Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 09:31:59AM +0200, Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote:
Hello Zbyszek,
You haven't really answered the "why" part: why is it so important to
save 50MB? And why is the effect on QA less important?
From my perspective, the storage on the inst
-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote:
Hello everyone,
Thanks for sharing your ideas and comments about this change.
Thanks to Mohan Boddu, I got RawHide DVD and netinstall images of
RawHide with the optimization features enabled. Those test composes
/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Bohdan Khomutskyi
RHEL Compose release engineer
EXD Software production
Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapr
_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Bohdan Khomutskyi
RHEL Compose release engineer
EXD Software production
Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
/OptimizeSquashFS
Regards,
On 13/05/2020 13:32, Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote:
Hello,
It was a long time since the last message in this change proposal.
Recently I was working to reduce the impact of the increased
compression ratio on the installation image size for Fedora. I have
achieved outstanding
required functionality in the Pungi compose build software.
On 25/01/2020 16:36, Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote:
Hello,
I opened a request to anaconda team with a draft patch to use
unsquashfs instead of rsync:
https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/2292.
That should lower the installation
el@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https:
lgorithm in EROFS, even if EROFS has perfect layout of the filesystem,
it's to good to be true it can outperform the XZ in compression ratio
tests. The difference for SquashFS LZ4hc 1M vs XZ 1M is >40%.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 2:17 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at
size, and *recommends
*to use certain compression options. But, I think, the final decision is to
be made by FESCO.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 12:42 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 8:41 AM Bohdan Khomutskyi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thanks everyone
1 Workstation x86-64 is available for
download at https://khomutsky.com/fedora-dvd/
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 5:34 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:46 PM Bohdan Khomutskyi
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I posted more benchmark results in this article:
>
testing, with slower installation media, and will
post the results next weekend.
I did not evaluate CONFIG_SQUASHFS_DECOMP_MULTI this weekend.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 4:38 PM Bohdan Khomutskyi
wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your comments. These are all valid concerns.
>
> I filed a n
@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
>
Summary
Improve compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem on the installation media.
Owner
Name: Bohdan Khomutskyi
Email: bkhom...@redhat.com
Current status
Targeted release: I propose this change for Fedora 32
Last updated: Jan 5 2020
Pagure.io issue: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9127
I
13 matches
Mail list logo
