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): My point here is that I want to keep Python 2 much longer (for developers who unfortunately still need to support it, e.g. for RHEL 7) than I'd like to keep allowing packages to buiid with it. "Developers who unfortunately still need to support it"

Re: Is there interest in Quantum computing in Fedora?

@matthew QISKIT itself is just an sdk which gives you programmatic access to a QASM simulator - no link to any proprietary hardware. There is another module they provide [1] which then allows you to directly interact with IBMs hardware. [1] https://github.com/Qiskit/qiskit-ibmq-provider On Fri, 1

Re: Software Management (RPM, DNF) 2020 retrospective

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 9:36 AM Daniel Mach wrote: > $ dnf offline-upgrade > $ dnf offline-distrosync >* New commands to upgrade your system on reboot > Sounds great. But I don't see those commands neither in F33 nor in Rawhide. Am I looking wrong? Thanks. ___

Re: Software Management (RPM, DNF) 2020 retrospective

On 18.01.2021 11:29, Kamil Paral wrote: Sounds great. But I don't see those commands neither in F33 nor in Rawhide. Am I looking wrong? Thanks. You need to install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade package first. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) __

Re: Migrating the Fedora Developer Portal to Fedora Docs

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 10:34:32 -0500, Pavel Valena wrote: > > Could you clarify on this? One has to fork and open a PR to contribute > > to the devportal too, right? > > Yes, you're right, but I think the process for github is intuitive, > and the contributor does not work with commandline (was my

Re: Software Management (RPM, DNF) 2020 retrospective

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:33 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 18.01.2021 11:29, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Sounds great. But I don't see those commands neither in F33 nor in > > Rawhide. Am I looking wrong? Thanks. > > You need to install dnf-plugin-system-upgr

Re: Software Management (RPM, DNF) 2020 retrospective

Dne 18. 01. 21 v 11:29 Kamil Paral napsal(a): On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 9:36 AM Daniel Mach > wrote: $ dnf offline-upgrade $ dnf offline-distrosync    * New commands to upgrade your system on reboot Sounds great. But I don't see those commands neither in F33

Re: How to properly go from arch-specific to noarch? (Finnish spell-checking)

On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 09:43, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 17. 01. 21 v 11:12 Ville-Pekka Vainio napsal(a): > > Hi, > > > > I am working on updating the Finnish spell-checking stack to the > > current upstream versions. > > > > Currently Fedora has the malaga-suomi-voikko package, which is

Re: Software Management (RPM, DNF) 2020 retrospective

Am 18.01.21 um 09:35 schrieb Daniel Mach: DNF 5 -   * The goal is to remove redundant code and make sure all tools built on top libdnf work the same (DNF currently uses a different code path than microdnf and PackageKit) Can you add a new goal: Don't use Python for it, as it it's slow o

Re: Software Management (RPM, DNF) 2020 retrospective

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:08 PM Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 18.01.21 um 09:35 schrieb Daniel Mach: > > DNF 5 > > - > > * The goal is to remove redundant code and make sure all tools built > > on top libdnf work the same (DNF currently uses a different code path > > than microdnf and PackageK

Re: How to properly go from arch-specific to noarch? (Finnish spell-checking)

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 7:58 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 09:43, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 17. 01. 21 v 11:12 Ville-Pekka Vainio napsal(a): > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am working on updating the Finnish spell-checking stack to the > > > current upstre

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Remove Python2 RPM Macros (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 18. 01. 21 10:01, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 16. 01. 21 v 8:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): My point here is that I want to keep Python 2 much longer (for developers who unfortunately still need to support it, e.g. for RHEL 7) than I'd like to keep allowing packages to buiid with it. "Developers

[Bug 1917355] F34FailsToInstall: perl-Tk-GraphViz

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917355 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC|

Requesting Review for Fedora Easyfix Modernization PR + Active Tagging of Issues With Easyfix

Hello folks, I write this to request review of the most recent PR https://pagure.io/fedora-gather-easyfix/pull-request/9 made to modernize the overall experience and functioning of the site. The changelog is listed in the PR body includes rewrite of the template in Bootstrap 5, in-page active

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Remove Python2 RPM Macros (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:13 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 01. 21 10:01, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 16. 01. 21 v 8:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > >> My point here is that I want to keep Python 2 much longer (for developers > >> who > >> unfortunately still need to support it, e.g. for RHEL

Fedora 34 Change: SOF as default audio driver for Intel LPE hardware (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SofDefaultForIntelLpe == Summary == Intel LPE audio hardware has 2 drivers in the mainline kernel the SST driver and the SOF driver, switch the default driver from SST to SOF. == Owner == * Name: [[User:jwrdegoede| Hans de Goede]] * Email: hdego...@redhat.c

Fedora 34 Change: uEFI for ARMv7 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARMv7UEFI == Summary == Move ARMv7 to use UEFI as default for all armhfp generated images == Owner == * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]] * Email: pbrobinson at fedoraproject dot org == Detailed Description == In Fedora 30 we tried to move ARMv7

Fedora 34 Change: fbrnch (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fbrnch == Summary == Add the [https://github.com/juhp/fbrnch fbrnch] packager tool to Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Petersen|Jens Petersen]] * Email: == Detailed Description == fbrnch (F(ed) Branch) is a tool designed to help simplify or semi-automa

Re: Fedora 34 Change: SOF as default audio driver for Intel LPE hardware (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SofDefaultForIntelLpe > > > == Summary == > Intel LPE audio hardware has 2 drivers in the mainline kernel the SST > driver and the SOF driver, switch the default driver from SST to SOF. > > == Owner == > *

[Bug 1917521] New: Upgrade perl-Calendar-Simple to 2.0.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917521 Bug ID: 1917521 Summary: Upgrade perl-Calendar-Simple to 2.0.1 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Calendar-Simple Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de

[Bug 1906599] perl-Mozilla-PublicSuffix-1.0.2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906599 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC|

[Bug 1917525] New: Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.141

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917525 Bug ID: 1917525 Summary: Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.141 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Config-Model Assignee: david.hanneq...@gmail.com

[Bug 1917525] Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.141

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917525 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|david.ha

Fedora 34 Change: Deprecate python-mock (Self-Contained change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePythonMock == Summary == The {{package|python-mock}} ({{package|python3-mock}}) package will be [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/ deprecated] in [[Releases/34|Fedora 34]]. The package is a standard libr

Re: Fedora 34 Change: fbrnch (Self-Contained Change proposal)

> Add the [https://github.com/juhp/fbrnch fbrnch] packager tool to Fedora. Sounds good ;) > ** Submit and complete package review(s). Links? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li

Re: Fedora 34 Change: SOF as default audio driver for Intel LPE hardware (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:49:58PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SofDefaultForIntelLpe > > > > > > == Summary == > > Intel LPE audio hardware has 2 drivers in the mainline kernel the SST > > driver an

[Bug 1917525] Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.141

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917525 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1917553] New: Upgrade perl-Gtk2-Unique to 0.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917553 Bug ID: 1917553 Summary: Upgrade perl-Gtk2-Unique to 0.07 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Gtk2-Unique Assignee: liangsuil...@gmail.com

[Bug 1917554] New: Upgrade perl-POE-Component-Client-Ping to 1.176

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917554 Bug ID: 1917554 Summary: Upgrade perl-POE-Component-Client-Ping to 1.176 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-POE-Component-Client-Ping Assignee:

[Bug 1917555] New: Upgrade perl-Set-Object to 1.41

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917555 Bug ID: 1917555 Summary: Upgrade perl-Set-Object to 1.41 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Set-Object Assignee: kra...@redhat.com Rep

Re: Rawhide broken by mutter-40.0~alpha.1-1.fc34

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:31:49AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi, > > Yesterday, after I updated my Rawhide, the machine would not start anymore. > To fix the issue, I have downgraded from mutter-40.0~alpha.1-1.fc34 back to > mutter-40.0~alpha-1.fc34. It seems that while the mutter-40.0~alpha.1-1

Re: Software Management (RPM, DNF) 2020 retrospective

On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 14:29 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:08 PM Marius Schwarz < > fedora...@cloud-foo.de> wrote: > > Am 18.01.21 um 09:35 schrieb Daniel Mach: > > > DNF 5 > > > - > > >   * The goal is to remove redundant code and make sure all tools > > built > > > on

Self Introduction: Serhei Makarov

Hello all, My name is Serhei Makarov. I've contributed to the SystemTap project for several years and I have an interest in various kinds of debugging and developer tools. Recently one of my side-projects (https://github.com/serhei/oc-inject) matured somewhat, enough to start shipping it as a s

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Rebuild

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 2:44 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 12:43:56AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > What system will be used to run the mass rebuild script? > > They run on compose-x86-01 I think. We run mass rebuild on compose-branched01.iad2.fp.o which is updated to

Artifacts of failed builds for debugging

Hello, I am trying to build new bind on Rawhide, but I suddenly get quite high rate of failures during builds. Strange is the build is always successful, when I try fedpkg mockbuild on my machine. I tried several tries [1][2][3] and scratch builds fail often. Even production builds fail, but I th

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable spec file preprocessing (System-Wide Change proposal)

clime writes: > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 20:43, Dan Čermák > wrote: >> >> clime writes: >> >> > ...snip... >> >> > >> >> > $ preproc-rpmspec pkg.spec.rpkg # prints rendered spec to stdout, >> >> > pkg.spec.rpkg is a spec template >> >> >> >> This would be a viable workaround, but a workaround ne

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

On 1/16/21 3:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 4:54 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: >> >> Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> See also: >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bootupd/c/c6cf7f6492e0d943e8471f86719df89eed587f6a?branch=master >> >> This is a blatant violation of F

Re: Release 5.6.1 of Sundials

I submitted an update for this: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9f9990ad15 hope that was okay. On 1/5/21 12:12 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: side-tag created for sundials-5.6.1: $ koji list-tagged --latest f34-build-side-35531 Build Ta

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Rebuild

On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:31:32PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback. I understand that is the normal way to proceed > at this point in the schedule. It doesn't really impact me a lot > personally as I build my own kernels anyway. Fair enough. > Given there are not so ma

Re: Artifacts of failed builds for debugging

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:22:10PM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to build new bind on Rawhide, but I suddenly get quite high > rate of failures during builds. Strange is the build is always > successful, when I try fedpkg mockbuild on my machine. > > I tried several tries [1]

Re: Self Introduction: Serhei Makarov

Welcome Serhei! On 2021-01-18 12:41 p.m., Serhei Makarov wrote: Hello all, My name is Serhei Makarov. I've contributed to the SystemTap project for several years and I have an interest in various kinds of debugging and developer tools. Recently one of my side-projects (https://github.com/ser

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Localization measurement and tooling (Self-Contained Change proposal)

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LocalizationMeasurementAndTooling It would be good to at least mention Transtats on the Change page as a related project. Jens On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:52 AM Jean-Baptiste Holcroft < jibec...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Transtats covers 100 packages, wh