https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261854
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PDL-2.85.0-2.fc40
I created a simple PoC udev rule to mount USB Storage devices with the "sync
option.
Available here :
https://github.com/larina3315/personal-stuff/blob/main/linux/10-usb-storage.rules
Currently, USB Storage devices are mounted without the "sync" option, causing
their writes to be cached.
This
Hello,
Could someone please help to review this package request?
-> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259602
Thank you.
---
-Prasad
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Unless someone has objections (which I haven't heard any since my last
mail) I am canceling this weeks EPEL Steering Committee meeting.
We will be meeting at the new time next week (2024-02-07)
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:00 AM wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-4ff425606f
openssl11-1.1.1k-7.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-54270ec4b3
clojure-1.8.0-2.el7
The following builds have been
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
27 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3a29f0d349
python-paramiko-2.12.0-2.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-76443fce3f
indent-2.2.13-5.el8
6
In the fmt.spec you posted, I see
>
> %mingw_cmake -G Ninja [...]
>
> this means that you are generating ninja build scripts, not Makefiles. If
> you want to use ninja, you should call
>
> %mingw_ninja
>
> after %mingw_cmake -G Ninja.
>
Thanks! That appears to be the right thing for the %build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256404
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Format-Atom-1 |perl-DateTime-Format-Atom-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256404
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261642
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-abd0f95d0a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8e93f1b716
indent-2.2.13-5.el9
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-5e8a045fdd
atril-1.26.2-1.el9
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261642
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-e4821c29f6 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260493
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 16:33 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2024-01-29 16:00, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_rawhide_is_allowed_to_lag_temporarily
> >
> > you may do a new build with lower EVR
>
> That is not what that
Hi,I am in the process of updating icu from 73.2 to 74.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname bump, but as usual, I'm including a libicu73 compat package providing the old soname to not break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so no rawhide breakage is expected. I'll work on the
I've very sorry if anyone was upset by fesco wanting to not allow the
new packages in while this was discussed. I'm the one who suggested
that, but as noted upthread, the idea was simply to allow time for
discussion before doing things.
There's actually a slightly similar case from long long ago
On 2024-01-30 12:45 p.m., Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 30/01/24 13:47, Sérgio Basto ha scritto:
Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
and I'm very upset
I tried to read all the backward discussion and, if I'm correct, the
point is that having the -x11 packages in
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:08:54AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:43:39PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > nirik ran a script that checks for versioning issues in Rawhide today, and
> > it found several: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11922#comment-893797
> >
> >
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:19:18AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > yes rawhide user should use dnf distro-sync not dnf upgrade
>
> +1. Rawhide EVRs should be allowed to go backwards, that is an integral part
> of being a development branch.
distro-sync is nice and
spot merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Wx` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Remove unneeded complexity of the gtk requires hack
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx/pull-request/3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list
I would like to unretire golang-github-apex-logs, and Mikel Olasagasti
Uranga was kind enough to review and approve my review request [1].
The unretire request has been idle for a while:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11880
I believe Mikel has been waiting for each package X to hit Rawhide
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Wx` that you
are following:
``
Remove unneeded complexity of the gtk requires hack
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx/pull-request/3
--
___
Hi,
On 1/30/24 19:23, Peter Hanecak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll take the widelands package.
Great thank you. Can you let me know your FAS username
please ? Then I'll give the package to you.
Regards,
Hans
> On 1/30/24 11:17, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I used to do a lot of gaming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232294
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from
Hello,
I'll take the widelands package.
Sincerely
Peter
On 1/30/24 11:17, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
maintainership anymore.
The last few years
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:46 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> One additional point I forgot to address: the initial concern was that
> the KDE SIG would be implicitly responsible for maintaining these
> packages if they are included in the main repository. From a purely
> technical perspective, I
On 2024-01-30 05:45, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
One additional point I forgot to address: the initial concern was that
the KDE SIG would be implicitly responsible for maintaining these
packages if they are included in the main repository. From a purely
technical perspective, I think that we
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2024-01-31 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meet...@chat.fedoraproject.org
The meeting will be about:
https://chat.fedoraproject.org/#/room/#meeting:fedoraproject.org
This is the weekly EPEL Steering
On Tuesday, 30 January 2024 15:57:12 CET Steven A. Falco wrote:
> I'm delighted that there are like-minded folks who want to maintain X11.
> Please allow them to do so.
I will just quote you what Stephen said:
> This is
> misleading, as the move to Wayland is specifically because the
> upstream
Il 30/01/24 13:47, Sérgio Basto ha scritto:
> Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
>
> and I'm very upset
>
I tried to read all the backward discussion and, if I'm correct, the
point is that having the -x11 packages in Fedora official repositories
would make "official"
I'm taking a look.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Tuesday, January 30th, 2024 at 7:59 AM, Miro Hrončok
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have
Hey there,
For those of you who use Fedora often on public cloud providers where
cloud-init handles the initial configuration, there's a change coming
for the very early DHCP request during the boot. ☁️
As reported in BZ 2247055[0], the existing dhclient binary comes from
ISC's dhcp and it
I'm looking in to efl FTBFS. It seems to be issues on s390x and ppc64le
related to more strict requirements, checks in gcc 14. I'm investigating them
now and if I will not be able to fix them promptly I will submit a PR with a
workaround( at first look disable altivec on ppc64le and for s390x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261957
Bug ID: 2261957
Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.18 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-WWW-Mechanize
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Sandro wrote on 2024/01/30 22:02:
On 30-01-2024 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34:
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be
probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before
the branching
Also, at least efl is FTBFS now, so it can't be rebuilt, and you'll have to
make a poppler-compat package before merging this, if efl isn't fixed by
then.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 2:03 PM Sandro wrote:
> On 30-01-2024 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30
On 1/30/24 08:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:38:51AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
3) Fedora has a long-standing and well-communicated stance that we are
a Wayland distribution first and foremost and that X11 support is
intended as a migration-support tool rather
On 29.01.24 10:38 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 02:32 Sandro Mani wrote:
For mingw, the most common approach is
%build
%mingw_cmake
%mingw_make_build
%install
%mingw_make_install
# Don't forget this one
|%mingw_debug_install_post|
Thank you,
On Tuesday, 30 January 2024 14:04:29 CET Germano Massullo wrote:
> What does it mean that FESCo is applying an injunction?
Only that the packages in question are "on hold" until a decision can be
taken.
The word sounds way worse than what it really is.
--
Almost there but running into a build problem with Blender...
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112606258
---
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.0.2/intern/cycles/scene/image_vdb.cpp: In
member function ‘bool ccl::ToNanoOp::operator()(const
openvdb::v11_0::GridBase::ConstPtr&)’:
Hello.
I have orphaned python-mccabe.
It does not build with updated hypothesis, because the update broke
hypothesmith and I don't have time to look into it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2261579
mccabe is a dependency of pylint.
Packages other than linters should not BuildRequire pylint in
Hello.
I have orphaned python-mccabe.
It does not build with updated hypothesis, because the update broke
hypothesmith and I don't have time to look into it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2261579
mccabe is a dependency of pylint.
Packages other than linters should not BuildRequire pylint in
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:38:51AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 3) Fedora has a long-standing and well-communicated stance that we are
> a Wayland distribution first and foremost and that X11 support is
> intended as a migration-support tool rather than a first-class
> citizen.
Does it?
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:38:51AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 8:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:47:44PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
> > >
> > > and I'm very upset
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 8:38 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 8:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:47:44PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
> > >
> > > and I'm very upset
> >
> >
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 8:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:47:44PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
> >
> > and I'm very upset
>
> Assume best intent first of all. An injunction is a temporary thing
> to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261452
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hi Neal,
On 1/30/24 12:03, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 9:33 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After the recent filing of FTBFS bugs I noticed that I'm somehow
>> still the maintainer for libcddb.
>>
>> I guess I never asked anyone to takeover since it has seen very
>>
Hi,
On 1/30/24 13:55, Sandro wrote:
> On 30-01-2024 13:33, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi Sandro,
>>
>> On 1/30/24 12:48, Sandro wrote:
>>> On 30-01-2024 10:41, Hans de Goede wrote:
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:47:44PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
>
> and I'm very upset
Assume best intent first of all. An injunction is a temporary thing
to allow some space for a decision to be made.
(I added my personal opinion
What does it mean that FESCo is applying an injunction?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 30-01-2024 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34:
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be
probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before
the branching together with rebuilds of dependent
On 30-01-2024 13:33, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Sandro,
On 1/30/24 12:48, Sandro wrote:
On 30-01-2024 10:41, Hans de Goede wrote:
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
maintainership anymore.
Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
and I'm very upset
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260493
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260493
Report this comment as SPAM:
Hi Sandro,
On 1/30/24 12:48, Sandro wrote:
> On 30-01-2024 10:41, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
>> over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
>> maintainership anymore.
>
> Many thanks! I'm sure many
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232294
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2261452
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261452
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2232294
Doc Type|---
This package contains OCaml bindings for newt, which is a kind of
terminal-based windowing system (I think originally used in Anaconda
back in the day).
It doesn't build after the GCC 14 changes:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2377565
It's also obsolete (as is newt) and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260493
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar
On 30-01-2024 10:41, Hans de Goede wrote:
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
maintainership anymore.
Many thanks! I'm sure many still enjoy the fruits of your labor.
The last few years
Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be
> probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before
> the branching together with rebuilds of dependent packages.
>
> I'll prepare the build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252728
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Net-DNS-SEC-1.23-1.fc4
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 9:33 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> After the recent filing of FTBFS bugs I noticed that I'm somehow
> still the maintainer for libcddb.
>
> I guess I never asked anyone to takeover since it has seen very
> little activity (nor bugs filed against it) the last few
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be
probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before
the branching together with rebuilds of dependent packages.
I'll prepare the build in a side tag and will message relevant
maintainers to rebuild
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252728
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-23be27784d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-23be27784d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252728
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Hi All,
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
maintainership anymore.
The last few years I have been limiting my package maintainership
to fixing FTBFS, which for many game packages is fine
Hi All,
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
maintainership anymore.
The last few years I have been limiting my package maintainership
to fixing FTBFS, which for many game packages is fine
Hi All,
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
maintainership anymore.
The last few years I have been limiting my package maintainership
to fixing FTBFS, which for many game packages is fine
Hi All,
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
maintainership anymore.
The last few years I have been limiting my package maintainership
to fixing FTBFS, which for many game packages is fine
Hi All,
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
maintainership anymore.
The last few years I have been limiting my package maintainership
to fixing FTBFS, which for many game packages is fine
Hi All,
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
maintainership anymore.
The last few years I have been limiting my package maintainership
to fixing FTBFS, which for many game packages is fine
Hi All,
After the recent filing of FTBFS bugs I noticed that I'm somehow
still the maintainer for libcddb.
I guess I never asked anyone to takeover since it has seen very
little activity (nor bugs filed against it) the last few years.
I really don't have much time for Fedora package
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 40 Rawhide 20240130.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261642
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-abd0f95d0a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-abd0f95d0a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261642
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-e4821c29f6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-e4821c29f6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261642
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261642
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:43:39PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> nirik ran a script that checks for versioning issues in Rawhide today, and
> it found several: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11922#comment-893797
>
> Some of these followed a pattern, so I figured a reminder was in order. In
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261658
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
81 matches
Mail list logo
