Fedora-Cloud-35-20220201.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220131.0): ID: 1116930 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On Mo, 31.01.22 18:32, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > See the discussion around seccomp and NNP. i.e. a new kernel facility > > was added precisely to ensure that seccomp cannot be used to run code > > that is intended to be run privileged – under

Re: Weirdness with clang and stdatomic.h on Rawhide

On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 22:45, Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all, > > I’m troubleshooting an issue and came up with this sample program: > https://pastebin.com/g9S8Z64q to demonstrate the problem. Basically, clang > 13, on Rawhide, won’t compile that program, while on Fedora 35 it does. > > The reason

Re: Weirdness with clang and stdatomic.h on Rawhide

On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 09:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 22:45, Ron Olson wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I’m troubleshooting an issue and came up with this sample program: > > https://pastebin.com/g9S8Z64q to demonstrate the problem. That's not a valid C++ program, even i

Re: Weirdness with clang and stdatomic.h on Rawhide

On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 09:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 22:45, Ron Olson wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I’m troubleshooting an issue and came up with this sample program: > > https://pastebin.com/g9S8Z64q to demonstrate the problem. Basically, clang > > 13, on Rawhide, w

Re: the meaning of pkgconfig's Libs fields

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 08:57:45PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Well, that is the reverse of how we do things in general. If I want to > > look for libraries using pkg-config, I install pkg-config. If I want > > to look for libraries using 'gcc test.

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220201.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220131.0): ID: 1116946 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: hdf5 fortran build failure with gcc 12

Orion Poplawski writes: > On 1/29/22 19:40, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: >> Looks like "minusone" variable looking like constant value defined >> in >> fortran/test/tH5A_1_8.F90 needs PARAMETER attribute. Tried this diff: >> ``` >> diff --git a/hdf5.spec b/hdf5.spec >> index 3b1d27b..2bac44d 100644 >> -

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 at 16:40, Steve Grubb wrote: > > >> Of course gcc -fsanitize=undefined cannot be used on production code. > > > > Why not? Will it find too many errors? > > This discussion is at least 5 years old: > > https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q1/363 > > I don't know if the problems ha

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 14:58, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 12:36:01PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 21/01/2022 19:04, Steve Grubb wrote: > > >Uninitialized variables are a big problem. > > > > Yes, but as a package maintainer, I don't want to deal with dozen

Re: Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 16:29, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Thursday, 27 January 2022 16.14.36 WET José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > $ src/lyx > > > > > > [1] 61542 > > > > > > src/lyx: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.30' not found (required > > > by src/lyx) > > > > > > > > > Any help

Action Required: Bugzilla - API Authentication changes

Forwarded Message Subject: [Bugzilla-announce-list] Action Required: Bugzilla - API Authentication changes Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 12:28:13 +1000 From: Jeff Fearn To: bugzilla-announce-l...@redhat.com Tl;dr From Monday 28th February, applications making API calls to Bugzilla ma

Re: Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux

On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 11:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 16:29, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 27 January 2022 16.14.36 WET José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > > $ src/lyx > > > > > > > > > > [1] 61542 > > > > > > > > > > src/lyx: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

* Jonathan Wakely: > Vitaly, it looks like you didn't respond to this. I'm also curious why > this change would lead to crashes. Are we missing something? I've seen cases where access to uninitialized data was fine as long as the memory location was never zero, something that was always true for

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

Lennart Poettering writes: On Mo, 31.01.22 18:32, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > See the discussion around seccomp and NNP. i.e. a new kernel facility > > was added precisely to ensure that seccomp cannot be used to run code > > that is intende

Re: Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux

On Tuesday, 1 February 2022 11.54.01 WET Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Which is also mentioned at https://jwakely.github.io/pkg-gcc-latest/ > so I've added a link to that page from the copr description. Thank you. That answered all my questions (regarding this issue :-) ). Regards, -- José Abílio __

Re: Action Required: Bugzilla - API Authentication changes

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 12:37 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Forwarded Message > Subject: [Bugzilla-announce-list] Action Required: Bugzilla - API > Authentication changes > Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 12:28:13 +1000 > From: Jeff Fearn > To: bugzilla-announce-l...@redhat.com > > Tl;dr From

Re: Action Required: Bugzilla - API Authentication changes

On 01. 02. 22 13:37, Fabio Valentini wrote: Hi Miro, Thanks for forwarding this announcement. Apparently the talk about "improving communication between RHBZ and the Fedora Project" has not born fruit yet. ;) Well the announcement was public, I recommend subscribing to https://listman.redhat.

Re: Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux

Davide, thank you for your interest in this. May I ask what plans you have using it for? We're investigating an integration into CentOS Stream. Regards Konrad On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 17:55, Davide Cavalca via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 12:13 +0200, K

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 12:03, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Jonathan Wakely: > > > Vitaly, it looks like you didn't respond to this. I'm also curious why > > this change would lead to crashes. Are we missing something? > > I've seen cases where access to uninitialized data was fine as long as > the m

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On Di, 01.02.22 07:14, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > On Mo, 31.01.22 18:32, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > > > > > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > > > > > See the discussion around seccomp and NNP. i.e. a new kernel facility >

Re: Action Required: Bugzilla - API Authentication changes

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:41:01PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 02. 22 13:37, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi Miro, > > > > Thanks for forwarding this announcement. > > Apparently the talk about "improving communication between RHBZ and > > the Fedora Project" has not born fruit yet. ;) > >

Re: Action Required: Bugzilla - API Authentication changes

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:25:36PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:41:01PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 01. 02. 22 13:37, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > Hi Miro, > > > > > > Thanks for forwarding this announcement. > > > Apparently the talk about "improving communi

Re: Action Required: Bugzilla - API Authentication changes

On 2/1/22 7:37 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 12:37 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> Forwarded Message >> Subject: [Bugzilla-announce-list] Action Required: Bugzilla - API >> Authentication changes >> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 12:28:13 +1000 >> From: Jeff Fearn >> T

Re: conditional require

On 1/31/22 06:17 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 22 23:51, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 1/31/22 05:08 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 1/31/22 04:04 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 22 21:58, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: During recent major version update, some files were moved from -doc

Re: the meaning of pkgconfig's Libs fields

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I think Suggests would be OK. Even Recommends seems like too much. You may > be using clang++ to compile the code, or just accessing headers from > doxygen, or maybe testing an alternate version of g++ from copr, i.e. with > a different package name… Suggests i

Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide

On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 14:00 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 11:09 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:32:22AM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > > > On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:57 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > A new gcc with most importantly the > > > > http

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

Lennart Poettering wrote: > CVE-2014-9680, CVE-2014-0106, CVE-2010-3853, CVE-2010-1646, > CVE-2008-3825, CVE-2006-0151, CVE-2005-4158, CVE-2005-3629, > CVE-2005-2959, CVE-2004-1051, CVE-2002-0043, … > > These are all env var cleanup issues in su/sudo context. And the environment variable cleanup

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

Lennart Poettering writes: On Di, 01.02.22 07:14, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > On Mo, 31.01.22 18:32, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > > > > > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > > > > > See the discussion around seccomp and NNP.

Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:55:14PM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > > > Apparently it was annobin (although it passed the test done during > > > gcc.spec > > > testing, apparently it was incompatible again). > > > Florian has rebuilt it, so please just retry. > > > Hi, > > after a few days, it seem

Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide

On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 14:55:14 +0100 Thomas Haller wrote: > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 14:00 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 11:09 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:32:22AM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:57 +0100, Jakub Jelin

Re: Orphaning some packages (w3c-markup-validator fallout)

Hi Nathanael, On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:28:27 -0700 "Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote: > I recently gave ownership of w3c-markup-validator to Sérgio Basto > which reminded me that there are a handful of perl packages that I > probably created/took a hand in as part of that. I haven't touched > them in a

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 36 approximately one week before branching. However, 5 weekly reminders are required and I forgot to start this sooner, hence the retirement will happen in 5 weeks, i.e.

Re: Action Required: Bugzilla - API Authentication changes

Miro Hrončok wrote: > From: Jeff Fearn […] > If you attempt to use an old method to authenticate to the API after this > change has been made, the API_KEY or password supplied will be treated as > potentially compromised and invalidated immediately. If you supplied your > password then you will ne

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On Di, 01.02.22 09:01, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/B2ZCFBIM3AWBUFJKNHGZWPLZZDZPH43Y/ > > > > I explained a locking DoS there: run privileged code, but with > > extremly restrictive resource s

Re: search among all spec files

Thank you everybody for your suggestions! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ L

F37 Change: MinGW OpenSSL 3.x update (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37MingwOpenSSL3 == Summary == Update OpenSSL for MinGW to version 3.x == Owner == * Name: [[User:smani|Sandro Mani]] * Email: manisan...@gmail.com == Detailed Description == mingw-openssl will be updated to version 3.x. The following dependencies will be

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Source-git SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-02-02 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG Agenda: https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting&status=Open

Re: Weirdness with clang and stdatomic.h on Rawhide

Well, yes and no. The code I linked to in the pastebin is what demonstrates the issue. The code in question is Apple’s libdispatch which I package separately as well as part of Swift. In that situation they’re using a C++ file that uses the underlying primitives in stdatomic in macros for their

GenericError: cannot update build 1910991, state: COMPLETE

failed with this error. What is going on there? I have tagged the glibc-2.34.9000-39.fc36 manually into f36-updates-candidate, which I assume will subject the build to gating. But it's still surprising. Thanks, Florian __

Re: openexr tests segfaulting on ppc64le only

On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 9:38 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > I thought the gcc 12 related issues with ppc64le had been fixed but perhaps > not in all cases? > > On the original rebuild[1] two tests failed (segfaulting) but on my latest > attempt with the new gcc 12 build[2] I now have 3 tests segfaulti

Re: openexr tests segfaulting on ppc64le only

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 10:40 AM Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 9:38 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > I thought the gcc 12 related issues with ppc64le had been fixed but > perhaps not in all cases? > > > > On the original rebuild[1] two tests failed (segfaulting) but on my > latest attemp

Re: openexr tests segfaulting on ppc64le only

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:53 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > No, I haven't tried building on one of the packager ppc boxes to investigate > further. Fighting other gcc 12 / python 3.10/3.11 issues :) > > Did you add the flag for ppc64le only? I'll try and see if it fixes things > for me as well. Yes, f

Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)

rpm -q -conflicts kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm kicad-doc < 1:6.0.1-4.fc35 ... When I add the '--best --allowerasing' flags, then I get the desired result: # dnf update kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm --best --allowerasing Last metadata expiration check: 0:43:04 ago on Mon 31 Jan 2022 05:0

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

> chocolate-doomsundaram I've managed to get this to build successfully in koji. I'll try to contact the maintainer, though looking at bugzilla, they haven't been active since April 2020. I'm willing to adopt the package should the maintainer drop it or be declared unresponsiv

Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)

On 01. 02. 22 18:01, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: rpm -q -conflicts kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm kicad-doc < 1:6.0.1-4.fc35 ... When I add the '--best --allowerasing' flags, then I get the desired result: # dnf update kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm --best --allowerasing Last metadata

Fedora CoreOS Community Video Meeting 2022-02-02

Hi All, Tomorrow we will be holding a video meeting for the Fedora CoreOS community. We will be discussing Fedora 36 changes as well as our high level goals. Time: 16:30 UTC (same as normal) on Wednesday February 2nd Location: https://meet.google.com/meo-enbb-rur (will be recorded) A

Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)

On 2/1/22 12:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works, but it's not automatic and, for the future, I am curious if there's another way. Sorry f

Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)

On 2/1/22 12:54 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 01. 02. 22 18:01, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: rpm -q -conflicts kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm kicad-doc < 1:6.0.1-4.fc35 ... When I add the '--best --allowerasing' flags, then I get the desired result: # dnf update kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_6

Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)

On 2/1/22 01:45 PM, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: On 2/1/22 12:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works, but it's not automatic and, for th

Re: GenericError: cannot update build 1910991, state: COMPLETE

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 05:27:22PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > failed > with this error. What is going on there? > > I have tagged the glibc-2.34.9000-39.fc36 manually into > f36-updates-candidate, which I assume will subject the b

Package review wanted - xterm-console

Hi folks! Was wondering if any packager would be able to do a quick package review for me: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2049236 It's a relatively small and simple package so it shouldn't be too hard, though it's slightly unusual both in terms of what it does and how it doe

Re: Retire openCOLLADA?

On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 4:20 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > "uninitalized variables" is generally easy to fix in the source code. > Has the author dropped the project, the last update in the github repo > is frm at least 3 years ago. > I found a fork with some of the fixes needed so at least it's

Re: Package review wanted - xterm-console

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 11:38:41AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Was wondering if any packager would be able to do a quick > package review for me: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2049236 > > It's a relatively small and simple package so it shouldn't be too ha

Re: Self Introduction: Stewart Smith

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:49:59AM -0800, Stewart Smith via devel wrote: > Hi there, I’m Stewart, a Principal Engineer at AWS working on Amazon > Linux, and thanks to our new direction in basing Amazon Linux on Fedora, > also Fedora. Hi Stewart! Welcome -- it's great to see you here! -- Matthew

Re: openexr tests segfaulting on ppc64le only

What's the best way to modify the flags? I tried this but it bombed out... %ifarch ppc64le %global optflags "%{optflags} -fno-inline-small-functions" %endif Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Weirdness with clang and stdatomic.h on Rawhide

On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 15:00, Ron Olson wrote: > > Well, yes and no. The code I linked to in the pastebin is what demonstrates > the issue. The code in question is Apple’s libdispatch which I package > separately as well as part of Swift. In that situation they’re using a C++ > file that uses the

Re: openexr tests segfaulting on ppc64le only

On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 14:35:52 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: > What's the best way to modify the flags? I tried this but it bombed out... > > %ifarch ppc64le > %global optflags "%{optflags} -fno-inline-small-functions" > %endif I believe you need to omit the quotes Dan __

Re: openexr tests segfaulting on ppc64le only

Getting closer, now just test 86 is segfaulting... Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/p

Re: Retire openCOLLADA?

On Sat, 29 Jan 2022, 21:28 Richard Shaw, wrote: > It seems to fail with gcc 12 due to uninitialized variables. That's easy > enough to work around but the last release was in 2018 and the only > consumer in Fedora in Blender. > > Maybe it's time to retire it? > It's a dependency of IfcOpenShell,

Odd annobin output during mock build?

I just did a local mock build of the latest version of OpenImageIO which was just released and saw this on every cpp line: annobin: /builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-2.3.12.0/src/libutil/errorhandler.cpp: Warning: -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS not defined Is this harmless? Thanks, Richard _

Re: Odd annobin output during mock build?

* Richard Shaw: > I just did a local mock build of the latest version of OpenImageIO which was > just released > and saw this on every cpp line: > > annobin: /builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-2.3.12.0/src/libutil/errorhandler.cpp: > Warning: > -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS not defined > > Is this harmless? No

Re: GenericError: cannot update build 1910991, state: COMPLETE

* Kevin Fenzi: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 05:27:22PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> failed >> with this error. What is going on there? >> >> I have tagged the glibc-2.34.9000-39.fc36 manually into >> f36-updates-candidate, which I as

Re: Odd annobin output during mock build?

On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:27:06 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: > I just did a local mock build of the latest version of OpenImageIO which > was just released and saw this on every cpp line: > > annobin: /builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-2.3.12.0/src/libutil/errorhandler.cpp: > Warning: -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS not

Re: Odd annobin output during mock build?

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 3:33 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard Shaw: > > > I just did a local mock build of the latest version of OpenImageIO which > was just released > > and saw this on every cpp line: > > > > annobin: > /builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-2.3.12.0/src/libutil/errorhandler.cpp: Warnin

Re: Odd annobin output during mock build?

* Richard Shaw: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 3:33 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Richard Shaw: > > > I just did a local mock build of the latest version of OpenImageIO which > was just > released > > and saw this on every cpp line: > > > > annobin: /builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-2.3.12.0/src/libut

Re: Odd annobin output during mock build?

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:27 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > I just did a local mock build of the latest version of OpenImageIO which was > just released and saw this on every cpp line: > > annobin: /builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-2.3.12.0/src/libutil/errorhandler.cpp: > Warning: -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS not

Re: search among all spec files

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:16:57AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 02. 22 1:03, Germano Massullo wrote: > > Good day. I have to search gcc-toolset among all Fedora packages specs > > files, in order to read some example of usage. > > Is that possible? For example cloning the whole git repositor

Re: GenericError: cannot update build 1910991, state: COMPLETE

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:34:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 05:27:22PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> failed > >> with this error. What is going on there? > >> > >> I have tagged

Re: search among all spec files

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:47:43PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:16:57AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 01. 02. 22 1:03, Germano Massullo wrote: > > > Good day. I have to search gcc-toolset among all Fedora packages specs > > > files, in order to read some exa

Re: Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux

On Tue, 2022-02-01 at 13:59 +0100, Konrad Kleine wrote: > Davide, > > thank you for your interest in this. May I ask what plans you have > using it for? We're investigating an integration into CentOS Stream. Hi Konrad, the immediate usecase for us is making it easier to do development on BPF ups

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

Lennart Poettering writes: On Di, 01.02.22 09:01, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > And an isolated process will be capable of rate-limiting itself in this > situation any better than a sudo process, which could do the same kind of > rate-limiting itself, exactly how? "Rate-limi