'application' correlates to a rpm-package?
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-package?
Application means GUI application that has a .desktop file.
That makes the 'software center' of lesser use, as the user will be
confused when he/she does not find the program/rpm-package/application
he/she wants to install.
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se
On 01/26/2014 12:18 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 12:14 +0100 schrieb Lars E. Pettersson:
...
Would it not be better to have a 'software center' that includes ALL
software available, be they GUI related or not? Probably based on
rpm-packages, as that is what our system
On 01/06/2014 08:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 08:01 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 01/06/2014 12:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
...
If it exists for backward compatibility, it doesn't necessarily need to
be documented.
Ehh? Why? Could you elaborate?
I don't see
On 01/05/2014 07:24 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
Three documentation bugs out of a side track of a thread is not a
terrible thread, in my opinion...
Yum auto completion missing erase:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048714
dnf man page missing to mention remove:
https
On 01/06/2014 12:43 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Otherwise, I totally agree with Chris and with DNF upstream. dnf remove
kernel should remove every kernel and should not behave magically.
What would be the point in removing the running kernel? Is there
actually such a use case?
Lars
--
Lars E
On 01/06/2014 02:06 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 6.1.2014 13:31, Lars E. Pettersson napsal(a):
...
What would be the point in removing the running kernel? Is there
actually such a use case?
Lars
Why are you asking? May be you should let your imagination run riot.
Why? Isn't that obvious
, they should be documented, if they are not
documented, then it is a documentation bug.
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
about it.
Regarding 'real world'. Correct, that's why I wrote ...if they are not
documented, then it is a documentation bug., and that's how it should
be treated.
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
/Linux
$ dnf erase kernel-3.12.6-300.fc20.x86_64
The same thing could be said about other packages now protected in yum.
Please protect them in the same way in dnf.
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 01/05/2014 12:02 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se wrote:
On 01/05/2014 09:23 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
why did they change remove into erase?
Yum actually offers both erase and remove for the same purpose. I
don't know which
On 01/05/2014 07:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:27 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
...
The running kernel should not be removed with a simple 'dnf erase
kernel' (why did they change remove into erase
On 01/05/2014 07:24 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
As I mentioned before I only auto completed yum, remove is not party of
the auto completed commands. If remove should be there, then this is a
bug. I will file one.
Pressed send a bit too early. Should of course be 'erase' here, not
'remove
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 01/06/2014 12:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 19:24 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
...
As I mentioned before I only auto completed yum, remove is not party of
the auto completed commands. If remove should be there, then this is a
bug. I will file one.
dnf has no auto
, in my opinion.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976704
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
Upgrade 19 Packages
The updates were successfully applied
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
thing to clog up the logs with that?
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
in charge on that computer. Perhaps this should be
mentioned in the installation guide or something, or even done in anaconda?
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
19 matches
Mail list logo
