OpenEXR and Imath builds are complete and dependencies are now being
rebuilt, all in a side tag.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Co
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:45 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 8:59 AM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:11 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> >
> >> > * Dennis Gilmore:
> >> >
> >> > > We intentionally never looked at enabling that and
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2021-08-23
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
We didn't meet for a few weeks, so let's get together and check
in. I don't have much specific for the
Thank you for pointer. After applying a patch made by a co-maintainer, another
issue occurred at that line:
/usr/include/pxr/usd/usdShade/output.h:303:10: note: candidate expects 1
argument, 2 provided
/usr/include/pxr/usd/usdShade/output.h:310:10: note: candidate: 'bool
pxrInternal_v0_21__px
On 8/20/21 9:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:03:27PM +0200, Iago Rubio wrote:
Right now, I was aiming for rarian.
It was orphaned a week ago, but the packager dashboard shows many
dependencies that will be in trouble in a month:
- dia
- etherape
- gconf-editor
- g
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:03:27PM +0200, Iago Rubio wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 08:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 08:15:36PM +0700, Didik Supriadi wrote:
> > > I think ppl now can go to
> > > https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/user/orphan to see
> > > orphane
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210820.0):
ID: 953046 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/953046
ID: 9
Unless someone convinces me of another plan, I intend to retire
python-typer and python-typer-cli in F35 and Rawhide in one week
(2021-08-27).
I myself introduced these two packages to Fedora quite recently
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964742,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
I picked up jakarta-commons-httpclient in an attempt to keep
ant-contrib building. That proved impossible, so I removed all
dependencies on ant-contrib from packages I maintain instead. That
means I don't need jakarta-commons-httpclient, so I am orphaning it
again.
These packages still depend on
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 21/205 (x86_64), 18/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210819.n.0):
ID: 952484 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/952484
ID: 952571 Test: aarch64 Server-raw
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 04:28:22PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:09:06PM +0200, Iago Rubio wrote:
> > What's the right place to file a bug for this ?
>
>
> Fedora Infrastructure would be the right place. In fact...
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10140
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210808.0):
ID: 952936 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/952936
ID: 952938 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Clou
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210820.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
* Ankur Sinha [20/08/2021 12:27] :
>
> I totally understand the point of the system we have in place, but I do
> see how it doesn't quite address the case of upstream developers or
> individuals who'd just like to maintain their few packages.
To be fair, the system does address the case of the up
As a reminder, the F35 Beta freeze begins on Tuesday.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. pipewire — pipewire-0.3.31-4.fc35.x86_64 no audio devices found
(due to pipewire-media-session user session service not being
automatically enabled on update) — NEW
ACT
OLD: Fedora-35-20210819.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210820.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 77
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 196.75 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hi,
Testing Farm Team is glad to announce possibility to test packages with
conflicting RPMs in Fedora CI [1] and RHEL9 CI [2] via the `exclude` option
in the `prepare` step in the TMT test definition [3].
For an example of a test using this see (test excludes maven-openjdk8 from
installation):
h
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
ID: 952356 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/952356
ID: 952357 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uef
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Branched 20210820.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Hi all,
I am building new gupnp/gupnp-av/gupnp-dlna 1.3.x that come with soname
bumps for both f35 and rawhide.
I'll take care of rebuilds of dependent packages. Hopefully it goes
smooth because I didn't expect soname bumps. (And the spec files had
so.* globbed so it caught me off guard. I've f
I've done quite a bit of checking on builds using a COPR so I don't believe
these updates make anything worse than they already are and might help in a
few cases.
As usual, the plan is to build in a side tag and I plan to update both
rawhide and f35.
Thanks,
Richard
__
Hi Guys,
If it helps I would be happy to volunteer to be a co-maintainer, especially
when it comes to assembler and linker command line options...
Cheers
Nick
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to deve
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210818.0):
ID: 951832 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/951832
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests complet
* Kevin Fenzi:
> I'd also be happy to help, but that said... I wonder if we couldn't ask
> the FPC to take it over? Or would that be too slow/too many people to
> get things done? Just thinking that they should know the pending
> guidelines and what macros make sense, etc.
I have been unable to
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 11:34:51 +0100, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
> Package is created properly, spec file is already maintained : https://
> github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/tree/master/PACKAGES/RPM
>
>
> but now, honestly, I don't really know what to do.
>
> Any help very welcome
Well, "pushing i
new issue:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/anitya/issues/1168
for the incorrect Fedora version, I added a comment to this existing issue:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/anitya/issues/1167
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programmin
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 08:50:16AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 8:48 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Where are you seeing 4.02.3? I can't see that in the upstream
> > repository.
>
> Go to https://github.com/ocaml/ocamlbuild/releases. Scroll all the
> way to the bottom a
On 20/08/2021 12:34, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
but now, honestly, I don't really know what to do.
You need to find a sponsor:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
__
Package is created properly, spec file is already maintained :
https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/tree/master/PACKAGES/RPM
but now, honestly, I don't really know what to do.
Any help very welcome
On 2021-08-18 20:09, Ben Beasley wrote:
Relevant history:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 23:20:35 +0200, Iago Rubio wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-08-19 at 16:28 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:09:06PM +0200, Iago Rubio wrote:
> > > What's the right place to file a bug for this ?
> >
> > Fedora Infrastructure would be the right place. In fact...
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:11 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:55 PM Sahana Prasad wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > No major progress on this task yet.
> > I found out that the compat package needs some more fixing.
> > I have more time in the coming days, so I should
> > have
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 15:04 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82'
Esser:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:49 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82'
> Esser:
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:43 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek:
> > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser
> > >
Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 16:23 -0400 schrieb Rich Mattes:
> On 8/17/21 10:21 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 8/14/21 10:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:34:11PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > > Have there been any recent changes to the arm (32bit) builders?
>
On 8/19/21 10:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 08:35:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:53:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It's also that redhat-rpm-config has come fa
35 matches
Mail list logo
