Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

Thank you, Vitaly and Fabio! That makes sense, I didn't look on the issue from new user's view. Most people who use vi/vim are aware of the differences and wanted vi/vim just work if the other is not installed, so vi/vim are drop-in replacements for them in this matter of speaking. And Vi is just

License change: libevdev -> MIT

Thanks to a copy/paste error many years ago, libevdev's COPYING file contained the HPND sell variant [1], not the intended MIT license. This has been fixed upstream with the 1.11.0 release which is currently hitting the Fedora repos. libevdev was always meant to be MIT, from the developer's

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-02-01 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/02/01/report-389-ds-base-2.0.2-20210201git95201aa83.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1922014] perlbrew-0.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922014 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4ec9940789 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1922743] perlbrew-0.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922743 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-83ab5bb91b opensmtpd-6.8.0p2-1.el8 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b68969af8c chromium-88.0.4324.96-1.el8 4

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 44 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a9fc09599 openjpeg2-2.3.1-10.el7 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f1768ebc94 opensmtpd-6.8.0p2-1.el7 7

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210129.n.0 changes

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 03:28:15PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30. 01. 21 19:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > resubmit should resubmit it just the way it was, ie, against > > f34-rebuild. A new build should get a new taskid, but this seemed to be > > the same one the releng one had. Dunno. Perhaps

[Bug 1922815] perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922815 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Fedora 33 network configuration (ifcfg*) migration guide available?

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > You can use crudini to manage .ini files. Works quite well. There's also > nmcli... You might also be able to work with kreadconfig5 and kwriteconfig5 from kf5- kconfig-core, though I have never tried those on NM configs. Kevin Kofler

[Bug 1922743] perlbrew-0.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922743 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4ec9940789 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4ec9940789 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1922743] perlbrew-0.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922743 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1922743] perlbrew-0.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922743 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1922716] perl-Log-ger-0.038 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922716 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1922716] perl-Log-ger-0.038 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922716 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

[Bug 1922652] perl-Template-Tiny-1.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922652 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1922652] perl-Template-Tiny-1.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922652 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1922266] Please package perl-Moo for EL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922266 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman --- This is the output of a (failed) koji build: DEBUG util.py:446: Error: No Package found for perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.76 DEBUG util.py:446: Error: No Package found for perl(Module::Runtime) >=

Re: Jython maintainer for Fedora needed

On 31. 01. 21 20:44, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 at 14:29, Miro Hrončok > wrote: Hello Pythonistas (and especially Jythonistas), I've noticed Jython is orphaned in Fedora. There is a new version 2.7.2 available from March 2020. I

Re: Jython maintainer for Fedora needed

On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 at 14:29, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello Pythonistas (and especially Jythonistas), > > I've noticed Jython is orphaned in Fedora. > > There is a new version 2.7.2 available from March 2020. I took a peek, > however > there are patches in Fedora's Jython I don't fully understand,

Jython maintainer for Fedora needed

Hello Pythonistas (and especially Jythonistas), I've noticed Jython is orphaned in Fedora. There is a new version 2.7.2 available from March 2020. I took a peek, however there are patches in Fedora's Jython I don't fully understand, so it is not easy for me to rebase them. I'd like to keep

Jython maintainer for Fedora needed

Hello Pythonistas (and especially Jythonistas), I've noticed Jython is orphaned in Fedora. There is a new version 2.7.2 available from March 2020. I took a peek, however there are patches in Fedora's Jython I don't fully understand, so it is not easy for me to rebase them. I'd like to keep

Re: btrfs hash algorithm (should xxhash be the default?)

* Matthew Miller: > Plus, it's 64 bit instead of 32 bit. The 256-bit algorithms are obviously > much, much slower and probably not right for a default, but should we > consider making xxhash the default for Fedora Linux systems with > btrfs? Is this for an integrity check? Wouldn't it be wise

Re: btrfs hash algorithm (should xxhash be the default?)

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 02:00:02PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > Could you file an issue on the fedora-btrfs project[1] on it? Done (with exactly the same text as my email here): https://pagure.io/fedora-btrfs/project/issue/40 -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader

Re: btrfs hash algorithm (should xxhash be the default?)

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 1:57 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On my Intel i7 laptop, xxhash is a small but clear performance win over > crc32c: > > $ ./hash-speedtest 1000 > Block size: 4096 > Iterations: 1000 > Implementation: builtin > > NULL-NOP: cycles:

btrfs hash algorithm (should xxhash be the default?)

On my Intel i7 laptop, xxhash is a small but clear performance win over crc32c: $ ./hash-speedtest 1000 Block size: 4096 Iterations: 1000 Implementation: builtin NULL-NOP: cycles: 1372543560, c/i 137 NULL-MEMCPY: cycles: 2844174884, c/i

[Bug 1922266] Please package perl-Moo for EL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922266 --- Comment #2 from Clément OUDOT --- Hello Emmanuel, thanks a lot for your help. We would need 2.003004 at least... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1922815] New: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922815 Bug ID: 1922815 Summary: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.18 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened Keywords:

[Test-Announce] 2021-02-01 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2021-02-01 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, and there are interesting goings- on, so let's meet up

[Bug 1922811] New: perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 Bug ID: 1922811 Summary: perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-re-engine-RE2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1922266] Please package perl-Moo for EL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922266 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value ---

[Bug 1920138] perl-Workflow-1.51 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920138 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Workflow-1.50-1.fc34 |perl-Workflow-1.51-1.fc34 ---

Re: Fedora 33 network configuration (ifcfg*) migration guide available?

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:55 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 27.01.2021 um 13:18 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > : > > > > On Wednesday, 27 January 2021 at 13:11, Arthur G wrote: > >> Too bad NetworkManager persists with the old MS-DOS "INI" file format for > >> it's configuration

Re: Fedora 33 network configuration (ifcfg*) migration guide available?

> Am 27.01.2021 um 13:18 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > : > > On Wednesday, 27 January 2021 at 13:11, Arthur G wrote: >> Too bad NetworkManager persists with the old MS-DOS "INI" file format for >> it's configuration files. At least network-scripts was bash script friendly. > > You

Re: Fedora 33 network configuration (ifcfg*) migration guide available?

> Am 27.01.2021 um 13:56 schrieb Robert Marcano via devel > : > > On 1/25/21 5:53 AM, Peter Boy wrote: >> With Fedora 33 network configuration is by default persisted in >> /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/*.nmconnection files. The old >> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg* files are

[Bug 1922738] perl-CSS-Minifier-XS-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922738 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends On|

[Bug 1920138] perl-Workflow-1.51 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920138 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1920687] perl-Dancer2-0.300005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920687 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1920138] perl-Workflow-1.51 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920138 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Workflow-1.50 is |perl-Workflow-1.51 is

Re: Test timeouts in Fedora Copr emulated envs

On Sunday, January 31, 2021 4:17:04 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 01. 21 15:35, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > I don't know, perhaps we could have some configurable coefficient for > > timeout_in Copr_ for emulated architectures? If that was say "3", and > > the --timeout was 3600s, emulated

[Bug 1920696] perl-GnuPG-Interface-1.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920696 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1921174] perl-Mojolicious-8.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921174 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1921789] perl-XML-Feed-0.61 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921789 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1921533] perl-JSON-Path-0.431 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921533 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Test timeouts in Fedora Copr emulated envs

On 31. 01. 21 15:35, Pavel Raiskup wrote: I don't know, perhaps we could have some configurable coefficient for timeout_in Copr_ for emulated architectures? If that was say "3", and the --timeout was 3600s, emulated arches would get 10800s instead? There can be a macro that you would use

Fedora-Rawhide-20210131.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 40/123 (aarch64), 33/181

Re: Test timeouts in Fedora Copr emulated envs

On Friday, January 29, 2021 4:26:18 PM CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > When we attempt to build libvirt in Copr, the test suite times out on > s390 builds. > > IIUC, this is because s390 in Copr is using a QEMU emulated system, > not native hardware, and thus is massively slower to execute. > >

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210129.n.0 changes

On 30. 01. 21 19:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote: resubmit should resubmit it just the way it was, ie, against f34-rebuild. A new build should get a new taskid, but this seemed to be the same one the releng one had. Dunno. Perhaps we could ask the people doing this? I've recently did: $ koji tag

Fedora-IoT-34-20210131.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 9/15 (aarch64), 4/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210130.0): ID: 766208 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi URL:

Re: Help for FTBFS packages: apcupsd and firefox-pkcs11-loader

Il giorno dom 31 gen 2021 alle ore 01:38 Robert-André Mauchin ha scritto: > It seems out of tree builds are not supported by the build script. > Just copy the xpi to the build directory to make it work: > > cp -a *.xpi %{_vpath_builddir}/ > > (after the %cmake call) Thank you, it worked!

Re: bootstrapping without .spec modification

On 1/31/21 11:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I think those worries are overblown. When a packager has the rights to build an rpm (in a side-tag or not), they also have the right to commit whatever they want to the spec file. Just taking a sentence out of context here: I believe you are

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Specio (master). "Update to 0.47 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-01-31 12:30:23 UTC From 0d186339fa7eb772e79d77d12b6d7d0c74c373f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Jan 31 2021 12:29:36 + Subject: Update to 0.47 - New upstream release 0.47 - Change Specio constraint object's stringification overloading to

[Bug 1922518] perl-URI-5.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922518 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1922518] perl-URI-5.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922518 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210131.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210130.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210131.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 24 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 49 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 119.05 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Rawhide 20210131.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 34 Rawhide 20210131.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: bootstrapping without .spec modification

On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:03:21PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 03:49:28PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > Currently a Koji task says: > > > > Source: > > git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.9.git#563b4f4b59a9f81095acfe30899fdc4b040c1b9b > > Build Target:

Re: cxxtools-2.2.1 fails to compile on rawhide with gcc11 with /usr/include/c++/11/string_view:98:21: error: static assertion failed

The issue has now been resolved with this patch: +++ include/cxxtools/char.h 2021-01-30 18:28:23.87739 +0100 @@ -68,9 +68,7 @@ typedef int32_t value_type; //! Constructs a character with a value of 0. -Char() -: _value(0) -{}

[Bug 1922743] New: perlbrew-0.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922743 Bug ID: 1922743 Summary: perlbrew-0.91 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perlbrew Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: