On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:51 AM Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> On 08/15/2018 08:11 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > It's in redhat-rpm-config-118-1.fc30.
> >
> > If it causes any problems for you - let me know. In the meantime, you
> > can use `%undefine _ld_as_needed` to di
It's in redhat-rpm-config-118-1.fc30.
If it causes any problems for you - let me know. In the meantime, you can
use `%undefine _ld_as_needed` to disable it.
Thanks for attention!
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:03 AM Dominique Martinet <
dominique.marti...@cea.fr> wrote:
> Igor Gnatenko wrote on Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:46:34PM +0200:
> > I've submitted
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_pulling_dependencies_for_static_libraries
>
I've submitted
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_pulling_dependencies_for_static_libraries
to improve the situation.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:57 PM Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:19 PM Robert Marcano
> wrote:
>
>
> >>> ___
> >>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https:
PM Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Whoops,
>
> I was dropping py2 subpackages from packages I maintain. I definitely
> checked what depends on it, but seems I missed this. I will revert it.
>
> Sorry for this.
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018, 2
> From ed22a57478396f5e82a92f80f88e0cb98ac16fec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Igor Gnatenko
> > Date: Aug 12 2018 14:53:14 +
> > Subject: Drop python2 subpackage
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
>
> Whoa, whoa, whoa!!! The python 2 version of Theano is still needed
crypto), but for others projects I really need openssl-devel (not
> compat*) and both, openssl-devel and compat-openssl10-devel conflicts
>
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveExcessiveLinking
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613852
>
--
-Igor Gnaten
subsurface
pwaltergitg libgit2-glib python-pygit2
qulogicR-git2r
rdieterkf5-ktexteditor
tdawsonrubygem-rugged
than kf5-ktexteditor
ttomecek rust-pretty-git-prompt
waltersgit-evtag
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel
uct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L3Y3PPOF33WNTZBGO64YKJARAQSC3O7Q/
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
_
gt; List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NQY6UH3PVKYTVCATNM6JCC33BS4PSIBP/
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
d
ML: r...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Feel free to stop by and don't hesitate to ping me ;)
P.S. I'm going to Flock this year, so let me know if you would like to meet
and work on.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
ling_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RFLLWLFFPAJON5UX7ORXJOZXRBFMIIBV/
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 5:32 PM Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 5:29 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> I would like to request a change of the Packaging Guidelines, advising
>> packagers not to interpose malloc.
>>
List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/43MAKHBKT5HHO6QEXQASWATMMK3TSH3K/
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapro
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:44 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 2:44 PM Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> So… Since I have hard times understanding code, I will just ask questions
>> here:
>> * Does it us
vel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archi
of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ECWHXZHDJ5UEPTLRHGYYGN65EW7Y6GRU/
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
> meson to build.
>
>
> [*] This is minimally-invasive, so I'd be willing to consider it as a late
> proposal for F29.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:23 AM Josh Boyer
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:40 PM Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > meson 0.47.0 has new option type - feature (tri-state option -
> enabled/disabled/auto). It is quite common that in autofoo and l
Unless there is strong opposition, I'm going to switch this parameter in
%meson macro and you would be able to change its value by redefining
%__meson_auto_features.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
lines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SRWNOFJVCW2RYWFEINSEZFYXF2TTUIFT/
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:43 PM Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 at 00:17, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> [..]
> > F29:
> > DEBUG util.py:439: Install 144 Packages
> > DEBUG util.py:439: Total download size: 87 M
> > DEBUG util.py:439: Installed size:
org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4G7SBK26225XIB4MMHDMEZBV6PF4M
Upstream released 0.4.9 which does this correction
<https://github.com/carllerche/bytes/commit/a6b9844296a1dbde74035a6327b9349520e338d4>
.
Should not affect anyone. Thanks for attention.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list --
t; > ones to ignatenko.
> >
> > Zbyszek
>
> Two of my packages (mendafen and gnome-chemistry-utils) failed because
> the mass fix added gcc to BR whereas gcc-c++ was required.
>
This means that build failed on checking for gcc. There ar
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 15:27 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > No one promised that I'm going to fix 100% of packages, I've fixed around
> > 2k packages. What my regex couldn't catch -- please send me list of
> > packages, I will analyze them and try to fi
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:13 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19-07-18 17:42, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:33 PM Hans de Goede <mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've just got 20 bugs
r now and we again close all the FTBFS bugs and
> rerun the script for them after doing a fresh build with the
> buildroot restored as it was.
>
No one promised that I'm going to fix 100% of packages, I've fixed around
2k packages. What my regex couldn't catch -- please send
the history,
> because from that point a new algorithm will be used.
>
> Are there any concerns about such change?
> I believe that >90% users wouldn't notice anything as it's related to the
> history database only.
>
Since we've changed the database entirely, what's the point of
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:29 AM Federico Bruni wrote:
>
>
> Il giorno ven 13 lug 2018 alle 12:39, Igor Gnatenko
> ha scritto:
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 11:19 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> On 8.7.2018 20:46, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >> > As per Changes/Remov
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 11:19 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 8.7.2018 20:46, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot
> > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_BuildRoot>, I'm
> > going to automatically add BuildRequires: gcc and/
and that's OK.
>
> And I think the mass rebuild changelogs are unnecessary and convey no
> valuable information, so *shrug*.
>
It's not only changelogs, people keep re-adding BuildRoot and %clean
section.
People keep overriding changes we've done in Fedora when they import from
&
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:52 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot
> > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_BuildRoot>, I'm
> > going to automatically add BuildRequires: gcc and/or BuildRequir
ject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/A6JBPULBPEFIUYBCD3C66QHRFIVYEKOY/
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: ht
0138de79f5f508784a0be01e57ff28eb293f022c>,
but I don't know how it is being pushed through… We should ask rel-eng to
help with this.
Mohan, Kevin?
>
> Thx
>
>
> Vít
>
>
>
>
> Dne 10.7.2018 v 01:03 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> today we fin
ot;%_install_langs en,C"?
>
No. While we can probably assume that no one needs docs, the install_langs
is dangerous. See the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot
for existing proposal.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mail
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:12 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 at 00:17, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> [..]
> > But looking into simple package build for f28 and f29 I see some nice
> trend.
> >
> > F28:
> > DEBUG util.py:439: Install 179 Pa
Thanks for attention!
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
il was sent Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 20:46:26 +0200.
> And today is 9th of July, so it is tomorrow.
>
> But yeah, doing the changes in the middle of a discussion… that's not
> excellent.
>
Discussion was over few months ago when FESCo approved the change.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
gnition.
> >
>
> I third that! :)
>
> Rober-André helped me with both of my new packages. As newbie, his
> feedback being almost instant and always clear and concise helped both
> learning and feeling how the Fedora community is alive and welcoming.
>
I fourth that!
/meson are supported).
I'm going to do this tomorrow.
After which, I'm going to ask rel-eng to finally remove it from buildroot.
This will happen before mass rebuild. Stay tuned.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 3:57 PM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 3:31 PM Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > This is the bug in annobin which is breaking many things.
>
> Thank you both, after adding "%undefine _annota
the patches with the same upstream
> commits. Has anything else changed in the meantime?
>
This is the bug in annobin
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598961> which is breaking
many things.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list
topic.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018, 18:32 Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 15:02, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> [..]
> >> # rpm --rebuilddb; dnf cean all; df -k /; rpm -qal|grep
> >> LC_MESSAGES|xargs rpm -qf 2>&1|sort|uniq| xargs dnf -yq reinstall; rpm
> >
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> ht
t.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fed
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:04 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 15:54 Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Zchun
or DNF, but it isn't
> OK for
> "any mission-critical systems".
>
I would say that DNF must do proper fallback in which case if zchunk fails,
DNF falls back to downloading full metadata. However, DNF does that do any
out-of-process metadata handling which might crash it entirely (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Upstream decided to relicense tokio crates from "MIT or ASL 2.0" to
"MIT". I'm updating some of these now.
Just FYI.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wF
ignatenkobrain commented on the pull-request: `Rebase to 0.14` that you are
following:
``
No need for Group tag.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-BSSolv/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Nothing special, just simplification of licensing story. Enjoy ;)
Update will happen only in rawhide (0.1.12 → 0.1.14).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
ltiple versions of packages available in
> COPR - especially MariaDB 10.3 and MySQL 8 which are still in
> developement.
Note that there are no "private" branches in Fedora. Everything is kept
forever and available for public.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqiXIMACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0ysVhAAgFIYwX2GUMxT2PGWjhEXuVyvuunLl5maKoHqDCsRGQcfm2SH1iiiWLKi
4Q9d1A3/GWZycxKez4P1sZ7Cqj8hvs9eUmJVzyxqH1ubRMk9Ws/RKDe2cwzUkm68
z9/5yIEIqHPqLc9mU
ver the former approach, but I wanted to list
> it
> to invite others to chew on it and see if it could work.
>
> If you have other suggestions on how we might gate packages in
> Rawhide
> that are wildly different than the above, please feel free to share!
I would not mind this, bu
the source tarball is Flask-OAuthlib. Ideas
> welcome, thanks.
>
> Richard
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-
everybody!
I have feeling that there are some packages which didn't appear here
due to networking issues, but it could be up to hundred of package, so
definitely good job!
Hint: you can use -s/--silent for curl
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 16:39 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 7.3.2018 v 15:08 Jerry James napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Igor Gnatenko
> > <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > This i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 07:08 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Igor Gnatenko
> <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > This is the second iteration of my mass-scratch-rebuild without
> > gcc/gc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 13:41 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 07.03.2018 08:43, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > This is the second iteration of my mass-scratch
h xz"
>
> Thanks!
> -Lukas
>
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:43:21AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > This is the second iteration of my mass-scratch-rebuild without
> > gcc/gcc-c++ in the
se RPM 4.13 to install RPM 4.14-built package which happen
to have such large header, RPM would simply crash. Solutions 1-4 are
not sustainable, #5 is.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqfxGoACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0zxaRAAkIrFRnMxIZNPNlJqNWR
://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-2.txt
[0] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.
fedoraproject.org/thread/IJFYI5Q2BYZKIGDFS2WLOBDUSEGWHIKV/
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqfmBkACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0x5
://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-2.txt
[0] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.
fedoraproject.org/thread/IJFYI5Q2BYZKIGDFS2WLOBDUSEGWHIKV/
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqfmBkACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0x5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 12:56 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 03/01/2018 08:46 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > I ran some check on latest compose and found that quite a few
> > packages
> > in repo can't be installed due to being obs
.noarch:
package is obsoleted by texlive-lib-6:2016-40.20160520.fc28.2.i686
can't install texlive-texworks-doc-6:svn40613-40.fc28.2.noarch:
package is obsoleted by texlive-lib-6:2016-40.20160520.fc28.2.x86_64
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 12:21 +, Vascom wrote:
> You must control this manually.
Until bodhi enablement for F28, this is not needed. Moreover, it won't
work ;)
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress?
> ;)
My plan is to do this bi-weekly ;) So this weekend then.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIG
use gcc
myself?
If answer is yes and yes, then list both. If your tool uses just g++,
but there is something else inside using gcc, you just list gcc-c++.
- --
Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqOdDQACg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 10:24 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/21/2018 10:12 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 02/20/2018 10:15 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA256
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
>
/rpms/rpm/c/99d6687a36647cb307b789d19921a34154e9
c671
¹ gnupg2, gnutls, ima-evm-utils, libassuan, libksba, libusbx, nettle, npth
² 171 → 163 packages
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqMHnsACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0wmUhAAtx5N4EQ
/rpms/rpm/c/99d6687a36647cb307b789d19921a34154e9
c671
¹ gnupg2, gnutls, ima-evm-utils, libassuan, libksba, libusbx, nettle, npth
² 171 → 163 packages
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqMHnsACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0wmUhAAtx5N4EQ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 11:47 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/19/2018 11:27 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:02 +, Tom Hughes wro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 11:15 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> 2018-02-19 9:30 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org>:
> > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> > > Hi Igor
> > >
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:02 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 19/02/18 08:30, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> >
> > > amsynth has been fixed in all supported branches.
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> Hi Igor
>
> > 2018-02-18 18:09 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org>
> > :
> > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild withou
e
> noise in the configureoutput, but I will patch out the LT_LANG([C++]) line to
> trim the noise.
Yeah, either you need to add BuildRequires: gcc-c++ or remove this
LT_LANG([C++]). If you won't do any of this, it will stop building
Thanks for fixing!
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 20:36 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 18 February 2018 at 17:09, Igor Gnatenko
> <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 14:18 -0600, Greg Hellings wrote:
> Igor
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA
uires: gcc-c++
> On Sunday, February 18, 2018 2:53 PM, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote:
>
>
> On 18/02/18 19:01, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:53 +, Tom Hugh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:53 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 18/02/18 17:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc
> > and
> > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora
e of this change.
All these packages were taken from comps.xml and simply removed gcc/gcc-c++
from that list.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqJzQYACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0zdEQ/8DlH6+DgxYVt6XmNNnlIgNRg40D4BEuMKzYNvIcJAYi05ePBzMJDqeywa
vt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:38 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Over this weekend I've per
n-use branches?
It would not hurt if you will do same in all branches, but at least you need to
make fix in Rawhide.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqJvV0ACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0wPsQ//cYJYTJQvPHvEI8MhOvwdt9aS+YgarAO3CHI7WyfKE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 17:33 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi Igor ,
>
> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having
> > gcc and
> >
://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqJs1QACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0xxkRAAj56QZYSxzDXiMyvM9eLdVS0Qrt9jiNa66rasIbDVciTym7WQoV2CXxM+
ZxaOCYU8eyxOhE1rx36KITJ7SgU6ugLu2dVZlG/QR8vH3RTqJPV/GWhM/WUAgaon
f
://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqJs1QACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0xxkRAAj56QZYSxzDXiMyvM9eLdVS0Qrt9jiNa66rasIbDVciTym7WQoV2CXxM+
ZxaOCYU8eyxOhE1rx36KITJ7SgU6ugLu2dVZlG/QR8vH3RTqJPV/GWhM/WUAgaon
f
runtime Requires: gcc. This is not really
harmful and hopefully there won't be many cases.
I will send another update closer to end (monday possibly).
⁰ Mikolaj Izdebski set up koji for me on one of our internal servers.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 15:18 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 21:59 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Your options:
> >
> > * Speak up and tell package names I should not touch because
cro is defined on all EPEL and Fedora, so Mark's
way is correct (almost).
> Because the ldconfig_scriptlets stuff only work in koji, not in other
> build system (brew, cbs, ...)
This is not a problem for Fedora.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZV
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 14:47 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > There is no simple way of doing this.
>
> grepping build logs for \bgcc\b might catch many of them
_from_BuildRoot
> >
> >
> > Owner(s):
> > * Igor Gnatenko
> >
> >
> > Removing gcc and gcc-c++ from default buildroot in Koji and mock.
> >
> >
> >
> > == Detailed description ==
> > Since beginning of Fedora, gcc (
//rwmj.wordpress.com
> virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
> http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
right
component, right version and such for it.
Do you think same way? If so, which URL should we put there?
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqFX2MACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0wB7g//TKeZAueQA8wuY8obJG3puVYQA0DUQxAY0/TUyGGlwxVyhLukHndxVE05
hNV
; It state:
> > fixes or adjustments for **new or modified** packaging guidelines
> >
> > This is obviously meant for changes, which would block progress. Change of
> > BuildRoot tag is pretty old. It could wait
> > few more days just fine.
>
/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering
[1] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/750
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqFPXwACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0y8SA//dtvyU2BWbmvWix4fHm9KpHWp3ACpROdJpip+cJTW/7u6gP3q0GGED8cU
until I went and
> looked.
It is possible with fedmsg which we use. You can set notifications in special
webservice[0] (although I find settings in it counter-intuitive). Simplest one
is to set up notifications on all packages you maintain.
[0] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications
- --
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 14:25 -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> On 02/14/2018 11:44 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> > Le 13/02/2018 à 23:05, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
> > > Just a small heads up, ...
> >
> >
> > As I
ec files which is accumulating there for
ages (try to grep specs for `0%{?rhel} < 4`.
They are actually harmful in a sense that when new people come they look at
existing spec files and copy them over and over.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM
301 - 400 of 908 matches
Mail list logo
