Re: koji: No space left on device

ject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastru

Re: Help needed: package javascriptcoregtk4.1-2.37.1-18.fc37.x86_64 is filtered out by exclude filtering

Miro Hrončok píše v Po 15. 08. 2022 v 12:04 +0200: > Hello, > > for a few days now, the Fedora 37 Python Classroom Lab fails to build > with > dependency issues like this: > > Wild guess: could it be excluded by the -java* pattern in the kickstart file?

Re: fedpkg request-side-tag: I don't understand "allowed_suffixes"

Richard W.M. Jones píše v So 18. 06. 2022 v 12:08 +0100: > I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would be > clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the OCaml > rebuild in Rawhide, but ... > > $ fedpkg request-side-tag --help > usage: fedpkg

Re: master branch renaming and fedpkg clone -B

Richard W.M. Jones píše v St 03. 02. 2021 v 13:53 +: > $ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash > Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx- > hash/rpkg.git'... > remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done. > remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done. > remote: Compressing objects:

Re: Fedora Cloud rawhide images not updating?

Kevin Fenzi píše v Ne 25. 10. 2020 v 13:56 -0700: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 12:30:13PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 11:23 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:29:14PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I noticed that the

Re: ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)

Lukas Zapletal píše v Pá 27. 03. 2020 v 10:30 +: > Hey guys, I am trying to build a SRPM since mockbuild does not work > due to (1). > > # fedpkg srpm > # fedpkg build --srpm /home/lzap/work/fedpkg/workrave/workrave- > 1.10.37-1.fc33.src.rpm Real builds from SRPM are not allowed for Fedora

Re: Build into < Rawhide side tag fails with "Package ... has already been built"

Richard W.M. Jones píše v Čt 27. 02. 2020 v 11:03 +: > I built ocaml-4.10.0-1.fc33 yesterday. > > Now I want to build ocaml-4.10.0-1.fc32 into a side tag today, but > builds fail with: > > $ fedpkg request-side-tag --base-tag f32-build > Side tag 'f32-build-side-19863' (id 19863) created. >

Re: Announcing multi-builds updates gating

Pierre-Yves Chibon píše v St 12. 02. 2020 v 13:57 +0100: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:18:33AM +, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:15 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon < > > pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > > Remark: fedpkg's request-side-tag command doesn't appear in the > > manual > >

Re: Koji build failure from missing tarball

Luke Hinds píše v Pá 07. 02. 2020 v 10:20 +: > Hopefully the correct list, if not apologies. > > Just updated a package I am newly maintaining, commit diff here: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keylime/c/563905a7b29096c0fecba1d4279e901c1acb95c5?branch=master > > When I perform

Re: Could not execute clone: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/mcatanzaro/Projects/fedora-scm/eog/.git/info/exclude'

mcatanz...@gnome.org píše v Út 06. 08. 2019 v 10:31 -0500: > $ fedpkg clone eog > Cloning into 'eog'... > remote: Counting objects: 2048, done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1594/1594), done. > remote: Total 2048 (delta 787), reused 1036 (delta 349) > Receiving objects: 100% (2048/2048),

Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?

Jerry James píše v St 27. 03. 2019 v 08:17 -0600: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:17 AM Miroslav Suchý > wrote: > > Hmmm, it would be nice if we can send ABRT reports from crashes, > > which happens during a build. > > Or a button I can push somewhere that downloads the contents of >

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

Igor Gnatenko píše v Po 28. 01. 2019 v 19:14 +0100: > Which includes: > * koji -- our buildsystem > * pungi -- our compose tool Not really. The only affected part is pungi-legacy subpackage, which provides /usr/bin/pungi command. While it still has some users, it is not part of any official

Re: Building multiple version of a package from same dist-git repo

Neal Gompa píše v Po 03. 09. 2018 v 09:01 -0400: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:02 AM Adam Samalik > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM Richard Shaw > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:32 AM Adam Samalik > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought that

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

Removing Yyum would mean that there will no longer be /usr/bin/pungi available in Fedora. This is not a problem for any work done by release engineering, but it is still used by people creating spins. So this is a call to action: if anyone wants to continue using it, now is the time to come up

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180411.n.3 changes

Vít Ondruch píše v Čt 12. 04. 2018 v 11:50 +0200: > > Dne 12.4.2018 v 10:26 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a): > > Added packages: 421 > > ... snip ... > > > = ADDED PACKAGES = > > Package: ReviewBoard-3.0.6-1.module_1655+c1bb0ce4 > > Summary: Web-based code review tool > > RPMs:

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

Vít Ondruch píše v St 28. 02. 2018 v 10:35 +0100: > Can the logs actually contain timestamps with timezone? There's a timezone offset at the beginning of the log: 2018-02-28 00:33:30 [INFO] Current timezone offset: +00:00 > And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at > >

Re: Broken dependencies: golang-github-docopt-docopt-go

Hello, it looks like you only rebuilt it for Rawhide (in master branch). The report mentions F 27, and the latest package there includes ppc64 arch. Doing a similar rebuild in f27 branch should fix things. Lubomír Jakub Jedelsky píše v St 13. 09. 2017 v 10:39 +0200: > Hi there, > > I received

Re: fedpkg says "fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated."

Adam Williamson píše v Čt 25. 05. 2017 v 12:09 -0700: > On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 13:04 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > Dear Packagers: > > > > I probably missed some kind of announcement, but this started > > happening > > unexpectedly: > > > > [zaitcev@lembas liberasurecode.master]$ fedpkg srpm > >

Re: thunderbird 45.7.1 and packer account

tech...@dk-software.org píše v St 22. 02. 2017 v 13:08 +0100: > Hi! > > I have build local thunderbird-45.7.1 for F25 and want upload it to > koji > but have no credentials. The error i become is "kinit > > kinit: Client '' not found in

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20170208.n.0 compose check report

Adam Williamson píše v St 08. 02. 2017 v 13:09 -0800: > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 20:34 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > Missing expected images: > > > > Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 > > This seems to be running into some kind of size issue: >

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

which means that I now have to run kinit before starting a > > packaging > > session, in addition to firing up keepass and entering the password > > Yeah. This will hopefully be helped by the upcoming kerberos cache > change.  Or you could set up Gnome Online Accounts and

Re: ping spin-kickstarts maintainer (bz1176483)

Dave Young píše v Po 06. 06. 2016 v 16:56 +0800: > Hi, > > We have a bug report for adding kdump anaconda addon to livecd: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176483 > > The bug was created in 2014, seems I can not reach the maintainer. > What else can I do? Do we have other

Re: two identical package

Hello, there is a known bug in fedpkg retire: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321462 Based on the output you posted you are not hitting the exact same issue, though. Ilia Gradina napsal Út, dub 5, 2016 v 12∶26 : Thanks, but not working( output: