On 2024-06-18 12:56 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Is anyone willing to swap reviews?
I haven't conducted any reviews yet, but this is probably a good chance
to learn.
I can swap for a review of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276821
--
___
Hey Folks!
We are excited to invite you to participate in the Accessibility Test
Week, a key event in our Fedora Week of Diversity, happening from June
19-25, 2024. This event underscores our commitment to making Fedora
accessible to all, ensuring that our latest features can be utilized
by everyo
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 07:58 +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> also a huge thank you from my side.
> You did an excellent job to keep nodejs in Fedora!
I'd like send the same message
- also a huge thank you from my side.
- You did an excellent job to keep nodejs in Fedora
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
_
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:39 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> * I suspect more of the hardware that don't support -v2 have failed
> out of use naturally
Due to product line feature differentiation there
are more recent -v1 hardware than the aforementioned
roughly 2008 date, but the one pre-nehalem -v1 sys
On 20. 06. 24 22:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
In the particular case of alternatives.rpm, the pull request was
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chkconfig/pull-request/13,
which then becamehttps://github.com/fedora-sysv/chkconfig/pull/131.
The Fedora PR was closed. The non-Fedora PR
Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 11:52 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> > > three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension"
> > > Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that they want
> >
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 22:03, Jason Montleon wrote:
>
> It may be this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290482
Yep, that's it, an enforcing=0 in the kernel command line works.
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 5:00 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm seeing an issue when
It may be this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290482
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 5:00 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm seeing an issue when using serial consoles, which I use quite a
> bit when doing low level HW pieces on Edge.
>
> The serial console getty isn't coming u
Hi folks,
I'm seeing an issue when using serial consoles, which I use quite a
bit when doing low level HW pieces on Edge.
The serial console getty isn't coming up automatically when I update
from GA to the latest Fedora updates.
If I run "systemctl enable serial-getty@ttyS0.service --now" it com
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 02:19:57PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 06. 24 12:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > 4. We have packages which use filepath Requires on paths in %_sbindir.
> > Such packages will FTI when the_providing_ package is rebuilt with
> > the new value of %_s
On 6/20/24 2:27 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 11:52 AM Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension"
Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that the
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 11:52 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> >
> > Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> > > three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension"
> > > Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that they want
> > > to run on
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 3:52 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> > three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension"
> > Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that they want
> > to run on ancient hardware.
>
> TBH I feel that a
On 6/19/24 6:07 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 18. 06. 24 18:46, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the license from GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
Hi.
How do you know the License tag is not supposed to be e.g. "GPL-2.0
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 11:52 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> > three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension"
> > Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that they want
> > to run on ancient hardware.
>
> TBH I feel that
Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension"
> Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that they want
> to run on ancient hardware.
TBH I feel that approach would be doomed to the same failure as the
attempts to ex
Oh, awesome, thanks Dan!
On 20 Jun 2024, at 11:24, Dan Horák wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:21:30 -0400
Ron Olson wrote:
Hey all-
I’m trying to monitor some builds and once they’re done they
disappear from “Active”, but when I switch to “All” I see,
well, everything, including for previous
On Thursday 20 June 2024 16:37:24 BST Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 20/06/2024 16:34, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> > For Pentium and Celeron branded processors, v2 also loses Skylake,
> > Icelake,
> > Haswell, Cometlake, Broadwell and others, even when their matching Core
> > branded processors support x86-
On 20/06/2024 16:34, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
For Pentium and Celeron branded processors, v2 also loses Skylake, Icelake,
Haswell, Cometlake, Broadwell and others, even when their matching Core
branded processors support x86-64v2 or x86-64v3.
That means that you lose all Pentium Silver processo
On Thursday 20 June 2024 15:48:55 BST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
>
> > On 20/06/2024 15:03, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Honestly, I'd like to pitch that we retarget Fedora at x86_64-v3 (yes,
> > > three) and recomm
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:21:30 -0400
Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m trying to monitor some builds and once they’re done they disappear from
> “Active”, but when I switch to “All” I see, well, everything, including for
> previous dates.
>
> Is it possible to specify a specific date to Koji
Hey all-
I’m trying to monitor some builds and once they’re done they disappear from
“Active”, but when I switch to “All” I see, well, everything, including for
previous dates.
Is it possible to specify a specific date to Koji a la “Show me all builds for
the specified date”? I looked at the A
V Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 01:57:59PM +0100, Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> I saw in key tasks: "Mass Rebuild: RPMs first, then modules", modules
> aren't over ?
They are over. Fedora 38 was last one with modules. Though relengs keept the
modular repository empty over 2 releases to enable seamless upgrade
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:51:56AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > > On 20/06/2024 15:03, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >
> > > > Honestly, I'd like to p
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > On 20/06/2024 15:03, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > > Honestly, I'd like to pitch that we retarget Fedora at x86_64-v3 (yes,
> > > three) and recommend creatio
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> On 20/06/2024 15:03, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > Honestly, I'd like to pitch that we retarget Fedora at x86_64-v3 (yes,
> > three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension"
> > Remix that can provide rebu
On 20/06/2024 15:03, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Honestly, I'd like to pitch that we retarget Fedora at x86_64-v3 (yes,
three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension"
Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that they want
to run on ancient hardware. It could be
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 8:49 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Stephen Smoogen said:
> > I don't think Peter meant additional packages since with the i686 it
> > didn't mean that. What it did mean was having to understand why two
> > architectures might do things differently and why bug
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:32 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> tl;dr: I'll be stepping down from maintaining the nodejs22, nodejs20
> and nodejs16 packages in Fedora, effective June 30, 2024. I will
> continue to maintain libuv.
>
Just a reminder that I will be orphaning the nodejsXX packages in a
... and there should be no reason to worry about that.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows i
Hello,
I saw in key tasks: "Mass Rebuild: RPMs first, then modules", modules
aren't over ?
BTW we continue to receive CVE's bugzilla reports on modules for
nextcloud on epel 8 for example , how we stop that ?
Thank you
On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 09:46 +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
Once upon a time, Stephen Smoogen said:
> I don't think Peter meant additional packages since with the i686 it
> didn't mean that. What it did mean was having to understand why two
> architectures might do things differently and why bugs might show up
> in one but not another.
In the i686 days, t
On 19. 06. 24 12:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
4. We have packages which use filepath Requires on paths in %_sbindir.
Such packages will FTI when the_providing_ package is rebuilt with
the new value of %_sbindir. To keep those packages working, I made
a list of all such file
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 7:30 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 16:23, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:40 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 19:13, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, 19 Ju
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 16:23, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:40 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 19:13, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, 19 June 2024 at 17:17, drago01 wrote:
> > > > [...] at some point we need to do
* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> On 19/06/2024 19:45, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
>> While it does *feel* better, both options effectively remove any UEFI
>> Secure boot protections.
>
> Another option is to package the nvidia-kmod-open module into Fedora
> and sign it with Fedora key.
>
> Starting with
36 matches
Mail list logo
