hello,
i've orphaned these linguistic packages for "de" languages:
* hunspell-de
this tends to have a new release once or twice a year
* mythes-de
upstream is a bit odd in that there is a new automatically generated
.oxt file once per day, but the file name never changes...
* hyphen-de
On 08.11.2017 15:53, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08-11-17 15:06, Solomon Peachy wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:54:03AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> Is there anyone who could raise concerns to Apple about the license
>>> change? Maybe convince them to dual-license it or something?
>>
>>
On 17.07.2017 19:26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:03:13PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> On 16.07.2017 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:59:37PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:
On 16.07.2017 14:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Debarshi Ray wrote:
>> How about reliable online updates of running applications as a
>> benefit?
>
> Upgrading RPM applications online just works. I do it all the time. The KDE
> tools do not even implement offline updates (and IMHO that's a good thing)
On 16.07.2017 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:59:37PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
>>> the point of forcing packagers to ma
On 24.03.2017 13:34, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
>> Why would Solaris switch to rpm, when they already had SysV
>> packages at the time, which are pretty much equivalent in
>> functionality?
>
> Solaris at the time had degenerated into a barebones system, they
> needed to find a way to impo
On 24.03.2017 10:35, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IPS is a tweak on rpm. I suspect a mostly overengineered one, SUN had
> massive ego problems and looked down on Linux systems. So they could
> not just adopt rpm, they had to change it sufficiently to one up
> Linux peasants (many o
On 15.02.2017 09:48, E.N. virgo wrote:
>> I'm not sure if I follow. Supporting multiple C++ ABIs would make
>> things more complicated for developers because they now have to figure
>> out which ABI their project needs and if all the libraries they want to
>
On 11/28/2016 07:53 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/27/2016 10:40 PM, drago01 wrote:
>> On Monday, November 28, 2016, Py mailto:p...@luyten.fr>>
>> wrote:
>> >An SSD drive might not have this problem, but a spinning disk
>> >definitely
>> >will. You should never try running multiple co
On 23.11.2016 01:57, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anybody working on fixing [1]?
>
> The exploit is a little impractical in that it only works if you have
> not updated any F24 base packages except GStreamer, but we should still
> fix it. I don't see any GStreamer updates in bodhi yet.
On 22.07.2016 16:53, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 16:48 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>>
>> 2. Add compat 1.0.2 package which would be used by 3rd party
>> applications and also temporarily by applications that are not yet
>> ported to the new API. However the current plan is to not provide
On 15.06.2016 08:24, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 06:27 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> On 06/15/2016 04:11 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
I *strongly* disagree here. The xdg-app folks seem to be doing a
pretty good j
On 29.03.2016 19:22, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>>> Yes. This makes it work. Thanks a lot.
>
>> Then it was probably broken by this update:
>
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253
>
> The "LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1" workaround fixed it for me a
On 15.09.2015 15:58, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 09:41 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 09/14/2015 08:29 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> I think the real issue here is the ELF model with backwards/forwards
>>> linking and symbol interposition. Ideally, we should load each DSO
>>> e
On 08.06.2015 12:37, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2015-06-05, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> The nature of programs written in these dynamic languages makes it quite
>> hard to compare types used in the API entry points of a library
>
> Pedantic note: There is difference between dynamic vs. static languages
On 09.01.2015 23:16, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently noticed Debian/Ubuntu has had support for "aclexec" in
> tcp_wrappers via a custom patch since 2006,
> so you can do this in /etc/hosts.allow or hosts.deny:
>
> sshd: ALL: aclexec /usr/local/bin/sshfilter.sh %a
>
> if sshfilter
On 28.10.2014 16:10, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 10:57 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
>
>> [dragonegg]
>> dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires libLLVM-3.4.so
>> dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
>
> This one's a joy. dragonegg is a
On 17.09.2014 13:58, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 09/17/2014 11:54 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> All those OSes require reboots when updating the OS.
>
> Define OS.
>
> Firefox is definitely not OS. While systemd is OS.
> I am fine with reboot after systemd upgrade, but not after upgrading Firefox.
On 06/06/14 00:25, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 20/03/14 20:05, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Thu, 20.03.14 12:20, Stephen John Smoogen (smo...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
I doubt there are many people even using them anymore, firewalls are
more comprehensive and a lot more powerful, and while
On 07/05/14 15:39, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:19:42PM +0200, Jan Staněk wrote:
>> One of the planned parts of the F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 [1]
>> is the introduction of downstream symbol versioning of both versions of
>> the libraries (libdb with v6 and libdb5 with v5
On 08/01/14 14:27, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> The problem is that it's been HOURS and Git hasn't finished cloning the
> tree.
> It's the third step which is taking forever to complete. I left it to
> run overnight (10 hours) and it never finished. I paused it, came to
> work, resumed it and it's s
On 03/12/13 19:58, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Út, 2013-12-03 at 18:46 +0100, Jan Včelák wrote:
>> Hello list.
>>
>> What is the current status of Crypto Consolidation in Fedora? Is it still
>> current and is the page up to date [1]?
>
> The page is mostly up to date.
interesting page... under "Packag
On 20/03/13 13:52, Neal Becker wrote:
> I'm also curious about how wayland might work with kde.
this page indicates that KDE developers intend to turn KWin into a
Wayland compositor/server, similar to what Matthias just
proposed/announced for gnome-shell:
http://community.kde.org/KWin/Wayland
-
On 20/02/13 09:40, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> One thing we're struggling with now is the normalization of stacktraces
> which means deciding which functions are important and which are not.
> e.g. for kernel there are stacktraces with a lot of warn_* functions and
> only a few functions are differe
On 05/02/13 17:57, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:02 +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
>> On Monday 04 February 2013 22:37:45 David Malcolm wrote:
>>> Content-addressed storage: they're named by SHA-1 sum of their contents,
>>> similar to how git does it, so if the bulk of the files don't
On 04/02/13 13:59, Martin Sourada wrote:
> Also, going by your reasoning there would be no point in having
> Calligra either... Furthermore, technically LO is the fork ;-)
technically, both Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice are forks, since
neither of them:
a) are under the OpenOffice.org govern
On 04/02/13 01:37, Peter Boy wrote:
>
> By the way: As I learnt on Linux Day last year, LibreOffice still
> depends on OpenOffice and is in the process to rebase their code to
> OpenOffice 3.4 (or something alike). So I'm wondering about different
> set of features.
how exactly does LibreOffice
On 16/01/13 21:40, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Stahl writes:
>> read more carefully then: the git repo contains binaries built against
>> different Ubuntu baseline versions, the older of which have jpeg6 and
>> the newer jpeg8.
>
> [ shrug... ] So we'd be incompat
On 16/01/13 16:55, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>>> I hope other distributions don't use that release.
>>
>> FWIW i'm afraid i've had to build jpeg8 f
On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 01/15/2013 01:01 PM, Adam Tkac wrote:
>
>> Another interesting thread is
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30352453
>>
>> We are currently discussing drop of the
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-
On 26/06/12 18:45, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> We discussed this in fesco today and had a couple of concerns.
>
> Another one is that connecting to systems that don't support xterm-256
> is not quite easy. In particular, there appears to be
[resent another time because the list automatically rejected my mail]
On 27/04/12 10:13, Panu Matilainen wrote:
[...]
> The short background is that for libraries which dont have a SONAME,
> rpmbuild fakes one based on the file name. The rationale for this has
> been that since the linker perm
32 matches
Mail list logo
