No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210211.0):
ID: 775353 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
> A few more things:
>
> * btrfs-progs tools don't yet have a way to report compression
> information. While 'df' continues to report correctly about actual
> blocks used and free, both regular 'du' (coreutils) and 'btrfs
> filesystem du' will report uncompressed values.
Are there plans for
On 2/11/21 1:40 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Ad side-tags:
>>
>> IMO the process should work for buildroot overrides too. Side tags look
>> good for big rebuilds, where not all packages belong to one maintainer,
>> but it looks like an overhead for only two packages.
>
> If you want multiple (even
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/02/12/report-389-ds-base-2.0.2-20210212git946f2048c.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:29 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 06:50:05PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > OK it's updated.
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide#Questions_and_Answers
> >
> > I couldn't figure out the offline distrosync method, dnf complained
> >
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:58 AM Jeremy Linton wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 1/1/21 8:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Anyway, compress=zstd:1 is a good default. Everyone benefits, and I'm
> > not even sure someone with a very fast NVMe drive will notice a slow
> > down because the
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 06:50:05PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> OK it's updated.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide#Questions_and_Answers
>
> I couldn't figure out the offline distrosync method, dnf complained
> about it maybe being a plugin but couldn't help me find it.
Known bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926738
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-45a4f1130e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926738
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from
OK it's updated.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide#Questions_and_Answers
I couldn't figure out the offline distrosync method, dnf complained
about it maybe being a plugin but couldn't help me find it.
--
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924375
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 01:44:42PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> The closest thing I've found for a guide on this is:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide#Upgrade_from_existing_stable_install
Also, we should probably migrate that to the docs site. Thread:
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 40/183 (x86_64), 25/124 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210210.n.1):
ID: 775032 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:29 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 6:24 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 01:44:42PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > sudo dnf config-manager --set-enabled
> > >
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 6:24 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 01:44:42PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > sudo dnf config-manager --set-enabled
> > fedora,fedora-modular,updates,updates-modular,updates-testing,updates-testing-modular
> > sudo dnf config-manager --set-disabled
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 01:44:42PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> sudo dnf config-manager --set-enabled
> fedora,fedora-modular,updates,updates-modular,updates-testing,updates-testing-modular
> sudo dnf config-manager --set-disabled rawhide,rawhide-modular
> sudo dnf update
> sudo dnf distro-sync
>
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 01:44:42PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> The closest thing I've found for a guide on this is:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide#Upgrade_from_existing_stable_install
>
> Specifically
> "Q: How do I get out of Rawhide again? I want to switch to the
> Branched
OLD: Fedora-34-20210210.n.1
NEW: Fedora-34-20210211.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:7
Upgraded packages: 223
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.24 MiB
Size of dropped packages:18.03 MiB
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I can't compile IceCat on Fedora 33+ since some days because of these
>>> errors:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage
>>
>> This is impacting
On 11. 02. 21 21:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Fedora 33:
python3-blurb
python3-first
python3-iniconfig
python3-pipdeptree
python3-pygments-pytest
python3-sphinx-last-updated-by-git
Fedora 32:
python3-blurb
python3-first
python3-pipdeptree
python3-pygments-pytest
Queries included updates
The closest thing I've found for a guide on this is:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide#Upgrade_from_existing_stable_install
Specifically
"Q: How do I get out of Rawhide again? I want to switch to the
Branched release or a stable release."
The problem is the suggested commands
On 10. 02. 21 11:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Pythonistas.
Unfortunately, we have found a regression in pyproject-rpm-macros wrt
%pyproject_save_files.
The nested __pycache__ directories were not properly owned. E.g.:
/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/rope
Greetings.
We have enabled the koji 'save-failed-tree' plugin in
koji.fedoraproject.org. This plugin allows you to tell koji to bundle up
a failed official builds chroot (either partly or fully) and download it
to investigate it locally.
This plugin should only be used for the case where you
Greetings.
We have enabled the koji 'save-failed-tree' plugin in
koji.fedoraproject.org. This plugin allows you to tell koji to bundle up
a failed official builds chroot (either partly or fully) and download it
to investigate it locally.
This plugin should only be used for the case where you
On 11. 02. 21 17:36, Dan Radez wrote:
On 2/2/21 12:09 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Pythonistas.
When we updated pytest to 5, I've introduced python-pytest4 compatibility
package to ease the transition. We are now on pytest 6.2 and python-pytest4
still exists.
However, pytest 4 has
Hi,
On 2/5/21 3:03 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 2/4/21 9:52 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
considerable lag. In the last 4 or so years I remember issues with
tracker, gnome-shell, mutter/clutter and friends on specific GPUs,
default or popular shell extensions and dbus services. A recent bug
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:44 AM Jan Staněk wrote:
> I maintain newsboat [1], which in the latest version(s) grew new rust
> dependencies. I have prepared a review request for all of them,
> and I'm willing to review other packages in return.
>
> The reviews are the following bugs:
> 1927183,
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:04, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 09:55 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > >
> > > So, what do folks think? Does this seem like a good idea? Should I go
> > > ahead with trying to get it deployed and onboard things to it? Any
> > > comments, ideas,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:04:12AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 09:55 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > >
> > > So, what do folks think? Does this seem like a good idea? Should I go
> > > ahead with trying to get it deployed and onboard things to it? Any
> > > comments,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 03:31:36PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> I have the latest fedora:rawhide container image:
>
> $ podman image list | grep rawhide
> registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora rawhide
> cea65dfcb551 7 hours ago188 MB
>
>
> Actually
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 02:21:28PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Just seeing that the Rawhide compose reports keep coming and there was also
> successful F34 compose, I'd like to thank to everybody involved in branching
> F34, because so far, this appears to me to be the smoothest branching ever
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927876
Bug ID: 1927876
Summary: perl-Search-Elasticsearch-7.711 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Search-Elasticsearch
Keywords:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 06:46:18AM -0800, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 2/11/21 2:27 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Tom, Kevin,
> >
> > What is the status here? It seems that Koji does not include make anymore.
> > However, my local build does. So whatever change was done on Koji should be
> > probably
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Graphics-TIFF` that
you are following:
``
Add FMF plan
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
This was once discussed here in Ask Fedora
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/how-to-increasing-performance-by-changing-cpu-governor-and-reducing-swappiness/10006
and there's an ongoing investigation regarding the same here
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/212. You would want to check
On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 09:55 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> >
> > So, what do folks think? Does this seem like a good idea? Should I go
> > ahead with trying to get it deployed and onboard things to it? Any
> > comments, ideas, potential problems? Thanks!
> >
>
>
> I am pretty sure you did :-)
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-02-12 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
Hi,
On 1/1/21 8:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 11:31 AM Artem Tim wrote:
It's faster. Here is some benchmark with different zstd compression ratios
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/28/1930. Could be outdated a little bit though.
But for HDD it makes sense to increase it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
--- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
the correctly thing was just git merge master to keep it in sync with fedora
spec.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
--- Comment #8 from Devrim Gündüz ---
@Petr: Updating it to 5.6.0 now. Revoked that action, will push 5.6.0 soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-018e865ab5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-018e865ab5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Lumír Balhar wrote:
> It seems to me that both apps are using the same engine which might lead
> to this.
>
> Is there any way how to solve this problem from user perespective?
Electron upstream needs to fix its distribution model. It just does not make
sense to have every single application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
--- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
(In reply to Devrim Gündüz from comment #4)
>
> > he is not interested in contributing to Fedora,
>
> Really?
not sure, look his last commit on fedora git.
--
You are receiving this mail
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-02-11 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2021-02-11 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2021-02-11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
--- Comment #4 from Devrim Gündüz ---
(In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #3)
> he is not interested in contributing to Fedora,
Really?
> he has his own repo at https://yum.postgresql.org/
This is the community repo I am
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
--- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #2)
> Devrim Gündüz was the only one who tried to build bucardo for EPEL 8 in
> August 2019. But the build failed (probably because of missing
> dependencies).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev...@gunduz.org,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
Itamar Reis Peixoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
I have the latest fedora:rawhide container image:
$ podman image list | grep rawhide
registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora rawhide
cea65dfcb551 7 hours ago188 MB
Actually attempting to install any extra packages fails:
$ podman run -iv fedora:rawhide
# dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927813
Bug ID: 1927813
Summary: not a bug - bucardo missing in "stream" repos
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
I'm wondering, though, whether we have to fix a FTBFS on F34 (!) just a few
days after the mass rebuild. The glib change which caused all this was pushed
after the mass rebuild, basically rendering mute the point of the mass rebuild.
In my case (notmuch) I got the notice from koschei - funnily
Thank you for your advice and willingness to help with testing. There is a
plan to create a side tag and test appropriate changes there.
Changed category to system-wide change.
Ondrej
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 3:42 PM David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:30:20PM -0700, Jeff Law
On 2/11/21 2:27 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Tom, Kevin,
What is the status here? It seems that Koji does not include make anymore.
However, my local build does. So whatever change was done on Koji should be
probably reflected also in fedora-comps.
I submitted a pull request for this:
Hi all,
I maintain newsboat [1], which in the latest version(s) grew new rust
dependencies. I have prepared a review request for all of them,
and I'm willing to review other packages in return.
The reviews are the following bugs:
1927183, 1927210, 1927248, 1927353,
1927362, 1927385, 1927763,
Am 11.02.21 um 15:28 schrieb Peter Robinson:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:03 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:14 AM Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:54 PM Michael Catanzaro
>>> wrote:
> […]
>>> This was bugging me for a while. I also noticed that Fedora
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:30:20PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 2/10/21 11:00 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 02. 21 18:47, Ben Cotton wrote:
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
Problems during build can appear in multiple packages what can lead to
build failure, as multiple packages require
On Thursday, February 11, 2021 2:24:28 PM CET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:19:25AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 2:49:00 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:29:51 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:03 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:14 AM Viktor Ashirov wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:54 PM Michael Catanzaro
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Has anybody investigated Jim Salter's claims that Fedora 32 is slow to
> >> launch
On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 13:46, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:41:16AM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Recordings are available on Fedora's youtube channel
> >
> > Growing Fedora CoreOS Community :
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSuBWeosAvQ
> > Fedora CoreOS as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926738
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-45a4f1130e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-45a4f1130e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926738
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
Benson Muite wrote:
> There are a number of php-imap implementations such as:
> https://github.com/barbushin/php-imap
> https://github.com/Webklex/php-imap
These confusingly all use the same generic name "php-imap", but they are all
different things.
https://github.com/barbushin/php-imap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927466
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Graphics-TIFF` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
fmf
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
One of the mentioned packages already has a fix upstream:
https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/pull/116105
Thanks for help.
Lumír
On 2/11/21 10:32 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11. 02. 21 8:39, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Hello.
I'm facing a problem with a conflict between two packages from
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
11 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 35/124 (aarch64), 42/183
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:19:25AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 2:49:00 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:29:51 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:19:41PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021
Just seeing that the Rawhide compose reports keep coming and there was
also successful F34 compose, I'd like to thank to everybody involved in
branching F34, because so far, this appears to me to be the smoothest
branching ever (I hope this is not premature and I have not tried to
update my
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Graphics-TIFF` that
you are following:
``
fmf
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:14 AM Viktor Ashirov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:54 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anybody investigated Jim Salter's claims that Fedora 32 is slow to
>> launch applications? Recent article:
>>
>>
On 11. 02. 21 13:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:22:54PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Ben Cotton wrote on 2021/02/11 0:44:
In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following
provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a
lack of
On 11. 02. 21 13:33, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Thanks, Miro!
foomatic-db build is now in testing and I was able to create a override
for it, but when I built foomatic, it got into bodhi automatically and
now I cannot add foomatic build to foomatic-db update to prevent
foomatic landing into stable
Thanks, Miro!
foomatic-db build is now in testing and I was able to create a override
for it, but when I built foomatic, it got into bodhi automatically and
now I cannot add foomatic build to foomatic-db update to prevent
foomatic landing into stable than foomatic-db.
I cannot even unpush the
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:22:54PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote on 2021/02/11 0:44:
> >In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following
> >provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a
> >lack of builds submitted in the last six months. If you
Ben Cotton wrote on 2021/02/11 0:44:
In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following
provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a
lack of builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this
directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you believe you
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210210.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210211.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 62
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 185.15 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Thank you so much @Ankur Sinha I have already gone through the "Information for
Gsoc 2021 " . I have joined the IRC , MAILING LIST and the DISCORD channel
Thanks ,
Unnikrishnan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Tom, Kevin,
What is the status here? It seems that Koji does not include make
anymore. However, my local build does. So whatever change was done on
Koji should be probably reflected also in fedora-comps.
BTW it would be nice if Koji used standard mock configs, especially I
don't see a
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 09:56:04 -, Unnikrishnan V wrote:
> Hey , I am new to open source , can someone help me to get started
> with how to start contributing . I want to participating in GSOC 2021
> with fedora. I am a bit confused and don't know to look out things
Hi! Welcome to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927466
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927663
Bug ID: 1927663
Summary: Upgrade perl-POE-Component-Client-Ping to 1.177
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-POE-Component-Client-Ping
Assignee:
Hey , I am new to open source , can someone help me to get started with how to
start contributing . I want to participating in GSOC 2021 with fedora. I am a
bit confused and don't know to look out things
___
devel mailing list --
On 11. 02. 21 8:39, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Hello.
I'm facing a problem with a conflict between two packages from non-fedora
repositories. I'm using vscodium and rememberthemilk apps for a long time but
now I cannot update both because there is a conflict in /usr/lib/.build-id/.
Error:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210210.0):
ID: 774398 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 2:49:00 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:29:51 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:19:41PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:18 PM Petr Menšík wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:54 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody investigated Jim Salter's claims that Fedora 32 is slow to
> launch applications? Recent article:
>
>
> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/02/ubuntu-core-20-adds-secure-boot-with-hardware-backed-encryption/
>
> "in
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 at 18:53, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Before the RH holiday shutdown, I started a new project designed to
> address a long-standing pain point in Fedora: we don't really have a
> good source of truth for release cycle information. I'm thinking of
> situations where
90 matches
Mail list logo
