Re: systemd-oomd blows away the gnome-shell desktop session

Also there's below: https://github.com/facebookincubator/below Hopefully it'll get packaged soon. https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/article-proposal-below-an-interactive-resource-monitor-for-modern-linux-systems/31176/2 Chris Murphy ___ devel mail

Re: systemd-oomd blows away the gnome-shell desktop session

Killed /user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/session.slice/org.gnome.Shell@wayland.service >Is there a command to list the current memory usage for each cgroup? Yes, either in sysfs or you can use systemd-cgls -m, and you can pass a path to eliminate extraneous processes and reveal more d

Re: systemd-oomd blows away the gnome-shell desktop session

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:14 PM Aleksei Bavshin wrote: > > On 7/27/21 6:23 PM, David Airlie wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been using f34 with gnome/wayland session on a 16MB machine which > > has 8GB zram swap configured. > > > > If I build anything large inside my desktop environment (llvm/clang)

Re: systemd-oomd blows away the gnome-shell desktop session

On 7/27/21 6:23 PM, David Airlie wrote: Hi, I've been using f34 with gnome/wayland session on a 16MB machine which has 8GB zram swap configured. If I build anything large inside my desktop environment (llvm/clang) from a gnome-terminal, systemd-oomd blows away my whole desktop slice. This seems

Re: Self Introduction: Ma Zheng

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:29 PM Ma, Zheng wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is Zheng, newly coming to Fedora community :) > > I’m now working on the rpm packaging things, hoping to contribute a package > soon! Welcome! Hope for your first package! - robin > > > > Zheng > > > > ___

systemd-oomd blows away the gnome-shell desktop session

Hi, I've been using f34 with gnome/wayland session on a 16MB machine which has 8GB zram swap configured. If I build anything large inside my desktop environment (llvm/clang) from a gnome-terminal, systemd-oomd blows away my whole desktop slice. This seems overly hostile. Now in theory I can use

Standard version specification in Dockerfile's for 'x-pkg verrel'

Hey y'all, I'm a developer at Red Hat working on adding a user-requested feature to the 'x-pkg' line of products. Specifically, the user would like the 'x-pkg verrel' command to work for those projects under the container/* branch of Fedora targeted software in the same way that the command wo

Standard version specification in Dockerfile's for 'x-pkg verrel'

Hey y'all, I'm a developer at Red Hat working on adding a user-requested feature to the 'x-pkg' line of products. Specifically, the user would like the 'x-pkg verrel' command to work for those projects under the container/* branch of Fedora targeted software in the same way that the command wo

Re: Fedora Zuul had been integrated with Testing Farm and TMT

On 27. 07. 21 20:37, Colin Walters wrote: (If Fedora used a unified git repo, I could easily just grep it, but...) Here you go, it is 12 GB: https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/git-seed-latest.tar.xz -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Fedora-IoT-35-20210727.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210726.0): ID: 936467 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/936467 ID: 936484 Test: aarch64

Re: Consider packaging Jello

Blaise! Awesome - long time, man! Will do. Kelly ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-con

Re: Consider packaging Jello

Hi Kelly, Let's see if I can hook you up. It would be a great excuse to get back in touch with you! I'm in eastern time zone these days, so send me your favorite contact info and we'll set something up. Best, blaise at gmail On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 3:50 PM Kelly Brazil wrote: > Thank you, but

Re: squashfs-tools being updated in rawhide

The upstream fix looks good and squashfs-tools-4.5-2 has the patch and is in today's rawhide compose. There will be a minor point release for squashfs-tools in the near future with the fix. But phillip is waiting a short bit to see if any other problems get discovered before making a new release

Azure CLI + SDK packaging update and review swap request

Hey folks, Thanks to everyone who helped with package reviews and guidance as I cobbled together the Azure CLI and SDK packages. The work is almost complete! There are a few remaining packages left to review: python-azure-appconfiguration (required SDK component) https://bugzilla.redhat.

Re: Consider packaging Jello

Thank you, but I'm not interested in becoming a package maintainer myself. I'm looking for someone to package and maintain a CLI app I developed. It is currently packaged or in process on some other platforms like homebrew, debian, AUR, etc. ___ devel

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote: > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-07-28 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00 > America/Indiana/Indianapolis >At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat > > More information available at: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US

Re: Fedora Zuul had been integrated with Testing Farm and TMT

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, at 9:04 AM, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Dear all, > > Today we are gladly announcing that the Zuul CI system for Fedora, Congrats! > which is running checks for pull requests against > src.fedoraproject.org, will also run Test Management Tool (tmt) based > tests via the

Re: PSA: partner-bugzilla to be replaced with bugzilla.stage on July 31st

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 27. 07. 21 10:34, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com > > > (e.g. for integration testing,

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

On 7/27/2021 10:31 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am Dienstag, dem 27.07.2021 um 16:23 +0200 schrieb Tomas Hrcka: Hi all, Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 on Jul 21st, 2021. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change

Re: F35 Change: Switch to WirePlumber as the PipeWire session manage (late Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Jul 27 2021 at 12:50:29 PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Has the Fedora Workstation Working Group made any recommendations around this? Does that group feel that WirePlumber is mature enough to replace the existing session manager? This change proposal is the first I've heard of it.

Re: F35 Change: Switch to WirePlumber as the PipeWire session manage (late Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:18 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WirePlumber > > == Summary == > PipeWire currently uses a simple example session manager. This > proposal is to move to the more powerful WirePlumber session manager. > Has the Fedora Workstation Working

Re: coreos-diskimage-rehydrator

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Yeah I saw it but as with many things I didn't necessarily understand > it :-( So in fact it's nothing to do with streams as I was thinking > about it. I guess "stream" means something like "software stream", as > in which distro

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

Am Dienstag, dem 27.07.2021 um 16:23 +0200 schrieb Tomas Hrcka: > Hi all, > > Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 > on Jul 21st, 2021. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements This change hasn't be

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

On 7/27/21 10:37 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: This is affectting many different packages that use the %cmake3 macro and try to enter its build directory. I traced the root of it. The %cmake3 macro calls the %_vpath_builddir macro to set its build directory name. F35 - %_vpath_builddir: "%

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

On 7/27/21 10:20 AM, Milan Crha wrote: Hi, looking on the libical build break [1], it looks like the ppc64le build doesn't use _target_platform properly in the CMake macros, because, if I read the build.log correctly, the build is done into `redhat-linux-build`, while the `_target_platfor

How to correctly handle scriptlets for systemd template unit instances

Hi everybody, I have a package (syncthing [0]) that provides both system and user units, depending on how the user wants the service to start. The user units are obviously specific to each user, but the system units are templates that are instantiated for the user who wants to have the service run

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

On Tue, 2021-07-27 at 16:23 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f35-rebuild) and moved over to > f35. > > Failures can be seen > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f35-failures.html > > Things still needing rebuilding > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 15:37, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > Hi all, Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 > on Jul 21st, 2021. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for: > > [...] > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F35Boost176 This change isn't in rawhide, so the rebu

F35 mass rebuild is finished

Hi all, Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 on Jul 21st, 2021. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.25 https://f

Self Introduction: Ma Zheng

Hi all, This is Zheng, newly coming to Fedora community :) I'm now working on the rpm packaging things, hoping to contribute a package soon! Zheng ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210727.n.0 changes

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:26:31 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > It's a locale in sed: > > $ grep '[ ]*#define[ ]*_AUD_PLUGIN_VERSION[ ]\+' > /usr/include/libaudcore/plugin.h 2>/dev/null | LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 sed > 's!.*_AUD_PLUGIN_VERSION[ ]*\([0-9]\+\).*!\1!' > 48 /* 3.8-devel */ > $ grep '[ ]*#define[

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210727.n.0 changes

* Petr Pisar: > V Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:03:36PM +0200, Michael Schwendt napsal(a): >> Something in grep/sed/rpm is broken since today or yesterday. >> >> On July 24th, a %global definition in a spec file still worked. >> It still works with a local Mock build for Rawhide/F35. >> It fails in koj

Self Introduction: Peter Savage

Hi all, I was a MOTU for Ubuntu in the past, recently I've become interested in composing music and there are a number of packages that I'd like to see in Fedora's main repo. I'm tacklingthe sFizz package first, hoping you'll see a package for review from me soon! Pete ___

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210727.n.0 changes

V Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:03:36PM +0200, Michael Schwendt napsal(a): > Something in grep/sed/rpm is broken since today or yesterday. > > On July 24th, a %global definition in a spec file still worked. > It still works with a local Mock build for Rawhide/F35. > It fails in koji Rawhide: > https://k

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210727.n.0 changes

Something in grep/sed/rpm is broken since today or yesterday. On July 24th, a %global definition in a spec file still worked. It still works with a local Mock build for Rawhide/F35. It fails in koji Rawhide: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3604/72743604/build.log ___

Re: Free Pascal and F35 Mass Rebuild

Thanks for the help, Florian. Unfortunately, I'll have to admit straight away that even though I co-maintain FPC, my knowledge of assembly, ELF and compilers in general is close to non-existent, so I don't really know how to apply the minimal patch you gave. I wanted to submit a bug report upst

Fedora-Rawhide-20210727.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Clou

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210727.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210726.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210727.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 104 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 21.00 MiB Size of dropped packages

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (i.e. in 1 week). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packag

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210727.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210726.0): ID: 935975 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: PSA: partner-bugzilla to be replaced with bugzilla.stage on July 31st

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 07. 21 10:34, Kamil Paral wrote: > > If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com > > (e.g. for integration testing, > etc, > > basically as a staging Bugzilla instance), please note that

Re: PSA: partner-bugzilla to be replaced with bugzilla.stage on July 31st

On 27. 07. 21 10:34, Kamil Paral wrote: If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com (e.g. for integration testing, etc, basically as a staging Bugzilla instance), please note that it says: "This instance of Bugzilla will be shut down permanently

PSA: partner-bugzilla to be replaced with bugzilla.stage on July 31st

If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com (e.g. for integration testing, etc, basically as a staging Bugzilla instance), please note that it says: "This instance of Bugzilla will be shut down permanently on July 31st at 12:30 AM UTC. You should use bugzilla.stage.redhat.com instead"

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210727.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210726.0): ID: 935901 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op