perl-YAML-LibYAML-API-0.013 in Fedora 37 changed a license from (GPL+ or
Artistic) to MIT.
Regards, Jitka
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039194
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 4/28/22 07:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Carl George
On 4/28/22 07:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:25 PM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:59 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:51 AM Aleksandra Fedorova
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Adam,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:50 AM Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, so this is a bit meta, but I couldn't resist :P
> > >
> > > Since the Fedora
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 09:39:25AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> I'd be open to putting some boilerplate at the beginning, although I'm
> not convinced it would do much good for this particular problem.
> Still, I doubt it would *hurt* anything. Aleksandra's suggestion is a
> good approach.
>
>
>
Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:01 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > We could also start the email subject with "CHANGE PROPOSAL" instead of
> > "Change"
>
> I'm pretty sure I used to, but people were upset about how much space
> it took in the subject so that you couldn't see what the
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we F36 Final release candidate 3
was declared NO-GO.
The next Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at
1700 UTC on Thursday 5 May in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for the
"target date #3" milestone of 10 May. The release schedule[3] has been
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we F36 Final release candidate 3
was declared NO-GO.
The next Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at
1700 UTC on Thursday 5 May in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for the
"target date #3" milestone of 10 May. The release schedule[3] has been
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:34:48PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> This upstream fix, which is basically a single line addition:
>
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1825/files
>
> is very important to us because it broke livecd-creator and we're
> trying to build live CDs
Another status update:
1. USDT/eBPF tracing turned out to be a fruitful logging approach.
Clemens Lang has kindly added USDT probes to the latest openssl builds,
traceable with a small tool [1] available from a copr [2].
Yes, this way it doesn't log into your face unpromptedly,
like
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Lest it sound like everyone just wants it to behave this way, I
> personally _do_ like getting emails for actions I did myself.
> I find that later when I am looking back to see what changed by who I
> can (sometimes surprisingly) find out it was me. :)
>
> So, I would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079983
Bug ID: 2079983
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.25 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/229 (x86_64), 7/152 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220427.n.0):
ID: 1245165 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_service_manipulation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1245165
ID: 1245235 Test: aarch64
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 13/231 (x86_64), 27/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220427.n.1):
ID: 128 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072972
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 04:41:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> If we can do the "make basic graphics mode do vga=ask and then write
> the chosen config to the installed system bootloader" thing, then that
> sounds sufficient to me. That will require co-ordination with the
> anaconda team,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894
--- Comment #4 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Waiting for perl-List-UtilsBy
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-90d261ea38
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 4:34 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:59 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 3:45 PM Fabio Valentini
> > wrote:
> > > There is also the question about whether anitya release-monitoring.org is
> > > actually set up for those
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:02 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> 3. add something to the Change page template to show a banner as long as
> it's not in approved state. Looking at the page, it's entirely not obvious
> that this is just a proposal, unless you know exactly where to look
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:59 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 3:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > There is also the question about whether anitya release-monitoring.org is
> > actually set up for those packages, but I don't have an easy way to make
> > scripted checks for
perl-YAML-LibYAML-API-0.013 in Fedora 37 changed a license from (GPL+ or
Artistic) to MIT.
Regards, Jitka
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:57 AM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > A qui, 28-04-2022 às 10:48 +0100, Sérgio Basto escreveu:
> > > A qua, 27-04-2022 às 16:58 -0700, Troy Dawson escreveu:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM
OLD: Fedora-36-20220427.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220428.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079742
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:57 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> A qui, 28-04-2022 às 10:48 +0100, Sérgio Basto escreveu:
>
> A qua, 27-04-2022 às 16:58 -0700, Troy Dawson escreveu:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 23:44 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 09:39:25AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> I'd be open to putting some boilerplate at the beginning, although I'm
> not convinced it would do much good for this particular problem.
> Still, I doubt it would *hurt* anything. Aleksandra's suggestion is a
> good approach.
>
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079742
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079766
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.5
I'd be open to putting some boilerplate at the beginning, although I'm
not convinced it would do much good for this particular problem.
Still, I doubt it would *hurt* anything. Aleksandra's suggestion is a
good approach.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:01 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> We could also start
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 3:33 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:50 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > Could we consider, in future, posting a clarification for journalists
> > in flaming six-foot high letters (I exaggerate only slightly) at the
> > top of *every* proposed
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:50 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Could we consider, in future, posting a clarification for journalists
> in flaming six-foot high letters (I exaggerate only slightly) at the
> top of *every* proposed Change page, and *every* official mail relating
> to a proposed Change,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:51 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
> Hi, Adam,
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:50 AM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > OK, so this is a bit meta, but I couldn't resist :P
> >
> > Since the Fedora 37 proposed Changes got posted, we have got the now-
> > inevitable round of
Hi, Adam,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:50 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> OK, so this is a bit meta, but I couldn't resist :P
>
> Since the Fedora 37 proposed Changes got posted, we have got the now-
> inevitable round of news stories which talk about proposed Changes as
> if they're approved
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039194
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 01:40:20PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > This upstream fix, which is basically a single line addition:
> >
> > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1825/files
> >
> > is very important to us because it broke livecd-creator and
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 3:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> There is also the question about whether anitya release-monitoring.org is
> actually set up for those packages, but I don't have an easy way to make
> scripted checks for this yet. If you add new Rust packages to Fedora, please
> make sure
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/161 (aarch64), 4/229 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220425.n.0):
ID: 1244032 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1244032
ID: 1244230 Test:
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> This upstream fix, which is basically a single line addition:
>
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1825/files
>
> is very important to us because it broke livecd-creator and we're
> trying to build live CDs on F35. I'd like to therefore backport it to
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 7:35 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> This upstream fix, which is basically a single line addition:
>
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1825/files
>
> is very important to us because it broke livecd-creator and we're
> trying to build live CDs on F35.
This upstream fix, which is basically a single line addition:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1825/files
is very important to us because it broke livecd-creator and we're
trying to build live CDs on F35. I'd like to therefore backport it to
dnf in Fedora 35+.
However dnf is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049725
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-83b69a171a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-83b69a171a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 07:09:41AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:25 PM Ewoud Kohl van
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049725
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Config-Model-2.149-1.f
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220427.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220428.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:18
Upgraded packages: 64
Downgraded packages: 3
Size of added packages: 539.13 KiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038611
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033314
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jples...@redhat.com
Fixed In
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:25 PM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>>
> On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 11:35 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Replying to a reply because I can't find the original mail, sorry.
>
> I want to be easily able to *NOT* be notified of things I just did. In
> fact this should probably be the default. Right now my FMN
> notifications are floods of
> Unfortunately no, it won't. I am a mamber of a group that has too many
> artifacts to be notififed about all of them by default. This needs to be
> opt-in.
Noted, thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
A qui, 28-04-2022 às 10:48 +0100, Sérgio Basto escreveu:
> A qua, 27-04-2022 às 16:58 -0700, Troy Dawson escreveu:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 23:44 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220427.0):
ID: 1244378 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1244378
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
A qua, 27-04-2022 às 16:58 -0700, Troy Dawson escreveu:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 23:44 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > > > > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering
Hi
I've got two packages for review (one simple + one simple but unusual):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053959
Review Request: yaksa - High-performance library for noncontiguous data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784
Review Request: systemd-boot - UEFI boot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079766
Bug ID: 2079766
Summary: Upgrade perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize to 1.56
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079765
Bug ID: 2079765
Summary: Upgrade perl-Template-Toolkit to 3.100
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Template-Toolkit
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077288
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.93-1.f
On 4/27/22 19:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 04. 22 17:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:08 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 04. 22 10:36, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:47:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 12:24 PM Ben Cotton
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079742
Bug ID: 2079742
Summary: perl-Imager-1.014 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Imager
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076895
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076913
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2f6a4a2e96 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-9425f33f05 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
65 matches
Mail list logo
