On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nelson Marques wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please forgive my lack of knowledge, but could you please provide a
> link to a .iso ? :)
>
> Thx.
>
> 2012/2/21 Andre Robatino :
>> As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3
>> (RC3) is now available for
2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski :
> Hi,
>
> Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17
> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
> ?
>
> This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features.
Not likely this late in the cycle, though the timing is great for f18
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I am sending this because, we have a lot of FTBFS packages which I have
> see at least one blog griping about, I accidentally fixed something that
> was blocking other work (in the sense that I didn't know that other work
> that I wouldn't
Hey!
As you're aware, as of F15 we changed our default init system from
sysvinit to systemd. But we have lots and lots of packages with
daemons, and not all have thus far been migrated. Some maintainers
haven't responded, some are too busy, some aren't sure how to go about
it. In many cases, un
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2012-02-27, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>> It would be better to walk through this list [1] which was designed
>> specifically with PP participation in mind as discussed with Toshio
>> during the F16 development cycle.
>>
>> Just add your n
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:42 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Seconded.
>>
>> And if anyone has gcc47 or libpng FTBFS issues, this is a great place
>> to ask for help on them.
>
> Well, pulseaudio
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:42 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>>> Seconded.
>>>
>>> And if anyone has gcc47 or libpng FTBFS issues, this is
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 20:22:56 -0800,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> Well, pulseaudio doesn't currently build, and that's preventing us from
>> fixing the bug that audio doesn't work in F17. The problem is apparently
>> in assembler cod
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
>> > So far there is only an f18 bluez build. That will work for my testing,
>> > but that won't let me easily to an f17 build.
>>
>> Nottingham appears to be getting an F17 bluez rebuild ready right
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
> well as f17?
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Yes, when they've finished.
https://f
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> I don't have the time to maintain pyusb, and it isn't used by any other
> package I maintain.
>
> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires pyusb
> garmin-sync-0:0.3-4.fc16.noarch
> nxt_python-0:0.7-8.fc15.noarch
Taken.
> Tim.
> */
>
>
> --
> devel mailing
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Fabian Deutsch wrote:
>>
>> because I no longer use them I am orpahning
>>
>> dbh
Took dbh.
-J
>> muParser
>> scidavis
>
>
> I use muParser in Meshlab. I'm not a C++ whiz (as witnessed by my not yet
> having figured out how to make Meshlab bui
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> dbh-1.0.24-9.fc12
I just took this and am working on the FTBFS
> nightview-0.3.3-2.fc14
Lubo maintains this, I may request ownership if I can fix the FTBFS.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
-
2012/3/7 Miloslav Trmač :
> Hello,
> I have orphaned foobillard: I don't have any time to fix reported
> bugs, there hasn't been a release since 2008, and the upstream site
> has been missing for at least 9 months. If you are interested, please
> take it.
> Mirek
Taken. I love that game. I h
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
>> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.03.2012 17:44, schrieb Paul Howarth:
>> On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> working since many motnhs with:
>>> subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
>>> subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
>>>
>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.o
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Martin Erik Werner
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:21 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga
>> wrote:
>> > Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
>> >>
>> >>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.03.2012 18:46, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
>> wrote:
>>> On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No, it looks like it stay
lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
this quick review, I'll take one in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803018
Thanks!
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
>> this quick review, I'll take one in return.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>
> Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a bugfix
> release. No API/ABI changes (in theory, I haven't done an exhaustive check.)
>
> In f16 we released 3.2.5. Am I allowed to update it in f16 to 3.2.6?
>
> In f17a
2012/3/15 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 03/14/2012 07:51 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It&#
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, John Ellson wrote:
> Can we just generate "karma" from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to
> find some other weird place to indicate that a fix "works for me" is a real
> pain.
Typically the link to the Bodhi update is provided in the BZ. I
imagine tighter
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> Perhaps and stupid question:
>>
>> After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs:
>> Uploaded and added to .gitignore:
>> Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file
>>
>> I do
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 2:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #699 Proposal to remove the p
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:25:38AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> /me gave the mail a subject
Thanks! :)
>>
>> Jon Ciesla wrote on 18.03.2012 23:33:
>> >
>> > = New busi
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804698
I'll be building this shortly, and I'll handle rebuilding the only
packages I found that require it, fife, manaworld and sear.
Thanks,
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-19)
===
Meeting started by limburgher at 18:00:23 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-03-19/fesco.2012-03-19-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Jan Klepek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have relased ownership of Argus package for Fedora branches due to lack
> of free time to take care about it.
> EPEL branches already have owner.
>
> What this will require from new maintainer?
> Argus is not up-to-date with upstream v
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> * #830 F18 Feature: ARM as Primary Arch --
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraARM (limburgher,
>> 18:44:13)
>> * LINK:
>>
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:37 +0100, Clément David wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does someone know how to contact lkundrak ?
>
> $ ./fedora_active_user.py --user lkundrak --email lkund...@v3.sk
> Last login in FAS:
> lkundrak 2012-03-20
> Last act
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> Jon, Brendan,
>
> In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
> I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
> are some places where I think the current pr
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 15:19 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > 4) All supported platforms must have kernels built from the Fedora
>> > kernel SRPM and enabled by default in the
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:55:41AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Matthew, can you add your initial list to the ticket as well, so we
>> have these starting places to refer to?
>
> I was planning to after we&#x
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 03/20/2012 08:24 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> I think the speed of the build hardware should be also part of the
>> criteria,
>> as all primary architectures are built synchronously. GCC on x86_64/i686
>> currently builds often in 2
a
few folks in other groups for one-on-one feedback.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
tenance burdon due to build related issues.
> We need a couple of groups to sign off that builds are fast enough, not
> just on a "full distro rebuild" (throughput) level, but also on a
> "doesn't destroy my workflow due to waiting on it" (latency) level.
Sure. Absolutely is a concern for us, as you can see from my other
comments above about the kernel, for example, but not just that.
Thanks,
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I want to thank you, and everyone else in FESCo for talking with us
> yesterday, and for looking over the proposal. Bear in mind, it's a work
> in progress. We intend to have broader conversations over the
individual node performance
at the high end, and about mass availability at the low end.
We can remain an x86-only primary distro. But that won't help address
the longer term problems we will face. I'll spare the hyperbole for the
moment, but I will add that this is a mul
this part of the discussion in the interest of
ever turning our proposal into something that will be accepted.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> Our current build systems can turn GCC 4.7 around in about 24 hours.
>> The enterprise hardware we anticipate using will take that down to about
>> 12 hours. If speed of build hardware is a consideration, where do y
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> Only if you assume that high clock speed workloads are the only
>> important workloads. For highly parallellizable tasks, an ARM system
>> with tons of slower cores is a powerhouse. Think a db s
On 03/20/2012 01:42 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:54:36PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> > > The hardware is way slower ... so we can just build on faster hardware
> > > (x86_64). Which is the only sane way to do it.
> > > Trying to build on ARM
d I've seen so far. We're
trying to figure out where to go to get to PA. If it turns out F18 is
wildly optimistic, ok, no problem. We'll come back later after we get
all the kinks ironed out. But the past few days have provided invaluable
initial input as we figure out how to dr
gt;>
>> But the image is a Fedora 12 system. Any updated images out there?
>
> New yum-installable RPM images coming Real Soon Now(tm) :-)
Chris, David has some time to possibly help with this. I already
mentioned it to him...hopefully he pinged you :)
Jon.
--
dev
on't. I haven't replied to
your other messages because they are filled with vitriol. I suspect many
other people similarly ignore you (and perversely, I suspect you assist
in our cause of becoming a Primary Architecture by being so extremely
vocal in your unreasonable opposition of the
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
wrote:
> Hi,
> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
> --
> Regards,
>
> Heiko Adams
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedorapr
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
>> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
>> --
>> Regar
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams
wrote:
> Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
>>> still mis
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams
> wrote:
>> Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> the pidgin upd
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 03/23/2012 11:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>
>>> It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> FAIL] f18
>>> Latest package: Fie
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>
>>> Darn... I was hoping that wouldn't bite me :) I'm assuming I can
>>> ignore
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
>> "JO" == Joe Orton writes:
>
> JO> Yup - the default config in the f18 httpd does load
> JO> mod_access_compat, and I don't see a problem with shipping like
> JO> that.
>
> This is good news, because even if we convert the httpd.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>
> Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each
> week, you at least have an SOP for arranging the meetings, so that this
> kind of thing is done consist
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> >
>> > Could I sugge
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:48 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:33 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> >> If you think this is a good example, I'll edit the page to fix those
>> >> issues.
>> >>
>> >> http://lis
Bug already filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807767
Might not be cups-specific, as the corresponding f17 cups-libs does
provide libcups.so.2.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz wrote:
> A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build anymore
> because of libcups.so.2().
> Here is part of the root.log.
>
> Getting requirements for jboss-web-7.0.13-3.fc18.src
> DEBUG util.py:257: --> jpackage-utils-1.7.5
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:27:57 -0500
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz
>> wrote:
>> > A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build
>> >
ver time, and in
another decade or two something more exciting than UEFI will replace
UEFI and folks will mail about how things were better with UEFI!
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
are also limits to coherency domains that generally mean you can't do
multi-socket coherency on practical 32-bit implementations. In the case
of 64-bit, one of the vendors at least has publicly announced an
intention to support fully coherent multi-socket domains. But in the
interim, we're go
This affects the following:
libnids
suricata
syslog-ng
Whose owners are CCd and which I'll handle rebuilding unless the
owners would rather.
Thanks,
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:15:12 +0200
> Jan Horak wrote:
>
>> Why it takes 12-20 hours to submit critical security update to
>> updates-testing repository? Do we have such long queue or is the push
>> done regularly in long period?
>
> f15/f16 u
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:58:58 -0500
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Slightly OT, will it be much longer before the next f17 push, or are
>> we waiting on Beta?
>
> Stable f17 push? yes, thats waiting until after we ha
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
> Due to lack of time I'd like to orphan a few of my packages, being:
>
> python-wokkel
I took this.
-J
> They're all low-maintenance packages with a release maybe once or twice a
> year.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ruben
> --
> devel mailing list
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 05:30 PM, M A Young wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Mon, 02.04.12 16:55, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> What about forensics? Any reboot erases information that might have been
> needed
>
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> This is feedback vs the current version of the following web page:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements_%28Draft%29
> FESCo and affected groups should have the ability to review whether or not
> t
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> I would like to call your attention to the following bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771262
>
> What is required is a build of a small and simple package for EPEL.
> However, I am unable to contact
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
>> >
>> > I would like to call your attention to the follo
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182)? No
> new builds have been done or queued up recently AFAICT...
There's a BZ open, I'll look into getting n update out ASAP.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, yersinia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver
>>> wrote:
>>> > Anyone k
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:20 AM, devzero2000 wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver
>> wrote:
>> > Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182)? No
>>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.04.2012 03:24, schrieb Bojan Smojver:
>> Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182)? No
>> new builds have been done or queued up recently AFAICT...
>
> this is really scary
>
> CentOS pushed yesterday a up
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:52 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Am 12.04.2012 03:24, schrieb Bojan Smojver:
>> >> Anyone k
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 01:59 AM, Anthony Green wrote:
>>
>> I recently release libffi 3.0.11, and ABI changes are mandating a .so
>> number change. Despite the ABI change, I suspect that simple rebuilds
>> are all that will be required for depen
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Greetings,
> I saw the changes in packaging guidelines related to PIE:
>
> If your package meets the following criteria you MUST enable the PIE
> compiler flags:
>
> Your package is long running. This means it's likely to be started and keep
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 05:37:12PM +0200, Mattia Verga wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> I saw the changes in packaging guidelines related to PIE:
>>
>> /If your package meets the following criteria you *MUST* enable the
>> PIE compiler flags: /
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> ajax wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>> If this is meant to cover administrative binaries that have no
>>> privilege escalation pieces of their own, merely run by root, then
>>> what makes them different from any other /bin/* program that a root
>>>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it seems to be the right time to do an unification/reorganization of
> Oracle (Berkeley) DB packages in rawhide. The current situation is that
> there are three of them:
>
> compat-db - shipping old libdbs for compatibility (4.5,4
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:21:36PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>>> So the plan is:
>>> 1) remove 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 from compat-db
>>> 2) put 4.8 to compat-db
>>> 3) make db4 a dead package
Based on the packages and builds I'm getting these for, yes, I'd say
so, probably a script error, but I'm not sure.
-J
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
> push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16..
Infrastructure is aware of the issue.
-J
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Based on the packages and builds I'm getting these for, yes, I'd say
> so, probably a script error, but I'm not sure.
>
> -J
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Ric
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for
> another package I'd like to submit.
>
> Pivy
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975
>
> zipios++
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812058
I've starte
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hallo,
>
> I have got the following error message from the build system:
>
> dist-f15-updates > f16 (stellarium-0.11.1-1.fc15
> stellarium-0.11.0-1.fc16)
>
> Unforunately, this makes n
evel@.
Feel free to add that to the list of requirements for SA promotion.
> If you're doing everything transparently
We are doing everything transparently. Some times it might happen on the
"wrong" channel, and we might screw up with regard to certain
expec
On 04/19/2012 01:22 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:42:58AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>> Hi Matthew,
>>
>> On 04/18/2012 09:54 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>
>>> Right now I don't think ARM's doing a great job of that [being pa
sting architectures?
Thanks for reading. Meanwhile, we genuinely will take the earlier
comments on board about a need to improve our level of engagement.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
uld like to add in? E.g. clarifying what
"sufficient developer resources" means, etc.
Thanks,
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/20/2012 04:30 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 04:22:38PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On 04/19/2012 05:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Ok, I'll modify that section. Thanks for the feedback!
>>
>> Matthew,
>>
>>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:34 AM, wrote:
> When I reported a bug on Armangil's podcatcher the other day, I
> noticed that the package had been orphaned. (Some time ago, actually,
> but I missed it at the time.) I still use it, so I decided to take
> over.
>
> This is the first time I take over
2012/4/23 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 04/23/2012 07:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>
>> Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't
>> support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora.
>
> So FESCo is in otherwords saying that other installers and even installing
>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't
>> support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora.
>
> Just for the sake of argument, our Amazon EC2 ima
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:33 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
>> Hello,
>> because upstart was in fedora 15 replaced by systemd, I don't see any
>> use for it. Almost no package provides job file for it and classical
>> init scripts should be also gone an
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 07:36 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:33 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >> because up
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 24.04.2012 02:08, schrieb Oron Peled:
>> Looks like this transition (as is currently planned) is going to
>> break many setups. I want to show the three following use-cases
>> which may be severely broken by this transition.
>
> exactly th
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 24.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>> Nothing is being taken away, the default is being changed. If you're
>> using Fedora in production, I presume you're installing with
>> Kickstart. You can set
Original Message
Subject: [fedora-arm] Weekly ARM status call - TOMORROW (Wed 2012/04/25)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:27:23 -0400
From: Jon Masters
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
To: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi everyone,
Let's have one of our "weekly" status ca
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Kévin Raymond
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Jeremy Sanders
> wrote:
>> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nice to have a third option:
>>> -Change release names to release theme.
>>>
>>> We don't really need a name (IMO), but the theme adds
301 - 400 of 974 matches
Mail list logo
